{"id":381,"date":"2007-02-16T10:06:21","date_gmt":"2007-02-16T17:06:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2007\/02\/16\/the-canon-85mm-f18-lens-in-the-studio\/"},"modified":"2021-01-21T02:28:33","modified_gmt":"2021-01-21T09:28:33","slug":"the-canon-85mm-f18-lens-in-the-studio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2007\/02\/16\/the-canon-85mm-f18-lens-in-the-studio\/","title":{"rendered":"The Canon 85mm f\/1.8 lens in the studio"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>They are almost giving these away.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Even if you don&#8217;t bother with Canon&#8217;s sleazy rebate deals &#8211; sleazy because your chances of actually getting your rebate are something of a crapshoot and it is a lousy way for Canon to treat its cusomers by trying to trip them up with endless paperwork &#8211; the 85mm f\/1.8 lens is a superb bargain.  B&#038;H lists it for $340 before rebate.<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Canon_85.jpg><br \/>\n<i>Canon 5D with the 85mm f\/1.8<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>I had toyed with the idea of one for a while, having used a 90mm &#8211; first an Elmar, then a Tele Elmarit, then an Elmarit-M and finally the <i>ne plus ultra<\/i> Asph Apo-Summicron on my M2 and M3 Leicas &#8211; for years.  $2,800!  It&#8217;s an ideal length for head and shoulder portraits in the studio on a full frame 35mm camera.  Forget all that rot about the perspective being better than with a 50mm &#8211; in reality the differences are not noticeable.  No, what makes a difference is the fast maximum aperture, which is nice for composition after the f\/4 of the 24-105mm L zoom, as the viewfinder is quite a bit brighter.  It doesn&#8217;t hurt that the lens is a fraction of the weight and bulk of the zoom.<\/p>\n<p>Using my portable Novatron gear and the background-in-a-bag, my little <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/10\/24\/studio-flash\/ target=_blank>portable studio<\/a> dictates an aperture of f\/5.6 at ISO 100 with the two Novatron heads in reflective umbrellas at 1\/2 and 1\/4 power, respectively.  With the Canon 5D it&#8217;s more like f\/6.3 as Canon is very conservative about its ISO rating.  The LCD screen and a couple of test shots obsolete the electronic flash meter.  The sensor in the camera is about 1\/2 stop more sensitive than indicated.  So when our son&#8217;s fifth birthday rolled around, it was the perfect opportunity to give the 85mm an outing, and all I can report is that the results are indistinguishable from the 90mm Apo Summicron on my M3.  Well, actually better, as the definition is as good but with the 5D&#8217;s wonderful full frame sensor, there is simply no grain visible even in 18x enlargements.  None.  And that makes for wonderfully smooth skin tones compared with 35mm film.  A fairer comparison would be with clunky medium format film gear as far as grain is concerned.  Trust me.  You do not want grain in studio portraits.<\/p>\n<p>Some user reports on the web suggest the lens is a dog, focusing incorrectly.  I can only think that these comments reflect poor technique.  You need to switch off all that silly matrix focusing or whatever it&#8217;s called, make the center rectangle the sole focus point, and <i>focus on the eyes<\/i>.  Half depress the shutter release to lock focus, recompose and click.  The short duration flash puts paid to any camera shake and the Novatron has a 1\/2 second recycle time on these power settings, meaning you can take pictures as fast as you can compose and press the button.<\/p>\n<p>And with children, that&#8217;s a good thing as it&#8217;s simply impossible to predict moods and expressions.  One of the few instances where <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/04\/24\/digital-waste\/ target=_blank>machine-gun shooting<\/a> is justified.  I managed to bang off some ninety picture in 5 minutes (at which point my &#8216;model&#8217; was getting pooped) and four were really good.  One of those, as I flipped though them on the iMac, made me go &#8216;WOW&#8217; and here it is:<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog2\/Winnie_is_five.jpg\" width=\"1014\" height=\"679\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\n<i>Winston at five.  Canon 5D, 85mm f\/1.8 at f\/6.3, ISO 100, two Novatron heads in umbrellas<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Resolving power?  How about this &#8211; the silvered umbrella and flash head are clearly visible:<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Win_eye_85.jpg><br \/>\n<i>At 18x magnification<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>The 18&#8243; x 24&#8243; print is printing right now on the HP DJ90.<\/p>\n<p>Processing?  Simplicity itself.  Drop the originals in Aperture, warm up the color temperature a tad &#8211; the Novatrons are on the cool side &#8211; and press the Print button.  Beauty needs no retouching.<\/p>\n<p>If you are serious about studio snaps get one of these or, if your DSLR uses a cropped sensor, then a 50mm will do as well.  The <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2006\/12\/15\/full-aperture\/ target=_blank>f\/1.4 version from Canon<\/a> is as cheap as the 85mm and is very special; I have little doubt that the offerings from the competition lack anything by comparison &#8211; that&#8217;s competition for you.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>They are almost giving these away. Even if you don&#8217;t bother with Canon&#8217;s sleazy rebate deals &#8211; sleazy because your chances of actually getting your rebate are something of a crapshoot and it is a lousy way for Canon to treat its cusomers by trying to trip them up with endless paperwork &#8211; the 85mm &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2007\/02\/16\/the-canon-85mm-f18-lens-in-the-studio\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Canon 85mm f\/1.8 lens in the studio<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photography"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=381"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36494,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381\/revisions\/36494"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}