Photographs, Photographers and Photography

July 31, 2006

Senility is a nasty thing

Filed under: Panoramas — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:51 am

It’s tough to remember everything when doing those panoramas!

So I made a small check list which I embossed and which now happilly resides in my camera bag:

You may like to do something similar. In my early attempts I kept messing up exposure for some reason …. not good for a guy who grew up without an exposure meter.

By the way, as taking 360 degree panoramas dictates a new way of seeing – you think of the whole scene around you rather than just one straight ahead view – my limited mental powers suggest that a photography expedition in search of QTVR panoramas should be limited to just that. Meaning only a tripod, the KingPano and the 5D/fisheye come along.

So a trip to the local Target store found me splashing out on a small shoulder bag that accomodates the 5D mounted on the KingPano, all set up and ready to go. A somewhat unwieldy mass. This avoids the need to collapse or dismantle the KingPano which greatly reduces setup time. My genuine-Eddie-Bauer-original-Made-in-China shoulder bag ran all of $22. You can always buy a camera bag for four times that if you are so inclined.

July 30, 2006

Test your Photo IQ

Filed under: Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:17 am

This is only a test. Answer Yes or No.

1 – I believe cameras are objects of beauty to be collected and should only be kept in climate controlled display cases.

2 – I like the strap lugs on my Leica M like on the early models where they are too far up and back, ensuring the camera tilts forward on my waist.

3 – I like the whole retro look thing because it means I am so cool and you cannot get it at the Apple Store. Would you just check these great features out:

4 – I get a real buzz from knowing that I paid $2,000 more than you did for your new rangefinder Leica, because I could. And you couldn’t. And it’s a nicely engraved, anyway. That’s German craftmsmanship for you.

5 – I like being a member of a group whose average profile is: Rich, semi-retired white male, wheeze when I walk, couldn’t take a picture to save my life, really wish my wife would slim down a hundred pounds or so, receding or no hair (me, not the wife), last exercised when raising a glass of vintage French champagne to my lips.

6 – Having a collector’s Leica means I must be a great photographer.

7 – I think waiting a couple of days for my pictures to come back from my $5,000 camera is the height of chic. What do those digital guys know anyway? A passing fad.

8 – I think blowing $5,000 on an imitation of a camera first made over fifty years ago really validates my success in life.

9 – My dad got his in WWII when he liberated Berlin and this one’s nicer. The old man should see me now.

10 – Like my Harley it’s only 50% foreign content and who’s telling?

How did you do? If you answered ‘Yes’ to one or more of the above, do I have the thing for you:

July 28, 2006

A (QTVR) brush with the law

Filed under: QTVR — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:29 am

Your intrepid photographer gets grilled by the law.

Now I’m not the sort of person to flout the law. Except that I speed, now and then, just like you do, the better to avoid being rear-ended by some poorly endowed guy in the Hummer behind me, I have always believed that doing things the legal way beats the prospect of a stay in the local pokey. Which is why the request that I submit to interrogation, the other day, rather took me aback.

There I was in Morro Bay, a charming little seaside village in central California, wandering among the fishing boats with 5D, KingPano head and tripod poised for action. In as much, that is, that this combination can be poised for anything, tending to the clunky end of the ergonomic spectrum. It’s the nature of the beast. The local Coastguard had raised one of their rubber dinghies out of the water for maintenance and its bright colors and interesting shapes naturally drew me like a magnet. Thanks to the QR heads I have fitted to this kit I was set up and ready to rock in seconds. Until, that is, the long hand of the law intervened.

Now you must understand that the Coastguard exists to prevent Mexicans, seeking to work in the US, from swimming twenty miles up the coast in frigid Pacific waters, in search of $5/hour. True, two million of them elect the land route annually, and if you have ever dipped a toe in the Pacific, you will know why. These fellows are not dumb. Still, should any one of them so much as try the Mark Spitz thing, be assured that the Coastguard and its huge annual budget will be there to protect our women and drive up the price of our vegetables.

“Our captain would like to know why you are photographing one of our boats” the voice intoned.

“Well, I’m not exactly photographing your boat” says I.

“Sir, you are photographing a military vessel. Please report to the office with your camera”.

Let’s step back a moment. We are not talking about the US aircraft carrier The Ronald Reagan here, equipped with a crew of 5,000 and fifty F-14 Tomcats primed with nuclear weapons, ready to destroy any country of choice at a moment’s notice. No, sir. We are talking about a thirty foot rubber dinghy.

En route to the captain’s office I quickly swap the CF card in the 5D with a spare. It’s not that I have any snaps of the dinghy on it, I don’t, but I sure as hell am not having my Limekiln redwoods snaps from earlier in the day confiscated by someone with more authority than the Commissioner of the IRS.

Anyway, after keeping me waiting for what seemed like ages while he finalized the pleasure cruise they were putting on for a local reporter in another Coastguard craft (your taxpayer dollars at work) I am suitably grilled by El Capitano.

After first reassuring him that my tan was acquired in the local vineyard and not in the Middle East, I chose the Obfuscation Route. After explaining that I am an amateur photographer with no thought of gain, I give him five minutes on Virtual Reality and how his boat is but a small part, great grand vessel that it is, of the larger design. He begins to glaze half way through this and lets me go, not before reminding me that “….you can’t be too careful after nine-eleven” you know and “You are dealing with the Office of Homeland Security, here. After all, sir, you are taking pictures which include a military vessel”.

I leave trying hard not to laugh while thinking of that 19 year old German air ace Mathias Rust who landed his Cessna in Moscow’s Red Square in 1986, at the height of the Cold War. Yeah, we won that one, too. One particularly apposite cartoon the next day showed a technical drawing of the plane captioned “Stealth Bomber”. So now I think of the dinghy as the “Stealth Destroyer”.

Wandering back to the dinghy, excuse me, military vessel, I tell the chap who apprehended me that “I have security clearance, you know” (always wanted to use that line) and set up the tripod et al. I take my pictures, after promising the Captain a copy (he says he has QuickTime on the Coastguard’s PCs so that’s something, I suppose), and go on my way, thoughts of hot lights and pentathol still in my head, and deeply reassured that, were we to be invaded by sea, all would be well.

Here it is – The Stealth Destroyer.

Too bad it wasn’t sunny. You can see the Coastguard Office, where I was brutally interrogated, in the distance, half way around the circle. What I’ll do for a picture. Now about that army base nearby….

Finally, a QTVR HDR real life panorama

Filed under: QTVR — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:24 am

The whole megillah.

There are times of the year you really do not want to be driving on Highway One in central California. This is one of them. Make it a weekend and you would probably have more fun doing your taxes. You see, for reasons known only to the drafters of the Constitution, RVs and SUVs are allowed on this narrow winding road. As the selfish idiots who drive these vehicles (imagine doing 2 mpg in an RV and having to carry your waste with you) are also incapable of reading, ‘Turnout’ means nothing to them, leaving but three or four legal (and semi-suicidal) passing areas in the 40 miles between Hearst Castle and Limekiln State Park, a trip I took yesterday. This was not helped by the fact that the road was well and truly socked in, fog being par for the course at this time of the year. The only person having fun on this road was the guy who passed me on the double yellow on his Ducati. More power to him.

So my first words to the Forest Ranger on arriving at Limekiln and handing over my $6 were “Boy, there are some bad drivers out there”. “No kidding”, he replied, “two went off the road at night just north of here last night and fell 700 feet to the ocean floor. Both died.” Let’s hope they were driving an RV – nature’s little fix for the gene pool.

