Photographs, Photographers and Photography

August 31, 2008

Talent

Filed under: Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 9:54 am

You know it when you see it.

I was ruminating about our six year old boy the other evening. I was wondering whether he would be a good photographer. Which got me thinking about the broader issue of talent.

I suppose the word really means doing something well. While a liberal mind set dissociates that from material gain, a capitalist world dictates otherwise. Call me a philistine, but if you cannot make money from your art, you are not talented. Beause the best and highest use of talent is to make it public and make it worth paying for.

What?

The greatest pianist? No, not some unknown whom five guests at a country house weekend enjoyed a while back. Horowitz. A supreme performer and an avid self publicist. As famous as they get. The best of the best. Were there better? We will never know because if they hid their light under a bushel we would have never heard them. Or of them.

The greatest photographer? No, not some unknown who showed a print or two at a country house weekend enjoyed a while back. Cartier-Bresson. A rabid self publicist. As famous as they get. The best of the best. Were there better? We will never know because if they hid their light under a bushel we would have never seen their work. Or seen them.

The greatest singer? No, not some unknown who sung a song or two at a palatial mansion weekend enjoyed a while back. Callas. A voracious self publicist. As famous as they get. The best of the best. Were there better? We will never know because if they hid their light under a bushel we would have never heard them. Or seen them.

Well, you get the point. Without publicity there is no talent.

That’s not to say that you cannot succeed without a talent in your chosen avocation.

No one without a tin ear would ever claim that Madonna can sing worth a twig. Yet she is a superb businesswoman and very successful. Money is her talent.

No one who is not blind or deaf would ever claim that Streisand can sing or act. Yet she is a superb businesswoman. Money is her talent.

No one with any aesthetic sense would ever claim that Mick Jagger could sing or dance. Yet his raw sensuality negated all of that. Fame is his talent.

The difference between the first and last three examples is that Horowitz, HCB and Callas will survive their demise. The likes of Madonna, Streisand and Jagger will not. And let us be grateful for that. Because, for the long term, talent is survival, not money.


Talent personified. Cartier-Bresson by Hoyningen-Huene, 1935


Talent personified. Horowitz at Carnegie Hall


Talent personified. Callas

August 29, 2008

One more reason the press is dying

Filed under: Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 9:18 am

First, fire all the photographers.

How many times have you seen it?

A sleazy politician calls a congressional hearing to attack the innocent and deflect opinion from his wrongdoings. Sitting at those long tables in the hearing rooms, be it in DC, London or Paris, the other end of the room will be replete with photojournalists all banging away at a zillion frames a second. For a picture of a sleazy ‘law maker’.

A pharma-fueled sportsman, fresh off a string of victories, is mobbed by photojournalists, all banging away at two zillion frames a second (sports being more important to the average consumer than his country’s constitution). For a picture of a zonker who escaped detection. (For the record, I have no complaint about the use of undetectable drugs by athletes. All I ask is that the same chemicals be made available to all competitors to level the playing field).


Primal idiocy at work. $2mm of equipment and $20mm in costs for a mug shot.

Thus, given that the snap of the sleaze or the zonker could as easily have been taken by one photographer using an Instamatic, the first thing any rational newspaper owner should do is to simply fire all the photographers and myriad hangers-on employed by his newspaper. The picture, mundane as it is, need only be purchased for pennies from some wholesaler of this kind of tripe. Or just reuse last year’s. No one will know the difference and it would be an act consonant with journalistic ethics as we know them.

The second, of course, is to establish a credible, paid, web presence with focused advertising. Which is why well managed papers like the Wall Street Journal and Financial Times will survive whereas poorly run ones like The New York Times and The Washington Post are doomed. You are going to pay for their content, where opinion passes as reporting? No, I didn’t think so. The good writers at the NYT can move to Art Monthly and continue their fine work.

So, first, we fire all the photographers. The good ones will join cooperatives like Magnum, quality will rise and costs will fall. The bad ones will become paparazzi and will be subject to the rules of the jungle. One of their own creation. Or maybe they could get a job as a cop or security guard if all else fails.

August 28, 2008

Cheap scans

Filed under: Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 9:38 am

Archive those attic snaps.

The New York Pravda may well have its editorial head stuck where the sun never shines, but now and then they have a useful photography piece, such as this one (account needed) on scanning all those old snaps in brown paper bags in the attic.

