{"id":8683,"date":"2010-12-14T10:00:28","date_gmt":"2010-12-14T17:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/?p=8683"},"modified":"2010-12-14T10:03:10","modified_gmt":"2010-12-14T17:03:10","slug":"cameras-in-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2010\/12\/14\/cameras-in-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Cameras in 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Can you say &#8216;Blah&#8217;?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>When it comes to changes in cameras my primary area of interest is the advanced amateur\/semi-pro gear.  It&#8217;s what I use and fits nicely as regards features and cost between the mind-numbing array of point-and-shoots and the heavy duty and very costly pro gear.<\/p>\n<p>For the advanced amateur user 2010 was a disappointing year for hardware, with by far the greatest let down being the Panasonic GF2.  Where the world was expecting Panny&#8217;s design genius to deliver a camera with a proper offset optical or electronic viewfinder, what we got instead was a warmed over GF1.<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Panasonic-Lumix-GF2.jpg\" width=\"650\" height=\"433\" alt=\"\" \/><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Still sporting the useless LCD finder, with a clip on low definition\/high noise EVF option (you might as well get the G1\/2 as the size is much the same with one of these clunkers and the G1\/2 EVF is a whole lot better), the camera addds little to the GF1 for the serious user.<\/p>\n<p>No less disappointing was Panny&#8217;s G2.  Adding a touch screen to the immensely capable G1, which I use and love, is not my idea of progress.  Excuse me, you are going to ponce about touching the hard-to-see screen to do stuff while taking pictures?  I don&#8217;t think so.<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Panasonic-Lumix-G2.jpg\" width=\"600\" height=\"476\" alt=\"\" \/><\/center><\/p>\n<p>At the upper end of the spectrum for the truly insecure <i>nouveau riche<\/i> came the Hasselblad Ferrari.  Or is that Ferrari Hasselblad?  I like both marques as well as anyone but, please, you need to tell the whole world that your ship just came in?<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Hasselbld-Ferrari.jpg\" width=\"604\" height=\"557\" alt=\"\" \/><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Hair piece and gold chains not included.<\/p>\n<p>No, by far the most exciting camera of 2010 is one which will not be available until 2011 &#8211; the Leica for the rest of us, the Fuji FX100.<\/p>\n<p><center><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.pindelski.org\/Blog\/Fuji_FX100_3.jpg\" width=\"600\" height=\"355\" alt=\"\" \/><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Promising a dual optical\/electronic finder, a fast six element wide angle fixed lens, an APS-sized sensor and looks that are just right, this is an exciting machine.  Aperture priority, shutter priority or full exposure automation come standard. Let&#8217;s just hope it lives up to its promise.  Why, even the textured body covering reminds me of my film rangefinder Leicas.<\/p>\n<p>As for 2010, it was strictly a year of blah.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Can you say &#8216;Blah&#8217;? When it comes to changes in cameras my primary area of interest is the advanced amateur\/semi-pro gear. It&#8217;s what I use and fits nicely as regards features and cost between the mind-numbing array of point-and-shoots and the heavy duty and very costly pro gear. For the advanced amateur user 2010 was &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2010\/12\/14\/cameras-in-2010\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Cameras in 2010<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cameras"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8683"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8693,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8683\/revisions\/8693"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}