Having been to Limekiln many times, the fog left me untroubled, for I knew that some 500 yards from the Pacific all would be sweetness and light. A few seconds in the warming sun and a whiff or two of scented air, and the frustrations of the trip were forgotten.

The goal was simple. I have always been mightily frustrated with my pictures here, for two reasons. First, the insane dynamic range makes preserving of detail in both highlights and shadows very difficult. Second, there is simply no way a static picture can convey the sheer magnificence of a giant redwood forest.

Here’s the sort of thing you get on 4″ x 5″ – at least the dynamic range is OK, if a tad blah:

Limekiln. Crown Graphic 4×5, 210mm Sironar, Kodak Portra VC160

But, let’s face it, you are not there.

So after all that work to learn QTVR photography, and tons more to learn HDR, I put the whole thing together after all those tedious tests in the home I have documented here over the past few days.

Canon EOS 5D and KingPano at Limekiln State Park, CA, July 17, 2006

I took no fewer than 24 pictures per image. 6 ‘circle’ views with the vertically mounted 5D + Canon fisheye rotated about a vertical axis on the KingPano head, each ‘view’ comprised of three pictures, properly exposed, + 2 stops (actually shutter speeds) and -2 stops. Two more views, each of three images, added the zenith and nadir images.

Back home (I had much fun on the drive back trying to run a pig on a Harley with open pipes – blasting his foul noise into unspoiled nature – off the road) each set of three images was merged in Photomatix into one HDR image which was then tone mapped in the same application. All eight resulting images were then dropped into PTMac, the previously determined lens parameters applied and auto control point generation was commenced. I didn’t even bother to delete the ‘bad’ (meaning big) control points. Saved the TIFF file, into Photoshop for final Levels and Curves fine tuning, a quick check of stitching using the Panagea plug-in, and then on to CubicConverter to save the panorama with the right starting point and zoom settings. This time I used the ‘M (high)’ JPG quality setting on the 5D, meaning each source image was between 3.4 mB and 5.1 mB. For some reason the underexposed ones are larger. Whatever. No need to use RAW – the files are too large for my purposes and I get better tone mapping through HDR than RAW can provide.

You can judge how much HDR adds to dynamic range from this non-HDR extract:

And here is the QTVR HDR result of the 24 constituent images:

Click Here

The young girl actually arrived on the scene when I had just finished the ‘circle’ images, so I asked her to stand as still as she could while I took three more to replace the original. As you can see, she moved slightly, but the effect is there. Photographer’s luck. You can’t have it if you don’t take pictures.

The file is some 2.5 mB in size, owing to the high quality of the JPGs used, and I have constrained the zoom range to the point where quality is not compromised on zooming in.

While taking 24 pictures to make one result sounds daunting, once you get the hang of it, assisted by auto over/under exposures and motor drive, and the click stops on the King Pano, things move along very fast. I didn’t even bother re-levelling the rig between shots, the subject being far less demanding for stitching purposes than the indoor scenes used to calibrate the equipment. A check of the time stamps on the files shows that the whole thing was done in two minutes. And do get QR heads for camera->King Pano and KingPano->tripod – the thought of all that screwing (I get enough from the IRS, thank you) in their absence is …. not good.

I hope you have enjoyed this learning exercise in QTVR HDR photography as much as I have.

July 27, 2006

QuickTime + High Dynamic Range photography

Filed under: Panoramas, QTVR — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:11 am

Some serious heaviosity, as Woody Allen once remarked.

Putting it all together calls for one more test; namely, combining High Dynamic Range photography (HDR) with QuickTime panoramic images. Not just a dry academic exercise as I propose to put this to work on my first field trip to the redwood forests where the dynamic range can be simply astonishing. From shadows to highlights can be as much as ten stops. It gets very dark on the forest floor.

What better environment than the home theater with the drapes open to disclose a 100F day and brilliant sunshine outside? Thank God for the sunspot cycle.

I reprogrammed the Custom setting on the 5D’s mode dial to include three exposure bracketing for each picture, meaning normal, +2 stops and -2 stops and set the drive mode on Continuous. That way one press on the shutter fires of three shots in one second.

The eighteen constituent pictures (6 x 3 – I did not take zenith or nadir shots in this test) were then placed in their own folder in the Mac’s Finder and color coded to avoid mistakes (File->Color Label:>).

These are all at the lowest JPG quality setting on the 5D.

Here’s how the result of the HDR + tone mapping step in Photomatix looks:

I increased the default tone mapping saturation from 50% to 60% and checked the ‘360 degree image’ box – no idea what that does, but it seemed like a good idea. Photomatix lets you save settings to ensure repeatability between picture groups.

I ran the six HDR pictures through PTMac using the techniques set forth in my previous articles and, sure enough, the first pass was perfect as regards stitching. Except for one thing:

A thumping great big tone discontinuity as clearly visible above. Poking around it was obvious that this was at the junction of the first and last images.

Back in PTMac, I checked the box marked ‘Blend around the -180/+180 boundary’. No stopping me now!

This process generates a lot of files, so orderly housekeeping is in….order. Here’s the result:

The first 18 JPGs are the source images, followed by 6 tone mapped HDRs.The ‘.xmp’ file records the settings made in Photomatix for processing each. The ‘.mov’ file is the QuickTime video, the ‘.ptm’ file is the result of saving all data in PTMac, the ‘.tif’ file is the Enblend TIFF file from PTMac and, finally, the ‘.txt’ file is something PTMac generates and I have no idea what it does!

If you check the times, it’s 108 minutes from taking the first snap to having the movie file completed. (I saved the ‘.ptm’ file later – must be better about that in future).

Before putting the TIFF file through CubicConverter, I adjusted tones a tad in Photoshop then let her rip.

And you can click here for the result. Does Enblend rock or what? Don’t waste your time on non-Enblend stitching.

The home theater doubles as Le Gallerie Pindelski (French gives it that touch of class, don’t you think?). The pictures on the wall are by yours truly, all taken over the past twelve months, and in case you are wondering where my assistant, Bert the Border Terrier is, would you be walking between buildings with a fur coat on when it’s 100F outside? We are talking one pretty smart animal here.

Do I think I am God or what? Or, to once more quote Mr. Allen, “Look, I have to model myself on someone”.

Enough of this testing. It’s time to put all of this into practice. A real live, in the field, photography trip follows. That will involve 360 x 180 HDR pictures in the local redwood forest.

July 26, 2006

Free Ruler

Filed under: Software — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:42 am

A great utility program to gauge your picture size.

Free Ruler is just that. A small OS X application that shows a ruler on your screen which can display inches, centimetres, pixels or picas.

Here’s a screen shot in Photoshop S2 with FreeRuler set to show inches:

The ruler can be dragged around with the mouse and either vertical or horizontal rules can be stretched as required or hidden if you prefer.

A quick calculation, for example, in regard to this picture, which Photoshop reports at 21.02% of actual pxel size discloses that an actual pixel print would be 29.7″ x 58.8″ – the 9:16 format of the Panasonic LX1 used to make it.

July 25, 2006

King Pano head and PTMac – Part III

Filed under: Panoramas — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:57 am

The acid test – a 360 x 180 QuickTime panorama.

In Part II I explained how to calibrate your lens/camera combination for use with PTMac, using just three heavily overlapped images.

While that article addressed use of the Canon EOS 5D and 15mm Fisheye, the approach is similar for any camera/lens combination. One caveat. If you are using a less wide lens, be sure to take the pictures so that you have sufficient overlap that a detail in the middle of the center picture appears in the left and right hand snaps also, and not too close to the edges of the outlying two images. This will make it possible to establish control points not just between adjacent images but between non-adjacent ones as well, heightening the accuracy of the calibration. Once calibrated this ‘large overlap’ approach is not needed with real life panoramas.

