<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photographs, Photographers and Photography &#187; Lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/category/photography/hardware/lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography</link>
	<description>This journal discusses photography in all its guises with an emphasis on the art of making photographs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 100mm Macro-L with IS</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/01/canon-100mm-macro-l-with-is/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/01/canon-100mm-macro-l-with-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=2569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Macro finally gets IS. While I find Canon&#8217;s announcement of yet another APS-C camera, the 7D, underwhelming &#8211; who needs yet another &#8216;me too&#8217; DSLR? &#8211; this did catch my eye: The new 100mm f/2.8 &#8216;L&#8217; IS Macro I have had nothing but good experiences with the existing (non-L, non-IS) macro which seems almost &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/01/canon-100mm-macro-l-with-is/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/01/canon-100mm-macro-l-with-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting closer</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/06/16/getting-closer/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/06/16/getting-closer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/06/16/getting-closer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small, yes, but is it fast? The Olympus Digital Pen is an exciting prospect for those of us interested in an affordable alternative to the ridiculously priced digital Leica M8, whose cost of entry with a lens is well north of $7,000. The Olympus Digital Pen wit the 17mm (=34mm) non-zoom lens At $900 for &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/06/16/getting-closer/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/06/16/getting-closer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lens of the Year</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/06/lens-of-the-year/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/06/lens-of-the-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/06/lens-of-the-year/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No contest. It&#8217;s not so much &#8216;Lens of the Year&#8217; as it is &#8216;Outfit of the Year&#8217; and the choice will surprise none who have been visiting here recently. Canon 5D, Canon 100mm EF Macro and Bower ring flash While none of this gear is &#8216;new&#8217; &#8211; the 100mm macro has been around for ages, &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/06/lens-of-the-year/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/06/lens-of-the-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon &#8211; you need to fix your glass</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/10/31/canon-you-need-to-fix-your-glass/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/10/31/canon-you-need-to-fix-your-glass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/10/31/canon-you-need-to-fix-your-glass/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply unacceptable color fringing. 5D, 50mm f/1.4 at f/8 &#8211; after and before correcting for green and red chromatic aberration When processing the picture included in yesterday&#8217;s journal entry, I was reminded again of the truly frightful extent of uncorrected chromatic aberration (color fringing) in Canon&#8217;s 50mm f/1.4 standard lens. For many this is a &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/10/31/canon-you-need-to-fix-your-glass/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/10/31/canon-you-need-to-fix-your-glass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let there be light</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/16/let-there-be-light/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/16/let-there-be-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/16/let-there-be-light/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No half measures here! My preliminary ramblings about the Canon 100mm macro focused largely on ergonomics with a quick peek at image quality. One of the advantages of the 100mm focal length is the doubled &#8211; compared with a 50mm &#8211; subject to camera distance, making lighting issues easier. But I decided I wasn&#8217;t about &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/16/let-there-be-light/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/16/let-there-be-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 100mm Macro &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/12/canon-100mm-macro-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/12/canon-100mm-macro-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/12/canon-100mm-macro-part-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not your father&#8217;s macro lens. For a preamble on macro lenses, please click here. Over the past five years anytime I wanted to get really close to something meant using my Olympus C5050Z five megapixel digital. Quality is decent, it focuses postage stamp close and framing using the built-in LCD screen is dead accurate. Rack &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/12/canon-100mm-macro-part-i/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/05/12/canon-100mm-macro-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon&#8217;s big guns</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/16/canons-big-guns/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/16/canons-big-guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/16/canons-big-guns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch how they are made. A reader posted an interesting comment (scroll down) with a link to Canon&#8217;s videos showing how lenses are made. (That same reader was very helpful in resolving a problem that prevented Internet Explorer users from commenting &#8211; thank you, Ben!). Click on Lens Assembly Process (click through to get there &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/16/canons-big-guns/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/16/canons-big-guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 400mm f/5.6 &#8216;L&#8217; lens &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/04/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/04/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/04/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens-part-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simply the best 400mm lens I have used. Refer back to Part I for the design and handling aspects of this lens. Now for some pictures. These were snapped with the camera/lens mounted at the lens ring on a Bogen 2016 monopod, one of the greatest bargains for any photographer. The monopod is fitted with &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/04/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens-part-ii/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/04/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 400mm f/5.6 &#8216;L&#8217; lens &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/03/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/03/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/03/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, the ergonomics Ergonomics are vital to all effective machine design and nowhere is this more true in photography than with really long lenses. The user is already confronting slow apertures and a high risk of camera shake. A poorly handling lens does nothing to help. So in this first of two parts (the second &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/03/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/12/03/canon-400mm-f56-l-lens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 20mm &#8211; some further thoughts</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/29/canon-20mm-some-further-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/29/canon-20mm-some-further-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/29/canon-20mm-some-further-thoughts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not perfect &#8211; you get what you pay for, I suppose. I wrote in somewhat lukewarm terms of the underwhelming definition of the Canon 20mm lens here. I took a more objective view of the vignetting issue by banging out four snaps on the old estate, camera and lens dutifully mounted on a tripod, at &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/29/canon-20mm-some-further-thoughts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/29/canon-20mm-some-further-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon&#8217;s 20mm f/2.8 lens</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/07/canons-20mm-f28-lens/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/07/canons-20mm-f28-lens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/07/canons-20mm-f28-lens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s nice to have a 20mm again Chevy. 