SX-70

The invention of an American genius.

This wonderful advertisement for Edwin Land’s Polaroid SX-70 instant camera is thrilling to watch.

Click to play. Refresh browser if not visible.

Almost eleven minutes long, and reveling for a considerable part in the fabulous technology of the machine, there is no better way, other than using one, of appreciating what Dr. Land had accomplished with his magic machine. The sheer simplicity of the SX-70′s user interface would not be rivaled until the iPad came along forty years later, and having used both, I can assure you only one is magic, and it’s not the product designed in Cupertino.

The film was made by Charles and Ray Eames, whose other accomplishments include architectural and furniture design. Talent is seldom evenly distributed.

Film for the SX-70:

A bunch of criminally insane people in Holland got together, bought out the old Polaroid film making hardware and got down to making film for the SX-70, and you can still buy it here. Bless them!

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

Nikon V1

Incredibly useless.

It takes quite an effort to accomplish all of these design criteria:

  • Make the ugliest camera since digital was invented
  • Equip it with a microscopic sensor in a body the size of the MFT competition
  • Trash your reputation and an expectant, loyal user base

Nikon, with its new mirrorless V1 has accomplished all three at the highest possible level of failure.

Nikon V1 – camel as camera.

It’s said a camel is a horse designed by a committee. Well, the V1 is a camel of a camera, doubtless with lots of costly market research thrown in. Steve Jobs has famously stated that Apple uses no market research. Rather, it gives the consumer what Apple thinks they need – the Next Great Thing. But had you told Nikon to listen to their user base and give them something useful, like an APS-C camera with an EVF and a range of small, fast lenses, they would doubtless have deferred to the committee. And you would still have ended up with a V1.

The funniest part? They will make an adapter which will allow use of gargantuan Nikon-mount lenses on this piece of crap.

At least Fuji’s equally worthless X10 is pretty to look at. And if you don’t think looks matter, how do you feel about your picture taking chances when you have to fight the gag reflex every time you pick your camera up?

For those looking for portability and other uses for their pocket camera, get an iPhone 4 or, better, next month’s iPhone 5 with an 8mp sensor.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

Posted in Cameras

Permalink

The Mirrorless Revolution

Bloomberg nails it.

Bloomberg has an interesting piece on how Nikon and Canon are missing the boat by not offering a mirrorless DSLR.


Click the picture to read the article.

As an early adopter and buyer of the first EVF interchangeable lens MFT DSLR, the Panasonic G1, I tend to agree that it’s the future. The EVF will only get better, it’s cheaper to make than the prism/mirror combination used in old tech, and there are no moving parts and no need for complex retrofocus lens designs to clear flapping mirrors.

While I tend to take this quote – “Mirrorless cameras accounted for 40.5 percent of SLR sales in the country in July, surging from 5 percent in early 2009, according to BCN.” – with a bushel of salt, there’s reason to believe that mirrorless DSLRs are gaining market share. Apochryphal data are mostly useless (just because your local bookstore is full does not tell you whether it’s booming or having a going-out-of-business sale), yet I constantly read that big DSLR owners are dumping their heavy gear for something they actually will take along on the next trip. I know, having done likewise with my (quite superb, I hasten to add) Canon 5D outfit with no fewer than eight lenses, in preference for the Panny G1 with but three compact zooms. Yes, it almost always goes along with me, not something that could be said of the 5D.

Still, I keep hoping that someone at these two dominant gear makers is working on an APS-C or full frame EVF design with a silent shutter and fast focus – things now found in several models in the Panasonic range. The disappointing Fuji X10, with its miniscule sensor almost got it right. What’s needed is a fast lens with a 28-90mm zoom range, compactness, silence, no shutter or focus lag and a proper sensor, not some nail clipping. The lens doesn’t even have to be removable. Price it at $750 and you will be rich. Canon and Nikon – are you listening?

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

Brad Liber and the RED digital camera

Conceived, designed and made in America – the man and the gear!

The RED digital movie camera is today’s state-of the-art in digital movie making.

What makes the RED digital camera so exceptional is not only its high definition, but also that, having started production in Singapore, it is now increasingly made solely in, wait for it …. the United States. Design and engineering is in California and assembly of some of the bodies is now at the same US location.

What reminded of the RED digital camera was when Brad Liber, my nephew mentioned that he was working on a movie project. Brad, who is making his way in New York and transitioning into movie making after assisting Vogue photographer Bruce Weber for a couple of years, is the cameraman on a new movie project. The concept is to show how two poor New York ghetto kids find life sustaining purpose in their skateboarding.

