<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photographs, Photographers and Photography &#187; Cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/category/photography/hardware/cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography</link>
	<description>This journal discusses photography in all its guises with an emphasis on the art of making photographs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon V1</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/22/nikon-v1/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/22/nikon-v1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=13428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incredibly useless. It takes quite an effort to accomplish all of these design criteria: Make the ugliest camera since digital was invented Equip it with a microscopic sensor in a body the size of the MFT competition Trash your reputation and an expectant, loyal user base Nikon, with its new mirrorless V1 has accomplished all &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/22/nikon-v1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/22/nikon-v1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mirrorless Revolution</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/09/the-mirrorless-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/09/the-mirrorless-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=13287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg nails it. Bloomberg has an interesting piece on how Nikon and Canon are missing the boat by not offering a mirrorless DSLR. Click the picture to read the article. As an early adopter and buyer of the first EVF interchangeable lens MFT DSLR, the Panasonic G1, I tend to agree that it&#8217;s the future. &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/09/the-mirrorless-revolution/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/09/the-mirrorless-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brad Liber and the RED digital camera</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/14/brad-liber-and-the-red-digital-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/14/brad-liber-and-the-red-digital-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=12158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conceived, designed and made in America &#8211; the man and the gear! The RED digital movie camera is today&#8217;s state-of the-art in digital movie making. What makes the RED digital camera so exceptional is not only its high definition, but also that, having started production in Singapore, it is now increasingly made solely in, wait &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/14/brad-liber-and-the-red-digital-camera/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/14/brad-liber-and-the-red-digital-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8216;new&#8217; Leica M9P</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/26/the-new-leica-m9p/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/26/the-new-leica-m9p/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=12092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a scam. It&#8217;s five years since I sold my first &#8211; and last &#8211; Leica and sadly the former German masters of design have given me no reason to regret that decision. You thought $7,000 for a camera body with no lens, no autofocus lenses available and a sixty year old viewfinder design, allied &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/26/the-new-leica-m9p/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/26/the-new-leica-m9p/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentax Q</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/24/pentax-q/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/24/pentax-q/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=12074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aptly named. Some wag at Pentax must have named their new forthcoming toy camera, for the &#8216;Q&#8217; designation is nothing less than a loud Question as to who on earth needs this? The Pentax Q. Or is that Q? It&#8217;s truly depressing to see Pentax make a camera with a minuscule digital sensor and interchangeable &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/24/pentax-q/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/06/24/pentax-q/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>200 megapixels</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/05/27/200-megapixels/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/05/27/200-megapixels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 14:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=11727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Innovation from Hasselblad. The newly introduced Hasselblad H4D-200MS digital camera body is not for everyone at almost $50,000. However, for the working professional who needs to make barn-sized prints for a living, the price of entry is easily recovered. Click the picture for more. The body is a modified variant of the existing H4D-50 which &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/05/27/200-megapixels/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/05/27/200-megapixels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameras in 2010</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/12/14/cameras-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/12/14/cameras-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=8683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you say &#8216;Blah&#8217;? When it comes to changes in cameras my primary area of interest is the advanced amateur/semi-pro gear. It&#8217;s what I use and fits nicely as regards features and cost between the mind-numbing array of point-and-shoots and the heavy duty and very costly pro gear. For the advanced amateur user 2010 was &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/12/14/cameras-in-2010/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/12/14/cameras-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The state of the art</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/07/21/the-state-of-the-art/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/07/21/the-state-of-the-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=7158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology continues to amaze. Two press releases from Panasonic today, detailing the features of their latest superzoom, the FZ100 and their newest &#8216;luxury&#8217; compact the LX5 shows how the state of the digital hardware art continues to progress. But does it make toast and coffee?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/07/21/the-state-of-the-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony NEX-5</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/19/sony-nex-5/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/19/sony-nex-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=6599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strange. There&#8217;s an old Wall Street mantra of which I have long been a fan. The subject is Loyalty and it goes like this: &#8220;If you want Loyalty, get a dog.