The service they profile, ScanMyPhotos is inexpensive and worth looking into, the point being that all those memories in the shoebox in the attic are probably not backed up.

It seems to me that even digiphobes would appreciate that a scan of precious, decaying originals makes sense. Of course, you also need a back-up drive as your hard drive will fail sooner or later. Mercifully, digital storage is becoming insanely inexpensive. Some prefer to upload their scans to a file sharing service, though I fail to see why that should be any more secure (how do you know they back-up properly? Recall the recent fiasco with lost emails when Apple’s poorly debugged MobileMe debuted?)

August 27, 2008

Another 10 years?

Filed under: 5D — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:41 am

The law of diminishing returns kicks in.

A couple of years ago I wrote, with something approaching amazement, about the longevity of the Epson 1270 ink jet printer, dubbing it a Ten Year Digital Device. Indeed, that printer’s current owner will testify to the Epson’s longevity having just picked up a prize for one of his pictures printed on it. Sure, the nozzles clog if you don’t use it frequently and the inks fade in bright sun, but the quality of the prints cannot be disputed.


Canon 5D and friends. A ten year kit?

All of which prompts the question whether the Canon 5D has a similar life expectancy. Sure, it remains a current model and certainly it is not as fast or as slick as newer offerings from DSLR makers. It coasts along at a modest three frames/second, has no dust removal and lacks silly features like live previews. Now given that 3 fps is meaningless to me as I take one picture at a time and avoid sports photography, I can only question who really needs the insane framing rates available today, sports and fashion snappers apart? Live previews are a solution looking for a problem with DSLRs but, yes, dust removal from the sensor would be nice to have. But I can live without it, just as I learned to live with the 1270’s clogging nozzles.

Wear is not an issue for me. After 30 months with the 5D it reports that I am on frame 6,873. That figures to some 25,000 frames over ten years, well below the 100,000 life expectancy of the 5D’s shutter.

Definition is not an issue. The law of diminishing returns suggests that all those latest pixel-heavy sensors are running into noise issues, and that the modest 12.8 megapixels of the 5D make for a perfect compromise between definition and noise.

Sensor size is an issue. I like what I have. As I want my 20mm lens to be 20mm, not the 32mm that I would get with a cropped sensor, and I like the depth of field a standard lens offers on the big sensor, my alternatives are limited to full frame cameras of which there are but two from each of Nikon and Canon. It’s clear we will have more large sensor DSLRs (Sony is rumored to be releasing one soon) and choice is always a good thing but the bottom line is that the images from the 5D’s sensor are so crisp, noise free and well defined that trading for more pixels or a medium format sensor make no sense.

Build quality is fine, too. Doubtless the big Canon and Nikon offerings are tougher but I’m an amateur snapper, for heaven’s sake, and not a photojournalist in a war zone.

Lens choice is fine and will only get better. A really good 20mm would be nice, Canon’s wide primes being less than thrilling unless you get the ridiculously bulky and expensive ‘L’ variants. Unless Canon does something truly dumb – like changing the lens mount – I am set.

Dynamic range, the biggest bugaboo of digital cameras (as in they have too little), is something I have worked around. Under-expose 1/2-1 stop and bring things back as needed in Lightroom, and all is well. Further, there will have to be some serious breakthroughs in sensor technology before DSLRs start exhibiting enhanced dynamic range. So for now I watch the highlights and let the shadows look after themselves at the exposure stage. Much as in the Kodachrome days….

Given that digital was a joke ten years ago and has now plateaued at a level significantly higher than film, it’s foolish to try to predict what will be on offer ten years hence. That plateau was reached a few years back by the Canon 1Ds Mark I and the 5D. So until some shattering new technology comes along that offers the image quality of the 5D in a package half the size, weight and noise – and I’m not holding my breath – I’m going to stick my neck out and suggest that maybe the Canon 5D really is a ten year digital device. That’s assuming I am not completely gaga 7 years hence and can still lift a camera to eye level without wetting myself. No calling that one.

August 26, 2008

Large prints on canvas

Filed under: Printing — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:39 am

Up to 86″ a side!

I came across this site while looking for a large print service.

They certainly use the right printers and fade free inks as this excerpt from their FAQ states:

“What kind of equipment are you using to print on canvas?

Photogonia uses state of the art printers like HP DESIGNJET 5500 series and EPSON STYLUS PRO 9800. These large format printers deliver high quality print jobs that fit the high standards that Photogonia sets for our products.

