Yearly Archives: 2007

Picture frames

Almost ready for prime time

A year ago I fantasized about the idea of using a flat screen TV to show changing pictures on the wall.

In one fell swoop you could have displayed an infinite number of images with vastly superior dynamic range, owing to the provision of transilluminated rather than reflected light, and none of the expense and agony of mounting, matting and framing. Indeed, when you realize that my one man show required framing of thirty large prints at a cost in excess of $3,000, two or three large LCDs could have been procured at that price with far greater utility value. Why, you could even watch the pap that passes for American television on them if you wanted a change. Best of all, you could display the world’s great paintings all in one place.

That idea is now taking fruition in the form of affordable LCD picture frames which do exactly what I was rambling on about, so I made my father-in-law the guinea pig this Christmas season and gave him a Coby DP-772 7″ picture frame to better display his family snaps.

It’s selling for some $100, including two faceplates and a handy remote.

I included a 1 gB SD card (all of $9!) and a USB-powered card reader (another $9!), and dumped a thousand family snaps on the card using iPhoto’s Export function. Well, firing it up we immediately encountered a snag. The pictures did not break properly betwen frames, like an old mistuned TV set. Digging deeper we discovered the operating system is very crude and determined that a few workarounds were called for.

First, if you check the Amazon reviews for picture frames you will quickly learn that they are all over the place, from one to five stars. This sort of thing usually suggests either poor quality control (evidenly not the case here), poor design or incompetent users. Unlike Apple’s Macs, these things are too new to ‘just work’.

As my father-in-law pointed out, once we inserted the SD card the images looked fine, then moments later the image break anomaly manifested itself. This suggested that the Coby’s OS was reading the files and defaulting the frame spacing to some lowest common denominator. Now our source pictures are in at least three aspect ratios; 4:3 from my the Canon Digital Rebel, 3:2 from my 5D and 16:9 widescreen from the Lumix LX1. So we decided (I say ‘we’ as my father-in-law is an engineer so this sort of thing is right up his alley) to force the iPhoto export to constrain the long dimension of the picture to 500 pixels, just larger than the Coby’s 480 pixel width. The Coby uses a 16:9 aspect ratio for the screen.

Here’s how the iPhoto export settings look:

More snags. After we erased the originals on the SD card, iPhoto ’08 refused to export more than 500 or so images directly to the SD card (yet more lousy quality control by Apple), so we dumped them to a separate directory on the iBook then dragged-and-dropped the directory onto the SD card.

Still not right. The Coby continued to show the old erased images, all messed up, as well as the new ones. So back to iPhoto and the MacBook and this time we did an ‘Empty Trash’ after erasing everything, re-exported the snaps and all was perfect. The ‘Prefix for sequential’ box is very useful as it prevents like numbered pictures from being overwritten as you add more. And a 1gB SD card can accommodate some 30,000 images ….

We also learned that directories are meaningless to the Coby – it reads everything in JPG format on the disc and dumps it to the screen. However, that does not mean that sub-directories are useless. They help you to catalog images and provide another way around the duplicate file name problem. Some manufacturers provide wi-fi streaming, but I avoided that as it’s another needless overhead problem for the Mac’s CPU.

Now everything was sweetness and light. We set the time interval on the Coby and it displays a gorgeous image every few seconds. It’s a mains powered device, so portability is limited. USB, SD, CF, MMC and xD card slots are on the back and you can also plug the device directly into your computer with the provided cable. We avoided this approach as our hard worked Macs need all the CPU cycles they can get, and this would just slow things down.

The screen uses the latest TFT LCD technology, meaning that the picture remains bright no matter how far off axis you view it. Finally, the device includes speakers to play music, though music slideshows from iPhoto are not supported, as far as we can tell. We have yet to test the speakers. I don’t know about you but I like to view my pictures in silence.

There are lots of these frames hitting the market and prices will only fall. This one works perfectly, if you follow the above instructons and disregard the negative and ill-informed reviews on Amazon. A little effort and it works wonderfully.

I can’t wait for the 50″ model ….

This sort of thing will obsolete traditional museums as we know them. No more expensive trips to the Metropoltan or Uffizi, no more jet lag, no more crowds and no more wasted jet fuel. And just think of the money to be made tearing down all those archaic museums for replacement with some good old fashioned high rise condominiums.

Christmas Carols

It’s that time of the year

Our boy is busy practising his carols at the local church, so yours truly dropped by and snapped a few pictures. Here is one from today.


5D, 24-105mm at 105mm, 1/30th at f/4, ISO 1600

There was another photographer there using flash and a tripod, no less. How little did he know what he was missing! And the 5D still has two stops in reserve as it can be cranked up to ISO 3200, plus one stop of underexposure in this low contrast situation.

As usual I had to adjust the 5D’s poor auto white balance to take the yellow skin tones out, caused by the incandescent lighting.