1 – Taking the pictures:

The deliverable is a 360 x 180 panorama, meaning a complete circle around the scene, with no breaks, and the ability to pan up to the sky and down to the ground with no ‘holes’ in the image.

For the 5D + Canon Fisheye, which has a horizontal angle of view of 91.7 degrees when mounted vertically, this dictates that six horizontal pictures be taken – theoretically you could get away with just four (4 x 91.7 > 360, if you get my drift) but that would result in such small overlap between images that the chances of a properly stitched panorama are zero. Likewise, five images might do, but control points would be too close to the edges of adjacent images, which PTMac does not like, so we go with six images. That gives a 53% overlap, if you must know, which falls under the description of ‘generous but not wasteful’ – everything your Government is not.

That means 8 clicks on the KingPano head between pictures, each click being 7.5 degrees. As the clicks are not very firm I double check my work by looking at the degree scale – starting at 0, the next five pictures are at 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 degrees. All of this, of course, after very carefully aligning the first (or ‘anchor’) image with the accessory shoe mounted double bubble level. Now the bubbles do not stay perfectly centered as you rotate, as King Pano recognizes in its instruction sheet, but you can easily readjust the camera to dead level in each shot with the three thumb wheel adjusters in the KingPano’s base. It takes seconds to do.

Those will complete the circle but will leave holes at the top and bottom. So after returning the KingPano head to its original position, the 0 setting, loosen the big knob on top of the vertical plate and rotate the camera 90 degrees so that the lens points up to the sky. Take a picture. Loosen the knob again and point the camera down to the ground – take another picture. This one will, of course, include the tripod and KingPano in the field of view. These are known as the ‘zenith’ and ‘nadir’ images and require special processing.

Here are the six ‘circle’ images:

And here are the nadir and zenith images:

2 – Process the images:

First load the images into PTMac – load only the six images constituting the horizontal circle. We will not be using PTMac for stitching of the zenith and nadir images as the program is simply too clunky to allow that to be easily done. We will plug them in later using Photoshop, ImageAlign and CubicConverter.

Then on the Lens Settings tab, load the file you created in the calibration process:

Go to the Image Parameters tab and click on Arrange, select (Shift-Click in the left hand column) Images 0-5 and make the entries shown below:

This table reflect the fact that the horizontal images have to be turned 90 degrees CCW and the angle between each is 60 degrees.

Unlike during the calibration process where Control Points were manually entered, we will tell PTMac to automate the process. Go to the Preferences->SIFT (what the hell does that mean?) ans set ‘Number of Control Points: to 5, as here:

Go to the Control Points tab and click on ‘Auto match’ at the bottom:

PTMac will generate 5 control points for each image pair and will report back with a message something like this when it’s done (the count will be zero through 5 in this case):

Go to the Optimizer tab and select images as shown:

We are leaving the Yaw, Pitch and Roll of Image 0 unchanged – the camera was carefully levelled – allowing the keying of Images 1-5 off this anchor image.

Go back to the Control Points tab and click on Table at the lower left. You will see a table of all Control Points which you can sort in descending distance order by clicking on the ‘Distance’ column heading.

Delete the worst (biggest number) from each image pair, leaving four control points per image pair. Re run the Optimizer.

Now we need to confer the calibrated field of view and ‘b’ parameter on the optimization process. Click on FOV and run the optimization. Then click on ‘b’ and run the optimization again.

Go to the Create Panorama tab, select Enblend TIFF [.tif] for File format and click on ‘Create Panorama:’

3 – Photoshop check-up:

Load the image into Photoshop and it looks like this:

Now from the Filter menu load the Panagea plug-in and you can do a proper QuickTime preview of the image, like this:

As you can see, I have once more involved Bertie the Border Terrier in the action, but I’m afraid you cannot buy him anywhere, even at B&H, and he’s not for sale.

This preview shows the image is almost perfect, but any troublesome areas can be fixed by alternating between the preview and PTMac (Command-Tab) and adding or fixing control points in troublesome areas. The panorama previewer in PTMac (Command-E) is simply not up to the task, I’m afraid, showing overlap errors where there are none.

4 – Adding the nadir and zenith images:

While PTMac can add zenith and nadir images, once you add them and regenerate control points your nice low control point distances for the circle images get shot, and there’s no way to just generate control points for the zenith and nadir images alone – PTMac insists on redoing all Control Points. I constantly got messed up circle image stitches using this approach. As the holes left at top and bottom with the fisheye lens are very small, it’s far easier to simply defish the zenith and nadir images using the ImageAlign plug-in (see my earlier pieces on this) and insert them via Cubic Converter and Photoshop. More about how to do this appears here.

6 – Adjusting the tonal range:

Reload the final panorama into Photoshop, check for alignment and, if all is well make adjustments to Levels, Curves, tonal range as you like. If stitching is still suspect, repeat the fine tuning process above. Save the TIFF file. Then save your work file in PTMac (File->Save As) – this creates a file with the .ptm extensionj which saves all references to your images and the optimization settings. Useful if you ever want to go back and fine tune things.

7 – The QuickTime conversion:

It now remains to convert the TIFF file into a QuickTime movie. I use Cubic Converter to do this – it’s far more flexible than the straightforward function in PTMac, allowing you to dictate the starting point of the panorama when it is first loaded (mine, of course, starts with Bertie in the middle of the picture) as well as permitting constraints to be placed on the (default) huge zoom range which otherwise allows zooming in well past the resolution limits of the original.

Here is the file loaded into Cubic Converter:

Before saving it in the default Cubic QuickTime VR Movie format, I adjusted the starting point to center on Bert by moving the slider below the image. Click on Convert and Cubic Converter commences asembling the six cube faces, graphically displaying each as it does so on the cube shown.

When it’s done the display gives you Save options as so:

I elected Min/Max zoom settings of 35/70, Fast Start Grey preview (this displays grey in unloaded sections as the image loads) and the default size of 1200 x 600 pixels which is a nice fit for most screens.

If there are no zenith or naditr images present, I restrict the ‘Tilt’ setting to -65 to +65 degrees. that way the viewer will not be allowed to tilt so much that the ‘holes’ become visible.

The TIFF file is 46 mB in size, whereas the QuickTime movie is just 1.3 mB, and you can view it by clicking here. The aggregate size of the eight constituent images, each shot at the 5D’s lowest JPG setting to yield individual images sized 2496 x 1664 pixels, was some ten megabytes. Thus you can see that the QuickTime format is exceptionally economical, and the definition of the movie lacks nothing if you don’t go berserk zooming in – and I have prevented you from doing that with the Cubic Converter settings I chose.

And yes, feel free to zoom in on that all round dynamo and breed standard, Bertram the Border Terrier. He kept my morale high during the black dog days working my way through the labyrinthine software that is PTMac. As for the KingPano head, I have nothing but praise. It’s a third of the cost of the Manfrotto and it does the job, even with the heavy Canon 5D on board, thanks to the built in levellers. Well done Mr. King.

A note on processing time:

Now that everything is in order, I did a dry run to determine the processing time for a newly taken six picture 360 degree circular panorama, without zenith and nadir images. After taking the pictures, here’s how it went:

Load images into PTMac, auto-generate control points, run optimizer and generate panorama – first pass: 8 minutes.
Examine result in Photoshop using the Panagea plug-in and add control points as needed (6 added): 5 minutes
Regenrate control points and new panorama – second pass: 6 minutes.

The result is perfect.

Total processing time for six 1 mB files on a PPC 2 gHz, 2gB iMac: 19 minutes.

Now that’s what I call a good return on investment of time!