&#8221; So when a new way of thinking in camera design comes along, I am more than interested. And I have no loyalty. In this &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/19/sony-nex-5/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/19/sony-nex-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any day now &#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/21/any-day-now/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/21/any-day-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;. someone will get it right. Another interesting product announcement from Samsung, the TL500, following on from their new APS-C DSLR: The lens is fast at f/1.8, it does RAW and the zoom range is an incredibly useful 24-72mm. Just about perfect for street photography. But, but, but &#8230;. there&#8217;s still no eye level viewfinder. &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/21/any-day-now/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/21/any-day-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Olympus E-PL1 and new lenses</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/04/the-olympus-e-pl1-and-new-lenses/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/04/the-olympus-e-pl1-and-new-lenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A strange idea. Let me preface my comments by saying that I have yet to handle the newly announced micro four-thirds Olympus E-PL1. Only journalists who will say nice things about it get advance copies and I am neither journalist nor toady. The Olympus E-PL1 The camera will likely retail for $500 compared to the &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/04/the-olympus-e-pl1-and-new-lenses/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/02/04/the-olympus-e-pl1-and-new-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epson&#8217;s EVF</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/16/epsons-evf/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/16/epsons-evf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now in quantity production. A reader sent me a link to Epson&#8217;s press release with details of their new Electronic View Finder. What&#8217;s significant about this is that smaller camera makers like Ricoh and Pentax who lack the capital to develop something similar will be able to buy the part at reasonable cost. Click the &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/16/epsons-evf/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/16/epsons-evf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another EVF SLR</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/04/another-evf-slr/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/04/another-evf-slr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Samsung, unsurprisingly. Samsung is rolling out its NX10 mirrorless DSLR any day now &#8211; much the same concept as the Panasonic G1/GH1 but with the larger APS-C sensor and using superior rear LCD screen technology. Boy, if anyone knows about LCDs it&#8217;s Samsung as they are one of the largest manufacturers of these in &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/04/another-evf-slr/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/01/04/another-evf-slr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falling lives</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/27/falling-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/27/falling-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=5023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shorter and shorter. I used my Leica M3 for some 35 years. It had everything I needed in a street snapper, being small, quiet, sharp and fast. Add a lens or two and you had enough to travel the world. I mostly used it with the 35mm Summaron with those ghastly viewfinder &#8216;spectacles&#8217;. My M3 &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/27/falling-lives/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/27/falling-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like the old days &#8211; not!</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/25/like-the-old-days-not/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/25/like-the-old-days-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=4976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A body and two lenses. You would sling the camera over your neck with the short lens on the body. The other lens, the medium length one, went in the shoulder bag. And that little outfit would be all you needed to go around the world. Back in 1973 it consisted of a Leica, 35mm &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/25/like-the-old-days-not/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/25/like-the-old-days-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A handy bag</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/23/a-handy-bag/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/23/a-handy-bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=4888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the US military The US military may last have checked the &#8216;win&#8217; column some 60-plus years ago, but not all is bad. This taxpayer got a bit of his own back by picking up a handy ex-military bag from the local Army &#038; Navy surplus store. Have you ever wondered what happens to &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/23/a-handy-bag/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/23/a-handy-bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin and Tiger</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/22/kevin-and-tiger/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/22/kevin-and-tiger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=4930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity endorsement trash. Why would anyone think that celebrity endorsements make sense? Will I be able to drive like Schumacher by buying a Ferrari? Ride like Lance on a Trek? Play like Tiger with those clubs? So I weep when I see a truly great actor like Kevin Spacey touting a camera in one of &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/22/kevin-and-tiger/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/12/22/kevin-and-tiger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts and pictures</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/15/experts-and-pictures/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/15/experts-and-pictures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=2982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trust your eyes, not charts. Frequently one sees performance of digital cameras compared using JPG images. This could not be more useless. Different sharpening algorithms in the cameras being compared render such comparisons meaningless, compounded by the poor dynamic range of the JPG file format. JPG is the fastest way of making a fifty dollar &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/15/experts-and-pictures/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/15/experts-and-pictures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Leica M9 and the Viewfinder Revolution</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/11/the-leica-m9-and-the-viewfinder-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/11/the-leica-m9-and-the-viewfinder-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=2876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last face lift. I wish Leica well with its new M9. There&#8217;s always a market, however small, for the dowager on her third face lift and no shortage of insecure, wealthy buyers with weak egos craving fame by association. I think of the M9 as the Joan Collins of cameras. Neither is cheap. The &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/11/the-leica-m9-and-the-viewfinder-revolution/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/11/the-leica-m9-and-the-viewfinder-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Leica X1 and street snaps</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/09/the-leica-x1-and-street-snaps/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/09/the-leica-x1-and-street-snaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=2801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some thoughts. It&#8217;s 9/9/09 and Leica finally introduced its full frame digital M9. I won&#8217;t be dwelling on it here as I doubt there&#8217;s much need for, or interest in, a $10,000 camera (with lens) which comes with almost no automation, bulky lenses and a near total lack of weatherproofing. For that sort of money &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/09/the-leica-x1-and-street-snaps/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/09/the-leica-x1-and-street-snaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