What kind of Ink are you using?

PhotoGonia uses ONLY original factory Inks like HP 83 UV Ink Cartridges for our HP printers and 8-color Epson Ultra Chrome K3™ Ink For our Epson printers. PhotoGonia doesn’t use refills, third party Ink or generic Ink. ”

A 40″ x 30″ ‘gallery wrap’ canvas (the printed edges are stretched over the frame) is $322.50, shipped. Not cheap, but the alternative of buying an ultra-wide carriage printer for one or two prints a year is hardly a viable choice. For that matter, unless you regularly make large prints, this sort of service makes sense for any photographer limited by the 13″ carriage width common on home ink jet printers.

August 23, 2008

Real Chicago

Filed under: Book reviews — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:36 am

Book review.

One of the reasons I so like Chicago is that I have never had to visit it in the winter. Add the fact that is is the quintessential American city, has mid-west standards and values, not to mention America’s finest architecture, and you have a place well worth visiting. No one who has lived there could remotely think of New York, by contrast, as anything but a European city.

The title of this book says it all. Divided into decade chapters from the forties to the nineties, it comes as no surprise that the best work here is in the first two chapters. When you realize that five frames per second is discounted as slow in the world of modern DSLRs, think about the working stiff with his Crown Graphic and a couple of film holders. He generally had but one chance to capture the decisive moment, and you see lots of that in this book. Something about these old pictures speaks differently, too. Maybe its their dignity, grace and composition. They move you in the way modern photojournalism seldom does.

My remaindered copy cost all of $15 and I recommend you add this book to your photo library.

And if you think I have glossed over the decades of machine politics and corruption in America’s second city well, I learned everything I ever needed about Chicago’s law enforcement from the succinct words of the humorist P. G. Wodehouse. “At least when you buy a Chicago cop, they stay bought”. Honor and integrity. Got to love that in your local police force.

You can see my library of photography books by clicking here.

For a fabulous evocation of what the city must have been like in the early post war years, click here.

August 22, 2008

Ring flash

Filed under: Technique — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:50 am

An awful lot to like.

The ring flash I have been using on the 5D with the 100mm Canon macro lens is proving to be a real joy. It’s pretty much set and forget. All I do is adjust ISO to procure an f/11 aperture with the camera on shutter priority and 1/200th (the fastest sync speed) and the circuitry in the flash takes care of balancing natural and artificial light. In use I simply leave the flash switched on all day – battery drain is only significant when recharging as opposed to maintaing a charged state. My current set of four alkaline AA batteries has lasted for some 16 hours and two hundred or so snaps, and shows no sign of dying.

F/11? That, I find, gives the best balance of definition and depth of field. Smaller apertures introduce diffraction and definition begins to fall – that’s physics, not Canon. Wider apertures at close distances result in very shallow depth of field – appropriate for plane, perpendicular surfaces only. ISO seems to end up in the range 100 to 400, which is the sweet spot for the 5D’s sensor. Nice!

Reflections of the tube in the ring flash can be an issue – though the sort seen here just enhances the sense of curves.

Occasionally, with reflective subjects, you get a nasty image of the flash tube reflected in the subject, like so:


Note reflections from the sun and the ring flash

I do not know whether the enhanced localised processing controls in Lightroom 2.0 could fix this – I”m still on 1.4.x and await 2.1, presumably suitably debugged. In the meanwhile, it’s back to that old dog Photoshop (Lightroom has a direct export and save function) and a few seconds with the Magic Eraser:


After using the Magic Eraser in PS CS2

That’s more like it. French Racing Blue never looked better. The wide brimmed individual on the left is none other than famed racing driver and backdrop man, Franklin Rudolph.

August 21, 2008

The King

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 10:07 am

No, not Elvis.


Sensuous curves on the car driven by the greatest ever. 2002 F1 Ferrari. 5D, 100mm Macro, Ring Flash.

No sport enjoys such a rapid pace of technological change as motor racing so comparisons of drivers between generations is a pleasant diversion if not one based in objective measurements.

But few, I think, would disagree that Michael Schumacher was the greatest ever – sportsman, gamesman, competitor, professional.

One color works here – what else for a Ferrari?

August 20, 2008

Machismo

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:51 am

It doesn’t get more macho than this.


Suspension detail on a pre-war Alfa Romeo racer. 5D, 100mm macro, ring flash, 1/200, f/11, ISO250.

