Photographs, Photographers and Photography

July 31, 2009

Dorothea Lange

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:47 am

A Depression era icon

I have finally set to right the inexcusable omission of a monograph on Dorothea Lange from my library.

Where Walker Evans mostly photographed things, Lange photographed people. And her pictures always seem to get to the emotional heart of her subjects and the horrors of the Great Depression.

The monograph, titled ‘Dorothea Lange: Photographs of a Lifetime’, is a splendid review of her work, covering the period 1932-59 and, as with all monographs published by Aperture, is of the highest quality.

It’s overpriced new, but my used copy came from Strand Books for under $40. That’s another bookseller which should be in every photographer’s address book.

In the photographer’s words:

“You force yourself to watch and wait. You accept all the discomfort and the disharmony. Being out of your depth is a very uncomfortable thing …. You force yourself onto strange streets, among strangers. It may be very hot. It may be painfully cold. It may be sandy and windy and you say “What am I doing here? What drives me to do this hard thing?”

The book relates the story of how she came to take her most famous picture, that of the migrant mother in Nipomo, CA. The story is so incredible that I will not retell it here and suggest, instead, that you buy this book to read all about it.

If you want to see the depredations visited upon this great nation by stunningly incompetent administrations of both parties, aided and abetted by a seemingly uncaring and callous Federal Reserve, you need go no further than Lange’s great humanism, as displayed in her pictures.

July 30, 2009

John Gutmann

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:18 am

Those who deny history are doomed to repeat it

A newly elected US president of patrician education and with sophisticated communication skills has just replaced one who destroyed more wealth than all his predecessors combined. The new wunderkind immediately sets to dramatically increasing the length of a catastrophic depression by increasing tariffs on trade and immigration and destroying business confidence by capricious fiscal policies and increased taxation to go along with his populist platform.

2009?

How about 1929?

It was to the disastrous fiscal policies of the FDR presidency that a fleeing John Gutmann resorted, pursued by the Master Race which sought nothing but ill for non-Aryans. To put this in perspective, imagine thinking that 1933 America – Gutmann’s choice as a refugee from Germany – was the best possible place to be! Which, I suppose, puts in context what he left behind. On a much smaller scale I am reminded of coming to America from England in 1977 and thinking that the then current US administration was actually not so bad compared to the catastrophe I had left behind.

Unlike his compatriots who mostly settled in New York, Gutmann made San Francisco his home and I only recently learned of his photography after seeing a sample in the splendid book, Capturing Light, which now graces my bookshelves.

It did not take long to add a monograph on Gutmann’s work, entitled ‘Culture Shock’. Here is the cover picture:

Gutmann started life as an art student in ’20s Berlin, that fertile melting pot for artistic talent at the time, but fascist control of the media and arts by 1933 made his position untenable, so he left for America, purchasing the newly introduced Rolleiflex just a month before leaving. His imagery built on his expressionist and surrealist leanings and is most reminiscent, to this viewer, of the work of Martin Munkácsi and Alexander Rodchenko. As the essay introducing the book states, “To Gutmann’s eye …. everything in America was exotic and strange”. I know the feeling.

While it’s out of print, my pristine example of ‘Culture Shock’ was obtained for very little at Powell’s Books which anyone interested in the visual arts should have in his bookmarks. Highly recommended if you enjoy an unusual vision strongly applied to everyday life.

July 29, 2009

Olympus EP-1 …. woof!

Filed under: Cameras — Thomas Pindelski @ 4:02 pm

A real dog

Coming from David Pogue, the New York Times’s technology writer with a knack for making the technical understandable, is a review of the new Olympus EP-1.



Click the picture for the review

Well, sorry to say, the camera is an awful disappointment, and an expensive one at that. No viewfinder, horribly slow focusing (Panasonic refused to share its superbly fast focus technology from the G1 with Olympus) and, yes, you guessed it, miserable shutter lag. Hard to understand why anyone would waste the development budget on a camera which, while adding interchangeable lenses to a small body, otherwise does absolutely nothing to conquer the three bugbears of compact point-and-shoots.

An LCD screen passing as a ‘viewfinder’, slow focus and shutter lag.

And, at $800, considerably more than the G1 which, for a little more bulk, has none of these problems.

A real dog.

And thank you, Mr. Pogue, for pulling no punches.

Where is the genius of the company that gave us the stunningly original Pen F half frame SLR or the ‘better mousetrap’ of the Olympus OM1 full frame film SLR under designer Maitani?

July 28, 2009

The G1 kit lens

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:01 am

In a word, impressive

I continue to be mightily impressed by the kit lens which comes with the Panasonic G1. At 14-45mm (28-90mm full frame equivalent) it has a most useful range of focal lengths and while the maximum aperture of f/3.5, falling to f/5.6 at the long end, is nothing to write home about, the lens is a fine performer. Back in the days of film, the Leica M street snapper found himself carrying 35, 50 and 90mm lenses for a similar focal length range. Swapping these was no fun, though the offset was that they were 2-3 stops faster in a very compact size. And the lenses were as good, if no better, than the kit lens supplied with the Panny.

Witness this snap taken at the crack of dawn.


G1, kit lens at 37mm, 1/50, f/5.6 iISO at 500

It’s a picture which discloses two things. First, the Electronic Viewfinder in the G1 renders an early dawn scene as if it was bright daylight, making composition incredibly easy, even if it makes pre-visualization of the final picture difficult.

Second, check out the near total absence of halation (light halos around bright objects) in this enlarged view.

Finally, there’s only minor chromatic aberration (red fringing in this case) to speak of in this very high contrast, challenging subject.

That’s no mean performance from an inexpensive zoom loaded with plastic components. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that many of the ‘glasses’ in the lens are made of plastic. Who cares? It’s the results that count. And this is at full aperture for the 37mm focal length used.

It’s also just visible in this snap that the limiting factor in definition is grain (sensor noise), not lens definition. At 500 ISO things begin to deteriorate as image size grows. The larger image above is consonant with a 30″ x 45″ print, so it’s not like I’m complaining. On the other hand, had this been taken on the Canon 5D, the fine detail, such as the print in the menu on the wall, would have been easily resolved whereas it’s lost in grain here. And, whether you like it or not, if you make big prints viewers will invariably stick their noses in them.

