{"id":730,"date":"2008-07-05T07:57:15","date_gmt":"2008-07-05T14:57:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2008\/07\/05\/bargain-of-the-year\/"},"modified":"2009-11-02T13:34:54","modified_gmt":"2009-11-02T20:34:54","slug":"bargain-of-the-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2008\/07\/05\/bargain-of-the-year\/","title":{"rendered":"Bargain of the year"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>The Canon 5D, that is<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>The Canon 5D has now been on the market some three years.  Mine, bought  a few months after the introduction, cost $3,000 in 2006 money.  Here&#8217;s B&#038;H&#8217;s web site today:<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/5DBargain.jpg><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Assuming 5% annual inflation (OK it&#8217;s really 15% but our government lies about it) I make that 40+% price drop, as the 5D Mk II replacement nears.<\/p>\n<p>Given that, for this user, the difference between the Mark I and Mark II is a $10 sensor cleaning brush, given Mark I&#8217;s love of dust, that&#8217;s hardly a compelling reason to upgrade.  After all, in the film days I made do with a 1960 Leica M3 for 30+ years, easily resisting the temptations of the M4\/5\/6\/7 &#8216;upgrades&#8217; which were less well made and cost a bundle.  Sure, Mark II will have more pixels, but if I can get perfect large prints with Mark I why would I want one of these?  The real enhancement digital sensors need is better dynamic range control and proper solution of that issue appears to be some way off yet.  A smaller body like a Pentax DSLR would be nice, too, but I&#8217;m not holding my breath on that one.  Recall that the small Olympus and Pentax film bodies &#8211; smaller than even cropped frame DSLRs today, were full frame snappers.  I can only think that Macho Big outsells Chic Petite, hence the dearth of small DSLRs.<\/p>\n<p>And for those looking to get into full frame digital at the lowest price, give Canon a short while to announce Mark II (likely identically priced as the new Nikon D700 competitor at $3,000) and you will be able to snap up a near mint used 5D for, what, $1,400 in the ensuing glut on the used market?<\/p>\n<p>Just add $10 for that <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2008\/05\/09\/a-handy-brush\/ target=_blank>brush<\/a> and you have the camera bargain of the year and large, sharp, grain-free prints to your heart&#8217;s content.<\/p>\n<p><center><img src=http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/BertieLarge.jpg><br \/>\n<i>Bert the Border Terrier guards the latest batch of large prints from the 5D<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Mark I shows every sign of being a decade-long keeper which, when you think about it, is an amazing statement given the rates of change in digital photography.  It&#8217;s really <i>that<\/i> good.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Canon 5D, that is. The Canon 5D has now been on the market some three years. Mine, bought a few months after the introduction, cost $3,000 in 2006 money. Here&#8217;s B&#038;H&#8217;s web site today: Assuming 5% annual inflation (OK it&#8217;s really 15% but our government lies about it) I make that 40+% price drop, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2008\/07\/05\/bargain-of-the-year\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Bargain of the year<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-canon-eos-5d"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=730"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3710,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/730\/revisions\/3710"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}