You think that’s long? Well, consider this. In 19 minutes Ansel Adams was still trying to remember where he left that bottle of pyro developer which he mistook for wine the other evening and when he did find it, what has he got three hours of dodging and burning later? Lung cancer and a lousy black and white print of some damned old rock in Yosemite. Gimme a break.

July 24, 2006

I like Leicas as much as the next man….

Filed under: Hall of Shame, Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:56 am

…but I know disinformation when I see it.

Can you believe this guy?

How many more people are going to buy into this ‘Freedom Train’ disinformation? This appalling apologia has now been around for some fifty years.

This is the same Leica company that gave us the Luftwaffe Leica, provided optics for Panzer tanks and most certainly did not depart Wetzlar for moral shores in 1939. Nor did it look to leave during the largest military build up the world has seen in the period 1933-39, being a major supplier of optics to their government. It’s not like they had no warning….

“Boy, oh boy, Ernst. Did you see the P&L this quarter? Are those Wehrmacht orders something, or what?”

I would have posted this comment in this writer’s web site but, predictably, comments are not possible. Why would they be when you write naive nonsense like this?

Mr. ‘Conscientious’ should find his conscience and question what he reads before repeating it as fact. That’s the sort of ‘reporting’ you find in most of today’s newspapers. Until you learn to question what you read, Mr. C, please stick to photography.

But of course we know that the Leitz company did not collaborate with the Nazis, they were only following orders and they really love their country, etc., etc. As this advertisement from the November 1942 edition of Foto Beobachter confirms – a perfect match for that Luftwaffe Leica:

Look, Leicas are nice, but let’s not deny history.

July 23, 2006

King Pano head and PTMac – Part II

Filed under: Panoramas — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:41 am

Three days of hard labor = one perfectly calibrated camera + lens.

There’s little use in setting up the King Pano head correctly if your camera/lens combination is incorrectly calibrated for the PTMac application.

PTMac comes with tons of lens/camera database settings which you can just load, but my experience suggests that you really should calibrate your particular body + lens, as calibration will adjust for your combination’s anomalies as well as for the offset of the sensor in the camera body. I cannot stress enough how important it is to do this, and as I have learned from my mistakes, you should be able to do this in a couple of hours by following the instructions below. This took me three days….

What follows is specific to the Canon EOS 5D + Canon 15mm EF Fisheye lens, but adapting these instructions to your camera/lens combination is a simple matter. It doesn’t help that the one set of lens parameters I found on the web for this combination (it does not exists in the PTMac database) did not work for my particular setup.

The problem with PTMac is that this great application is hampered by confusing instructions. The vendor is clearly very conscientious in responding to queries, but the result is that the magic sauce is in several places – the application’s Help file, the vendor’s forum and various FAQs also on the vendor’s web site, not to mention all sorts of chatter on Google. What follows is self contained – everything you need.

1 – Taking the calibration pictures

With the camera mounted in the King Pano as shown here, go to an indoor setting with as many horizontal and vertical lines as possible. Indoors is preferred to outdoors as you have total control of your environment – no wind movement, constant light, etc. – and you will be much closer to your subject, which makes for more critical calibration and, chances are, the setting will be replete with strong horizontal and vertical lines. Except for geodesic dome types, most homes tend to be rectangular.

I have my 5D’s custom setting (’C’ on the mode dial) set for ISO 200, 1/125, f/8, color balance set to sunlight (not AWB), JPG quality set to the lowest possible (you want small files to speed up PTMac processing), auto rotate Off and the lens set to manual focus. Set the focus between the 3′ and infinity marks, adjust the shutter speed for exposure, leaving the aperture at f/8 and take a trial picture to check everything is nice and bright and easy to see. One half stop overexposed does not hurt. Now set the KingPano to the zero degree click stop and orient the camera + tripod so that the camera points to the leftmost side of the scene.

You will be taking just three pictures – each three click-stops apart on the KingPano – meaning 22.5 degrees as each click stop is equivalent to 7.5 degrees. Now while the full frame Canon 15mm fisheye will cover a 360 degree circle in just 6 shots (60 degrees between shots), we are opting for a huge overlap in the interest of best calibration.

Now level the camera carefully using the accessory shoe-mounted double bubble level I illustrated here . You want the camera to be level, so disregard the bubble level on the King Pano which will give false readings owing to the slight sag of the assembly from the weight of the 5D. That’s not the manufacturer’s fault. To make the King Pano much sturdier would greatly increase bulk and weight.

Take three pictures spaced three clicks apart.

2 – Load the pictures into PTMac:

The screen looks as follows:

3 – Guesstimate the lens settings:

Go to the Lens Settings tab and set the Lens type to Full-frame Fisheye[Rectangular] and the Hor. Field of View to 91.733 degrees. This will change as we calibrate but that’s Canon’s data sheet spec for the fisheye.

Note the Focal length multiplier is set at 1.000000 as the 5D is a full frame camera. Other Canons may be 1.3x or 1.6x, Nikon DSLRs are 1.5x and so on. You know your number. Leave everything else unchanged.

4 – Fix orientation:

Now go to the Image Parameters tab and this is what you will see:

The left hand column of images shows the full frame shot, the next column how these images are aligned by PTMac. Two things are wrong. The images are turned through 90 degrees and all overlap exactly.

Click on Arrange at the bottom of the screen and adjust the variables as shown below:

What you are doing is telling the application to turn every image 90 degrees CCW and to make the spacing between each 22.5 degrees, which is what the spacing was when you took the pictures.

Your screen now looks like this:

The pictures in the ‘Warped’ column are now turned upright and offset from one another.

5 – Set preliminary Control Points:

Now go to the Control Points tab. A Control Point is nothing more than two indicators – one in each picture – telling PTMac that those points either constitute identical points on those images or are points between horizontal or vertical lines. We will establish vertical line control points first – these tell PTMac about the Fisheye’s distortion.

In the following picture one Vertical control point has been placed at the top left of the vertical door jamb in Picture 1 and the second, in Picture 2 where the door jamb is most bowed from fisheye distortion.

You must also click the entry in the ‘Align’ column in the data box at lower left and choose Vertical Line to tell PTMac this is a vertical line control point pair.

Now you have to add five more control points which are spot Control points – remember to elect the Spot choice (a circle with a dot) in the ‘Align’ entry for the first of these – PTMac remains at whatever Control Point type was previously selected. Once chosen, a spot Control Point will be somewhat confusingly shown as ‘H+V’ in the Align column. No one ever accused engineers or software writers of being good at ergonomics, the guys at Aperture excepted. This is how it looks after adding five spot Control Points between Images 0 and 1 – strongly defined image details have been chosen not too close to the edges. PTMac does a nice job of magnifying the Control Point cursor in the small panels below the pictures as you move the mouse, clicking first in one image then in the other:

Now click on the right arrow key to the right of the Image 0 drop down menu at the top left and Image 0 becomes Image 1 on the left. Image 1, on the right, becomes Image 2. All Control Points have disappeared as none have yet been established between this image pair. Repeat the process – one set of vertical Control Points and five spot Control Points:

Now in each pair of images establish a pair of Horizontal Control Points – the example below illustrates point 7 between Images 1 and 2, at the top of the picture. Remember to elect the Horizontal Line choice in the Align table entry, as has been done here:

Finally, chose Image 0 for the left hand pane and Image 2 for the right. Create at least one control point which is identically placed between these non-adjacent images. You can do this by virtue of the huge overlap the 22.5 degree spacing affords – common information will apear in each of the three pictures.

