The Razer Death Adder 3500dpi mouse

I take a leaf from the gamers’ book.

My initial enthusiasm for the Apple Magic Mouse has cooled.

There are three reasons.

The first is that it frustratingly loses the Bluetooth connection now and then which simply drives me up the wall. It does this both with my HackPro and, far more often, with the MacMini I use to watch stored movies. You would think it would work better with Apple’s hardware, but no. And that’s from two MagicMice – so unlikely it’s a sample fault. Go figure.

The second is that the ergonomics are not right. Even though the device is gorgeous to behold, it’s too low and I am developing wrist pain after extended use. And whoever designed that sharp edge – on a device meant to be held in the hand – well, the less said the better.

The third, another cause of extreme frustration, is that I cannot consistently get to the desktop by touching a selected point on the surface no matter how hard I try, using the MagicPrefs application I mention in my earlier piece. The touch point seems to change at random, working when it wants to. Just beyond irritating and the reason that finally made me change.

I checked around and one photographer friend recommended a Logitech model (the MX900) but sadly that is discontinued here. Others prefer to use the multi-touch pad on the MacBook Pro or whatever. However, I need a mouse for business use and also find it the easiest way to outline areas in Photoshop where localized manipulation is required.

So as those in the farming community like to say, I got me to thinking. Who would know most about mice? Why, the gaming community of course. They use them all day long, use them hard and are very demanding when it comes to smooth and instantaneous response. So I checked reviews of gaming mice with the following dictates in mind:

  • Must be wired. I am through with batteries, RF and Bluetooth.
  • Must have outstanding ergonomic design.
  • Must be programmable for use with Mac OS X Snow Leopard.
  • Must be super responsive.
  • Has to have a scroll wheel.

I eventually settled on the fancifully named Razer Death Adder 3500dpi mouse, replete with glowing scroll wheel and adder design on the body. Mercifully, the glow can be switched off. On receipt, I downloaded the latest software from Razer’s site and read through the comprehensive instructions. The application runs as a stand alone program rather than installing as a System Preference pane. The Mouse pane in System Preferences continues to work so you can experiment between that and the settings in Razer’s application, though the latter has many more options.

The contrast in shape with the MagicMouse is clear from the picture:

Two side buttons circled. Illuminated scroll wheel and death adder (!) switched on for this picture.

The Death Adder is larger in all dimensions, maybe too large for small hands; most importantly it is far taller, meaning your palm rests lightly on it, which is impossible with the Magic Mouse. It’s some 1 3/4″ tall compared to 7/8″ for the Magic Mouse – that’s a big difference. The indented sides further aid comfort. The left and right buttons are discrete and a comfortable concave shape, unlike on the Magic Mouse which uses a contiguous convex surface and, although the Razer’s two programmable side buttons are on the left only, the mouse can be configured for left hand use. Nice. For serious lefties there’s a true left handed version with the buttons on the right. Every control surface can be programmed for any action and macro programming is also possible. I left dpi and polling at their maximum settings (only a slow CPU working near capacity would need these reduced) and simply programmed the side buttons for Desktop and Dashboard, respectively, and programmed a press on the scroll wheel for Exposé- all windows. I hop into the desktop and between apps often.

The dramatic height difference is clear.

Double click speed, scrolling sensitivity, cursor speed/acceleration are all adjustable. I have scrolling set to the lowest speed otherwise it’s crazy fast. It’s a fraction heavier than the Magic Mouse which means just right. There’s a satisfying heft to it. The cord provided is very long at 7 feet – no issues reaching the HackPro under my desk. When shipped the lower surface is protected with clear plastic; once removed the mouse is wonderfully smooth on a mouse pad, resting on three protruding nylon pads. The side buttons are responsive and you can even adjust the delay before they kick in. There is no ball, a laser beam being used for tracking. Tracking is very smooth – I can detect no jerkiness or ‘steps’ as the cursor is moved on screen. It’s as good as the Magic Mouse in that regard, meaning excellent.

What’s not good? Vertical scrolling is stepped rather than smooth, something that only Apple seems to do right. The scroll wheel does not tilt sideways for horizontal scrolling, though it’s not a feature I miss. Let’s hope that the eventual ingress of dirt through the scrolling wheel will not wreck the mouse in the way the Magic Mouse’s predecessor, the Mighty Mouse, would fail. The Lazer’s body is sealed, so it’s not like you can clean it.