For film aficionados, the ‘grain’ is much finer than that delivered by, say, TriX film. It’s comparable to a medium speed black and white emulsion like FP5 or to Kodachrome 64 in color slide film. So those extolling the wonderful definition of Leica M lenses at f/2 should pause. What use is great definition if your sensor – be it film or silicon – cannot resolve the detail?

All in all – decent sensor, great kit lens – it’s not a bad compromise given how diminutive the G1 is. Absent the usual sharpening on import of the RAW image into Lightroom 2.4 (Amount=100, Radius=1.1), the image is completely unprocessed. And Panny will only improve things, based on their recent rate of progress.

July 25, 2009

Runner

Filed under: G1/G2, Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 10:20 am

iISO does its thing

The iISO function in the Panasonic G1 (”intelligent ISO”), according to the wretched instruction manual which ships with this otherwise fine camera, does the following: “The ISO sensitivity is adjusted according to the movement of the subject and the brightness”. (Page 79). I use this setting in my default setup for street snaps.

Here the CPU in the camera elected 1/500 second to freeze the running boy and an enlarged view in Lightroom confirms that his shirt is, indeed, tack sharp.


Runner. iISO, Panasonic G1

It’s a two edged sword, however. If you want movement blur, it has to be switched off or, much better, simply set the large mechanical mode dial on top to Shutter Priority, in which case iISO is switched off, though that fact is buried in a footnote in the instruction book. As I wrote earlier, Panny must have had some real live photographers involved in the design of this fine camera. Too bad they weren’t involved in the writing of the manual.

A note on AE lock: You can elect whether the ‘AF/AE Lock’ button on the top rear of the body locks focus, exposure or both, much as you can on the Canon 5D, my other ’serious’ camera (though the G1 is to the 5D as a Ferrari is to a Mack truck). In both bodies I have set the button to lock exposure only, as focus can be locked with a first pressure on the release button of either.

Canon does this right. The AE lock lasts for some 10 seconds – ample time to recompose and take the snap.

The G1 gets it wrong. You have to keep the button depressed to maintain exposure lock until you press the button. That makes for some strange contortions of the hand.

The alternative in the G1 is to enable ‘AF/AE Lock Hold’, a separate choice in the Custom menu, but they got that completely wrong. Yes, it does lock exposure (and/or focus depending how you set ‘AF/AE Lock’) but the camera’s settings remain locked to your exposure even after the shutter is released. You can only unlock things by again depressing the button on the back of the camera. If you opt for a minimal viewfinder display as I do, you don’t know that your exposure is still locked until you notice a super bright or dim screen when making the next picture. You then scramble to unlock things only to find that your subject has gone ….

What Panny should do is change the firmware so that, with ‘AF/AE Lock Hold’ enabled, the lock is released after the exposure is taken. Let’s hope they change this, as selective exposure reading is a useful tool with dynamic range-challenged digital sensors.

July 24, 2009

Sometimes it does matter

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 12:47 am

Not all posing is right

There’s an interesting article in a recent issue of The Guardian on whether Robert Capa faked the famous snap of the Spanish revolutionary soldier at the moment of death:


Click the picture to read the article

If you click the above there’s an excellent audio commentary with many great Capa pictures – and pictures of Capa – which is worth spending a few minutes on.

I wrote in a light tone on the subject of whether posing a seemingly candid snap made any difference here, and feel it is only appropriate to add that, in this case, it probably does make a difference. If it’s unposed, this is a great piece of photojounralism; if posed, it’s an attempt to manipulate opinion to the photographer’s political leanings. Not good, as the picture was clearly presented as reportage not opinion – not something any of the candids in my earlier piece could be accused of.

July 22, 2009

Yummy!

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:20 am

A kid does his thing


G1, kit lens at 21mm, 1/125, f/4.5, ISO 100

Snapped in the Inner Sunset district of San Francisco. A small adjustment with the Fill Light slider in LR2 brought up the diners in the restaurant.

July 21, 2009

Capturing Light

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:41 am

Book review

This wonderful survey of California photography from daguerrotypes to the present served as the catalog for an exhibition at the Oakland Museum of California’s exhibition ‘Masterpieces of California Photography, 1850 to the Present’ and is edited by its photography curator Drew Heath Johnson.

With many, many fine reproductions and several quite splendid essays it’s a superb introduction to California photography in a large format.

When I tell you that remiandered or lightly used copies are to be found on the web and that mine cost all of $11 shipped, what are you waiting for?

As Edward Weston cheekily said, “Everything worth photographing is in California”.

July 20, 2009

We are on to you!

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:15 am

The truth is told

This splendid depression era picture by John Gutmann says it all.

Among the inscriptions on the car is one which says: “Yes, Columbus did discover America. We have discovered the international bankers have taken it away from us.”

Probably taken in San Francisco’s Mission District.

July 19, 2009

Women Photographers

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:49 am

A questionable categorization

I came across a book named ‘Women Photographers’ the other day and couldn’t but wonder at the arrogance of the title. To in some way suggest that gender distinction was worthy of a book simply raised my hackles. A good photograph is just that. A good photograph. To try to ladle distinction on a subset of the species just because it happens to include pictures made solely by women seems specious.

But it did get me thinking, I confess. Click on ‘Photography Books’ in the right hand column and you will see what’s currently in my library. I see monographs on Barbara Morgan, Germaine Krull, Joyce Tenneson, Imogen Cunningham, Ilse Bing, Margaret Bourke-White, Mary Ellen Mark, Regina Relang and Tina Modotti. Yet not a one of these was bought because the photographer was a woman. They were bought for the simple reason that the photography was special and unique.

Strangely I seem not to have anything by Dorothea Lange, so here’s a reminder of what she did and a mental note to fix that omission at the earliest occasion.


