{"id":39610,"date":"2025-03-03T10:21:57","date_gmt":"2025-03-03T17:21:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/?p=39610"},"modified":"2025-05-04T12:13:49","modified_gmt":"2025-05-04T19:13:49","slug":"sharpening-the-35mm-f-3-5-summaron-rf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2025\/03\/03\/sharpening-the-35mm-f-3-5-summaron-rf\/","title":{"rendered":"Sharpening the 35mm f\/3.5 Summaron RF"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><I>Pretty easy.<\/I><\/p>\n<p><I>For an index of all Leica-related articles click <a href=https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/indexes\/photography\/leica\/ target=_blank>here<\/a><\/I>.<\/p>\n<p>The other day I was pixel peeping, at 100% magnification, images from the <a href=https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2025\/02\/08\/35mm-f-3-5-leitz-summaron-rf\/ target=_blank>Leitz 35mm f\/3.5 Summaron RF<\/a> taken on Kodak Ektar 100 film.  These would make 48&#8243; x 72&#8243; prints.  Two things are obvious.  There is minor red fringing chromatic aberration, easily removed with one click in the LRc Develop module.  And while this image, taken at the lens&#8217;s sweet spot of f\/8 will easily make a 13&#8243; x 19&#8243; print, start cropping and the definition is not quite there.  Given that this is the least expensive Leitz branded 35mm lens you can buy (other than the poor earlier 35mm f\/3.5 Elmar in LTM) and realizing it was first sold some 70 years ago, I&#8217;m not grumbling.  But can we get a quart out of this pint pot?<\/p>\n<p><center><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog2\/Summaron_sharpen.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\n<I>1\/250th, f\/8, Kodak Ektar 100, Noritsu HQ scan.<\/I><br \/>\n<\/center><\/p>\n<p>Reading up on various sharpening applications I came across one named Gigapixel from Topaz labs, a long time maker of LR plug-ins.  They offer 20 full trial attempts and place no watermark on the enhanced image.  Nice.  The cost is $100.  The examples on their <a href=https:\/\/www.topazlabs.com\/gigapixel target=_blank>web site<\/a> are startling, showing massive improvement in micro-contrast and detail.  Using the above image I could not remotely get comparable improvement.  Indeed, if there was <I>any<\/I> improvement I was very hard pressed to see it.  Either Topaz Labs is using an especially &#8216;friendly&#8217; image which supports their technology or this is pure snake oil.  Either way, $100 saved.<\/p>\n<p>Next I took a look at Affinity Photo 2, v.2.6.0, using their Develop Persona and Document->Resize Document, quadrupling the displayed pixel count, for a file which accordingly grew to four times the size:<\/p>\n<p><center><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog2\/Affinity_sharpen.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\n<I>The Document dialog in Affinity Photo 2.<\/I><br \/>\n<\/center><\/p>\n<p>Again, I could barely notice any difference compared with the original.  Pass.  Lots of disc space saved.<\/p>\n<p>Next I tried LRc&#8217;s native controls.  In the Develop module I went to Photo->Enhance where, for JPGs like this, there is only one active option named Super Resolution:<\/p>\n<p><center><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog2\/LRc_Sharpen1.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\n<I>Super Resolution in LRc.<\/I><br \/>\n<\/center><\/p>\n<p>Well, the file size again quadrupled but the difference was again negligible.<\/p>\n<p>Hmmm, none of this works.<\/p>\n<p>Then I recalled that LRc has a simple Sharpen slider in the Develop module, one which I had not looked at in years as I was using good lenses with large digital sensors, no sharpening needed.<\/p>\n<p><center><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog2\/LRc_sharpen2.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\n<I>Optimal sharpen settings.<\/I><br \/>\n<\/center><\/p>\n<p>Now I <I>really<\/I> started seeing improvements.    In the Develop module you can see &#8216;Before&#8217; and &#8216;After&#8217; images by hitting the &#8216;Y&#8217; key, and here they are, at 100% magnification.  Again, that translates to a 48&#8243; x 72&#8243; print:<\/p>\n<p><center><br \/>\n<a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Summaron_sharpen_big.jpg target=_blank><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog2\/Summaron_sharpened.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<I>100% pixel peeping, &#8216;Before&#8217; (left) and &#8216;After&#8217;.<br \/>\nClick the image for a large original.<\/I><br \/>\n<\/center><\/p>\n<p>Look at the detail in the flag and in the fluting of the Grecian columns. A very significant improvement.  Now I am not about to make prints that large but now I know I can crop images from this ancient optic and get great prints from the crops.  Not half bad for an ancient bit of bottle!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pretty easy. For an index of all Leica-related articles click here. The other day I was pixel peeping, at 100% magnification, images from the Leitz 35mm f\/3.5 Summaron RF taken on Kodak Ektar 100 film. These would make 48&#8243; x 72&#8243; prints. Two things are obvious. There is minor red fringing chromatic aberration, easily removed &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2025\/03\/03\/sharpening-the-35mm-f-3-5-summaron-rf\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Sharpening the 35mm f\/3.5 Summaron RF<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[93,104,50,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film","category-leica","category-lenses","category-adobe-lightroom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39610"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39610\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40196,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39610\/revisions\/40196"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}