5d, 20mm, ISO 250, 1/500, f/11, 1 stop underexposed, processed in Aperture No question about it, I miss my 21mm Leica Asph Elmarit, though who can afford one at $3k+ today beats me. The Canon 24-105mm L zoom is wonderful, if a tad bulky and heavy, and &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/07/canons-20mm-f28-lens/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/07/canons-20mm-f28-lens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon and collimation</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/05/canon-and-collimation/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/05/canon-and-collimation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 13:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/05/canon-and-collimation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An intriguing new feature in the latest pro Canon DSLR It was a rite of passage when using my rangefinder Leica bodies &#8211; the M2 and M3. Should the rangefinder alignment go out for whatever reason, you would go outside, place the camera on a tripod, focus on infinity then remove the lens. Sighting the &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/05/canon-and-collimation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2007/06/05/canon-and-collimation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full aperture</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/12/15/full-aperture/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/12/15/full-aperture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/12/15/full-aperture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[f/1.4 is fast! I have never owned a lens faster than f/2. That said, the f/2s I have owned have invariably said &#8216;Leica Summicron&#8217; on them, whether 35mm, 50mm or 90mm. Which is sort of like saying that all your sports cars have been Porsches, meaning the best of breed. At 90mm, that was an &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/12/15/full-aperture/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/12/15/full-aperture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A tale of two lenses</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/30/a-tale-of-two-lenses/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/30/a-tale-of-two-lenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/30/a-tale-of-two-lenses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some empirical tests deliver surprising results. Being the &#8216;serious&#8217; photographer in the family, the sad responsibility of selling off everyone&#8217;s film cameras naturally falls on my shoulders as we all move on to the world of digital picture taking. I made mention of my mother-in-law&#8217;s magnificent Kodak Medalist II earlier, at which time I also &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/30/a-tale-of-two-lenses/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/30/a-tale-of-two-lenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vibration Reduction</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/17/vibration-reduction/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/17/vibration-reduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/17/vibration-reduction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The greatest photographic invention since digital imaging. The current B&#038;H paper catalog contains no fewer than ten pages listing some 132 digital cameras, from inexpensive point-and-shoots to full frame Canon DSLRs. So there&#8217;s no shortage of choice at any price point. What is intriguing is that some 25% of these now include words like &#8220;Image &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/17/vibration-reduction/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/11/17/vibration-reduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So you thought f/1.4 was fast?</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/30/so-you-thought-f14-was-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/30/so-you-thought-f14-was-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/30/so-you-thought-f14-was-fast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about f/0.85 back in 1934? &#8216;Glamor&#8217; lenses for 35mm cameras, the ones with bragging power, have either entailed large apertures or extreme length. On the extreme length end, it was rather like the cubic capacity of motorcycles. Once you hit the magic thousand, you had bragging rights. So when Vincent motorcycles (then known as &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/30/so-you-thought-f14-was-fast/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/30/so-you-thought-f14-was-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 15mm Fisheye lens &#8211; Part III</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/08/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/08/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/08/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-iii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mind you don&#8217;t bump into things I mentioned in Part I that this lens can focus very close. So close in fact that in this image one of the flowers almost touched the bulbous front element! Canon EOS 5D, 15mm fisheye, ISO 50, 1/20th second. Gaussian blur added to edges in Photoshop So getting close &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/08/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-iii/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/08/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 15mm Fisheye lens &#8211; Part II</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/05/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/05/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only wider than the 14mm, it more than holds its own I dropped by Hearst Castle again today to put the Canon Fisheye lens through its paces. The ultra wide angle of view, equivalent to a 12mm full frame lens using ImageAlign &#8211; see Part I &#8211; is ideal for interiors of the magnificent &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/05/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-ii/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/05/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 15mm Fisheye lens &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/03/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/03/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not just a throwback to the sixties Update November 2009: ImageAlign is out of business and the plugin described here is no longer available. However, something every bit as good is available. It&#8217;s called PTLens and you can read about it here. Lightroom3 also now includes &#8216;defishing&#8217; controls. The lengthy list of things best forgotten &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/03/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/06/03/canon-15mm-fisheye-lens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 200mm f/2.8 &#8216;L&#8217; lens</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/05/30/canon-200mm-f28-l-lens/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/05/30/canon-200mm-f28-l-lens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 21:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally, a replacement for the magnificent Leica Apo-Telyt-R Mention of the fabulous Leica Apo-Telyt-R lens in my column on the Leicaflex SL the other day prompts mention of its replacement which I have been using for a few weeks now on the Canon EOS 5D. Available during the period 1975-98, the 180mm f/3.4 Apo-Telyt was &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/05/30/canon-200mm-f28-l-lens/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2006/05/30/canon-200mm-f28-l-lens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