Migrant Mother. The most famous Depression era picture

Lange snapped this in Nipomo, CA, just a few miles south of the old estate. Lange was a great photographer who just happened to be a woman.

July 18, 2009

Getting greedy

Filed under: G1/G2, Photography — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:01 am

What the future holds

If I am right that Panasonic will be surprised about the number of pros and serious snappers buying their G1 as a second camera, then they are thinking very hard right now how to further poach on Canon’s and Nikon’s up-market turf.

Look at how they have got to where they are.

First, they link up with Leica to design lenses for their point-and-shoots. Instant credibility with rich old guys and journalists, though ‘credibility’ and ‘journalist’ probably make no sense used in one sentence. They download Leica’s intellectual property on traditional lens design, then move on. It’s no accident that the word ‘Leica’ is notable for its absence from the splendid kit lens on the G1. Leica is on record as saying that they disapprove of software correction of optical defects (these guys would be a shoo-in at the Pentagon with that sort of intellectual firepower) and Panny, of course, knows better. They simply fix what ails the very compact 14-45mm kit zoom at the back end. The result is a near total absence of the two bugaboos of the Leica lens on my LX-1 – barrel distortion at the wide end and chromatic aberration everywhere. It’s the Software, Stupid.

Second. they make a few trial runs at Electronic View Finders which are better forgotten – like the one in the Lumix L1 – using full size, clunky and heavy Leica lenses. They realize that their state-of-the-art technology in their professional movie cameras is the answer, so they invent micro four-thirds and incorporate that EVF technology into the next two designs, the G1 and the GH1 (a G1 with video added). Now they have a great finder system, no mirror and no prism required.

Third, they state that the G1 is positioned for the upgrade amateur market. Last I checked, the Japanese are not stupid, and I do not necessarily buy that spin. On reflection, it seems to me that the G1 is as much a Trojan Horse as the original two door Honda Insight with its small 3 cylinder engine was to the car business. I know, because my wife owned one until the two seats in that 70mpg wonder proved inadequate when our son came along. The Insight, a rolling test bed sold at a loss and proved the viability of a hybrid battery/internal combustion power plant as much as the G1 will convert skeptical advanced photographers to EVFs.

Fourth …. what is fourth? I don’t think that needs much of a crystal ball, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Panny already had working prototypes. Remember how they said they were retaining the prism hump in the G1 to make users feel comfortable? After all, all the ‘prosumer’ DSLRs from the competition come with one and if you are Johnny Come Lately to the game, you might as well start out by looking like the competition before you change the world. Remember also how Panny said that they could have made the G1 significantly smaller but decided not to? Partly because, I suspect, big equals good for the American consumer and partly because you can only make the body so small before it becomes hard to handle. The G1 is at the cusp on that point. So they can make the G1 a little larger, drop that dumb pentaprism hump and make it with a full frame sensor. Add credit card sized, long life flat batteries along the lines of the ones used in the latest Apple notebook computers and convert all those dated Leica full frame lens designs to lighter, smaller, aberration loaded variants with software taking out the defects and you have a shot straight at the big Canons and Nikons. (I suppose I should add Sony, but they are not really a player in the pro leagues, innovation having seemingly deserted the company). Only Canon, Samsung and Sony have the capital to compete and both Canon and Sony have access to high quality EVFs in their professional video cameras used extensively by the news media. So, I suppose it really boils down to Canon being the target as I see Nikon pretty much dead on the vine for lack of capital. Camera design as it is played today dictates that capital is king.

Imagine that new camera. With one body, a 1,000 exposure battery and maybe two or three IS lenses – 14-28mm, 28-90mm and 90-400mm, the lot weighing maybe 4 lbs., with a 7 fps exposure rate and an even better, faster EVF than the one found in the G1. A world beater. And who cares if the lenses say Leica on the front or not? Based on my early experience with the kit lens in the G1, Panasonic have got modern lens design down cold.

I am getting greedy, it’s true. Greed, as always, has a price.


Burger king. G1, kit lens @ 14mm, 1/640, f/4.5, ISO 100

I’m hoping the X1 full frame Panny with an EVF will be a tad slimmer.

A note on the manufacturing location of the G1: As with many new products designed by the Japanese, early production is in Japan by local workers. Eventually this frequently changes to China, Taiwan or some other place with lower quality standards – just like with Hondas and Toyotas. Both the body and lens in my G1 kit say “Made in Japan” so I would encourage you to look for those labels if you are a buyer. After all, you no more want a Chinese made G1 than you want an American made Honda.

July 17, 2009

Snap!

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:14 am

At the local coffee shop


G1, kit lens at 45mm, 1/60, f/9, ISO 400, RAW original

Well, I confess that in situations like these, the G1’s LCD rotated for waist level use is just like using that old Rolleiflex, except that the image is no longer reversed and the whole thing is far less obtrusive. Plus, of course, you had to wait for Kodak to process your Kodachrome film, back when it was still available in 120 size.

I simply set the G1 to Auto ISO and let its brain, far superior to mine, do its thing. The light on the subject’s skin is simply lovely.

By the way, I had my netbook with me and the place has wifi. That little computer has an SDHC card slot and runs LR2 just fine, so this piece was completed within about five minutes of taking the snap.

July 16, 2009

Panasonic G1 grain

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:09 am

Not at all bad

To read the whole series on the Panasonic G1, click here

Here’s a snap from a puppet show my son attended the other day. The puppeteer is explaining how he works his magic:


G1, kit lens at 45mm, 1/40, f/5.6, ISO 1250

The sensor was cranked up to ISO 1250 in the poor incandescent indoor lighting, and the lens was at its maximum aperture, fully extended, at f/5.6.

Now here’s a section of that same picture which would make a 28″ x 42″ print – a size hardly anyone is going to print at:


Section of the above

All in all, not at all bad. I’m using firmware version 1.3, the current release and Auto White Balance. IS shake reduction does its job here, the only blur visible being motion blur. The Electronic Viewfinder just shines in this sort of situation, where it seems far more comfortable than outdoors in bright light.