Other than that, the Razer Death Adder seems like a winner, at under $50. I had $20 left over after unloading both my (not so) MightyMice for $35 each. Good riddance. The only thing that ‘Just Works’ here is eBay.

The current issue of The New Yorker has an interesting piece by experienced technical writer Malcolm Gladwell about how a young Steve Jobs saw a prototype of the original mouse at Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center in the 1970s. He had his engineers make it mass produced and cheap. Too bad Apple has forgotten how to design a good mouse. Like its iMac, the Magic Mouse is a triumph of form over function, looks trumping all else in the design brief.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

A bigger MBA SSD

Looks like an easy ugrade.

When I first reviewed the new 11″ MacBook Air (MBA) I mentioned that a larger 256gB Solid State Drive (SSD) was coming to the aftermarket as a replacement for the small 64gB or 128gB versions Apple ships. Well wouldn’tyou know it, Apple put a kibosh on PhotoFast threatening to pull all their other procurement from the manufacturer if PhotoFast did not cease and desist from making the MBA a more useful tool. You can guess the rest.

Well, that tyranny just ended as MacSales now sells much the same SSD under the name of Mercury Aura Pro Express in capacities of 180, 240 or 360gB for $500 – $1,180. The 240gB is the sweet point in terms of gB per $ at $580. It ships with the required pentalobe screwdriver; Apple arrogantly thought that fitting these unique retainers would stop anyone from opening up the MBA (the company feels increasingly like it’s run by tort lawyers – so much for ‘Think Different’). This special screwdriver is used to remove the ten screws holding the rear cover. It will also work on the latest versions of the iPhone 4 which uses like retainers. Jerks. Removal of one more regular Torx screw frees the SSD for replacement, and MacSales provides that screwdriver also. Like drives are also available for the 13″ MBA.

The PhotoFast SSD promised to ship an external enclosure to make use of the removed original SSD; MacSales does not include that (shame) so you must first make a bootable backup before replacing the original SSD. Use Carbon Copy Cloner to do this. Hopefully aftermarket enclosures will crop up to make use of the removed SSD.

10 external and one internal screw, and the new SSD (circled) is a plug-and-play replacement.

So for $1,000 for the 11″ MBA and $580 for the 240gB SSD upgrade you have an extremely light and capable notebook computer which my earlier tests showed is more than up to the task of running Lightroom 3 and Photoshop on the road. You will need a plug-in adapter for CF cards on either the 11″ or 13″ MBA and an SD card adapter for the 11″ (the 13″ has an SD slot). That’s still a lot of dollars per gigabyte but in the recorded history of man slim, light and fast have never been cheap.

I am finding that the 11″ MBA is the perfect size for occasional computing, lacking the added optical drive and backlit keyboard of the MacBook Pro but weighing in at 2.3 lbs vs. 4.5 lbs for the 13″ MBP. The MBA has a 5 hr battery life vs. up to 10 for the MBP. This piece was written on my MBA.

If you want to make the MBA into your primary computer (it accepts external large displays for home use) the addition of increased SSD capacity described above may make sense.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

Goodbye, Mr. Jobs, and Good Riddance

Time for change.

“The graveyards are full of indispensable men.” DeGaulle

Steve Jobs’s latest leave of absence from Apple needs no expressions of sympathy for him and his family from me. You can take those as read. It’s not for fun that our home is littered with Apple products which are here for one key reason. Not looks. Not specs. Just function. When they are not overheating or prematurely failing they work better than anything else out there used by this avid photographer.

But I see only good in Jobs’s latest – and maybe final – leave from Apple.

Apple stock:

In a strange way Jobs’s absence – assuming it’s permanent this time – will free up the PE of the stock. The 2x discount (15x instead of 17x) will go away as the stock has been discounted to the market ever since an emaciated Jobs appeared on stage in January 2008 for a product roll out. The drop in the Price/Earnings multiple dates exactly from then. Wall Street may be irrational but it’s not stupid. Anyone with eyes could see the man was very ill indeed.

The sooner the rock star presence is removed the better for the company, its employees and its investors. A rational CEO will immediately declare a massive dividend or stock buyback to return the ridiculous pile of cash Apple is sitting on to its owners – the stockholders. It’s $52 billion (billion!) at the time of writing and growing at $20 billion annually for a company with no debt. That will open the stock up to a new population of long term value investors and take some of the speculative interest away.