6 – First Optimizer run:

The first Control Point pass is done. Go to the Optimizer tab and check the ‘Yaw:’, ‘Pitch:’, ‘Roll’: and ‘Use Control Points of:’ boxes as shown below. You have to click well to the right of the word ‘Image0′ and so on to get the check mark (or ‘tick’ to Her Majesty’s subjects) to show :

Here’s what the terms mean. Imagine you are on the Titanic, doing your Kate Winslet thing, facing the prow (front) of the ship, your arms outstretched horizontally to your sides, pointing to the horizon on either side. When the ship Rolls, your arms go up and down relative to the horizons. When it Pitches, the prow goes up and down in your dead ahead line of vision. When it Yaws, the prow moves from side to side as you look forward dead ahead. Just don’t ask me about port and starboard.

Click on the Run Optimizer box at the lower right. When the program is done, click the Field of View entry in the Lens parameters: box and run the Optimizer again. Then click the ‘b’ entry and run the Optimizer. Then click ‘a’ and ‘c’ and run the Optimizer. Finally, click both ‘Hshift’ and ‘Vshift’ and run the Optimizer one last time. By running the optimization process in multiple steps you heighten the accuracy of the result, as the program learns about your lens’s distortions and the camera’s sensor offset – the latter a normal result of manufacturing tolerances (Canon is emphatically not Leica in this regard!). Baby (optimization) steps beat one giant leap anyday.

Now take a look at the Lens Settings tab – you will see something like this (your numbers will differ):

Reflecting your optimization, PTMac has entered the various parameters in the boxes for your camera/lens combination.

We are not done. The critical point is now reached where you must fine tune your control points to get them as accurate as possible.

7 – Save your work:

But first, so as not to lose anything, click on the Lens Database box and you will be presented with this screen:

Click on Lens Database again and click on your saved settings’ name and you will see the following:

8 – Fine tune your control points:

Now we need to examine Control Points, so go to the Control Points tab an click on Table at lower left. This is what you will see:

We want to get the amounts shown in the Distance column as low as possible – below 2.0 ideally.

Click Goto and PTMac will go to the the images with your control point pair. Click the box above each picture to choose 100% display – that’s the largest you can get and allows you to critically reposition control points with the benefit of greater screen detail. Here’s how it looks. You can pan around with the slider bars at the sides of the pictures or Option-Drag the mouse cursor to move the image. Click the padlock in between the image tops to decouple their movement.

You can reposition any control point by grabbing it with the mouse pointer and click-dragging it. I cannot stress enough how critical this step is to a proper calibration. Go back to the table, chose the next over 2.0 entry in the list (none change until you re-run the Optimizer) and repeat. Keep doing this until you have addressed all point control points with a distance reading over 2.0. By all means check your horizontal and vertical control points also, but beware that PTMac gives wild readings for these which are not meaningful to the fine tuning process. If they are correctly set – meaning exactly on their respective vertical or horizontal lines – leave them alone.

9 – Now fine tune your Control Points again:

Now repeat the Optimizer routine above, doing it in many steps as before. Check the Lens Settings tab and you will see the data have changed, so resave them as before:

Now go back to Control Points and again re-tune any spot control points over 2.0. Keep doing this until all are under 2.0. It takes time. Believe me, the pay back in time saved from a correctly calibrated camera/lens combination is worth it. Now resave the lens settings.

10 – Preview the panorama on the screen:

You can now preview the panorama on the screen with Command-E, but be warned that the previewer is very crude and does not properly show alignment. On no account should you even think of manually dragging the images in the previewer screen to secure better alignment. You will waste a lot of time and you will fail.

11 – Generate the panorama:

You must have Enblend (on the Kekus.com web site) installed in a directory on your hard drive and you must input the path to Enblend in the Preferences settings for PTMac, otherwise the panorama generation will fail.

Click on the Create Panorama tab and select Enblend TIFF in the drop down box. This is the only setting that results in the best possible blending of stitches between adjacent pictures. Leave everything else alone and click Create Panorama at the lower right.

The panorama creation process takes a while – with these three small files (each ~800k) on my 2 mHz, 2gB PPC iMac it took some three minutes – this is what you will see towards the end of the process:

12 – Get the dog out – sorry, I mean Photoshop:

Load the TIFF file generated by PTMac and Enblend into Photoshop and this is what you will see:

Note that sophisticated man about town, Bertram the Border Terrier, earning his modelling fee. A dog far superior to anything from Adobe/Macromedia. You can use other breeds, of course, but I find the Border Terrier works best.

13 – Install the PanoPreviewer plug-in:

To allow previewing of this in QuickTime format, go to Panagea’s web site and download and install the PanoPreviewer Photoshop Plug-in. Restart Photoshop, reload the image and you can preview the image in its full QuickTime glory by selecting the plug-in from Photoshop’s Filter menu. This is how it looks:

14 – Check for skew and stitching errors:

Pan around and check the whole thing. If your picture is skewed to the horizontal you need to recheck your camera levelling and do this all again. There are no short cuts. If you see any stitching errors, go back and rework the control points. If that still fails, recheck your KingPano setup, especially checking nodal point and alignment settings. The subject above is very, very challenging with a multitude of strong overlapping details very close to the lens. The door is but eight feet from the camera, despite appearances. If it works with this sort of subject, it will work anywhere!

Here are the final Control Point distance statistics (identical to the finally saved data in the lens database on the Lens Settings tab) after all this calibration:

Why PTMac has determined the Field of View (FoV) to be 134.9 degrees when the vertical FoV of the Canon Fisheye is 91.733 degrees beats me but, hey, it works!

You can see that the 5D’s sensor is offset some 15 and 12 pixels from dead center (the Hshift and Vshift numbers). Yours will be different which is why you should calibrate your camera/lens and not depend on someone else’s settings from a table. It may be that full frame sensor cameras with fisheyes are just more sensitive, I don’t know, but it is the only approach which worked for me. The result is simply perfect – the joins are impossible to see.

In Part III I will look at creating a full 360 degree panorama using six images at 60 degree angles to one another plus a nadir and zenith image. Right now, if you scroll up or down you will see holes where image data are missing, like so:

By the way, here are my final camera/lens calibrations – these are unique to this particular camera and lens; substituting another 5D body (I should be so lucky!) will not do, as the sensor offset will be different owing to manufacturing tolerances:

15 – View the result:

Click here to view the QuickTime movie created from the three images stitched above. The file is 600kB. As you will see, it’s only a partial panorama as images were only taken over a narrow range of Yaw.

There. I finally used a technical word! You can take the lad out of engineering, but you cannot take the engineer out of the lad.

You can pan with the mouse cursor in all directions and zoom in and out with the Shift and Control keys. You will need QuickTime on your computer – all Macs come with it installed.

16 – Buy an Apple computer is you don’t have one:

I believe there is even a version of QuickTime available for download from Apple for those poor unfortunates who have yet to see the light – they are called Windows users – but you need a Mac to use PTMac, so now’s the time to switch to one of these great machines. Each lock-up on your Windows machine costs you 30 minutes. Say your time is worth $50/hour. A new 17″ iMac with the maximum 2 gB of memory installed costs $1,600. So that’s 64 lock-ups or two months’ of use of Windows. Get a grip!

July 21, 2006

King Pano head – Part I

Filed under: Panoramas — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:49 am

Calibration for Quicktime 180×360 panoramas.

Having got the panorama bug a while back, I finally took delivery of the King Pano head yesterday. Orders are currently backlogged three weeks, testifying to the popularity of the product.

