Let’s hope for a GF2.
The 43Rumors site speculates that the Panasonic G1 has been discontinued.
That wouldn’t surprise me. The camera lacks the GH1’s movie mode (not a factor for me but doubtless bad in those tabular comparisons beloved of gearhead sites) and two years in a field with rapidly changing technology is probably as long a life as anyone can expect.
What would make me trade? Well, I’m hoping for a GF2 – meaning a body shaped like the GF1 with the deletion of the pop-up flash, this being replaced by the G1’s excellent electronic viewfinder – much in the same location as on the rangefinder Leica M models. The EVF can only get better and marvelous as the G1’s finder is, Panny can improve on its tendency to blow out bright lights as well as reduce the noise in lower lighting. The noise thing is, however, way exaggerated by the mass media. Which would you prefer? A near invisible traditional DSLR view or a noisy but bright one from an EVF?
Come to think of it, why not a slimmed down version of Panny’s own failed L1 which was overpriced and offered mediocre sensor quality and a lousy EVF in an oversized package? I would think that by now Panny has realized that the original marketing focus on point-and-shoot upgraders is too narrow and that the whole micro-four thirds thing is now becoming a very serious threat to all those gargantuan DSLRs out there.
The GH2/G2 – take an L1 and remove 30% of the bulk and weight.
And while you are at it Panny, please add a real click stopped ISO dial on the top plate and make that darned wheel less easy to depress so that I cease constantly going into exposure correction mode when all I want to do is change the aperture or shutter speed.
If, on the other hand, the G2 is just a warmed over thing with more buttons, I can see adding another G1 as a back-up when the body only price drops to $300.
The L1 doesn’t have a lousy EVF, it has no EVF it is an optical viewfinder because it is a DSLR! Also the sensor is not mediocre, it is susceptible to poor exposures more than some, but properly exposed even ISO is usable. I also have newer Olympus DSLRs and the image quality from the L1 in some respects exceeds them when MP are scaled. The L1 and L10 have very week AA filters, which makes output extremely sharp. The L1 has excellent colour reproduction but benefits from working in RAW. If you work in RAW you will find the DR is amongst the best in class. Plus no mention was made of three of the L1’s best features, the bounce flash, the quality of construction and the feel in the hand.
I stand corrected. I should have written that the L1 has a lousy optical viewfinder:
DPReview has the details.