Here, by contrast, is a similar presentation at ISO 100 from yesterday’s piece:


G1, kit lens @ 16mm, 1/80, f/4.5, ISO 100


Section of the above

No grain to speak of.

If big prints are your thing (by ‘big’ I mean the shortest dimension is at least 18″) then the G1 will not disappoint up to ISO 400. After that, fine detail begins to disappear – this is no Canon 5D, whose sensor is almost four times the area of the G1’s. The 5D’s sensor remains the standard to judge by in the digital domain. Some say the 5D Mark II is even better, but absent a broad consensus on this point it makes no difference for other than chart-on-a-lab-wall fiends. Beats me why anyone spends time on this sort of nonsense. I should add that I have not used the 5D Mark II.

An 18″ x 27″ print is an 18x enlargement for the 5D but a 34x ratio for the smaller sensor in the Panasonic G1. If I want super fine detail in large prints at high ISOs, the 5D is the camera to use. Horses for courses.

July 15, 2009

The Panasonic G1 – Part VIII

Filed under: G1/G2, Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:01 am

Some field tests

To read the whole series on the Panasonic G1, click here

The ProStrap for the GI finally arrived.


ProStrap fitted to the Panasonic G1

No more excuses for deferring a proper outing for the camera so after attaching the strap I set out for the big city, spare (and very small) Panny battery in my Levis. The strap really does nothing for the handling of the camera which is a good thing. The right hand finger and thumb grip on the body are properly engineered for a secure grip and the left hand cradles the lens from below in traditional fashion. What this little strap confers is enhanced peace of mind that you are not about to drop the camera, and it’s far more functional for my intended use than a shoulder strap emblazoned with the manufacturer’s name.

Before setting out I did a little more checking of the confusing instruction book and made a couple more changes to the settings.

First I switched on AF+MF. This means that when you have locked focus with a first pressure on the shutter button, you can still make manual focus changes with the collar in the lens. When turned this renders the enlarged view in the EVF for fine changes in focus. A quick press and re-press of the shutter button then restores the full image with the focus locked on the new setting. Very clever.

i.Exposure was also turned on – this provides for automatic adjustment of contrast if the contrast range is too high for the sensor to handle. A tacit acknowledgment by Panasonic that things are not yet perfect with digital sensors.

Then I turned on i.ISO. If the subject is moving the ISO is adjusted upward automatically for a faster shutter speed. The electronics can do this as the live sensor video feed continuously measures movement blur. I had already limited the maximum ISO to 800 to mitigate grain/noise as described yesterday so it will be interesting to see how this works out in practice.

Bottom line? I should have things set just so for a very responsive …. point-and-shoot.

The major criticism to be leveled at Panasonic so far is that they have done such a poor job of the instruction manual. Multiple cross references, a near-useless index and a rote recitation of each menu choice and control function. What is needed is an approach which focuses on the user, not the camera. A section for street snappers, a section for the sports crowd, a section for landscape photographers and so on. How can a company making a multi-million dollar investment in wonderfully executed new technologies pay so little attention to the ergonomics of a user manual?

  • The camera is a sweetheart to carry around. Small, quiet, unobtrusive and very fast.
  • I have to learn to avoid depressing the front control wheel to avoid putting it into exposure compensation mode.
  • 2/3rds of a stop underexposure is just perfect for avoiding blown out highlights, with Lightroom’s Fill Light slider doing the rest
  • Based on my knowledge of what my Canon 5D’s sensor will do, any one of these will easily print razor sharp at 18″ x 24″
  • Grain is noticeable at higher ISOs but not obtrusive
  • The lens is simply wonderful. Minimal barrel distortion at the wide end, none elsewhere. Maybe this is Adobe Camera Raw doing software tricks in Lightroom 2.4 to fix things. Who cares? It works. Try saying that about barrel distortion with the Canon 24-105mm ‘L’. Further, there’s no chromatic aberration to speak of. A remarkable piece of optical + software design.

This camera may be the answer for many, like this fan of the magnificent M2 and M3 bodies, looking for that elusive replacement for the Leica M rangefinder.

Simply stated, Panasonic’s G1 is a keeper. I believe it marks a seismic change in quality camera design which will have the competition scrambling to keep up.

July 14, 2009

The Panasonic G1 – Part VII

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:03 am

A few more tweaks and dynamic range considerations

To read the whole series on the Panasonic G1, click here

A reader mentioned that maximum ISO could be limited and, indeed, I found it in Page 4 of the Rec Menu (v1.3 firmware) under ‘ISO Limit Set’. I set this to ISO 800 as the sensor, being a good deal smaller than the one in Canon’s 5D, begins to show noise earlier and 800 is about as fast as I ever need. At 18mm x 13.5mm the sensor’s area is but 28% the size of the 5D’s, although a lot larger than the 8.5mm x 4.78mm homunculus in the LX-1. So the marketers amongst you would doubtless point out that the G1’s sensor is no less than 498% larger than the one in the LX-1. There are, as Mark Twain (Disraeli for British readers) reminds us, only three kinds of numbers – lies, damned lies and statistics. You can go to Wall Street or to camera makers for the first two. The reality is that this particular statistic just goes to show how Lilliputian the LX-1’s sensor is, not how large the one in the G1 happens to be.

For HDR fans (or for digital sensor skeptics), I note that there is a wonderful range of auto-bracketing available for successive exposures – especially useful given the sensor’s proclivity to burn out highlights. You can have 3, 5 or 7 (!) pictures in either 1/3 or 2/3 stop intervals. A very helpful graphic illustrates the spacing of your choice. Unless you like to really overdo things, I think you may find that 3 pictures at 2/3 stops is ideal. The sequence of recording of bracketed exposures can also be set between center/under/over and under/center/over, the latter being my preference.

The self timer, smartly set with a top plate switch rather than with some horrid LCD menu driven approach, is really thought out, too. You can choose a 10 second delay with one picture, the same with three pictures, with about a second between each, or a short two second delay. The red light on the top right of the G1 flashes while the self timer is running. The two second delay would seem ideal for tripod work with long lenses, especially those without IS, as it will let vibrations settle if no remote release is handy.