My normal habit of underexposing by half a stop does wonders in preserving the dynamic range in the printed version. This has an almost Fritz Lang-like mechanistic intensity which greatly appeals to some part of my nature. The curves of the bodywork are easy on the eyes, too.

I find that f/11 gives you workable depth of field and the best definition. Smaller apertures do not show the Canon 100mm macro at its best. I simply change the ISO until f/11 is indicated.

August 19, 2008

Canon 1Ds Mark III

Filed under: Cameras — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:36 am

The poor man’s medium format digital.

The English site DP Review has an exhaustive test of Canon’s top of the line full frame digital camera, the 1Ds Mark III, reflecting no fewer than eight months’ use. What is surprising in their conclusions is that they compare the images to ones taken on a medium format digital sensor. I have long maintained that my 5D easily equals medium format film results, so despite its $8,000 price tag, the big Canon body remains a bargain when you look at the cost of medium format digital bodies, with their bulk, slow speed of use and limited lens ranges.

Do I have any interest in one? No. Total overkill for me and why would I want to spend all that money when I routinely make large prints (18″ x 24″ is my idea of ‘large’) from the 5D? I can easily print from half the frame at that size – equivalent to a 36″ x 24″ print from the full frame – with negligible quality loss. And I don’t mean from just the ‘best’ snaps – pretty much from every frame.

On a related note, the review suggests that sensor noise is now beginning to rise with pixel density – the far less dense 5D sensor is more than a match when it comes to absence of grain. Maybe there are new breakthroughs around the corner but it’s hard to change the laws of physics.

August 18, 2008

Monocolor

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:05 am

The thinking man’s Monochrome.


1920s Bugatti racer, with safety wire. 5D, 100mm Macro, Ring Flash.

No need to hide behind the forced abstractions of monochrome when color does it better. Just imagine how unspeakably dull this would be in black and white.

This small version cannot begin to do justice to the large print hanging on my garage wall. Only minimal processing (regular sharpening to offset the effect of the 5D’s anti-aliasing filter) was required, using Lightroom.

August 17, 2008

Bring your own …. drop cloth!

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:01 am

Cleaning up the clutter.

After my first serious venture into the world of macro pictures of vintage car details one persistent irritant was the clutter many snaps exhibited in the background.

So before venturing forth a second time, the occasion being the Monterey Historic Races, I dropped by that acme of capitalism and low prices, WalMart, and asked the nice lady in the haberdashery department for a couple of pieces of non-reflective cloth in black and red. These would serve as backdrops to clean up the clutter. I thought about getting some green for British cars but concluded that my love was closer to the Mediterranean than the English Channel, so plain black and Ferrari red seemed more in order.

Now a back drop is useless without a drop cloth manager, so I prevailed on friend and vintage racer Franklin Rudolph to accompany me on the two hour drive to Laguna Seca. This had several advantages. First, as I find driving the ultimate time sink and Franklin likes little else, he got to drive the car and I read the Wall Street Journal. Second, few know more of vintage racers than my colleague, so I had the best possible tour guide to the paddock area, replete with dozens of $5mm toys. If the arcana of 1954 Maseratis are your thing, Franklin is the man. Finally, Franklin not only helped with spotting interesting shapes and forms, he volunteered to be the back drop man, holding up the cloth or placing it under the cars as we saw best.

A win-win. He gets two 18″ x 24″ prints of his choice for his superb workshop and I get the best possible professional help on the planet.


Leaf springs on a vintage racer, red back drop in place

On the way home, going south on the 101 Freeway, we cut a two hour trip to what was seemingly a few minutes as we gazed with appreciation on the dozens of exotics making their way north from Los Angeles for the Historics while simultaneously keeping a careful eye out for cops writing speeding tickets, to finance their early retirement at the local doughnut store. Franklin’s choice was a gorgeous Dino with a V6, mine a late 50s tourer with a real Ferrari V12 in the front, where they belong.

Thank you, Franklin, for your friendship and easy expertise. Not to mention your back drop skills!

August 16, 2008

Just add lightness

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:20 am

Lotus was not the first.

Ask any graduate of UC London’s School of Mechanical Engineering which alumnus they are most proud of and the answer is likely to be Colin Chapman of Lotus Cars fame. Chapman’s pioneering designs resulted in many victories in all forms of motor racing but most notably in the most demanding of all, Formula One.

