I am more convinced than ever that this is true.<\/p>\n
Here’s a time line for this year’s annual family picture mailed to all our friends:<\/p>\n
11:30 am – Family commences donning decent clothing. No jeans allowed!
\n11:40 am – Old Olympus 5050 digital is placed on the tripod and a test shot is made. This camera, despite the horrible shutter lag, boasts a fine wireless remote which is easily hidden in the palm.
\n11:47 am – The first picture is taken
\n12:06 am – The last of 22 pictures is taken – you try to get all five people, including a dog and cat known to conspire, looking good at the same time
\n12:10 am – The best snap is chosen in iPhoto and cropped to 3:2 to match the 6″ x 4″ prints we will order
\n12:15 am – The picture of choice is uploaded to Walgreens and forty ordered at 19 cents a print
\n12:25 am – Walgreens emails that the prints are ready for collection
\n12:35 am – The family, having strolled down the road, picks up the pictures at Walgreens and hands over $8.23
\n12:36 am – We cross the road to the greasy spoon for lunch and share the pictures with the nice Koreans who run it so well<\/p>\n
1 hour and 5 minutes start to end. Meanwhile, the home printer is wondering why his print heads are clogged, the colors are wrong, and then runs out of ink. Walgreens uses a superb Fuji printer which renders lovely skin tones and runs it with Kodak paper, interestingly. They told me it works better that way.<\/p>\n
\nSixty-five minutes, $8.23 and forty prints later<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It cannot get any simpler than this. Almost a year ago I wrote why I believe it makes no sense for a photographer to process his own small prints. I am more convinced than ever that this is true. Here’s a time line for this year’s annual family picture mailed to all our friends: 11:30 … Continue reading The Christmas snap<\/span>