2007 Best (and Worst) of the Year awards

No great new technology breakthroughs

If 2007 has been a disappointment on the hardware front for photographers it’s mostly owing to the lack of any new breakthrough technologies. Cameras added megapixels, generally for the worse, as too many on a small sensor means loss of sharpness. Imagine if one of those miniscule sensors in a consumer digital with, say, 10 mp, was translated to a full frame one. The typical 7mm x 5mm sensor is but one twenty-fourth of the area of a full frame one. So 10 mp would scale up to 240 mp on a full frame sensor! At that size, the pixels start to interfere with the wavelength of light and the result is that definition suffers. More is not always better.

Nikon finally added a full frame sensor in its D3 which is wonderful news for Nikon users, provided they have lenses to cover the full frame. Sony/Minolta and Panasonic seem to be getting ever more serious about their DSLRs and I would be delighted to see full frame digital cameras from both in 2008.

Except for the one issue of dust handling (and an LCD screen which is worthless in sunlight) I continue to be over-the-moon delighted with my Canon 5D and its pocket companion, the Panasonic Lumix LX1, with its glued on 28mm viewfinder. The latter awaits transplant to the DP1. Until the Sigma comes along, the Lumix is the modern Leica for this user. Smaller, quieter, cheaper than the M8 and with a great Leica lens, it does the job when the vast bulk of the 5D cannot be tolerated. I would expect the 5D to be replaced soon with a like body which adds dust removal for the sensor, like the other Canon DSLRs now boast. If you can live with the dust issue and don’t need 40″ x 60″ prints, the 5D looks to have a very long life indeed, especially in these times of rapid change.

My equipment has remained largely stable, with a few Canon primes added for good luck. Two of these bear comment. The 20mm – my second sample – is underwhelming in the extreme. Poor frame coverage wide open and with modest resolving power at best it’s an embarassment to a great maker of optics. Canon should dismantle any wide lens from Leica to see how it’s done. On the other hand, the 85mm f/1.8 Canon prime is every bit the equal of its predecessor in this household, the 90mm Apo Summicron-M Asph. At one tenth the price (yes, one tenth!) it’s the match of the German lens in every respect, adding auto focusing and aperture automation. A superb bargain. Plus if you drop it, you can get another for the price of filling up the gas tank in your SUV. Unlike the 24-105mm ‘dust pump‘ L zoom, the primes do not emulate a vacuum cleaner with the camera’s mirror box as collector.

For those with more sense than money, I recommend the Novoflex Magic Ball ball and socket head. New thinking, funky looks and very capable at a price which is a fraction of the ridiculous amount asked for those so-called ‘pro’ heads. After one year of solid use there’s nothing I would change.

If Sigma manages to pull its corporate finger out and give us the DP1 with a good, wide non-zoom, then any remaining reason for buying a Leica M8 goes away. The latter’s dated design, lack of focus automation and general bulk (what was small in 1954 when the M3 was introduced is now gargantuan), noisy shutter and poor quality control all around a crippled sensor which makes nonsense of your hyper-expensive ultra-wide M lenses, it really makes you wonder what they were thinking of at some $5,000 for a body without so much as a lens. If ever there was any doubt about my moving away from the M system, the M8 removed any remaining vestiges.

Printing continues merrily along with the Hewlett Packard DJ90. It seems to have been discontinued (though HP still lists it for $995 on its USA web site) but if you want big prints cheap, snap up a remaindered one. Far cheaper than the ones which replaced it albeit without the built-in spectrometer for matching print to screen. And the DJ90 uses dye-based inks, not pigments. I like dyes. The cheapest 18″ wide printer I can find comes from Canon at some $1900, so the DJ90 is an all time bargain.

My back-end for all of this continues to be the Apple Mac, albeit with a surprise change which saw sale of the iMac G5 in favor of a bottom-of-the-line MacBook. The Intel Core2Duo CPU is better and faster in every way, and a large, cheap 21.6″ Samsung widescreen makes things just so when processing pictures. Performance with Aperture is twice as fast – a very noticeable improvement. BUT, I have to report growing dissatisfaction with Apple. The Airport card in the MacBook failed in the first four weeks, only to be followed by intermittent (and very hard to diagnose) failure of the Apple 802.11n Extreme router. Both replaced at no charge, sure, but that’s a 100% failure rate on new Apple hadware acquired this year. Zero for three, Mr. iCon Jobs. Now the hold clicker on my iPhone earbuds has failed. Further, my initial caution about upgrading to Leopard was more than borne out with many reports of instability and incompatibility for an operating system which seems to be heavy on non-functional cosmetic glitz, comes with a criminally faulty back-up application (what could possibly be more important to get dead right?) and is simply not ready for prime time. I am sticking with OS Tiger until a few versions of the new cat have come and gone. Meanwhile, meet Leopard, the new Windows. (OK, nothing can be that bad, but I am miffed).

Back-ups continue to reside on external Lacie Firewire drives, controlled by SuperDuper! The latter’s value is greater than ever given Leopard’s shortcomings. Who would have thought it?

