http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/05/30/canon-200mm-f28-l-lens/ This journal discusses photography in all its guises with an emphasis on the art of making photographs. Tue, 22 May 2012 17:37:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/05/30/canon-200mm-f28-l-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-21919 John Willems Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:44:50 +0000 http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=147#comment-21919 Thanks for the spledide review. I have a 70-200 f.4 IS and I use these for aesthetic photograph. The sharpness is good. But when I use these lense, I go always 200 mm. So, esspecially for sharpness the prime 200mm is also on my wish-list. No IS is not directly a negative point for landscapes bacause You can use the mirror lock-up activation (by the 5D). So, I think I go it buy. Thanks again for share Your experience with us. John Willems. Thanks for the spledide review. I have a 70-200 f.4 IS and I use these for aesthetic photograph. The sharpness is good. But when I use these lense, I go always 200 mm. So, esspecially for sharpness the prime 200mm is also on my wish-list. No IS is not directly a negative point for landscapes bacause You can use the mirror lock-up activation (by the 5D). So, I think I go it buy. Thanks again for share Your experience with us. John Willems.

]]> http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/05/30/canon-200mm-f28-l-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-191 Leigh Tue, 30 May 2006 22:46:44 +0000 http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=147#comment-191 200mm or 17-40L? I love prime lenses but I want both! I know I work a lot with the 100mm and it's a superb lens. Thanks for the review - that 200mm is on my wish list! 200mm or 17-40L? I love prime lenses but I want both! I know I work a lot with the 100mm and it’s a superb lens. Thanks for the review – that 200mm is on my wish list!

]]>