When asked about his key design tenets, Chapman would answer “Just add lightness”.


1930s Alfa racer at the Laguna Seca Historics, 2008

As this pre-war Alfa Romeo grand prix racer’s suspension shows, he was not the first to have that idea.

What makes our former adulation of great engineers and designers so poignant today is that the US, desperately in need of engineering talent, makes it increasingly difficult to enter the profession. Domestic production of engineering graduates is stymied by the childlike attention spans and instant gratification generated by TV, populism and computer games. We prefer to encourage our kids to become pop stars, actors or sportsmen – all fields of endeavor with miniscule prospects for success. Or worse – we make fine brains into the mush that passes for lawyers, a business (it’s no more a profession than prostitution) that has done more to hurt US productivity and destroy wealth than even the government could. At the same time we place foolish cartels on immigration because we (rightly) fear that we cannot compete with Ivan, Lee or Yamamoto. Capitalism is truly hanging itself with its own rope.

August 15, 2008

Beauty

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:02 am

From the 2008 Monterey Historic Races.

Back from the days when drivers were fat and tires were thin.


Late 1930s Talbot-Lago filler cap

The annual Historic races held at the Laguna Seca track in Monterey County, California, provide an orgy of viewing of some of the finest cars made. Insiders know that the race track is lousy for viewing and that all the real action is in the paddock. Further, go on the Thursday before the race weekend and you will not only get in free, you will also avoid the polyester set with its foul clothing and even worse taste. (N.B. For the best parking spot tell the fellow at the entrance that your are “pit crew”. Works every time.)

Instead, in a friendly and unrushed setting, you can chat with the drivers and mechanics and exult in the beauty of what once was.


Leather belt drive for the tachometer on a late 1920s Bugatti. Note the simple tensioner.

The charming owner of this Bugatti explained that the leather belt is actually a sandwich of leather with a Teflon ‘filler’. It looks fine and, unlike the original, lasts. Note the beautifully executed, diamond machined, firewall.


Door handle on a pre-war Delage. Pure, unabashed sensuality.

And forget all that rot about beauty being in the eye of the beholder. It’s absolute. You either get it or not.

I use the 5D with the 100mm macro for these, with a shadowless ring flash, which preserves the original shadows cast by the sun while dampening down the otherwise excessive dynamic range. If there is a better hand-held macro outfit with the certainty of sharp, large prints, I do not know of one.

August 13, 2008

Charles Miller

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 9:12 am

Woe is me!

A friend sent me this link to Charles Miller’s site, or just click on the bio below.

Simply stated, it’s the sort of work which reminds me never to waste any time on wild animal photography.

August 11, 2008

Wealth

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:06 am

A fabulous photograph.

I blew by this one on my first glance through this month’s pile of fashion magazines and am awfully glad to have revisited it.

Lord & Taylor is a clothing and knick knack store for the wealthy. If you want to see the best Christmas windows in New York you need go no farther than Cartier, Saks or Lord & Taylor, all conveniently close by on Fifth Avenue. By the way, when it comes to Christmas windows, we west coast recluses marvel at Saks’s in Union Square in San Francisco, a city with much of New York’s charm and diversity but little of its nastiness.

First and foremost, this complex composition, worthy of Rembrandt’s Night Watch, speaks of success. A large, well dressed family, preparing for a barbeque. Obviously this is the weekend place.

The silver haired paterfamilias, fit and tanned, is very much in charge, strengthening his position of control by taking on the menial cooking chores. He’s old world, of course, so no stainless steel multi-knobbed built in barbie for this man. So gauche. No. It’s charcoal and an old Weber grill, and who could argue? It’s the ultimate condescension of the wealthy – use what the working man does. It’s real – look at the smoke trails in front of the preppie boys.

The massive cantilevered arms must support a very large awning. The affluent have large patios which need large awnings.

He seems to have three sons, the two who finished prep school and are now at Yale and Princeton, the eldest very aware of his film star looks, and then the third, in the hoodie. He went to UC Santa Cruz, did too much surfing and too many drugs, started a rock band and is the real success of his generation. He’s making music on the bass with his niece on the trumpet. Rich people play instruments.

The mother (Lauren Hutton?) is messing about with the pony (doesn’t everyone have a pony?) and the animal is the focus of attention for her daughter and grandchild on the right. Rich people have animals. Big animals.

