Yearly Archives: 2011

The Panasonic G3 – Part IV

Finally here!

Under attack dog guard. Bert keeps an eye on the G3.

The Panasonic G1 was a truly revolutionary camera. It was the first to incorporate a proper, usable electronic finder and interchangeable MFT lenses. The design is now reaching a broad audience and will do great harm to slow moving Canon and Nikon who have either awful alternatives (like Nikon’s V1) or none (Canon). Click in the right hand column under Categories->Photography to access my earlier articles on this ground breaking design. I passed on the G2 which added a movie mode and a touch screen but used the G1’s sensor. There was no compelling reason to upgrade for my purposes.

While the wait for my Panasonic G1 has been just short of six months, it would be churlish to complain. Japan has been ravaged by an earthquake, tsunami and radiation in that time and is digging its way out without a single case of looting or crime. Imagine saying that of any other nation on earth. So, thanks, Panny, for getting things together and back into production. Though the G3 says ‘Made in China’, unlike the Japanese G1, many of the components originate in Japan, so the delay is understandable.

If I say that 14,000+ pictures later that the G1 is second nature to me, that’s not quite true. No modern camera with the myriad of adjustable variables can ever be second nature, not when there are literally millions of combinations permitted. But once you have it set just so, it does become an old friend; I find that once set, I never change my preferred settings. Thus I went about cloning these settings to the G3 as soon as it arrived. The battery is half charged, so I simply charged the spare while doing this. It took almost two hours to get it right, not helped by the fact that there are many more menu choices in the G3 – movie modes and touch screen options being the dominant causes of bloat.

I will not be saying much about the touch screen, as I have no use for LCD screens in cameras. It’s actually ‘push’ rather than ‘touch’- it’s pressure sensitive, unlike the superior capacitive one on an iPhone or iPad. I shoot from the eye, using the Electronic ViewFinder (EVF). The day I compose snaps holding a camera at arm’s length and squinting at a poky screen will be a cold one in hell.

Immediate reactions? The body really cannot get much smaller. For my largish hands it’s at the limit of smallness to be easily worked and some controls, like the countersunk Display button on the back panel, are tough to use. Mercifully, that one is rarely, if ever, used after the initial setting. The smaller front handgrip is as comfortable as the G1’s larger one, and the rotating adjuster wheel is now in the rear (like on the G2) but has been stiffened to prevent accidental depression – an action which permits aperture or shutter speed change in the respective modes. I still struggle with the front mounted wheel on the G1, occasionally depressing it by accident. So while the G3 wheel is a tad rough to the feel, the trade off is worth it.

The G1 and G3. Only a twit uses the stock strap. Those are Upstraps.
Note the much improved, ringless strap attachment points – silent for movie makers.

The AE lock button has disappeared but the Fn2 button is easily assigned that task, allowing locking of exposure when recomposing.

Shutter noise is the same as on the G3. Quiet and low frequency, so you will not draw undue attention to yourself in other than silent settings. I never use multiple shot mode so cannot comment. Decisive moments are not caught with machine guns.

The proximity sensor for the EVF has gone. If you use the LCD then a mechanical switch to the left of the EVF has to be pressed to alternate between LCD and EVF. I never use the LCD so it’s a non-issue. If you open the LCD it comes on. Close it and it reverts control to the EVF. But if you keep the LCD open, then the switch has to be worked. In the G1/G2, the proximity sensor did this for you. A cost cutting exercise in the G3, then, but not one which intrudes for this user.

One immediate improvement is the provision of two custom settings on the top dial – C1 and C2. This is wonderful for me, as I take most of my snaps at ISO320, but like to switch to ISO1600 for poor light. In the G1 that means fiddling about with EVF displays (or the LCD which is hard to read in bright light). Here, once programmed, it’s simply a case of turning the dial one notch – I have C1 at ISO320, C2 at 1600. All the Scene settings on the G1/G2 have been consolidated into one click on the dial and are invoked using display controls. A camera of this calibre does not need easily accessed Scene modes, so it doesn’t matter if these are deleted from the mode dial.

Note the escutcheon surrounding the G3’s lens mount – likely required to pad out the very thin body.
Sadly the G3 does not come in Blue or British Racing Green, so Black it is.

On an 8gB SDHC card (the G3 will also take high capacity SDXC cards, for long movies I suppose) the G1’s 611 RAW capacity falls to 459, exactly in line with the G3’s larger 16mp file size compared with the G1’s 12mp. The G2H is the only other Panny to include this higher pixel count sensor at this time, the GH2 adding sophisticated movie modes and the ability to use high quality external microphones; the G1 makes do with two small built-in mics.

The overall feel of the camera confers slightly greater confidence than the G1; while the weights are similar (G3 – 11.8 ozs, G1 – 13.4 ozs), the G3 packs more into a smaller volume, thus seeming more solid. I’m sure it’s just a psychological effect, for it’s not like my G1 had any reliability issues.

Strangely, the provided G3 body cap does not lock on the G1, but all three MFT lenses I own – the Oly 9-18, the 14-45 and 45-200 Panasonics – couple properly. If you want to switch off anti-shake in the latter two (the Oly has none) you can use the switch on the lens. Users of later lenses like the 14-42 kit lens will have to dive into the menu system. A step back, but a non-issue as I’m sticking with the outstanding 14-45 kit lens. The new, not yet available, Panny 14-42 OIS PZ kit lens with electronic zoom is much smaller than the 14-42/45 variants with their manual zoom control. The PZ optic claims higher performance than the already excellent manual zoom kit lenses, so it’s an intriguing prospect. I’ll take a look at the new $400 PZ 14-42 when it comes out to see if Panny’s design genius makes it workable for still photographers, the appeal being that it is very small, a size in keeping with the whole ‘small and light’ Micro Four-Thirds design ethos. It will quite possibly make the G3 a pocketable outfit – a true dream harkening back to the compact screw mount Leicas of yesteryear. I have fond memories of using Leica IIIA, IIIC and IIIG models many years ago with the collapsible 50mm Elmar. Tweed jacket-pocket specials.

One area where it’s hard to imagine any improvement is in manual focusing. In the G1, with focus set to auto, turning the manual focus ring would enlarge the image in the EVF for truly critical focus, as long as you kept up a first pressure on the shutter release. However, you lost any sense of composition in the G1, as you were looking at a hugely magnified part of the center of the image. The G3 nails it. Now a central rectangle opens in the EVF for critical focusing, yet the rest of the image appears in regular size around it. It’s as if someone had taken the center RF rectangle on a Leica M body and vastly magnified its content wthout changing the periphery, allowing composition to continue. Magic!

Over the weekend I’ll be wringing out the G3 on the streets and will comment on sensor quality when I have some images to work with. Needless to add I will have the sensor set to a 3:2 aspect ratio; 30+ years with Leicas have me composing in that format and I’m not about to change. 4:3, for me, is too square. I’ll be using SilkyPix to convert the RAW files to TIFF before import to Lightroom 3. A pain, but once Adobe adds the G3 to its PS/LR RAW engines, that nonsense will cease. Hopefully something good will present itself, allowing creation of 18″ x 24″ prints on the HP DesignJet wide carriage dye printer. That is the touchstone of quality chez Pindelski.

Part V is here.

The Panasonic G3 – Part III

Some things do not change.

The operating manual for the Panasonic G1 is 166 pages of useless. That for the G3 is in the same format but has shrunk to 56 pages, making it one third as useless. The completely useless long form 208 page version ships on the provided CD.

Click below to download the Panasonic G3 manual which I have placed on my server. Trying to find anything on Panny’s site is as futile as attempting to divine intelligence in government:

Click to download the Panasonic G3 manual

When my G3 arrives this evening, I’ll be setting it much along the lines of the G1; my street snapper settings appear here.

And if you want to read about touch screen this and movie that, go elsewhere. I’m a still photographer, a street snapper, and LCD screens simply have no utility value in those avocations. I never use the one in the G1 and the G3’s use will be no different. That will also help with battery life which has never been an issue for me in the G1. The G3’s battery is noticeably smaller, holding 19.2% less power. 500 shots on one 8gb SDHC card in the G1 (which holds 608 RAW snaps on the G1), is typical, as I do not use the battery draining LCD. Based on the larger RAW file sizes in the G3, I expect card capacity to fall to 456 shots and battery capacity to 491 shots. Not a problem.

The main focus of my comments on the G3 will be, in priority order:

  • The sensor. Is it noticeably better?
  • Operating speed. Is autofocus faster? What is the shutter lag like in real world snapping?
  • Ergonomics. Does the smaller body hamper handling?
  • Shutter noise. Is it quieter than the already quiet G1?

Looking at that largely useless manual, the layout of the various menus seems much the same as that in the G1. Good. One less thing to learn before wringing it out on the streets.