I confess that I find the engineering of the depth of field preview (the lower left button on the rear which doubles as the delete button in preview mode) simply magic. Magic that is only possible with an EVF camera. Depress the button for depth of field preview and that’s exactly what you get except that the screen does not dim. The software adjusts the screen brightness to compensate and, yes, you do get some EVF noise when stopped all the way down, but have you every tried making anything out on a screen using this technique with a conventional SLR viewfinder or, worse, with a large format camera and screen? If the noise bothers you, it’s easy to opt for preview on the LCD screen where there is none. Simply magic.

For Leica M2 and late M3 aficionados reading this, you will know that those Ms had a unique and effective depth of field ‘preview’ function. Notches extended in the central rangefinder rectangle allowed you to focus such that the overlap of the (non-) coincident images fell within these notches. The wider top notch would have everything in focus at f/16 with a 50mm lens, the lower one at f/5.6. That’s all you really needed, no preview was needed (or possible, obviously) and Leitz did such a truly lousy job of explaining this wonderful feature that it was discontinued with the M4 and all later bodies. Shame, I loved it. But what you get with the G1 is better – the first time I have seen non-dimming d-o-f preview in a camera, workable at any aperture. Once the Panny macro lens becomes available this feature will really sing. For that matter, you will be able to preview d-o-f on your attached 42″ LCD monitor in the studio, without any dimming, owing to the video feed provided on the G1 …. a seismic change in camera design. Add wider aperture lenses and this will become even more useful.

At the 45mm end of the kit lens’s range, focus seems to go down to one-third life size which is hardly limiting for the sort of thing I have in mind.

Boy, they must have had some real live photographers involved in the design. I simply cannot help thinking that Panny will be surprised at the sort of photographer who opts for the G1. They have stated that the G1 is targeted at the point-and-shoot user who is looking to upgrade. I think that’s a stretch – going from a $150 snapper to a $700 one is a big jump. On the other hand, Leica made, what, over one million M film rangefinder cameras and I’ll bet that at least 10% of those users are: a) Still alive, and b) Mightily disillusioned with the lack of a modern digital alternative to these masterpieces of times past. Those users have either been using a 5D for the full frame experience (and the related carpal tunnel and bad back symptoms) or been making do with a small sensor DSLR with a simply horrid viewfinder and a noisy, flapping mirror with the attendant bulky pentaprism. This camera will see a lot of those users (including Yours Truly) choosing a G1 as their daily snapper of choice.

Dynamic range: From a purely subjective standpoint (which is all I pretty much care about) the dynamic range of the G1’s sensor is inferior to that of the Canon 5D’s – I would guess by at least a stop or so. The following snap of a lovely Greek Orthodox cupola proves the point.


G1, kit lens @ 45mm, 1/1000, f/9, ISO250, 1 1/3 stops under exposed

I used the ‘click and turn’ front wheel to set 1 1/3 stops underexposure in the EVF and used ‘pattern metering’ which averages the overall exposure. A very simple operation. Alternatively, I could just as easily have taken a light reading from the overcast sky using spot metering in this very high dynamic range subject. Using average exposure measurement with no adjustment would have blown out the sky, past the point of recovery. When processing in Lightroom 2.4, I simply cranked up the fill light slider to bring detail back to the leaves framing the cupola, thus:


Fill light used to recover shadow detail

It is far easier to expose for the highlights and adjust the shadows; trying the reverse generally increases grain and seldom does a good job on the highlights, in my experience. So this is an important caveat for G1 users – take care to meter on the right thing and err on the side of underexposure.

Here’s a snap of my G1 Army and Navy white supremacist belt pouch into which I simply chuck the camera. It’s nice using a body with no attached straps. At $12 it’s neither ideal nor expensive, though I have found it poses some interesting challenges when you do your thing in the men’s room! A dirt cheap 8gB SDHC card ($20) is included for scale – the latter may not be very fast but the G1 handles it just fine.


Army and Navy special

The last thing you want in this world is a camera bag emblazoned with the word ‘Nikon’ or ‘Canon’ or ‘Tenba’ et al. Can you spell ‘Steal Me’? For that matter, much the same goes for the camera:


Stealth G1, Blue Tape Special

I have enough tape for about 750 G1s so I’m not about to run out ….

July 13, 2009

The Panasonic G1 – Part VI

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 5:57 am

Some more snaps

To read the whole series on the Panasonic G1, click here


Derelict. G1, 14-45mm @ 14mm, 1/100, f/9, ISO 250, RAW image processed in LR 2.4


Macho dog. G1, 14-45mm @ 36mm, 1/640, f/9, ISO 250, RAW image processed in LR 2.4


Beautiful family. G1, 14-45mm @ 33mm, 1/250, f/8, ISO 250, RAW image processed in LR 2.4

Some early idea of what the G1 can do. I dropped by the local Army & Navy store, filled with ex-Marines reliving fun times in Basra and Fallujah, and picked up a belt bag (excuse me, ammunition holder) for the G1 from the Chinese (!) proprietor. It’s a second’s work to whip it out, switch on and snap. I have found it best to switch the camera off when stuffing it in the bag, as buttons are all to easily depressed, messing up my default settings if it’s left on. As the G1 comes to life instantly once switched on it’s no big deal – just a habit to learn and easily done as the camera is removed from the belt bag. My wrist strap has yet to arrive and I’m not missing it, using the G1 strapless. I’m certainly not about to fit the shoulder strap with that awful ‘Lumix’ embroidered logo. The right hand finger grip and thumb pad on the top right rear are engineered perfectly.

One warning – the G1’s sensor is more prone to blowing out highlights than the 5D’s so a little under-exposure is no bad thing:


Detail is just holding in the street lamp’s globe here – after a tweak in LR 2.4

Of course, the lens everyone is waiting for and something to drool about:


The rumored Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 ‘Pancake’ lens for the G1

Let’s hope Panny gets with the program on this long delayed optic. And if that does not wet your appetite, there’s also a 45mm f/2.8 Macro with IS rumored to be coming some day.