The number of kids is hard to fathom. I’m reckoning the girl at top left was a surprise fourth child for the old couple. Rich people can afford it. That still leaves seven kids to account for, so either the last generation was Catholic, or someone else’s kids got into the party. It just adds to the fascination of the picture.

Finally, the almost too precious arrangement of vegetables by the Weber makes another subtle reference to wealth. Clearly these are for show, not consumption. The rich love show pieces, be they veggies or china.

Note also the Degas-like cut off of the child at the lower left and that insanely mischievous look of the little boy front center. What a piece of choreography! All told there are fourteen people in the picture …. and one pony. Mercifully, the art director and photographer left out the obligatory dumb-as-a-brick golden retriever. A Border Terrier would have been nice, but I suppose that’s too much to ask. The rich own Border Terriers.

The inspired choreography, the subtle and oft repeated message (if you have to ask you cannot afford it), the warm colors reminiscent of the great party scenes of Renoir, the rustic setting, the simple classy clothes worn with grace.

Advertising does not get more subliminal than this. Not only does the viewer get gently invited to the world of wealth, he gets an object lesson in deportment and behavior just by gazing at the guests. Would I change anything? Well, I would likely give the old boy a stiff G&T in a nice L&T crystal tumbler. Easy on the ice. When it dawns on the old boy how much of his inherited capital he has just blown on nice clothing, he will need a restorer.

What a photograph! Bravo!

Boy, do I wish I could speak to the photographer who took this.

P.S. The edge tears are in the original; the center ones are mine as I had to rip out the two page spread to scan and join the images.

August 9, 2008

Leni Riefenstahl

Filed under: Hall of Shame — Thomas Pindelski @ 3:30 pm

To know her work is to understand.

Few would dispute that the greatest movie about the Olympics is Olympia, Leni Riefenstahl’s 1936 masterpiece chronicling the Aryan master race in the 1936 Olympics. It shows perfect specimens of the nordic man-god ideal variously chucking the discus, running like a gazelle (albeit slower than the schwartzer untermensch Jesse Owens), and generally being, well, white and superior. Sure it’s dated (whitey is unlikely to win much of anything in the modern sham known as the Olympic Games) but the photography is superb.

The movie follows on from one far greater, perhaps the most evil film ever made, Triumph of the Will. Watch it with an open mind and you, too, will be swept up in the cleverly managed tension which builds throughout the movie until her slightly less than Aryan leader finally makes his appearance for the 1934 Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg. The style is one of a succession of still images rather than that of a movie. Between Riefenstahl’s adulation of this bad man and the Propaganda Ministry’s financing, she produced the greatest fake documentary yet made. I was forcibly struck by just how plagiarized her work has become in watching the old version of Spartacus with Kirk Douglas and just about any of the tedious Star Wars epics from Geroge Lucas (a man who has never met an actor he can direct). Look at any of the crowd scenes of the armies of bad guys from either director and you have a shameless rip off of the best/worst in Riefenstahl’s propaganda masterpiece. Look at the post war The Third Man and you have all her camera angles writ large by director Carol Reed. She left an indelible mark on the documentary genre.


Hitler’s favorite film maker supervises filming

Sure.

She was just following orders.

They should have whacked her at Nuremberg – where could have been more appropriate? – along with all the others in 1946, and have saved the world another 50 plus years of her denials and apologia. Her total absence of shame rightly confines her to this journal’s Hall of Shame.

August 8, 2008

The last time the Olympics were relevant

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:19 am

How about Berlin, 1936?


The Master Race gets a taste of the future

August 6, 2008

Worth a thousand words

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 1:20 pm

From the despots in China.

God help all those marathon runners. Let’s hope their undetectable performance enhancing drugs carry the day for sports and Big Pharma.

What a cruel joke to hold an event meant to send a message of freedom in a brutal dictatorship with drug-fuelled ‘athletes’ breathing foul air.

This picture truly is worth a thousand words.

August 3, 2008

NYC Architecture – some snaps

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:26 am

Rounding out the Manhattan thing.

Here are some snaps of New York architecture, taken over the years.


Guggenheim Museum, Fifth Avenue


Old and new


MoMA


SoHo


Park Avenue


The Look building reflected in the Helmsley Palace


Sixth Avenue

A fine primer on architectural style is How to Read Buildings – if you want to regale friend with the differences between an architrave and a muntin, this one is for you.

Here’s another worth checking out if Art Deco is your thing:


Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress