{"id":189,"date":"2006-07-06T07:03:35","date_gmt":"2006-07-06T14:03:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/07\/06\/a-plug-in-for-filmies-2\/"},"modified":"2016-01-18T19:25:44","modified_gmt":"2016-01-19T02:25:44","slug":"a-plug-in-for-filmies-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/07\/06\/a-plug-in-for-filmies-2\/","title":{"rendered":"A plug-in for filmies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Now retro-tech can make your work look like Sarah Moon&#8217;s<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>First I should explain that &#8216;filmie&#8217; is a new noun used to describe those poor boobs who mourn the passing of film.  They rue the passing of a tired technology, messy chemicals and a medieval production cycle. So if you are a filmie, read on.  Indeed, I might be mistaken for one of those twits with all those recent ramblings about <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/06\/23\/kodachrome\/ target=_blank>Kodachrome<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Back in the Sixties, French photographer Sarah Moon discovered Ansco&#8217;s GAF500 color film.  Nominally rated at 500 ASA &#8211; it was actually a bit slower but the marketers got to it first &#8211; it made over-exposed and over-developed TriX look fine grained by comparison.  The film was very low contrast so everything looked sort of &#8230;. filmy, if you get my drift.  Had it been around in Georges Seurat&#8217;s day he would have put down his paint brush, shaken off incipient carpal tunnel, and used a camera instead.<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Seurat.jpg><\/p>\n<p><i>Seurat does GAF500.  Or was it the other way around?<\/i><\/p>\n<p><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Moon.jpg><\/p>\n<p><i>Sarah Moon does Seurat<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Moon was working for Pirelli doing their calendar when she took the above; someone at Pirelli decided mechanics preferred their women blurred and grainy so they retained her to do the photography.  I confess I have yet to meet such a mechanic, but maybe they are all French?<\/p>\n<p>GAF500 has been unavailable for decades and the original slides made with it will long since have faded.  I took a roll to Paris once and confirmed what Georges and Sarah knew.  It was a great film.<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Eiffel.jpg><\/p>\n<p><i>Pindelski does Seurat.  Eiffel Tower, Leica M3, 35mm Summaron, GAF500<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Well, I&#8217;m obviously not the only filmie around as a company named Alien Skin (What? Hard to think up a less appealing name) has come up with a product named <a href=http:\/\/www.alienskin.com\/exposure\/exposure_examples.html target=_blank>Exposure<\/a> which, they say, will allow your digital pictures to look as if they were taken on GAF500.  Or Kodachrome.  Or lots of other emulsions.  Now at $100 I&#8217;m not rushing out to buy it, but it&#8217;s nice to know that if I ever get another GAF500 urge I can indulge in grain excess using this product.  The demo is fully functional for thirty days, by the way.<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/EHHGAF500.jpg><\/p>\n<p><i>Pindelski does Moon.  Pentax 6&#215;7, Kodachrome, Alien Skin&#8217;s GAF500 conversion<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>And here&#8217;s a babe in monochrome:<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/EHHTriX.jpg><\/p>\n<p><i>Pindelski does Bailey. Alien Skin&#8217;s TriX conversion<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>I actually think I like the &#8216;Cross Processed Agfa Optima&#8217; version:<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/EHHXP.jpg><\/p>\n<p><i>Pindelski does drugs.  Alien Skin&#8217;s Agfa Optima conversion<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Finally, the glamor lighting version.<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/EHHglamor.jpg><\/p>\n<p><i>Alien Skin&#8217;s glamor lighting conversion<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Fair&#8217;s fair.  The AS people (oh! dear) do that one really well.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now retro-tech can make your work look like Sarah Moon&#8217;s. First I should explain that &#8216;filmie&#8217; is a new noun used to describe those poor boobs who mourn the passing of film. They rue the passing of a tired technology, messy chemicals and a medieval production cycle. So if you are a filmie, read on. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/07\/06\/a-plug-in-for-filmies-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A plug-in for filmies<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sofware"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30488,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189\/revisions\/30488"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}