The next two years:

For the next two years there’s little cause for concern about the existing product lines.

  • The iPad will get thinner/faster and will add expandability. With Jobs gone hopefully they will open it up to running Flash, which all competitors will support.
  • The iPhone/iPad will continue to benefit mightily from the AppStore.
  • iMacs and laptops will add better screens, faster CPUs, better graphics, Intel’s LightPeak connectors will replace pokey USB, battery lives will continue to improve and so on.
  • OS X will continue to offer a lock-up free computing experience for desktops and laptops.
  • Apple TV fill will finally reach critical mass.

So there will be lots of reasons to attract new owners and encourage existing ones to upgrade.

Does Jobs really matter or is he just another charlatan?

It’s after the next two years that the picture gets cloudy, and the question to ask is just how important was Jobs to innovation?

Is this drop out from a second rate US university where he majored in LSD and calligraphy a design engineering genius?

Was his use of the GUI and the mouse from Xerox PARC luck or simply theft?

Did he suddenly wake up and conceive the iPhone?

Did he have a Eureka Moment and suddenly found the iPad fully formed in his head?

Was he the only one to see that music distribution and royalty rights could be changed from the old model to the iTunes Music Store one?

Is he the only one who can stand up to the CEOs of the major cellphone makers, component providers, music makers, movie studios, etc. and cut a good deal?

Or is he just a slick salesman/charlatan who has got away with claiming credit for others’ inventions, adding a touch of personal obsessiveness to design and looks and making sure the world knows about it?

I strongly lean to the latter view.

I base this on a couple of observations:

  • The way co-founder Steve Wozniak was pushed out the door in the early days. This genius engineer/designer was a threat to Jobs’s bullying primacy. An engineer’s engineer who continues to enjoy a huge following in the tech geek world, Wozniak was a major threat to the egomaniacal dictator-in-training.
  • Jobs’s technical cluelesness. The man dropped out of liberal arts at school. And you see it every time he is asked a technical question and every time he demonstrates something that needs machine interaction. It’s most visible when he demonstrates some new piece of hardware at a product roll out. The man is no engineer, no designer.
  • The arrogance which costs Apple market share daily. My way or the highway. Refusal to adopt matte screens. Refusal to allow Flash to run on portable devices. Refusal to admit the major design flaws in the iPhone 4′s antenna. Complete blindness to, and disregard of, the needs of corporate users.
  • The form-over-function obsession. This non-engineer ensured Mac users got a generation of poorly heat managed devices, doomed to expire at the conclusion of the warranty period. The white iMacs, the Time Capsule, the first AppleTV, any number of MacBook Pros, most current laptops – all overheat significantly because of case space limitations.

    Technically clueless.

    The key to design at Apple is the English design engineer, Jon Ive. He was at Apple five years before Jobs rejoined, his talents hidden in a sub-basement. In an earlier life he designed toilet bowls for a UK manufacturer …. by luck or good judgment, Jobs plucked him out of the toilet, gave him a tooling budget and proceeded to allow Ive to have his head. Ive thinks nothing of making a hundred prototypes before settling on the final article. As a child his room was filled with design prototypes of ideas he was noodling on. This man is the Real Thing. Ive gave us the first iMac with that wildly colored translucent case and funky mouse. He designed the one piece LCD iMac (the gorgeous ‘screen on a stick’ design, yet to be improved upon and properly cooled, let it be added), the MacBook Pro, the iPhone, the iPad. Apple’s design skill is not about to evaporate because the Charlatan in Chief just quit.

    The man behind the machines. English engineer Jon Ive.

    The management team and innovation:

    As for the ‘make the trains run on time’ aspect, Apple has the best operating man in the business at its helm today, Tim Cook, who honed his resume at IBM and Compaq as a production engineer before joining Apple a decade ago. There’s not a lot you can teach this man about inventory, economic order quantities, just-in-time manufacturing, sourcing, price negotiation and so on.