Click for the ‘Preview of Pablo on Wheels’

Brad has rented a RED movie camera to make the movie. It’s a costly piece at $25,000 (meaning there’s a burgeoning rental market) but, when I tell you that it’s becoming the new standard in Hollywood, it gets your attention. With top stars commanding eight figure paychecks, equipment cost is chump change. What makes the RED camera different is that not only does it record in digital format, it’s also the highest definition digital movie camera in the business, and the first to rival film for quality. Compare that with still pictures where the best in digital surpassed film five years ago. Then again, still pictures are not commonly projected on 300 inch screens, either. The RED web site is quite candid about the camera’s capabilities, stating:

What cameras does the RED ONE compete with?

Because the RED ONE is a digital cinema camera (and not an HD video camera), the list of competitors is a short one. Cinema, or film based, cameras offer resolution rated a little over 3K. The RED ONE, at 4K, provides approximately 3.2+K resolution, based on the slight hit of an optical low pass filter (OLPF) used to reduce the effect of aliasing. It is RED’s considered opinion that, going forward, a system must have at least 3K resolution to meet the demand of 4K projection technologies, now being promised by many of the major projector manufacturers. Digital cameras offered by many of RED’s “competitors”, such as Sony, Arri and others, only provide, at best, 2K, and most, only High Definition, which is just not enough information to be scaled to 4K projection.

It is safe to say that RED’s biggest competition comes from film, and as the sensor technology continues to improve, while film’s days of progress are numbered, the promise of digital acquisition will be realized. The advantage film has currently is one of dynamic range. With each generation of RED sensor development, the gap becomes narrower and narrower.”

To put this in perspective, ’4K’ in movie talk means each frame is frame is 4096 x 2048 pixels, or 8.4 megapixels in 16:9 widescreen format. Shooting at 30 frames a second that computes to a minute of recording requiring 503 megabytes or just over 30 gigabytes an hour. With overhead that figures to more like 60gB/hr. Not trivial! But that’s definition consonant with the highest available from rapidly adopted digital projectors, increasingly found in movie theaters. For older projection hardware, the digital image still has to be converted to traditional film.

The RED is huge – so it’s just as well that Brad is young and, as an enthusiastic runner, exceptionally fit:

Brad with the RED digital camera and an Arriflex lens – most of this short was shot by Brad.

On the set of ‘Pablo on Wheels’

Brad reports:

I’m pleased with the camera so far; despite the weight, it is very nice to work with. I have been shooting wide open at f1.3 or f/2.8 on the 75mm, and pulling my own focus; very sensitive during movement; steep learning curve but I’m getting a good feel for it. Great crew on set, with a gaffer and key grip out from LA film scene (they are good friends of Director Brett and I; also film grads of SFSU). Using Mole 1k pars and Kinos both daylight and tungsten bulbs (depending on shot). The light is soft but lit very moody, exposed for darker feel.

I am very pleased with the Red M-X sensor, though I must say that the operating menu needs a complete overhaul …. The menu screen has considerable lag, and the resolution of a 1990s Mac screen. Really I felt like I was inputing changes to the camera via an old Nokia cell phone. We had a wonderful set of Arri prime lenses however, and you will see shortly see the beauty that these optics can deliver.

I’ll post more when the movie is released.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

The ‘new’ Leica M9P

What a scam.

It’s five years since I sold my first – and last – Leica and sadly the former German masters of design have given me no reason to regret that decision.

You thought $7,000 for a camera body with no lens, no autofocus lenses available and a sixty year old viewfinder design, allied with a noisy shutter was a lot?

You are a piker.

Because for a mere $1,000 extra you can have the 2 cent red paper dot on the front (you know, the one that says you are rich and screams ‘steal me and my owner’s wallet’) removed and the word ‘Leica’ engraved in script on the top plate like they used to do twenty years ago. And lest we forget, Leica has made the LCD glass tougher than the one made of pure cheese on the ‘base’ model. Such a deal.

Here’s the latest blurb from the antiquarians at Leica Camera:

Hey, but “Hang on a minute”, you say. I get one of the smallest cameras out there. The factory says so.

Uh huh. And for a bit less you can get a Panny G3 whose modern sensor will rival the M9′s dated Kodak one (so much for a ‘lifetime camera’), offers auto everything, is super quiet and comes with a great choice of lenses, some even branded (if not made) by Leica. No red dot at those prices, though. But you do get a pro-quality movie mode to compensate. As a point of reference, the red outline of the M9 is superimposed on the G3 body below.

And you can buy 13 of those for the price of one M9P or a mere 11 for the price of one regular M9. That way, when your Panny blows after 50,000 exposures you recycle it and pull the next one out of its box. Better still, get smart, buy one, and upgrade to a G4 in 18 months. It will be even better.

As for logo removal, my roll of black electrician’s tape should last the next five generations in Dr. P’s lineage.

A fool and his money are easily parted.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

Categories

Archives

Translate