July 12, 2009

Fortune lauds Kodachrome

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:28 pm

A fitting tribute

While it’s the very last place to go for objective investment advice – unless you are a ‘pump and dump’ broker (aren’t they all?) – Fortune magazine has championed great photography over the years and has published a fitting tribute to Kodachrome on its web site.

This picture by Walker Evans, a rare color effort, says everything you need to know about capitalism. Heavy steel with a mendicant living under the bridge. Click the picture for more.


Walker Evans and American steel

The Panasonic G1 – Part V

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:32 am

Firmware upgrade and other housekeeping

To read the whole series on the Panasonic G1, click here

Panasonic’s G1 has the ability to upgrade both camera and lens firmware (built in software) separately. To date only firmware upgrades have been issued and can be found here. I dutifully downloaded v1.3, copied it to a freshly formatted SD card, inserted a fully charged battery in the camera, switched on and pressed Play (the button in the circle of the arrow quadrant) . The upgrade took all of 2 minutes.


English as she is wrote – firmware upgrade in progress

Once installed I went into the Setup menu and adjusted the viewfinder display to maximum brightness (vertical arrow) and the contrast to the contrasty end of the slider (right arrow). Then a touch of the Display button on the rear switched the adjuster to color – a new function conferred by firmware v1.3. The default neutral setting was slightly bluish. I moved the slider all but one click to the left – warmer. This emulates the slightly warm look I so liked in the M2’s range/viewfinder – mine was a 1961 model. (The M3 – mine was a 1960 model – was, by contrast, slightly too blue for my taste). The blown out look referred to in Part IV is still there on very bright highlights but substantially mitigated. I can live with it.

Manual Focus: In Firmware v1.0 (as shipped) switching the top left dial to manual focus and turning the focus collar on the lens would switch to a magnified image making focusing very easy using the EVF. However, after 10 seconds, the camera would switch back to full screen view. In v1.3 I can confirm that the magnified view no longer switches off, only reverting to full screen when the shutter release button is touched. That’s as it should be and Panasonic should be commended for the change.

Matrix focus: Ugh! The 23 area focus computer displays multiple green rectangles purportedly reporting what it has focused on and I see no way of switching those off. Plus, how the heck does it know what I want to focus on? So I switched to the center rectangle for focusing and now only see one green rectangle. This can be placed over the critical area for focus and a first pressure maintained on the shutter release pending recomposition and exposure.

Autofocus and Autoexposure lock: As with my 5D, I like the AF/AE lock button on the rear to lock exposure only; a first ‘press and hold’ on the shutter release serves to lock focus on off center subjects. This requires two adjustments in the Custom Menu. First you have to switch the software to tell the AF/AE button to lock exposure (AE) only. Then, one step down in the same menu you have to enable AF/AE Lock – meaning that you do not have to maintain pressure on the AF/AE button to keep the exposure locked. AE lock is, I find, very useful with digital sensors which are prone to blow out highlights. A second pressure on the AF/AE button toggles the AE function on and off. Nice.

Auto exposure: For now I am sticking with multi-metering, rather than center weighted or spot, as it seems to work pretty well.

The Q.Menu button: Given the vast number of menus and the time it takes to get through them – they largely defeat my addled memory – I have tried to make things as menu-independent as possible. Still, there are times you want to change, say, the aspect ratio or ISO – and Panasonic has been awfully clever here. Once again, bear in mind that I really dislike LED screens and prefer not to use mine, opting for the EVF. Well, if you press the Q.Menu (Quick Menu) button on top, you can scroll through the most common settings with the front-mounted scroll wheel. Press the wheel and scrolling further changes the variable you have chosen. First, by doing this in the EVF you can actually see what you are doing, regardless of the light. Second, the action is so quick and easy one can but applaud Panny for this thinking. It begins to occur to me that they actually had some photographers involved in the design stages. Indeed, someone at Panasonic has realized that humans prefer knobs, switches and buttons to pick-and-choose screen selections. Many of the most commonly accessed controls are on dials or switches. Even when a button has to be pressed, the next step invariably involves the front mounted wheel. Someone at Panny can spell ‘ergonomics‘. Those ‘reviewers’ who have criticized the design for the space wasted by the top left focusing mode knob (single, continuous or manual focus) just don’t get it.

Some more thoughts on the EVF: The Electronic Viewfinder is the crux of the G1 and points the way to future designs. As with LCD displays, this miniature ‘TV screen’ will only become cheaper and better, with yet faster refresh rates to remove the last vestiges of blurring as the camera is moved. As it stands, the continuous video output of the G1’s EVF can be routed to a display of your choice using the HDMI socket, meaning that the studio photographer will be able to preview composition, lighting and exposure and instantly review the resulting picture once taken. Imagine an inexpensive 32″ or 42″ LCD monitor in the studio as the ultimate feedforward and feedback device! The mind boggles at the possibilities, and I can’t wait to get my studio flash and big screen connected to try this. Aftermarket remote wireless strobe flash triggers, like the one I use on my 5D, are not yet listed on eFraud, but it’s only a matter of time. Wireless remote shutter releases are already being sold. So for now it will have to be a wired connection to the Novatron studio flash with the G1.

July 11, 2009

The Panasonic G1 – Part IV

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:52 am

First impressions – at last

To read the whole series on the Panasonic G1, click here

The fact that it has taken me three articles to get to the point where I finally try the G1 either confirms that I am a hopeless windbag or discloses how much hope I have for this revolutionary camera. Because I am convinced once electronic viewfinders are done right, the flapping mirror with its attendant vibration plus the heavy and bulky glass pentaprism will be a thing of the past.

If you read on, you will find an unconflicted user opinion – no advertising, no click-through dollars. There are far easier ways of making money and this is my hobby, not my livelihood. What you will find is highly opinionated writing which, let’s face it, is why you come here in the first place.

My goal is simple. I want a digital Leica M without the ridiculous cost and limitations of the M8 which, erroneously in my opinion, has tried to shoehorn 21st century technology into a 1950s body and design.