    Apple’s key sales and technology design players have been in place for years. Hardware guru Bob Mansfield, iPhone man Scott Forstall and ace marketer Phil Schiller have all been with Apple a long time. And if you think head of retail Ron Johnson doesn’t matter, well then it’s time you stuck your head in an Apple Store near you to understand how important the Store showcases are to the Apple sales story, be it in Palo Alto or Beijing. It doesn’t matter whether you buy there or not; the issue is that you can try and feel the products in low pressure, gorgeous settings. And they even let our dog in at the local one, so what’s not to like?

    So I have little concern about design innovation at Apple. Will product innovation continue? I don’t know, but the innovation gene runs strongly in the company, so I’m optimistic. One thing I’m fairly certain of. Jobs may have been a design auditor but innovation is hardly his forte. But he has done a superb job of bullying those around him into subservience while he claims all the credit.

    Apple employees breathe a sigh of relief:

    The best thing you can say as an Apple employee is that the cruelty, the disdain, the arrogance, the put downs in front of your peers, the egocentricity and the demands for slavery and adulation from the corner office will be no more, and that Apple will become a far happier place at which to work.

    So for all of that, I can only say “Thanks, Mr. Jobs, and Good Riddance”. A company second only in market value to Exxon in the US, a company which employs 40,000 in the US and another two million indirectly abroad, one which comprises 21% of the Nasdaq100 and 3% of the S&P500 meaning that everyone’s savings are invested in Apple, can no longer afford risking so much on you, your ego and your health.

    The market agrees. AAPL today.

    Disclosure: Long AAPL calls.

    For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

Latest iMac 27″ bench tests

Compared to the HackPro.

When FU Steve built the HackPro to replace my fried 24″ iMac the goal was simple – make something reliable and fast for photo processing with superior heat management and using inexpensive off-the-shelf parts.

Technology marches on and Apple has now released its latest iMac which in its best configuration includes the latest Intel i7 CPU and a 27″ display. Is it better than the HackPro?

Summer 2010 27″ iMac.

HackPro (under the desk!) running two Dell 2209WA monitors, fall 2009 vintage.

The proof of the pudding is in test scores using Geekbench (CPU and memory performance) and Cinebench (video and graphics speed).

The specifications compare as follows, both machines using Snow Leopard 10.6.4:

HackPro:

CPU: 2.83gHz Intel Core2Quad, Q9550
GPU: EVGA Nvidia 9800GTX+ with 512mB GDDR3 memory
RAM: 8gB DDR2 800mHz

iMac 27″ i7:

CPU: 2.93gHz Intel QuadCore i7
GPU: ATI Radeon HD5750 with 1gB GDDR5 memory
RAM: 8gB DDR3 1333mHz

Here are the test results using Geekbench and Cinebench, both in 64-bit mode:

Geekbench 2.1.6 64-bit:

HackPro (my tests):

Overall: 6731
Integer: 6430
Floating point: 10142
Memory: 3385
STREAM: 2545

iMac (Apple Insider tests):

Overall: 10052
Integer: 8868
Floating point: 15764
Memory: 5028
STREAM: 4258

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit:

HackPro (my tests):

OpenGL: 23.44 fps
CPU: 3.16 pts

iMac (Bare Feats tests):

OpenGL: Not stated, but I would guess 20-30% faster
CPU: 5.50 pts

What’s the fastest that Cinebench has tested? Here are the results from their database (12C/12T means 12 Cores and 12 Threads):

Cinebench R11 OpenGL test results – HackPro in orange.

Cinebench R11 CPU test results – HackPro in orange.

The bottom line is that the top of the line iMac i7 CPU model smokes the HackPro with faster video, CPU and RAM performance. The price is competitive too. The top of the line iMac i7 with 8gB RAM sells for $2,399. The HackPro with a like screen (the Dell U2711), CPU, GPU and RAM would cost $2,000 to make.

So what’s to choose?

  • The iMac is $400 more
  • The iMac needs zero construction time. It takes an experienced worker 3-4 hours to assemble the HackPro, and klutzes need not apply
  • The iMac uses an LG 2560 x 1440 IPS display with a glossy glass cover; the screen only accommodates 72% of the AdobeRGB gamut. 1 year warranty.
  • The Dell U2711 uses the same LG display with a matte plastic cover; the screen accommodates 96% of the AdobeRGB gamut. 3 year warranty.
  • Reliability of the iMac is unknown.