What of photographers? Among the great masters of the genre, I have greatly enjoyed getting to see again the work of Norman Parkinson and Guy Bourdin, fashion photographers and romantics both. Likewise, revisiting the austere classicism of those brothers under the skin, Hoyningen-Huene and Horst has been unalloyed pleasure. But maybe the greatest teacher this year has been Lord Clark in his Civilisation series which I bought mid-year. I last saw it 30 years ago. Clark opens our eyes to the Renaissance in such a cajoling, loving way that we can but learn from the old masters he so lovingly portrays. As photographers there are few better starting points for a visual journey. Finally, it would be churlish not to point out the work of Saul Leiter – an original if ever there was one.

But easily the most satisfying thing I did as a photographer in 2008 was to finally have my own one man show. That felt really good! Next time, though, I am getting a college student to mount, matt and frame the work. Life is too short to waste on this sort of thing.

And finally, this one’s easy. Gadget of the Year? It has to be the iPhone. A near perfect device out of the box, despite its revolutionary complexity under that elegant skin, it also happens to be a (not very good) camera. This is the future of mobile computing.

Vendor off the year, yet again, is the wonderful B&H. They always ship on time, when it say ‘In Stock’ on their web site it is and I’m awfully glad I am no longer a New York City resident when it comes to sales taxes. I had to exchange the first copy of my 20mm Canon f/2.8 lens (genuinely awful) for a second (pretty awful) and they gave me no grief about the process, which was handled expeditiously. Thank you, B&H. Runner-up? Not a photographic vendor, but I have been overwhelmed with the quality of support from that most reviled of vendors, AT&T. When I had an issue with consolidating my land line and cell accounts onto one monthly bill, AT&T said they would check back in a month to see all is well (sure, and I have a bridge in Brooklyn for you) and …. amazingly …. they actually did! And they didn’t even try to sell me anything when they called back. I did what any rational consumer of staples would do with a massive multi-quarter recession/depression facing profligate America. I bought the stock. For those of you who have spent the last century in a cave, the stock’s symbol is T.

Biggest disappointment of the year? Blurb’s lies about the quality of the paper used in their online books, which come printed on toilet paper rather than the 80lb material promised. Our culture may have institutionalized lying (politicians, doctors, lawyers, marketers, Wall Street, the military, etc., etc.) but that’s no reason to support liars with your money if you can help it.

Greatest irritation? Persistent spam ‘comments’ from morons predominately resident in Russia. None of these can get through, but will someone please bring back the Cold War?

Canon 5D – time to wait

A few months’ patience will save hundreds


It’s not hard to guess what the Mark II version of Canon’s 5D will be like. If the upgrades to the current pro (1D Mark III and 1Ds Mark III) and amateur (Digital Rebel, D40) models are any guide, expect to see sensor dust removal technology, a slightly faster frame rate and a 3” diagonal LCD screen replacing the current 2.5” one. Who knows, the new screen may even be readable in daylight.

Will the sensor be upgraded? Well, the full frame pro model (1Ds Mk III) migrated from 16.7 to 21.1 megapixels, so maybe the 5D Mark II gets an upgrade from 12.8 to 16.7? It really does not matter. First I think it’s unlikely as there is too much risk of cannibalization of the $7,000 top model compared with the $3,000 or so to be charged for the new 5D. Secondly, the 5D’s sensor is already recognized by many to be superior to the old 16.7 megapixel one in the 1Ds Mark II, so marketing may dictate the change, image quality does not. Canon’s sensors in their DSLRs are already so far ahead of the competition that incremental changes reflect the law of diminishing returns.

The point of all of this is simple. Today a new 5D (Mark I) body can be bought from a reputable retailer for $2,200. The used market sees mint bodies selling for $1,700, give or take $100. A 24% discount, say. Now I’m a huge fan of buying used as that means someone else has paid the depreciation for you and you save money at very low risk. If the new 5D comes out at something like the $3,000 I paid for my new Mark I (no used ones were available at the time), I can see the used market dropping another 10%, making a mint used ‘obsolete’ Mark I some $1,500, or half the price of a new Mark II.

“But there’s no warranty on a used product” you cry. Well, first read this then find a good mint used model. The odds are very much on your side. Remember, all insurance (e.g. warranties) is nothing more than a play on human gullibility and fear, the latter seldom supported by objective analysis.

If I’m right about the enhancements in the Mark II, unless you need dust removal or a larger (probably every bit as useless) LCD screen and those are worth $1,500 to you, have at it. I would suggest the better course of action is to wait 3-4 months and pick up a used mint Mark I for less than half the price of a new Mark II. The $1,500 can buy you two or three great primes from Canon which, I can assure you, are optically in a different class from the zooms, to say nothing of their compactness. Alternatively, you can blow the change on a few tankfulls of gas for your car ….

Back in May I wrote that a $2,500 budget couldn’t get you into a full frame DSLR kit. Well, that is no longer correct, which is great news. Your $2,500 gets you a mint used 5D body ($1,500, say, in a few months’ time), the ultra-wide 17-40mm L zoom (they are giving it away at $650 new) and the drop-dead fabulous 85mm f/1.8 portrait lens ($320). That’s $2,470.