\nCan you spell ‘planned obsolescence’?.<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n
While this piece is focused on Apple, like thinking applies to all computer hardware makers. They conspire with the software authors (in Apple’s case they conspire with Apple) to make sure that older machines can no longer run the upgraded operating system and many of the related applications. The conspiracy deepens when you look at the horrendous costs laid on users by ethically challenged businesses like Adobe who, in obsoleting earlier versions of their apps, use the planned obsolescence strategy to force you into a rental payment system, euphemistically known as the ‘subscription model’.<\/p>\n
So it was with the memory of that great recycled Mac Pro that I read this well researched article<\/a> in Macworld magazine. The bottom line is this:<\/p>\n Imagine if your house or your car lasted only 5 years. But, the hypocrites in Apple Marketing are the first to tell you about their environmentally friendly packaging for the new Mac Mini. It’s cardboard<\/I> for heaven’s sake. See for yourself:<\/p>\n Any mention of the fact that your new Mac will be toxic landfill 5 years hence because Engineering was told by Marketing to make sure it’s obsolete by then? And because avoiding that required just a few lines of code? You must be joking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Apple’s planned obsolescence. The other day I sadly took my 2010 Mac Pro to the recyclers. The resale value approximated what it would cost to ship this behemoth and the last six generations of OS X releases saw to it that none would run on the machine, denying me the security fixes announced seemingly monthly. … Continue reading Shocking hypocrisy<\/span>
\nHypocrisy redefined.<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n