The King Pano camera base is screwed to the camera with the provided 1/4″ slotted screw and a screwdriver. Not good, as I want to keep the Manfrotto QR plate on the camera at all times, and the thought of messing about with a screwdriver in the woods is not something I wish to contemplate. So I left the QR plate on the Canon 5D and fitted a QR tripod base to the King Pano camera baseplate, which now looks like this:

The Manfrottoo QR tripod base fitted to the King Pano camera baseplate

A camera QR plate is then fitted to the base of the King Pano. This combination allows the camera to be fitted and removed to the King Pano in a second or two and the King Pano to likewise be attached or detached speedily to or from the tripod. In this way the King Pano can remain undisturbed between panorama projects.

When it came to centering the camera vertically over the bubble level, I had to rack the vertical plate all the way to the back to properly center the camera over the built-in bubble level; had I not used the QR plate the setting would have fallen nearer the center of the range of movement. As it is I just squeaked in!


The plate is racked as far to the left as it will go

The next step is to set the nodal point – I only need to do this once and as my camera/lens combination will be the 5D/Canon 15mm fisheye. Different lenses have different nodal points. The idea is that, as the camera is rotated, the relative spacing of near and distant objects remains constant. This means the camera/lens combination is now rotating about the nodal point of the lens (the point where light rays invert en route to the film/sensor), thus eliminating parallax which plays havoc with subsequent image stitching attempts.

Here’s the correct setting for the 5D/15mm Fisheye:

The left scale shows 102mm at the upright, the right 52 with the King Pano attached through the right hand threaded hole.

I set the camera on a tripod with the edge of the office door some three feet away. The ceiling lamp is 12 feet distant with the window some 75 feet away. Here are the results with the camera rotated to place the window edge to edge:


        

Four sections of pictures with the lamp at right and moving progressively left across the frame

Note the constant spacing between lamp and door edge and between the window and door edge. The nodal point is correctly set.

Here’s how it looks on the tripod – the nodal point with the fisheye is very close to the front of the lens; for more normal lenses you would expect the nodal point to be well within the body of the lens dictating that the lens be further forward.

Finally, when it comes to levelling I consider the built in bubble level to be the wrong way to go. You want the camera aligned to the ground, not the King Pano. The relatively heavy (compared with cropped sensor cameras) 5d causes the King Pano to flex a tad, meaning that the bubble level no longer reflects the alignment of the camera, and as I tend to believe that Canon’s hot shoe is exacty parallel to the base of the camera body, I bought a neat little double bubble level which can be shoe mounted. It comes from B&H for a few dollars:

Bubble level ensures the camera is dead level. That’s what you want.

Here’s the part number:

Lighter cameras probably do not need this as they will distort the King Pano far less than the heavy 5D.

By the way, the King Pano will not work with the big Canon DSLRs with the battery grip – the body is simply too tall to permit centering of the lens over the bubble level. To accomplish that the vertical plate would have to be quite a bit taller which would probably compromise stability too much in any case.

So now that things are set just so, Part II will address lens calibration for use with the PTMac software used to create QuickTime panoramas.

July 18, 2006

Some more thoughts on ImageAlign

Filed under: Software — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:49 am

You can have regular or widescreen flavors.

It’s no great secret that I am very excited after my early experiences with the Canon full frame fisheye lens and ImageAlign software. I discipline myself to think ‘hyper wide’ by venturing out with just the 5D and the fisheye. It’s not a rational step from 24mm to 12mm but rather a completely different way of thinking.

As I have been experimenting with that wonderfully sharp and flare free Canon lens, I have been learning how best to place the subject in the frame so as not to lose things once ImageAlign ‘de-fishing’ is applied. I rarely leave the image with its original fisheye look as it’s a gimmick which gets tiresome quickly. The fisheye + ImageAlign results in a lens with an effective focal length of some 12mm on the full frame 5D.

On a few occasions I have been frustrated with losing corner details using ImageAlign’s adjuster which retains the original aspect ratio of the image when removing the lozenges disclosed at the top and bottom of the frame once ImageAlign is used. Phew! That’s a mouthful. To make things clear, here’s an original fisheye image from my beach series:

Wet suits, Cayucos Beach. Canon EOS 5D, 15mm fisheye, ‘de-fished’ with ImageAlign.

I was just inches from the wet suits when taking this! Someone saw me taking the picture and, judging from their reaction, must have concluded that I was some sort of rubber fetishist, as a regular camera would have captured just part of one of the suits. What we do in the cause of photographs….

Now apply the ImageAlign slider to remove the white spaces (in this example I also had to apply 3.5 degrees of rotation to get the sea level, hence the strange shape of the white sections) and this is what you get:

Wet suits, Cayucos Beach. Canon EOS 5D, 15mm fisheye, white spaces removed.

The image remains in 3:2 format, like that of the 5D’s sensor. But lots of edge details have been lost.

So rather than use ImageAlign’s correction, I took the first image and cut out a rectangle to get rid of the white spaces, but preserving the full width of the image:

Wet suits, Cayucos Beach. Canon EOS 5D, 15mm fisheye, cropped in Aperture.

Quite a difference. And guess what? The proportions are roughly 1.79:1. Now widescreen is 16:9 or 1.78:1 (what you can get with the Panasonic Lumix LX1’s sensor) so you end up with a widescreen de-fished image which preserves far more edge detail – ‘wideness’ if you like – than the constant image ratio version from ImageAlign. Plus that wide look really goes well with beach and sea scenes! If you print to, say, 24″ wide, the image height will be 13.4″. Oh! and your 12mm ‘rectilinear’ fisheye just became a 10mm full frame wide angle lens.

July 16, 2006

The trouble with Flickr

Filed under: Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 9:45 am

Oddly named and a complete mess.

Occasionally I get picture references from friends who store their snaps on Flickr. I can see that its a nice, cheap place to keep your pictures online and hopefully someone at Flickr is backing up everything properly.

But that’s the only use I have ever found for Flickr or sites like it. The problem is that there is no editing of content, no quality control. So everyone can post there – and sometimes it seems that everyone does – but unless you are directed somewhere specific, it’s not the sort of destination you drop by hoping to find some good pictures to look at. Of course there’s a wonderful selection of great photographs on the site, but how do you go about finding them? Or finding new work of interest, for that matter? That’s the problem with freedom of speech. Everyone gets to say anything they want and, distribution curves being what they are, most of it is pure, unadulterated garbage.

Sorry, but the First Amendment just does not cut it when it comes to art quality.

Contrast the Flickr experience with the one at File Magazine which states:

“We publish images that treat subjects in unexpected ways. Alternate takes, unconventional observations, odd angles — the photographs in the collection reinterpret traditional genres”

And they are true to their credo. Images can be submitted by anyone but must be reviewed and approved. This is what accounts for the site’s great quality and I think you will enjoy much of the great photography there.

I realize that it’s unfair to compare a free storage medium (Flickr) with an edited magazine (File Magazine) but I like to look at good pictures and there’s no way to find them on Flickr without much time wasted on seemingly random searches.

By the way, I came across File Magazine during yet another enjoyable session Stumbling about and commend that approach to you. Every tenth site, and there now seem to be thousands, has something to offer. The service only works with Firefox.

July 15, 2006

Finally, a good HDR image

Filed under: Technique — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:48 am

I think I’m getting the hang of the HDR technique.

After the indoor and hand-held tests documented in this journal over the past few days I ventured forth to the hinterlands with 5D loaded with Optimism, rated at 400 ISO. I have always found that to be a particularly effective film stock.

As before, I set the Canon to record three exposure bursts, with the second and third 2 stops over and under exposed compared to the first. A legacy of the street shooting school, I do not much care for tripods, but those great Manfrotto QR plates made everything go very smoothly, I must say.

I’m trying to learn how to maximize reproduced contrast range without stepping over the line to garish. Easily done with this technique.