So the iMac is a good buy if you can get over the unanswered reliability issue and think you can properly profile that garish screen with the very limited adjustments provided. My experience is that Apple makes some of the most unreliable hardware on earth, with heat managment consistently compromised at the altar of appearance. However, if this new iMac proves reliable then it’s getting very hard to justify the 100% premium asked for the separate box MacPro.

There’s no arguing with the value this time around. Further, if you want a second 27″ display, Apple’s newly announced (glossy, of course) Cinema Display will run you $1,000, which is much the same that Dell is charging for its comparable Ultrasharp 2711.

Am I tempted to upgrade? Not remotely. While I can increase the HackPro’s CPU performance by 20% by simply overclocking the CPU there is no incentive to do so, given my needs. The enhanced speed means little to me as my primary use is Lightroom 3 (where everything is super fast on my rig) and I do no video processing; were I doing the latter for a living I would certainly think about it, if I could get comfortable with the glossy screen and its poor handling of the Adobe RGB gamut. The most likely upgrade in my future is to a pair of larger Dell monitors – either the 24″ U2410 ($500 each) or the 27″ U2711 ($1,000). But that’s a discussion for another day. Stated differently, for my use the HackPro’s processing speed is at the point of diminishing returns, meaning I would have to spend a lot more for a relatively modest increase; the graphics display card remains state-of-the art and can drive anything out there but there are now considerably better and larger displays available, albeit at a price. Indeed, for my day job of money management, which uses lots of stock price, bond yield and live news data feeds, the only thing I would like in the HackPro is more screen real estate. It seems there’s never enough display space available in our information overloaded world.

As a matter of interest, as the HackPro is assembled from readily available off-the-shelf PC components, upgrading to the CPU and RAM specifications of the latest top-of-the-line iMac would necessitate a new motherboard, CPU and RAM at at total cost of $700. The GPU in the iMac is close in specs to that in the HackPro so no upgrade is called for. Everything else in the HackPro – case, coolers, drives, card reader, wireless, can be reused. Not something you can say of the iMac. And given that most of the HackPro’s components come with 3-5 year warranties, a fairer price comparison suggests adding AppleCare at $169 to the cost of the iMac which extends the one year warranty to three years.

How cool does the HackPro run with its five fans (two set on medium – case cooler and HDD cooler, three variable speed – CPU, GPU and power supply coolers)?

The spikes are from running the demanding Cinebench video benchmarks.

Sure would be nice to have that data for the new iMac; when running Lightroom the temperatures barely budge on the HackPro.

If you are spending someone else’s money, not your own, here are the latest MacPro prices, all without a monitor:

Prices for dopes.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

The L5 Remote

The best remote yet.

Those of you who, like me, are visually oriented, will likely be using your big screen TV for viewing pictures, as do I. Mine fronts as a display device for a Mac Mini, an AT&T Uverse cable box with a DVR, and for a BluRay DVD player. The latter adds BluRay which is not supported by Mac OS X.

With all those inputs the result is the usual mess of remote controls, each seemingly designed by someone who never actually tried using it. It is one of the worst areas of ergonomic nightmares in the home.

So it’s no surprise when I relate that I have long been searching for the perfect universal remote. Well, I’m getting closer. I started seven years ago with a mid-range infra-red Harmony which was OK, but still too many buttons. Then I migrated to the very costly infra-red Harmony 1000 with its small color touchscreen (‘push screen’ is more like it) which I upgraded to radio to avoid the line-of-sight frustration experienced with IR sensors. This was OK for a while but I got royally irritated with Harmony’s truly inept Mac software which constantly locked-up and with their device code database which is riddled with errors and requires much manual tinkering to get things working. So I sold the Harmony and went back to an inexpensive RCA IR remote, the RCA RCRP05B for under $20. You can see my review on the linked Amazon site. The appeal of this inexpensive device was its extreme programmability and before long I had it singing and dancing. My primary test is that our eight year old can use it with no help and I am at a point where Winston no longer asks for help. Getting there was far harder than that sounds!

To obviate the line-of-sight problem I added an IR blaster to amplify the remote’s signal regardless of how it is pointed and it’s such a significant enhancement that I recommend a like device unreservedly.

But, the RCA, capable as it is, still has lots of little buttons, none are illuminated making use in the dark very difficult, and most of the buttons are redundant at any one time. What I really wanted was a touchscreen remote like the AMX of old. That had three drawbacks. It could only be programmed by the vendor, it burned through its battery daily and it was clunky as all get up, but it did have a half decent touchscreen. Last I looked, 8 years ago, these ran upward of $5,000 …. and woe betide you if you change hardware.

