<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Mighty Mouse replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/22/a-mighty-mouse-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/22/a-mighty-mouse-replacement/</link>
	<description>This journal discusses photography in all its guises with an emphasis on the art of making photographs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:42:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/22/a-mighty-mouse-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-45012</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5615#comment-45012</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s very interesting. My wireless mouse has laid idle, gathering dust, for some time. I use a chunky old Logitech MX900 via BT and it&#039;s ok, but showing its (considerable) age. I too like the side buttons but in considering the Magic Mouse I felt it just wasn&#039;t going to cut it, the swiping movement on a mouse that&#039;s already difficult to hold, no side buttons - no way. I shall give the 6000 a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very interesting. My wireless mouse has laid idle, gathering dust, for some time. I use a chunky old Logitech MX900 via BT and it&#8217;s ok, but showing its (considerable) age. I too like the side buttons but in considering the Magic Mouse I felt it just wasn&#8217;t going to cut it, the swiping movement on a mouse that&#8217;s already difficult to hold, no side buttons &#8211; no way. I shall give the 6000 a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Pindelski</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/22/a-mighty-mouse-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-45008</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5615#comment-45008</guid>
		<description>Jonathan - fine, but the Logitech seems to be missing the side buttons which I find so useful for jumping to the desktop - something I do a lot as I&#039;m visually oriented and generally include pictures with my content, be it blog or email.  The Douglas Adams aphorism strikes me as spot on.  Good point on the scarcity of USB sockets on (Apple) laptops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan &#8211; fine, but the Logitech seems to be missing the side buttons which I find so useful for jumping to the desktop &#8211; something I do a lot as I&#8217;m visually oriented and generally include pictures with my content, be it blog or email.  The Douglas Adams aphorism strikes me as spot on.  Good point on the scarcity of USB sockets on (Apple) laptops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Pletschke</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/22/a-mighty-mouse-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-45006</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Pletschke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5615#comment-45006</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I looked at the Apple offerings and they simply looked like &quot;every expense had been spared to give the impression that none had been spared... &quot; (Douglas Adams). I went with the &lt;a href=http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Bluetooth-Cordless-Laser-Notebooks/dp/B000UY3NR8/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1264528650&amp;sr=8-1-fkmr0 target=_blank rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Logitech BT Laser Travel Mouse&lt;/a&gt; device @ 40% of the Mighty Mouse price and considering the MAC Book Pro 15&#039; has only two USB ports the need for an additional USB dongle was a &#039;luxury, bloody luxury&#039;. The look and feel is excellent and build quality is fit to purpose. MAC OSX picked the thing up with no problems and the Logitech driver is configurable via System Preferences - it also works well sans driver although the driver offers additional config settings. The scroll wheel is excellent and configurable. Pick-up isn&#039;t as instantaneous as you describe but that&#039;s a BT thing. I&#039;ve used it for about a year now (OSX Tiger and Snow Leopard). Battery life is just shy of 8 months on 2 AA Alkaline batteries with daily use.
Regrds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I looked at the Apple offerings and they simply looked like &#8220;every expense had been spared to give the impression that none had been spared&#8230; &#8221; (Douglas Adams). I went with the <a href=http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Bluetooth-Cordless-Laser-Notebooks/dp/B000UY3NR8/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1264528650&#038;sr=8-1-fkmr0 target=_blank rel="nofollow">Logitech BT Laser Travel Mouse</a> device @ 40% of the Mighty Mouse price and considering the MAC Book Pro 15&#8242; has only two USB ports the need for an additional USB dongle was a &#8216;luxury, bloody luxury&#8217;. The look and feel is excellent and build quality is fit to purpose. MAC OSX picked the thing up with no problems and the Logitech driver is configurable via System Preferences &#8211; it also works well sans driver although the driver offers additional config settings. The scroll wheel is excellent and configurable. Pick-up isn&#8217;t as instantaneous as you describe but that&#8217;s a BT thing. I&#8217;ve used it for about a year now (OSX Tiger and Snow Leopard). Battery life is just shy of 8 months on 2 AA Alkaline batteries with daily use.<br />
Regrds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