So now I know the camera is stationary, but what I did not realize is that any movement in the subject is a matter for concern. As you are combining three or more images, things that move do not look so good. Witness the many translucent gulls shown in my pictures at the beach. Someone once asked Hitchcock how he managed to get all those birds to stand still in his movie to which he cryptically replied “I paid then well”. Seems like I have to get those birds on the payroll.

On the way to the beach I did come across this charming pastoral scene off Highway 46, near our home. The farmer had left the gate open so I shot in, Linhof tripod in one hand, the 5D in the other, and proceeded to bang away, hot footing it before the local pit bull made lunch of my backside. Let me assure you that a good QR head beats a pit bull any time.

Anyway, the clear appeal of this scene was the golden color of the freshly harvested land, contrasting with the trees, sky and that standby for us farmers, the John Deere tractor. God, America, apple pie and John Deere, because America and apple pie would be in short supply sans John Deere. As a wine grape grower I can attest to the discovery that a couple of hours on a Deere beats $250 to the local shrink any time. Lots more fun too. And the engine is made in Japan, so it starts first thing, too!

Taken at noon (bad time for landscape work) the contrast range was, predictably, extreme.

Making Hay. Canon EOS 5D, 24-105mm at 100mm. RAW converted to JPG in Aperture. HDR processed in Photomatix

The next step was to fire up the HP DesignJet 90 printer for the acid test. How sharp is this combined, processed picture when printed to a decent size? On a side note one of the unheralded features of the DJ 90 is the way it keeps the print heads warm even when nominally switched off. I assume this is to prevent ink clogging and, indeed, after some six weeks of non-use (like you, I spend 40% of my year working for the IRS) the first print out is perfect, with no need to run magical routines to clear the heads. The moral of the tale being that if you want to keep your DJ heads ready to go, by all means switch the printer off (the fan noise gets tiresome anyway) but do not pull the power plug.

The result is great. Definition equal to a traditional one negative print and dynamic range to blow your head off. All at 400 ISO.

Bertie the Border terrier testifies to the size of the print:

Bertie guards Making Hay.

After all this banging away on the tripod, I couldn’t resist just one opportunity to take a real, live action shot, so apropos nothing, here it is:

What’s a guy got to do to get a drink around here? 5D, 24-105mm. 400ISO

July 13, 2006

When all else fails, change your logo

Filed under: Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:07 am

Fuji takes a page out of the Kodak playbook.

Here’s the business philosophy statement from Fuji’s web site:

“We will use leading-edge, proprietary technologies to provide top-quality products and services that contribute to the advancement of culture, science, technology and industry, as well as improved health and environmental protection in society. Our overarching aim is to help enhance the quality of life of people worldwide.”

Yet Fuji, when it’s not busy making the world a better place, continues to call itself Fujifilm and seems to think that changing its logo – like the folks at Kodak did recently – will cure all that ails it. Still, I suppose a 95% share of a dead market sounds good to some bean counter somewhere.


Fuji’s thrilling innovation – a new logo

Well at least they were honest. The red bit they added speaks to the results of their film division and looks about to fall off.

Where do businesses get these money wasting ideas?

July 12, 2006

This just in from Reuters

Filed under: Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 10:42 am

Better get rid of that black and white film in your refrigerator, racist pig.

From Reuters today:

“Reuters reports this morning that a PlayStation Portable billboard campaign featuring a black-and-white photograph of a lady in powder-white makeup and clothing, grabbing the face of a darkened black lady, is being discontinued by Sony in the Netherlands. Apparently, there were complaints that the imagery – which was designed to show ceramic white, the new color of some PSP models, as competing with jet black – had racist overtones.

…The ad campaign riled California Assemblyman Leland Yee, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and a youth civil rights education project called Sojourn to the Past.

Those critics condemned Sony’s use of the racially charged photo to sell a product and said it recalled an age and time when black people were portrayed in minstrel shows.”

Anyone found using black and white film will be pursued by the Bicultural Interdiction Group Offfice Trackingforce (BIGOT), a joint arm of the US and EU governments, and will be subject to prosecution. BIGOT has also requested that all image software manufacturers revise their applications to remove any ‘convert to monochrome’ capabilities, owing to the racially charged nature of such conversions. Those refusing to comply will be subject to penalties which will include being forced to listen to jazz music eighteen hours a day as part of the cultural assimilation process, in addition to the usual monetary fines.

Separately, Apple Computer is expected to voluntarily agree to discontinue both the black and the white versions of its new MacBook laptop computers and will henceforth issue these clad in grey and pink only, the latter for homosexual and lesbian consumers.

Diane Arbus – fake.

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:43 am

A cruel, exploitative photographer without a shred of decency.

Diane Arbus, of course, is famous for having killed herself at the age of 48 in 1971. Since then, this unknown photographer’s work has sky rocketed in fame and value. Proving that nothing so much enhances the value of your work as suicide.

Which is not the same as saying that her photography is either good – it is not – or genuine. Indeed, few photographers have produced more shamefully contrived work than Arbus, which qualifies her instantly for the Hall of Fakes.

Arbus was smart. She cottoned on to the fact that the photographic intelligentsia was buying It, It being her cruel, exploitative view of a world seemingly filled with monsters, freaks and the deformed. There’s not another photographer who so cruelly mocks his subjects, distorting them this way and that, ridiculing them at every turn, without the least indication that she had either a heart or a conscience. It’s as if one of those poor fools who photographs beggars on the street suddenly acquired a taste for the bedside manner of the IRS and proceeded to put it to work in the local mental institution with a camera as a weapon.

Her work, then, is the antithesis of class, of decorum, of decency.

But face it. The intelligentsia, the taste makers, goodness help us, believed the exact opposite of what her pictures represented. Where there was poor taste, they saw insight. Where there was cruelty, they saw sympathy. Where there was depravity, they saw honor. Or said they did. She got away with it, until her lack of conscience eventually caught up with her, culminating in a miserable ending of slashed wrists and a drug overdose.

The best example of her fakery is perhaps seen in the contact sheet of the seemingly crazy child holding the hand grenade. Robert Frank, you cannot help thinking, would have pounced on this subject as an example of American depravity. Anything to knock the country that is his adopted home. At least his picture would have had some class. But taking a look at Arbus’s contact sheets you see, to your amazement, that this is in fact a very ordinary little boy playing with a toy. It’s just that in this one accidental shot he is grimacing just so and the whole thing takes on a look of insanity. A sweet, ordinary child, rendered crazy for the ages by the lying, dishonest vision of a supreme fake.

Don’t believe me? Then let me quote her for you and you be the judge:

“Freaks was (sic) a thing I photographed a lot. It was one of the first things I photographed and it had a terrific kind of excitement for me. I just used to adore them. I still do adore some of them. I don’t quite mean they’re my best friends but they made me feel a mixture of shame and awe. There’s a quality of legend about freaks. Like a person in a fairy tale who stops you and demands that you answer a riddle. Most people go through life dreading they’ll have a traumatic experience. Freaks were born with their trauma. They’ve already passed their test in life. They’re aristocrats.”

You can find her garbage on the web as I’m damned if I’m reproducing it here.

May we not see her like again.

July 11, 2006

Fast landscape

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:54 am

The decisive moment exists in landscape pictures too.

Working on my beach series yesterday I was rambling along Grover Beach and idly eyeing the yellow Jeep wondering if something could be crafted aound it. True, I had noted a flock of some two hundred or so Common Tern minding their own business on the dunes nearby, but thought nothing of it. Fish eaters, these, so likely pretty smart, what with fish being so good for the grey matter. Known to attack marauding humans, too, so I kept my distance. A lovely bird – pure white with a jet black head and yellow beak. Quite the designer’s dream.

