A well placed offering.

At $200, the new 7″ Kindle Fire color LCD tablet is attractively priced and designed, for what it offers. However, I see limited use for photographers at this stage, and all the talk of competition for the iPad seems to miss the point of the very meaning of the word.

Click the picture.

Simply stated, you do not choose between a Porsche and a Ford when buying a car, though you may own both. The comparison between the iPad and the Fire is much the same. They can coexist in a market which has not remotely been penetrated yet one whose lower demographics have nothing to choose.

With apps like Snapseed bringing a well designed touch interface to the oft tedious job of photo processing on the iPad’s 9.7″ screen, the migration of the iPad away from a pure consumption device to a content creation one is accelerating. I often find, for example, that I create or edit blog postings using the WordPress app on my iPad, especially now that the app’s many early problems, with lots of bugs, seem to have been overcome. The latest mobile version offers most of the editing tools of the desktop variant.

The Kindle Fire is a more narrowly focused device than the iPad in its first version, but Amazon’s touting of its ingeniously designed predictive web browser, named Silk, is very promising. So, in addition to all the usual book access, now supplemented with music and videos, you will be able to browse the web for content. If the browser is fast then the Fire will make a tremendous tool for schools at all grades. And, if content is king, then the Fire is only the second tablet to hit the market not only with a full complement of content in all its guises, but also with a loyal and growing customer base.

At its attractive price, maybe our 9 year old will cease having to lug 10 lbs. of books to and from school daily, when all he needs access on any day is a page or two. Carrying 10 lbs and accessing 2 ounces really is rather silly. The Fire weighs but 15 ozs …. A touch Kindle at $200 plus lots of public domain content should be substantially cheaper than traditional hard copy while adding video and sound to the learning experience, so it’s not like the device represents an increase in operating costs. And teachers will be able to maintain dynamic curricula on the school’s servers, accessible at the touch of a screen. One can but dream, with makers of traditional – and very profitable – academic text books even now warming up their slush funds to delay the inevitable victory of digital delivery and consumption. It’s called the US taxpayer-funded abomination which is our public schooling system.

Meanwhile, until proposed screen designs which meld eInk (traditional Kindle and excellent in bright sun) and LCD (excellent in all other lighting conditions) are perfected and manufactured in volume, the Kindle Fire will have the same issues with readability as the iPad – meaning it’s unusable outdoors most of the time.

So the iPad soldiers on without any competition, all other tablet makers are in big trouble (Dead Pool: HPQ, RIMM; Two shots, back of skull: Asus, Acer, B&N Nook, Xoom, Sony) either because they are clueless drunks (Dead Pool) or overpriced with no apps or content (Two shots crowd).

For photographers, there’s little here. The Fire’s screen is small and the absence of apps, at least for now, debilitating. However, a rumored 10″ Fire in 2012 may change the competitive landscape and I most certainly hope it does. Competition is always good – have you checked you monoplistic provider’s cell phone bill recently between all your dropped calls?

Disclosure: Long AMZN stock and long AAPL 2012 call options.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

MSFT drops the ball. Again.

Microsoft Surface has been around for, what? 5 years now?

Think of it as a large iPad on steroids, but with tremendously improved touch functionality.

Not surprisingly, MSFT’s web site on the product is simply awful. No dynamism. No excitement. A narrative as thrilling as the instruction book for repairing a washing machine. What is it with Microsoft? Even the ‘copy and paste’ link does not work!

If I was marketing this product I would make sure to give free versions to every major film studio, news channel, publishing house and famous photographer I could find, make it sell for $3,000 and watch it take off. I have seen it used twice – once on a TV news show and once in a James Bond movie, both times to jaw dropping effect. And if I was MSFT, I wouldn’t care about the profit or loss. They have already lost millions on it. What I would care about is the tremendous halo effect it would have on my other mass market products. It’s a simple variant of ‘win on Sunday, sell on Monday’ in the car world. Porsche wins Le Mans? You buy a new 911.

Microsoft Surface – click to view the boring video.

Steve Jobs’s was so right all those years ago when he said ‘Microsoft has no taste’. Even when they make ground breaking products like Surface and Kinect, their marketing, in a word, sucks.

Watch it from the man himself.

You can even get to enjoy the world’s worst CEO in this video – though he has strong competition from Howard Stringer at Sony. Here Ballmer extols Windows ’95 which most would agree was the worst OS ever. Or was that Windows ME?

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

A wireless solution.

Headphones? What’s that doing here? Well, show me someone not interested in music and the movies and I’ll show you one who cannot take a photograph.

One of the cheapest – yet most vital – components of my HackPro desktop is the extremely thin layer of conducting Arctic Silver thermal paste between the case of the Core2Quad CPU and the Coolermaster radiator which keeps the CPU cool as a cucumber. The maker of that paste, beloved of all computer builders, also makes headphones.

For a long while now I have been using a pair of Sennheiser PX100 corded headphones for listening to music and watching movies on the iPhone and iPad. They are over the ear, comfortable and the sound is fine. They cost $60-70. Folding them into the provided clamshell case requires a degree in astrophysics, but once you get the hang of it there’s lots of innocent fun to be had and money to be made betting friends they can’t get them into the case! Indeed, I just had the satisfaction the other week of taking $2 off our nine year old who quit in frustration. One back for the old man!

But that bet cost me, as somehow the cord got frayed and is now literally hanging by a thread. So I searched around for a wireless alternative which might better survive our boy’s ministrations, and settled on the Arctic Sound P311 at $30, a Bluetooth headphone which requires no wired connection.

