{"id":908,"date":"2009-01-19T19:32:37","date_gmt":"2009-01-20T02:32:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2009\/01\/19\/somethings-afoot-at-panasonic\/"},"modified":"2009-01-19T19:33:43","modified_gmt":"2009-01-20T02:33:43","slug":"somethings-afoot-at-panasonic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2009\/01\/19\/somethings-afoot-at-panasonic\/","title":{"rendered":"Something&#8217;s afoot at Panasonic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>The new Leica M?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Call me dated.  Say I am out of touch.  Ridicule my love of the mechanical age.<\/p>\n<p>I have no problem with any of those accusations as all are true.<\/p>\n<p>So when I wrote a while back, not a little intrigued, of the <a href=http:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2008\/11\/29\/micro-four-thirds\/ target=_blank>Panasonic G1<\/a>, it was for no other reason than that this photographer&#8217;s <i>schnozzer<\/i> sensed a possibility in the making.<\/p>\n<p>Revolution?  Why, yes.  A modern Leica M for the digital set because, whether you like it or not, we are all members.  Meaning small, fast, quiet and with large aperture lenses for low light work.<\/p>\n<p>And we all know who designs the lenses for the best Panny designs, don&#8217;t we?  Can you say Leica?<\/p>\n<p>These thoughts were brought to the fore when <a href=http:\/\/www.dpreview.com\/reviews\/panasonicdmcg1\/ target=_blank>DP Review<\/a> published its analysis of the Panasonic G1.  To cut to the chase, it&#8217;s not ready for prime time any more than the L1 (which at least looked like a Leica M) was. But you have to respect where Panny is going with this.<\/p>\n<p>Meaning they are inching closer to the Leica ideal &#8211; small, quiet, fast, unobtrusive.<\/p>\n<p>Now all they need to do is throw the design book out of the window and &#8230;. take a hard look at the form factor of the Leica M &#8211; but 33% smaller this time.  And it wouldn&#8217;t hurt to have a viewfinder that works in something less than California sunshine.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The new Leica M? Call me dated. Say I am out of touch. Ridicule my love of the mechanical age. I have no problem with any of those accusations as all are true. So when I wrote a while back, not a little intrigued, of the Panasonic G1, it was for no other reason than &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/2009\/01\/19\/somethings-afoot-at-panasonic\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Something&#8217;s afoot at Panasonic<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cameras"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pindelski.org\/Photography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}