<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Photographs, Photographers and Photography &#187; Lightroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/category/photography/sofware/adobe-lightroom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography</link>
	<description>This journal discusses photography in all its guises with an emphasis on the art of making photographs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ACR lens profiles</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/26/acr-lens-profiles/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/26/acr-lens-profiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon lenses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=16843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fixing what ails fine optics. Adobe has long provided a free utility named Adobe Lens Profile Creator which permits any user to generate lens profiles which will correct the three most common causes of image degradation &#8211; vignetting, chromatic aberration and distortion. These profiles work with Lightroom 3 or later and with Photoshop CS4 or &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/26/acr-lens-profiles/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/26/acr-lens-profiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lightroom 4 book by Martin Evening</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/25/the-lightroom-4-book-by-martin-evening/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/25/the-lightroom-4-book-by-martin-evening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=16807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just buy it. While there is a case to be made for non-photographers testing new hardware &#8211; after all you don&#8217;t have to be Annie Liebovitz to stick a camera on a tripod and shoot a test chart &#8211; no such argument can be sustained when it comes to writing software instruction books. The hardware &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/25/the-lightroom-4-book-by-martin-evening/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/03/25/the-lightroom-4-book-by-martin-evening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 4 Beta</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/01/10/lightroom-4-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/01/10/lightroom-4-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=15141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh! You can download the Beta version of Lightroom 4 here. Windows XP users are SOL. After a quick look and comparison of pictures on identical monitors side-by-side against LR3, here are my observations: Not a major upgrade unless you do movies. RAW Import and preview generation speed no different from LR3. Despite renamed sliders &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/01/10/lightroom-4-beta/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2012/01/10/lightroom-4-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on keywords</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/07/more-on-keywords/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/07/more-on-keywords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=13264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do it now, save time later. I wrote about the need for key wording back when Lightroom 2 was the current thing here. Since then I have been eating my own cooking and after several &#8216;catch-up&#8217; sessions now make it a practice to keyword all new snaps placed in the LR3 catalog immediately. You are &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/07/more-on-keywords/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/09/07/more-on-keywords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom with Shutterfly</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/15/lightroom-with-shutterfly/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/15/lightroom-with-shutterfly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=12371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calendars on the fly. There are few better ways of sharing your pictures than with a calendar. You can be sure the recipient will display each of your twelve snaps for a month, which is a lot more attention than they command on your website or blog! Further, forget the tired system that has the &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/15/lightroom-with-shutterfly/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/07/15/lightroom-with-shutterfly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collections and Slideshows</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/03/17/collections-and-slideshows/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/03/17/collections-and-slideshows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=10573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Useful Lightroom tools. Two powerful tools in Lightroom which perhaps don&#8217;t get the recognition they deserve are Collections and Slideshows. Collections allow you to group selected images in one place, suitably named. No catalog bloat results, as a Collection is simply a set of pointers to existing pictures in your Lightroom catalog. Collections in Lightroom. &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/03/17/collections-and-slideshows/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2011/03/17/collections-and-slideshows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Adobe lens corrections in Lightroom 3</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/14/more-on-adobe-lens-corrections-in-lightroom-3/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/14/more-on-adobe-lens-corrections-in-lightroom-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=7882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very clever indeed. A friend wrote recently how much he was enjoying using the newly added built-in lens corrections in Lightroom 3 with his ultra-wide Nikon zoom on a pair of Nikon pro bodies, a lens whose profile is included with Lightroom 3. This got me thinking. How can one-click corrections work when distortion varies &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/14/more-on-adobe-lens-corrections-in-lightroom-3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/14/more-on-adobe-lens-corrections-in-lightroom-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topaz DeNoise</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/04/topaz-denoise/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/04/topaz-denoise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[G1/G2/G3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=7629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snake oil? I confess that I have always regarded noise reduction applications for digital images as so much snake oil &#8211; a solution which makes the problem worse. Sure, they reduce noise but they also destroy definition in the process. Better noisy and sharp than blurred and smooth, in my book. Further, with most of &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/04/topaz-denoise/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/04/topaz-denoise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keywords in Lightroom</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/03/keywords-in-lightroom/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/03/keywords-in-lightroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=7621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A useful discipline. No matter how well you catalog your images in Lightroom, adding keywords always helps. That snap at the beach may belong under &#8216;Beach and Sea&#8217; in your catalog or, equally well, under &#8216;Abstracts&#8217;. But if you add the name of the beach as a keyword, or the words &#8216;beach&#8217; if it&#8217;s cataloged &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/03/keywords-in-lightroom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/03/keywords-in-lightroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lens profile correction in practice</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/02/lens-profile-correction-in-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/02/lens-profile-correction-in-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=7597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A dream to use. Having explained how to create your own lens profiles for use with Lightroom3 yesterday, here&#8217;s that experience being put to use. In this snap I wanted to emphasize the foreground sign to heighten the impact of the lone child on the beach. As you can see the original is rather blah &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/02/lens-profile-correction-in-practice/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/02/lens-profile-correction-in-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 3 Lens Profile Creator</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/01/lightroom-3-lens-profile-creator/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/01/lightroom-3-lens-profile-creator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=7523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DIY lens profiles. Adobe has not left Panasonic MFT camera users out in the cold when it comes to automation of corrections to remove distortion, chromatic aberration and vignetting in Lightroom 3. They provide a fine tool to create your own lens profiles, for example when using non-Panasonic lenses on a G-digital body, like my &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/01/lightroom-3-lens-profile-creator/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/08/01/lightroom-3-lens-profile-creator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A great Lightroom 3 book</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/07/31/a-great-lightroom-3-book/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/07/31/a-great-lightroom-3-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=7525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin Evening scores again. It&#8217;s been almost a year since I wrote about Martin Evening&#8217;s outstanding Lightroom 2 reference book and the Lightroom 3 version is now available. Best of all, you can get it in a Kindle eBook version which will play on up to five devices &#8211; I have mine on the iPad &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/07/31/a-great-lightroom-3-book/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/07/31/a-great-lightroom-3-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 3 grain</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/12/lightroom-3-grain/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/12/lightroom-3-grain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=6804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A useful addition. One of the new features in LR3 is a set of sliders to add and manipulate the traditional effect of grain from film days of yore. Here&#8217;s a straight, unprocessed snap: Plane, graves and flowers. 5D, 1/350, f/11, 24-105mm at 24mm. Here&#8217;s an enlarged section of the above &#8211; note the grain &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/12/lightroom-3-grain/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/12/lightroom-3-grain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 3</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/08/lightroom-3/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/08/lightroom-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=6755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some outstanding improvements. Lightroom 3 has exited the Beta test stage and is now available as a $99 upgrade to Lightroom 2 users. I tried the Beta version but when it choked converting my previews to the new version after an hour of grinding away I decided someone else could do the testing and spent &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/08/lightroom-3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/06/08/lightroom-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running Lightroom on the iPad</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/26/running-lightroom-on-the-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/26/running-lightroom-on-the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=6634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prepare to have your mind blown. Yes. You read that right. I am using my iPad as a remote viewing and control device for Lightroom, which is running on my desktop HackPro under OS X Snow Leopard. The iPad app I am using is named LogMeIn Ignition and costs $29.99 for the iPad. You think &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/26/running-lightroom-on-the-ipad/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2010/05/26/running-lightroom-on-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom wins</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/22/lightroom-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/22/lightroom-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/?p=3094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aperture is dead in the water. Having started serious volume digital photo processing with Apple&#8217;s Aperture and finally made the switch to Lightroom almost two years ago, the following data recently released by Adobe hardly surprise me: Clearly, I&#8217;m not the only one making the move, especially if you take into account the large increase &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/22/lightroom-wins/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2009/09/22/lightroom-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightroom 2 on an older Mac</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/18/lightroom-2-on-an-older-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/18/lightroom-2-on-an-older-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/18/lightroom-2-on-an-older-mac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Useable. I mentioned a while back that I would comment on how Lightroom 2 runs on an older Mac. I had tried LR 2.1 on my 6 years old iMac (IBM G4 1.25gHz CPU, 1 mB of RAM) and it was not useable for localized adjustments such as the adjustment brush. You would paint something &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/18/lightroom-2-on-an-older-mac/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/18/lightroom-2-on-an-older-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tethered photography with Lightroom 2</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/14/tethered-photography-with-lightroom-2/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/14/tethered-photography-with-lightroom-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/14/tethered-photography-with-lightroom-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit tricky. The idea of tethered photography with a digital camera is that what you snap appears shortly thereafter in Lightroom on a screen size of your choice. Practically, this translates into controlled conditions where the camera and a computer can remain close together, so think studio photography. No matter whether your subject is &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/14/tethered-photography-with-lightroom-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/12/14/tethered-photography-with-lightroom-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP Designjet paper profiles in Lightroom 2</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/24/hp-designjet-paper-profiles-in-lightroom-2/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/24/hp-designjet-paper-profiles-in-lightroom-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/24/hp-designjet-paper-profiles-in-lightroom-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trust HP to design this for engineers, not humans In yesterday&#8217;s column I mentioned the existence of aftermarket profiles for some interesting papers made by the likes of Hahnemühle and Arches. These are swellable papers designed to absorb the ink dyes used in the HP DJ 30/90/130 printers. That&#8217;s all well and good, but how &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/24/hp-designjet-paper-profiles-in-lightroom-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/24/hp-designjet-paper-profiles-in-lightroom-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camera profiles in Lightroom</title>
		<link>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/19/camera-profiles-in-lightroom/</link>
		<comments>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/19/camera-profiles-in-lightroom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Pindelski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/19/camera-profiles-in-lightroom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now you can match the manufacturer&#8217;s intent. I have generally avoided using Canon&#8217;s DPP Professional software which comes with the 5D. Clunky, slow, limited in application and not integrated with my man processing &#8216;engine&#8217; &#8211; Lightroom &#8211; plus all those comedic spelling errors, well, it&#8217;s all just too much. Or too little. Now Adobe has &#8230; <a href="http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/19/camera-profiles-in-lightroom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://pindelski.org/Photography/2008/11/19/camera-profiles-in-lightroom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

