http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/09/10/not-in-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/ This journal discusses photography in all its guises with an emphasis on the art of making photographs. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:57:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/09/10/not-in-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-27127 Tom Aellis Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:30:14 +0000 http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/09/10/not-in-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/#comment-27127 I wish I could push a button and have everyone stop asking and thinking about Megapixel Count and begin asking about the Dynamic Range. Does the community still believe that they will witness a difference between their 16x20's of a 16meg and 21meg Bodies? To be frank, for most of our needs anything above 8meg is a waste and it's all about the dynamic range. Watch, soon most will "get it" and ask only that. I wish I could push a button and have everyone stop asking and thinking about Megapixel Count and begin asking about the Dynamic Range. Does the community still believe that they will witness a difference between their 16×20′s of a 16meg and 21meg Bodies? To be frank, for most of our needs anything above 8meg is a waste and it’s all about the dynamic range. Watch, soon most will “get it” and ask only that.

]]> http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/09/10/not-in-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-27123 Alastair Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:40:15 +0000 http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/09/10/not-in-the-canon-5d-mark-ii/#comment-27123 Not that the rumour mills are always to be trusted, but a couple of them state that Canon has arranged a press conference on the 17th to make some 'important announcement'. Either way, 17th or the 23rd, I guess we'll know before too long! Not that the rumour mills are always to be trusted, but a couple of them state that Canon has arranged a press conference on the 17th to make some ‘important announcement’. Either way, 17th or the 23rd, I guess we’ll know before too long!

]]>