First impressions are important and my touchstone for comparison is the Leica M2 which, I contend, was the greatest rangefinder camera ever made. Small, fast, superb optics, quiet and unobtrusive, it was never equalled by any subsequent M Leica. Later models added confusing framelines, build quality fell off a cliff, the rangefinder design was compromised rendering it useless for into-the-light photographs, the TTL light meter could only be adjusted at eye level (what were they thinking of?) until the fully auto-exposure M7 came along, and the whole thing went ballistic in price. The Leica M, in other words, had gone from tool to fetish. After 35 years with an M2 and M3 – years which put me in the ‘can use it blindfold’ category and yes, that includes loading film – I really do not need to hear from anyone that I do not know what I am talking about. If you believe that, don’t bother writing and go elsewhere right now.


Same dog, smaller box. Bert awaits the formal opening of the G1

The camera ships with an uncharged battery, which is frustrating as it’s dead without one, but an hour in the charger fixes that. Like everything about this camera, the battery is very small. An hour which is usefully spent with the massive. printed instruction book as the PDF download is frustratingly missing many key pages. I completely blew it on sizing the belt pouch by the way – I bought the Domke F-903 – which is far too small. I shall penitently request a refund from the fine people at B&H.

Once the battery was in the first steps were to get rid of the clutter. This is a street snapper after all.

  • Switch off the LCD and keep it ‘face in’
  • Switch off the focus confirmation beep – goodness gracious, who needs this?
  • Switch recording to 3:2 – Leica format. 4:3 is simply too square for me.
  • Switch off all that ‘face detection’ garbage – I know what I’m pointing the camera at
  • Switch to Aperture Priority – my preferred setting
  • Switch off ‘auto ISO’ and set ISO to 250 – it’s a nice compromise setting for me
  • Switch off all the EVF menus – all I want to see is the picture – I managed to get it down to just the A/S indicator (Aperture or Shutter priority), aperture, shutter speed and +/- below the picture frame in the viewfinder. Too bad Panny did not add the remaining picture count. To see that and to get all the other nonsense, a touch on the Display button toggles information overload on and off. The limited display I have opted for is only the third in-viewfinder display which I have found readable – the first two being on the Leicaflex SL (shutter speeds only) and the Pentax ME Super
  • Recording is set to RAW + high quality JPG
  • Autofocus is set to 23 point matrix, whatever the hell that means. If it’s no good I will try one of the alternatives.
  • Focus Priority in the Custom Menu is set Off – the shutter will release regardless of whether the scene is in focus
  • The lens cap was discarded together with the gargantuan lens hood and replaced with a B+W 52mm UV filter for protection
  • All the complex menus are visible both through the EVF and on the LCD so, in really bright sun, you don’t suffer the frustration (try this with the 5D) of having to find a shaded spot to make changes. Just use the EVF. Pretty special, if you ask me.
  • The next one is very special. Surely the single greatest feature of the M2 was the 0.72x magnification viewfinder. The finder frame would appear projected onto the subject – full sun or coal cellar, it made no difference. And the rangefinder rectangle was just as bright and focus simplicity itself. Well, the G1 does not show anything outside the picture taking area, though it is 0.7x in magnification. But its design provides that, when the light is poor, the image is automatically brightened so even in poor light it remains bright. Sure, it gets a bit grainy through the EVF but it is simply illuminated. Magic. This is the sort of thing no conventional mirror+prism DSLR can do

Here are my immediate impressions after inserting the battery and a Sandisk Extreme III 1 gB SD card (that’s a fast, if small, card) with the 14-45mm kit lens fitted:

  • Really small and light
  • The blue color is very classy and unobtrusive and blue tape on the markings further improves things. I paid for the camera and do not propose to be an unpaid advertiser
  • Rubber covering gives an excellent feel, not the divine sensuality of the textured rubber on the M2, but close
  • Not so small that my large hands interfere with operation
  • Thank goodness for the eyepiece diopter adjuster – it has a large range and I can set it just so
  • I wear glasses and have no difficulty seeing the whole screen through the EVF
  • Zoom ring on the lens feels OK – could be smoother. That’s what happens when you trade Leitz’s beautiful, low friction, heavy brass helicoids for plastic with stepper motors
  • Switch-on is instant
  • The EVF illuminates instantly when the camera is raised to the eye, courtesy of the eyepiece proximity sensor
  • The front control wheel is a little strangely placed but something I can get used to. In aperture or shutter priority it is used to adjust the aperture and shutter speed. Depress it toward you and the function toggles to under/over exposure adjustment – wonderful thinking by the designers!
  • The EVF looks great indoors but a little blown out outdoors – something I need to adjust
  • EVF blurring with motion is insignificant and the definition is absolutely, bloody wonderful. There are slight moiré patterns visible in the EVF with textured subjects but I do not find the effect particularly objectionable.
  • Autofocus is instantaneous – feels like the 5D in that regard
  • Shutter response is almost equal to the Leica M2 – and as there’s no need to set focus, the overall responsiveness is superior
  • READ THAT AGAIN. Shutter response is almost equal to the Leica M2
  • The shutter is marginally louder than the M2’s – little in it. A huge feature for me. As I have learned with the LX-1, complete silence is not a good thing – you are never sure if you have pressed the button. Will the shutter’s noise embarras you or draw undue attention? No.
  • The viewfinder screen blackout after pressing the shutter release is very noticeable, but I’ll trade that for the shutter response any day
  • To avoid 2-3 second delays between snaps, I switched Auto Review to Off, thus making snap-to-snap times very short. 2 or maybe more a second seems feasible. The picture review is projected on both the EVF and the LCD and is simply unacceptable and, for me, quite unnecessary. You are hardly going to stop to review pictures on the run, after all. The camera will still be writing out the first file to the SD card while you are taking the second picture, but the EVF remains available during this process – and I’m talking about taking RAW + HQ JPGs (10.5 + 4-5.5 mB)
  • With the top left dial set to Manual Focus, turning the focus collar on the lens immediately magnifies the image for a very usable full area focus screen as seen through the EVF. Is it as good as the microprism in the Leicaflex SL? No. Nothing is. But it’s close.