Well, there’s a new kid on the block and it is very impressive indeed, fixing all of these drawbacks.

The L5 Remote attachment (circled) for the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad

In the photograph you can see the L5 dongle attached to my iPhone (any model works as well as iPod Touches and iPads), displaying one of the screens I have programmed. When the dongle is first attached it downloads the related software from the iTunes store. You can program any number of screens to make the device activity based – one for Watch TV, one for Watch DVD, one for Listen to Music and so on. The icons are dragged and dropped into place and programmed by using your existing remote to ‘teach’ the L5, so if you have lost the original you are out of luck for now. L5 has promised to add a downloadable code database but that may take a while. I would also like the ability to directly input 5 digit JP1 codes to any key of choice, as is possible with the RCA.

Macros (command sequences) are easily created – just program individual (temporary) icons with the commands required then drop them onto a macro key. Once the Macro key sequence is assigned using your individual keys, the latter can be erased – the information is not lost. Very cleverly done and it really permits you to eradicate all clutter. In the following example which is for Watch TV, the On, Off and Favorites keys are all macros with embedded command sequences. The Channels icon utilizes another clever feature of the L5. Touching it opens a drawer below the main screen where I have inserted favorite Channels for direct touchscreen access. The icon with the small rectangles drops down a numerical keyboard for those (very) rare occasions when you want to key in a channel number.

The TV screen. Note the red Record button for saving to the AT&T Uverse DVR.

The Channels drawer has been opened here, showing three favorite channels.

Most importantly, the Macro key assignment function provides for variable delays, of the user’s choice, between the execution of key strokes. This is vital in practice as most televisions are very slow to start up and to respond to commands. My three years old 42″ Vizio needs some five seconds before it will respond to input switching commands and does not like to be rushed between input selection changes. Adding these delays, a matter of trial and error, is trivial with the L5 software.

A couple more screens:

The BluRay DVD player screen – I still need to add a Volume toggle.

The DVR/TiVo playback screen

When the dongle is attached to the iPhone all other functions remain usable at a touch of the Home button. The software rotates the screen image 180 degrees so that the dongle is pointing away from you in use, but if you use an IR blaster as I mention above, this is not necessary, but not something that can currently be switched off.

The quickest way to switch between activity screens is to simply flick them with a finger. It would be nice if L5 could add the ability to sort the order in which the screens appear.

If you are new to Macros, there’s lots of hard ways of setting them up and one foolproof easy way. Using your original remotes, go through the sequence of events required for an activity, making a written note of each keystroke. For example, if I want to watch TV the sequence is something like this:

  • Switch on TV
  • Switch on Receiver
  • Switch on AT&T Uverse cable box
  • Switch TV input to HDMI2
  • Switch Receiver input to Video2
  • Switch Uverse to Favorite channels

Now, following your notations, program each keystroke you had to make to a discrete button, add these to your Macro key in the right order, add inter-step delays as necessary if your macro misbehaves, test then delete the temporary keys you just created, keeping only the macro key which you can name anything you want. You can also choose from a range of logo/icons for any key you create.

L5 say that they are working on iPad-specific software though the existing app will run fine on the iPad. They have also promised to add the ability to transfer your settings from one iDevice to another. Yes, please! I actually like the small size of the iPhone’s screen for this application and expect to dedicate my 3G iPhone to the dongle full time when I shortly upgrade to the 4G iPhone to be announced on June 7, 2010.

Bugs? I have only encountered one. When designing a new screen after dragging and dropping the required buttons onto the display area, you hit ‘Assign’ to program these using your original remotes. On a few occasions the software showed a blank screen instead of one with the buttons on display and available for selection. Simply repeating the process generally fixed the issue which is only seen at the design stage. In operation the software and hardware have been flawless. Even hard to program remotes like the one which came with my Insignia DVD player proved easy to set up; where the L5 did not recognize the IR code on a first pass, it would ask for three or four passes and would invariably get there with ease.

The L5 Remote is highly recommended, costs $50 and comes from L5 Remote. To really get the best out of it I also recommend spending an additional $70 on an IR blaster.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

Categories

Archives

Translate