{"id":244,"date":"2006-08-21T07:06:37","date_gmt":"2006-08-21T14:06:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/08\/21\/a-predictable-disappointment\/"},"modified":"2014-02-06T23:11:37","modified_gmt":"2014-02-07T06:11:37","slug":"a-predictable-disappointment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/08\/21\/a-predictable-disappointment\/","title":{"rendered":"A predictable disappointment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>The Panasonic Lumix L1 is a catastrophe<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Much as I predicted a couple of months back <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/06\/21\/digital-leica-not\/ target=_blank>the Panasonic Lumix L1<\/a> which has just hit the market is nothing short of a catastrophe as photographic tools go.  This is Panasonic&#8217;s first attempt at a DSLR with removable lenses so you would think it should be good.  For $2,000 you get what sounds like a nice Leica lens and decent manual controls.  You also get about the worst viewfinder possible and no image buffer, meaning that shooting in RAW demands a five second pause between pictures while the camera saves the image direct to the card.  <\/p>\n<p>A remarkably objective review by <a href=http:\/\/luminous-landscape.com\/reviews\/cameras\/Panasonic-L1.shtml target=_blank>Michael Reichmann<\/a> &#8211; remarkable as he admits the camera was a loaner so you would think he would make nice &#8211; confirms my earlier conjecture that the use of the lousy viewfinder from the Olympus Evolt E-330 would make the L1 a lousy camera, and adds the killer point about the absence of the RAW buffer.  Thank you for your candor, Mr. Reichmann.<\/p>\n<p>Sure, Panasonic seems to have cured the worst of its noise problems in the images, but that&#8217;s hardly much use when you can barely see what the devil you are photographing in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>I have not used the L1 and am not about to.  Suffice it to say that he compares the viewfinder unfavorably to the one in the Canon Rebel 350. That I have used and must say the viewfinder in the Rebel is underwhelming to the point of mediocrity, as the image is so small. At least it&#8217;s bright.  The 5D is fine, just like a regular SLR if not Leica bright, so you can see where I am coming from.  Then again, at $3,000 the 5D had better be good.<\/p>\n<p>Leave this camera to the Leica fetishists who will buy it because it looks like a Leica M rangefinder which, I suppose, is about as bad a reason to buy a camera as I can think of.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update as of November 11, 2006:  I retract what I wrote about Reichmann&#8217;s apparent objectivity, above.  Please read the <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/11\/11\/leicas-watergate\/ target=_blank>following journal entry<\/a><\/b>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Panasonic Lumix L1 is a catastrophe Much as I predicted a couple of months back the Panasonic Lumix L1 which has just hit the market is nothing short of a catastrophe as photographic tools go. This is Panasonic&#8217;s first attempt at a DSLR with removable lenses so you would think it should be good. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/08\/21\/a-predictable-disappointment\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A predictable disappointment<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cameras"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26615,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244\/revisions\/26615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}