The manufacturer claims a 20 hour life per charge, and charging is through the provided USB cable from any computer, so there’s no additional charger to carry. All you need is the mini-USB cable and your laptop or desktop. The iPad’s battery life on streamed Netflix movies is a consistent 11 hours, so as long as the headphones’ battery lasts 11 hours or more things are fine. Charge the iPad, charge the ‘phones. My ‘phones shipped partially charged, needing just 90 minute to full charge, indicated by the red charging LED being extinguished. The maker says a full charge takes 2 hours. The bottom line is that a 2 hour charge to get 20 hours of use is far faster and longer than recharging an iPad will get you, so the iPad remains your limiting factor in practical use as far as recharging goes.

Charging light on. This changes to alternating red/blue when pairing – see below.

My primary use is for iPad movies, but the ‘phones work fine with my rather dated iPhone 3G, my HackPro (which uses an iOGear BT dongle), the MacBook Air and the MacMini used as a home theater computer. The latter is handy as you can listen to movies on your big screen TV using these Bluetooth headphones, and disturb no one during a spot of late night viewing. On the iDevices pairing is simply a question of holding down the button on the right headset for a few seconds until you get alternating red and blue LEDs, then going to Settings->General->Bluetooth. On desktops and laptops you go to System Preferences-> and have at it. In all cases, disconnect the existing Bluetooth connection or things get hairy and be sure you are not charging the ‘phones while you do this – I had no luck pairing while charging.

Here are some screenshots of the pairing process.

Pairing on an iDevice:

Step 1

Step 2

Select the Eq which suits your ears best – forget what it’s called, go with your ears:

Step 3

Pairing on a laptop or desktop:

Step 1 – System Preferences

Step 2 – Paired.

Step 3. System Preferences->Sound. Redirect the output to the headphones.

Use with AppleTV2:

As TUAW confirms, ATV2 includes a Bluetooth chip but it is not accessible in the device as shipped. Frustrating. You can hack your ATV2 to make BT work but it’s likely that future software updates will reverse the hack, so I’m leaving it alone for now. Hopefully Apple will add a Bluetooth switch in its ATV2 software. Meanwhile, rumors suggest that the next ATV OS update will add Bluetooth functionality to ATV2. That will be great if it happens.

These ‘phones fit over the ear (Van Gogh need not apply), like the Sennheisers, but rather than using a sprung steel band across the top of your head to provide grip, they hook over each ear instead with the connecting band serving no mechanical purpose other than connecting the two speakers and providing a route for the wire buried within, to get sound to both ears.

The P311 headphones over the ear, showing the controls.
No problem when wearing glasses, either.

The volume control buttons are visible above; the other two black buttons are for fast forward and reverse (next/previous track) and the center button is on/off/pause/answering phone calls. All controls worked perfectly with the iPod app on my iPhone and iPad.

The P311s comes with a nice, semi hard case. The earspeakers are folded in eyeglasses-style, and the astrophysics degree you just got to put away your Sennheisers is now useless:

Sound: I tested the ‘phones on classical piano and on Ken Russell’s extraordinary movie ‘Mahler‘. The sound is excellent. You won’t get earth shaking bass from speakers this small (especially given their low level of sealing to the ear) but experimenting with the EQ settings in an iDevice (see above) gets you the best sound, based on your hearing. Both the iDevice and P311 volume controls remain functional so you can mute from either. Pausing using the big, central button on the right speaker also pauses the movie or iPod on your iDevice.

Despite fitting lightly over the ears, these provide a fair amount of sound isolation. You are not sealed from the outside world but there is a significant amount of noise reduction. Best as I can tell there is no electronic noise cancellation technology in the P311s.

Comfort: If you tilt your head back the crossbar will strike the base of your neck and try to displace the ‘phones. Whether that’s an issue only you can decide. In practice it suggests these ‘phones may be sub-optimal for aggressive work out routines. The picture of the acrobat on Arctic’s web site strikes me as ludicrous.That’s not what I use them for so I cannot comment.

Microphone: There’s a built-in mic for use with the iPhone. I have not tested it.

Range: Extraordinary. There is no loss of signal until you are over 40 feet from either iPad or iPod, despite intervening walls and a staircase. This translates, in practice, into ‘walk-about’ functionality in the average home without having to take your sound source with you

A fine set of phones at a great price and a worthy replacement for my damaged Sennheisers. There’s the inconvenience of having to recharge these, but as their battery life exceeds that of the related iPad I use them with, it’s hardly an issue, as I simply recharge both simultaneously. BT pairing on the five devices I tested – iPhone 3G, iPad, HackPro, MacMini and MacBook Air was flawless. Let’s hope pairing with the AppleTV2 arrives with the next ATV OS update. Recommended, but try them first to see if they are comfortable for you.

Most importantly, cordless ‘phones transform an iPad from “I’m not going to lug that around” to a functional music source, whether from stored music, your Home Sharing or, soon the iCloud.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!

It’s happening.

The two biggest disabling issues making it impossible for serious photographers to use the iPad as a portable photo processing device are the paucity of good photo processing apps and the iPad’s low storage capacity.

The former issue is being rapidly resolved as new processing apps geared to touch screens seem to be appearing wekly.

The latter has finally been addressed by some clever people at Hitachi.

Click the image for the Hitachi site.

The device, priced at $200 and available in 4 weeks, will behave as a wireless hard drive for your iPad. So, if it works as advertised, that means that you should be able to download your RAW files to the device and then process the images from your iPad. Whether direct download from a USB card reader to the G-Connect is possible is unclear, but if it is and if delivers as promised, I’ll be in line.

Given that the primary (only?) reason to buy a 64gB iPad over the 16gB one, a poky 48gB storage increase, is if you want to store lots of videos or RAW files on your iPad, why not get this device instead? The price increase is the same, the weight penalty minor – it’s likely little larger than a notebook HDD – and you can use it as a wireless disk with any computer.

For a daily snap be sure to visit my photoblog Snap!