A few words about processing RAW files.

I store Import settings in Lightroom 2 for my various cameras – currently the 5D and LX-1. So into LR2, Develop->New Preset with the following tentative settings:

This is a high level of sharpening but entirely appropriate. Panasonic, thank goodness, like Canon with the 5D, have used a very weak anti-aliasing filter (corrects ‘jaggies’). This leaves the user to make sharpening adjustments and gives maximum flexibility. The above settings were determined after looking at imported RAW files 1:1 on my 24″ iMac’s screen.

As for in the field operability and picture quality, that will have to wait for the next installment. Here’s an early grab shot.


At the florist. G1, 14-45mm @ 18mm, 1/40, f/7.1, ISO 320, 16:9 RAW original processed in LR2

And another:


At the library. G1, 14-45mm @ 16mm, 1/25, f/7.1, ISO 320, 16:9 RAW original processed in LR2

Meanwhile I am optimistic. Panasonic, along with Sony, Canon and Samsung (Pentax), is one of the very few companies with the capital and electronics know how to create an essentially new camera for the twenty-first century. A small, quiet, fast SLR (or whatever you choose to call it) with a large sensor and with compact interchangeable lenses at a very reasonable price. The Electronic View Finder is the future and you can have it now in the G1, perhaps the first really usable execution in a consumer priced camera. Durablity? Who cares? You can get ten of these for one M8 and the only viable alternative is Panasonic’s GH1 which, while adding a movie mode for a few hundred dollars more, is otherwise identical.

Firmware: My G1 shipped with v1.0; Panny just announced v1.3 details here. Installation simply involves copying the firmware download to a freshly formatted SD card and starting the camera with a fully charged battery. Be aware that v1.3 prevents the use of aftermarket batteries. For me the most useful changes are in v1.1 – adjustment of the EVF/LCD color cast is permitted and the enlarged view in Manual Focus mode no longer switches off after a time out.

July 10, 2009

The Panasonic G1 – Part III

Filed under: G1/G2 — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:02 am

A cornucopia of lens choices

To read the whole series on the Panasonic G1, click here

If you want compact optics on the G1 then your only choice right now appears to be the lenses Panny specifically designed for the body. So far (double everything for 35mm equivalents) the 14-45mm kit and 45-200mm meet that description. Both have IS so just imagine that super compact long zoom at 200mm (400mm) – hand held! Others allegedly in the pipeline include the 20mm f/1.7 Pancake (yes please!) and a rather exotic and costly 14-140mm super zoom. Let’s hope Panny adds a macro once they realize the target audience is far broader than they envisaged. Olympus lenses for their Digital Pen will fit but – I’m not sure of this – may have some limitations. The Panny lenses have two more electrical contacts on their rear so there must be some sort of difference.

Now before Panny came up with the ‘micro four thirds’ body, they first issued a ‘four thirds’ one – meaning larger and heavier, as are the lenses. Olympus did likewise. That format always struck me as a waste of capital investment. All of those ‘four thirds’ lenses will fit using a custom adapter and, once again, I suspect there are some limitations when it comes to function. Leica also makes a few lenses in the four thirds format, though they do look pretty bulky to me. Maybe someone could enlighten me?

But it really does not stop there and, of course, this long time aficionado of glass which says Leitz Wetzlar (back in the days these lenses were hand made by Germans of the old generation) on the bezel is rather thrilled to note that adapters exist to mount your Leica screw or M rangefinder lenses on the G1. This is possible owing to the very slim body in the G1, meaning that the short flange-to-film dimension of those great M lenses is not so short as to prevent infinity focus on the G1. Plus, you get to use the EVF and its magnifier facility for accurate focusing.

Now, before we get too carried away, there’s the focal length doubling to take into account. That translates into Leica M wides being a waste of money if the kit zoom which comes with the G1 is any good. After all, why pay the enormous premium for a 21mm Asph Elmarit which can cover a 24×36mm frame when you end up with a rather uninspiring 42mm fixed focal length lens of modest f/2.8 aperture?

However things get a little different if you really want fast long lenses. How about a 90mm Summicron with an effective length of 180mm? A 180mm f/2, that is? Or that fabulous 180mm Apo Telyt R (this fits the Leicaflex, but there’s also an adapter for Leicaflex lenses available) for a ne plus ultra 360mm f/3.4?

So far, nosing around the web, I have spotted the following adapters:

  • Leica M (and LTM with a screw to bayonet adapter added)
  • Leica R/Leicaflex
  • M42 Pentax thread
  • Canon FD
  • Canon EOS – but without electronic controls so full aperture use only
  • C mount (movie camera lenses)
  • Contax/Yashica
  • Exakta (remember those?)
  • Hasselblad (no kidding)
  • Nikon F
  • Minolta
  • Olympus OM – some nice glass there
  • Olympus Pen – from the F/FT half-frame wonders of yore
  • Pentax 645
  • Pentax 6×7
  • Rollei 35mm
  • Zeiss Contarex (wow!)

So it’s not as if the G1 is lost for choice if you are into older optics! I’m hopeful that a Canon EOS adapter with aperture control (this is all electronic, so some circuitry will have to be added) is not too far away. The thought of my 400mm f/5.6 Canon ‘L’ on the little Panny amuses me no end.

Here, from an eTheft vendor, is one of my favorites:


G1 with the Leitz Canada 90mm Tele Elmarit

I used on of these sweet little Tele Elmarits for ages on my M2, M3 and M6 (the less said about the latter, the better) and simply loved it. The Ontario, Canada factory was equal to Wetzlar when it came to quality control as this lens, my 90mm Summicron-R and the 180mm Apo Telyt-R attest.

Well, the camera finally arrived last night but, as with Pandora’s Box, I’m letting it sit a while to heighten the fun of the moment when I open everything. I was always a sucker for Christmas, regardless of the time of year. Hard to believe that three and a half wonderful years with the contents of that box have passed. The Canon 5D was a quantum leap in camera technology and remains superb in just about every way. The G1 has a lot to live up to.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress