<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20 snaps = 1 gigabyte</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/22/20-snaps-1-gigabyte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/22/20-snaps-1-gigabyte/</link>
	<description>This journal discusses photography in all its guises with an emphasis on the art of making photographs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiernan OToole</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/22/20-snaps-1-gigabyte/comment-page-1/#comment-28756</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiernan OToole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/22/20-snaps-1-gigabyte/#comment-28756</guid>
		<description>Right, so 50mb an image is mad, but that 22mb for the 5D MKII is also quite crazy. that means on a 4Gb card, where my old 350D would take nearly 600 RAW images, i am now limited to just 190 (ish). i have just ordered my 5D MKII.... think i need even more memory cards now too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, so 50mb an image is mad, but that 22mb for the 5D MKII is also quite crazy. that means on a 4Gb card, where my old 350D would take nearly 600 RAW images, i am now limited to just 190 (ish). i have just ordered my 5D MKII&#8230;. think i need even more memory cards now too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

