{"id":8428,"date":"2010-11-10T17:34:38","date_gmt":"2010-11-11T00:34:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/?p=8428"},"modified":"2010-11-16T10:49:41","modified_gmt":"2010-11-16T17:49:41","slug":"three-displays-at-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2010\/11\/10\/three-displays-at-work\/","title":{"rendered":"Three displays at work"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Not a glossy screen in sight.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>In the <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2010\/11\/04\/adding-a-third-monitor\/ target=_blank>previous column<\/a> I rambled on about using a USB-powered gadget to drive a third display connected to the HackPro, as I did not want to have to install a second video card with all the related complexities that would entail.  That worked out well and today I received my third Dell 2209WA display as you can see below:<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Three_2209WA.jpg\" width=\"700\" height=\"421\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><i>A nice place to work &#8211; three Dell 2209WA displays running under Snow Leopard.<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Installation could hardly be simpler.  After connecting the third display to the open DVI-D connector on the HackPro I fired up System Preferences->Displays, setting things thus:<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Screen%20shot%202010-11-10%20at%203.54.27%20PM.png\" width=\"700\" height=\"516\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><i>Display settings for three displays.<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>The white bar, draggable at will, denoted the display which will display the menu bar; the display screens&#8217; are simply dragged into place so that cursor movement across them is continuous.<\/p>\n<p>In the next picture I have Lightroom 3 running on the two left hand most displays and Photoshop on the right.  Thus you can easily round trip a file from LR to PS, working the PS adjustments on the third screen,<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Three_displays_LR_PS.jpg\" width=\"800\" height=\"438\" alt=\"\" \/><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Note the high tech reams of paper raising each display so that my eyes are level with a point a couple of inches below the top; even at maximum height I cannot get them high enough without this kludge.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m surprised how easy all this was to do and am now out of desk space for any more &#8211; maybe I need to go to two tiers?<\/p>\n<p>Nah! &#8211; here&#8217;s my next version:<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/MissionControl_Houston.jpg\" width=\"516\" height=\"387\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><i>Houston &#8211; we have lift off.<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Temperature monitor reports no detectible heat rise for any component.  The HackPro can take it!<\/p>\n<p><b>A few words on the latest Dell 22&#8243; display:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The current 22&#8243; Dell display (it&#8217;s 21.5&#8243; just like my 2209WA) is the E2210H and at $200 is significantly cheaper than the 2209WA which remains available at $319.  There are, however, three other key differences, over and above rthe price, which are significant:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The 2210 is 1920 x 1080 compared to 1680 x 1050 pixels, so more pixels\n<li>The 2210 does not use an IPS panel\n<li>The 2210 is the far narrower 16:9 width:height aspect ratio compared to 16:10 for the 2209\n<\/ul>\n<p>Why would I prefer the 2209?<\/p>\n<p>First, because IPS panels have far less color change off axis than regular ones; try it in a store and see for yourself.  For photo processing that&#8217;s a key difference.  Second 1920 x 1080 is <i>too many<\/i> pixels for text &#8211; for my mediocre eyes the default  font is too small at this pixel density and while I can increase it using System Preferences, why have it in the first place?  Finally, while 16:9 is great for watching widescreen movies on your computer screen (you want to watch movies on a computer?) as the picture fills the screen, for work use it&#8217;s simply to narrow, wasting space at the sides.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a comparison of the aspect ratios from the Dell site (not to scale) which clearly shows how much wider the 2210 (on the right) is:<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Dell2209_2210.jpg\" width=\"501\" height=\"307\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><i>Dell 2209WA and Dell E2210H<\/i><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t believe me.  Check the current iMacs in your local Apple Store.  The 21.5&#8243; one is 1920 x 1080 (like the Dell 2210) and the 27&#8243; is 2560 x 1440 pixels.  In practice this results in near identical font sizes on both and that font is <i>small<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>I thought long and hard about this and checked out the 27&#8243; screens extensively &#8211; the choice was two 27&#8243; screens or three 21.5&#8243;ones.  Well, despite the better apparent specs of the 27&#8243; screen. I came down squarely in the 21.5&#8243; camp, and added a third.  You should do like comparisons to see what works best for you.  The screen real estate between the two alternatives is roughly similar.  By the way, 27&#8243; Dell matte screens, made by LG Electronics just like the ones in the iMacs, are $1,000 each, whereas the three Dells I use cost me under $1,000 <i>in total<\/i>.  Not a trivial difference and one which, intriguingly, highlights what a good value the 27&#8243; iMac is, if you can live with a glossy screen, small fonts and historically execrable reliability for these prone-to-overheat machines, as my personal experiences illustrates.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Not a glossy screen in sight. In the previous column I rambled on about using a USB-powered gadget to drive a third display connected to the HackPro, as I did not want to have to install a second video card with all the related complexities that would entail. That worked out well and today I &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2010\/11\/10\/three-displays-at-work\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Three displays at work<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hardware"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8428"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8428\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8451,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8428\/revisions\/8451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}