In its two years of intensive use I have made 14,275 snaps on the G1, of which 3,234 survived the cull, according to Lightroom3, a 23% retention rate. If the G3 works out, the G1 will pass to our 9 year old son, and will also do duty as a backup. Wish I had had a dad like me ….

RAW processing:

I only use RAW in the G1. LR3 makes it invisible and I retain the best file quality in that way. Converting to a small JPG for the web, using LR3, is easy. Unfortunately, at the time of writing, Adobe has yet to update Photoshop or Lightroom (I’m on 3.4.1) to read G3 RAW files (Apple’s Aperture does not support G3 either), so I will likely have to use Panasonic’s provided SilkyPix as a RAW conversion tool and then import the (lossless) TIFF files into LR3. A bit of a pain, but I’m not willing to process in SilkyPix as I like the idea of one LR database for all my files and am very comfortable with the LR3 processing flow.

MFT lens range:

Click the picture to see the large range of MFT lenses now available:

Click the picture to see the full range of 26 MFT lenses available.

Part IV is here.

Bill Cunningham

In a class of one.

The New York Times fashion photographer, Bill Cunningham, is a special person. His avocation is the photography of fashion in the real world. He records what people are wearing on the streets of Manhattan, the fashion center of the world, and has been doing so for fifty years.

Cunningham with one of his 27 bikes.

The best way to learn about this remarkably self effacing photographer is to rent the documentary about his work Bill Cunningham New York where you see him at work. He rides his bike all over Manhattan and is now on his 27th, the previous 26 having been stolen over the years! That’s New York for you.

The work is not great in the sense of representing iconic images of a time and place. But its comprehensive nature over decades shows how taste and style in clothing changes, a fascinating subject in itself.

Some favorite quotes:

  • I eat with my eyes.
  • All the designers come to Paris to steal.
  • Clothes keep us alive.
  • I have never owned a television and I rarely go to the movies.
  • I just like fashion as an art form, dressing the body.
  • My dear, it’s not work, it’s pleasure.
  • He who seeks beauty will find it. (On receiving the Legion d’Honneur).

The movie is highly recommended and you will not fail to be charmed by Cunningham’s personality, ascetic lifestyle, work ethic and sheer joie de vivre.

You can read more at the New York Times by clicking here.

Nikon V1

Incredibly useless.

It takes quite an effort to accomplish all of these design criteria:

  • Make the ugliest camera since digital was invented
  • Equip it with a microscopic sensor in a body the size of the MFT competition
  • Trash your reputation and an expectant, loyal user base

Nikon, with its new mirrorless V1 has accomplished all three at the highest possible level of failure.

Nikon V1 – camel as camera.

It’s said a camel is a horse designed by a committee. Well, the V1 is a camel of a camera, doubtless with lots of costly market research thrown in. Steve Jobs has famously stated that Apple uses no market research. Rather, it gives the consumer what Apple thinks they need – the Next Great Thing. But had you told Nikon to listen to their user base and give them something useful, like an APS-C camera with an EVF and a range of small, fast lenses, they would doubtless have deferred to the committee. And you would still have ended up with a V1.

The funniest part? They will make an adapter which will allow use of gargantuan Nikon-mount lenses on this piece of crap.

At least Fuji’s equally worthless X10 is pretty to look at. And if you don’t think looks matter, how do you feel about your picture taking chances when you have to fight the gag reflex every time you pick your camera up?

For those looking for portability and other uses for their pocket camera, get an iPhone 4 or, better, next month’s iPhone 5 with an 8mp sensor.

The Panasonic G3 – Part II

Finally shipped!

Part I is here.

A sharp eyed reader dropped me a line to say that black Panasonic G3 bodies were in stock at B&H (thank you, Bill!) and it took mere seconds to cancel my Amazon order for the G3 and buy the body from B&H, along with a spare battery. The G3’s small size means the battery is smaller than in the G1, so I’m playing it safe.

Given that my AMZN order was placed on May 12, I felt it only right to splash out $22 on expedited shipping from the center of the world to the left coast!

I’m getting 80% of the quality of my (sold) Canon 5D from G1 snaps in 18″ x 24″ prints, and as the G3 is the first MFT camera to use the latest generation 16mp sensor I’m hoping that results in a little more headroom when the light is poor or the original needs a bit of cropping. The bulk and weight saving with MFT hardware over full frame digital is tremendous and the main reason I switched.

Stay posted as I wring this new body out with my existing complement of Oly (9-18 MFT) and Panny (14-45 and 45-200 MFT) lenses, all known quantities extensively covered here in past articles.

Part III is here.