{"id":11779,"date":"2011-05-31T14:39:50","date_gmt":"2011-05-31T21:39:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/?p=11779"},"modified":"2011-06-11T07:57:17","modified_gmt":"2011-06-11T14:57:17","slug":"plasma-displays","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2011\/05\/31\/plasma-displays\/","title":{"rendered":"Plasma displays"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>The sweet point.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Plasma and LCD displays continue to compete, with the latter now making the manufacture of plasma screens much below 42&#8243; an uncompetitive proposition.  But though plasma displays are heavier and use more energy than LCDs, and though they use a glass front plate with all the attendant issue of reflections, they remain the standard by which contrast range is judged.  Nothing beats the blacks of a plasma screen. <\/p>\n<p>What prompts this piece is my use of an inexpensive LCD display for <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2011\/05\/29\/tomorrows-photo-gallery-realized\/ target=_blank>display of art on the wall<\/a>.  I thought it might be interesting to compare prices of plasma displays at different screen sizes.<\/p>\n<p>For some five years now the 104&#8243; Panasonic plasma display has been the largest readily available plasma display, starting out at some $90,000. You see them now and then on TV where they are used for presentation purposes, though it is ordinarily far cheaper to simply use a blue screen behind a news anchor to project charts and the like.<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Panasonic_104_Plasma.jpg\" width=\"800\" height=\"546\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><i>The Panasonic 104&#8243; display.<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>That Panny whopper has come down in price a lot, and I compare the most common Panny 1080p plasma displays for size, price and weight in the following table.  The &#8216;Area ratio&#8217; refers to the relative surface area of each screen compared to the 42&#8243; one.  So the Panny 104&#8243; has more than six times the area of the 42&#8243;:<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/TV_ratios.jpg\" width=\"272\" height=\"130\" alt=\"\" \/><\/center><\/p>\n<p>The chart clearly shows that the pricing sweet spot fades rapidly once the screen size exceeds 65&#8243;, and you can bet that there&#8217;s not that much left to be gained from economies of scale, as it&#8217;s unlikely that displays larger than 65&#8243; will ever sell in the quantities needed to really bring prices down.  Homes are simply not large enough, for the most part, and the logistical nightmare of installing a 500 lb. display does the rest.<\/p>\n<p>Not that I would complain if you gave me that 104&#8243; display, having lived with a <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/08\/26\/qtvr-on-the-big-screen\/ target=_blank>100&#8243; projection screen<\/a> in our previous home.  The problem with the projection screen was that you needed a darkened room for the overhead projector to cast a contrasty image, but the price of the installation was a small fraction of the Panny plasma whopper.<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Home_theater_cost.jpg\" width=\"373\" height=\"151\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><i>Cost of a 100&#8243; projection system.<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Power consumption &#8211; a few watts, compared to 1,500 for the giant Panasonic.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The sweet point. Plasma and LCD displays continue to compete, with the latter now making the manufacture of plasma screens much below 42&#8243; an uncompetitive proposition. But though plasma displays are heavier and use more energy than LCDs, and though they use a glass front plate with all the attendant issue of reflections, they remain &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2011\/05\/31\/plasma-displays\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Plasma displays<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hardware"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11779"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11921,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11779\/revisions\/11921"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}