I am not, as a rule, the type who composes in the viewfinder, preferring to visualize the scene with my (not so great) eyes then administering the coup de grace with a quick raising of the camera to eye level and a pressing of the button. A legacy of years of street photographing, I suppose. Auto focus and exposure makes that approach even easier than in days of yore.

I found myself wondering about the tranisent lighting effects that can so quickly change a landscape. The times when the clouds open just so and you miss the shot because of some malfunction with the tripod. Landscapes are anything but static subjects.

But this one was, let’s face it, not going anywhere. The waves were rolling in on a fairly predictable schedule and the jolly yellow Jeep was parked. So I just sort of stood there, taking in the view on yesterday’s cool morning, glad I had remembered to pack my wool pullover, for it was but 58 degrees. (14 Celsius for those of you who follow the allegedly Beautiful Game of soccer, where he who gets away with the most fouls, and pays the officials most, wins).

Then for some reason known only to this gaggle of fish eaters a communal take-off took place and the magical moment was just that. A moment. Seconds later the tern had left and the little Jeep had driven off. Who said landscapes are static subjects?

Tern and Jeep. Canon EOS 5D, 24-105mm, 400 ISO.

July 10, 2006

Cropping is just a tool

Filed under: Technique — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:57 am

If someone tells you you should only print the full frame of your negative or digital original – run – don’t walk, away.

You hear this sort of thing a lot from academics and pseudo-intellectuals. The Alfred Rosenbergs of the photography world. Sadly, unlike Rosenberg, they remain alive to propound their mealy mouthed tripe in an earnest attempt to earn what modest living their lack of intellect affords them. It goes something like this:

“No great photographic artist every crops his originals when printing, knowing that true greatness in a photograph can only be attained when the original visualization is rendered truly and uncompromisingly on photographic paper. To crop is to destroy the integrity of the creative process.”

Often this codswallop will be followed by a reference to Cartier-Bresson whose prints are so intellectually honest that they often include the surrounding frame of unexposed film. What art. What genius.

What utter rubbish.

Given that the sole purpose of an art photograph, as opposed to a commercial one, is to provide aesthetic satisfaction for the viewer, it is irrelevant whether the spectator sees all of the frame or just a slice. The only thing that matters is that the photograph works.

Here’s a snap I took in one of the great public squares of Paris. Yes, you can check the dimensions – all of the original 24mm x 36mm of the negative is faithfully preserved.

Crossings. Paris 1977. Leica M3, 35mm Summaron. TriX/D76

Three crops follow.

In the third crop I also removed three people in Photoshop. Just didn’t like the way it looked.

Now pretend that you never saw the full frame original. Who is to say that any of the crops is better or worse? The reality, of course, is that the photographer should crop for effect and choose the best possible crop to display his art work.

The academic rule is even dumber when you think that the same effect can be largely accomplished by simply placing a longer lens on the camera. I print it full frame using a 90mm lens on the camera versus cropping from the original taken with a 50mm lens. No difference, maybe except for definition and grain. But the first picture is sacred as it is uncropped, whereas the latter is garbage as I broke a cardinal rule of academia. Doesn’t work, does it?

What with all that burning, dodging and special chemistry he used, you wonder how Ansel Adams ever got past these academics. They probably mistook darkroom technique for great photography. In one respect you can think of Adams as the Greatest Cropper of all. How different is cropping, after all, from selective exposure in the darkroom? Both have as their intent the removal of unwanted features or effects. So, for that mattter, why not remove things, as I did in the third crop above, to make the result better?

All of which goes to confirm that Those Who Can – Crop, whereas Those Who Cannot – Teach.

Crop away. Keep cropping until it looks good or move onto the next original. And if you really want to fool them, why not add a frame depicting the unexposed film, with film manufacturer of choice, in Photoshop. How intellectually dishonest of you.

You will be in good company. The great photographer Brassai thought nothing of using one original to craft two or three pictures.

July 9, 2006

Hyper-wide candids

Filed under: Photographs, Software — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:27 am

When you are that close you become invisible.

Having long been a fan of ultra-wide angle street photography, after many enjoyable years with a 21mm lens on my Leica, it seemed only natural to extend this approach to the realm of the hyper-wide world. That’s the result when using the Canon 15mm full frame fisheye lens on the 5D, augmented by the ImageAlign Photoshop plug-in I have explained in detail before. This plug-in removes objectionable fisheye lens barrel distortion.

The basic premise is that the man in the street has no idea what a fisheye lens does, especially when it come to reducing subject to camera distance if a frame filling picture is required. You can basically be pointing your camera almost directly at the subject and the latter will blithely assume you are photographing something over his shoulder. So proximity confers a level of invisibility unavailable to those using lenses in the 28-50mm range. Use anything longer and you also lose that involved, up close, candid feel.

The small, inconspicuous appearance of the fisheye adds to the stealth factor, an attribute no big honker super-wide zoom can claim. Finally, blanking out all those maker’s advertisements on your camera with some electrical tape makes sure you don’t scream ‘Canon’, or ‘Nikon’ or whatever for the whole world to hear and see.

To illustrate, here are four pictures taken yesterday in one of California’s many beach cities, Pismo Beach. The subjects were mostly within 1-2 feet of the lens.





All images taken on a Canon EOS 5D, 15mm Fisheye, Image Align.

What fun! Certainly the extremely wide view does the young woman’s legs no harm in the last picture.

July 8, 2006

Slim Aarons and rich people

Filed under: Book reviews, Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:08 am

Rich beats the alternatives any day

One of the best things to be said about Slim Aarons’s book Once Upon a Time is that there is not a cat in sight. Lots of dogs and a few horses, but no felines. For that hooray! The rich like their pets obsequious and subservient. Plus they like loyalty. That must explain it.

And it’s the rich this book is about. Having got tired of being shot at in WWII, Aarons rightly decided to enjoy the rest of his life and ended up taking pictures of rich people. Not first generation Gates-rich, you understand. We are talking old money here. The kind your forbears made and you got to enjoy, if you had chosen your parents well. Cabots, Phippses, Agnellis, Fords, Marlboroughs (no dear, not the cigarettes), Windsors and so on.

Frankly, what makes the pictures in this book interesting is the voyeuristic frisson they generate, for the photography is, for the most part, unexceptional to downright mediocre. Aarons’s subjects save the day as often as not. A blurred picture of Prince Charles will always be more interesting than your blurred picture of your sister. Unless, that is, she just happens to be Paris Hilton in the buff.

And while it may take ten generations in Italy to make your money Old Money, five in Britain and one in America, what is very much on display here is Old Money. Lots of Old Money.

The most appealing picture in the book? Page 23 where Mrs. Henry B. Cabot, Jr. (probably named Muriel Finkelstein in real life, for all I know, she cottoned on to the Cabot thing fast), her pert little jeans-clad tushie resting on the fender of the Alfa runabout, the obligatory poodle in the car, proudly displays her magnificent estate home, not so accidentally in the background. You see, being rich means showing that you have money. Don’t bore me with tales of quiet wealth. No such thing. No, what makes this picture special is the Cabot arriviste’s three gorgeous kids variously disposed all over the car. The picture is dated 1960 and the eldest child is probably seven. You see, these kids have yet to learn they are rich. One little boy grins stupidly while holding a football, while the other makes a silly face at his sister, because little boys are like that. A charming and very special photograph.

And while you or I could have done much better with most of the content given the chance – even the cover picture is poorly timed – let’s face it. It’s a lot more fun to look at these than yet another book of war photographs. Aarons got that right.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress