Photographs, Photographers and Photography

July 3, 2009

Undercover

Filed under: The digital revolution — Thomas Pindelski @ 1:33 pm

Catch that thief!

This seems like a compelling application for anyone with a costly MacBook laptop – it’s named Undercover and for $49 a year provides a decent chance of not just catching the thief of your laptop but also, probably more importantly, recovering your laptop and all the data resident thereon.

It’s a software service which is loaded on your MacBook laptop which, if stolen, transmits screenshots of what the thief is doing and sends his picture to law enforcement using the built in camera. All Macs except the Mini now have a built in iSight camera. The thief’s IP address is also recorded when he logs in to the Internet and allows the cops to locate him easily.

The next best thing to loading your laptop with some C4 for remote detonation.

Of course I am fighting the urge to point out that this does not work on Windows laptops for a reason, but I won’t go there. Just take a look at Microsoft’s latest exercise in incredibly poor taste and you will see why no one should care if a Windows laptop is pinched. Purportedly an advertisement for Internet Explorer, this really does confirm that MSFT needs to address changes at the CEO level.

Full disclosure: I never let my disgust with MSFT’s products interfere with investment policy and I do own their 6/01/2019 4.2% corporate bonds. Even Ballmer can’t screw up $22bn of annual free cash flow to service a few billion in senior secured debt interest. The bonds were issued to finance the idiotically overpriced acquisition of Yahoo at $30bn which, of course, failed, much to the relief of MSFT’s shareholders. Yahoo’s market value today is now half of that bid and falling. Still, I suppose those same shareholders can take comfort in the knowledge that there is (or rather, was) a dumber CEO than Ballmer – Jerry Yang at Yahoo.

New York Times photoblogs

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:15 am

Fine work

A couple of readers were kind enough to comment on yesterday’s piece about the Reader application put out by the New York Times and pointed me to two NYT photoblogs in the process.

One is Lens and the other is 1 in 8 million. Both are well worth a visit though the latter does take a while to load owing to the inclusion of sound and video. That said, the presentation of both is superb and the use of short introductory sound clips in the ‘1 in 8 million’ blog is inspired, doing just enough to pique your interest.


From the ‘Lens’ blog – Michael Woolf’s essay on glass


From the ‘1 in 8 million’ blog

For a truly splendid profile of an exceptional man, take a look at this piece on Harry Reininger by Sarah Kramer. It’s the scarcity of such people in New York that contributed to my departure from that modern Gomorrah in 1987.

Nice work, NYT!

By the way, it is incorrect to ascribe the demise of newsprint to financial engineering, as one commentator on yesterday’s column states. Rather, the causes are:

  • A drop in literacy owing to falling educational standards
  • Craig Newmark (Craigslist) who has singlehandedly destroyed classified advertising revenues for newspapers
  • A disconnect between the views of newspaper journalists and their readers
  • The trash that is modern television programming – truly the opium of the masses
  • The self-destructive practice of making content available free online

Financial engineering does not account for the drop in circulation. I am no defender of Wall Street, but it is hardly to blame for the above.

July 2, 2009

Times Reader

Filed under: The digital revolution — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:18 pm

A bold step

We all know that traditional paper distribution of news is doomed, and quite why the sector is seeking to hasten its demise, by making everything available free, defeats logic.

Millions pay for a subscription to the Wall Street Journal, even if we all weep at the drop in journalistic standards occasioned under a new owner who has always believed in underestimating the standards of his readers. But just about everything else out there – The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times – is free to anyone with a $300 netbook.

Well, the NYT is doing something about that and I just paid $14.95 for a one month trial subscription as, after all, the paper has the best Arts section in print, if you get my drift.

It’s a mixed bag and why pay, you ask, when free is better? Well, because the format offered by the The Grey Lady in the paid version is very promising. Further, much as with Amazon’s Kindle, the paid version is actually downloaded to your computer where you can opt for up to 7 days’ storage. That means that when your laptop is not in a wifi area, you can still merrily read the paper. On an aircraft or in the subway, for example.

Integration of photographs with text is plainly a work in progress. The sports pages do this well:

Note the simple controls – you page up and down using the related keyboard keys or mouse click at bottom right. Text is crisp on my netbook and the (free) Adobe Air application powering all of this automatically determined that my screen is 1024×600 pixels (16:9 widescreen) and presented the text in near fullscreen format.

The Arts page, or what I have seen of it today, is nearly all text, but I’m sure that will change. Strangely, once you sign up for the free trial the Business section is free, others are locked; you would think the well heeled could afford the business section but whatever. No one has ever accused the Sulzbergers of being business giants. However, for the conspiracy theorists among you, maybe this is just a smart way of getting paid subscriptions from business readers, most of whom, let’s face it, use other people’s money to pay for this sort of thing.

The technology section is mysteriously missing but I’m sure that’s a simple oversight.

Hardware? I’m running this on OS 10.5.6 on a Mac and have had no problems. Software? Safari Public Version 4 Beta – I refuse to update to the final release until someone comes up with a hack to reinstate the URL progress bar in lieu of the weak flashing ‘loading’ indicator that El Jobso has seen fit to stick us with.

Ads? Yes, there are ads, but they are seemingly limited to selling the NYT and are fairly innocuous – none of that awful Flash animated advertising that made anyone reading news online get an ad blocker, thus accelerating the demise of newsprint.

Before setting out with your netbook to the local Greasy Spoon or boarding a plane, you have to remember to fire up your computer and load the Reader application; this will result in an automatic download of current content. It takes a couple of minutes based on my experience, with a small progress bar showing the state of play. Is this a viable alternative to using a tethered phone modem with your netbook to confer wireless capability regardless of the availability of wifi? I believe it is, as the monthly charges for such modems are very high and, at least in America, telecom carriers are uniformly awful in providing adequate bandwidth and coverage for such devices. (Ever tried getting a cell phone signal on Highway One in California?) Thus, while the latest iPhone has tethering capability built in, allowing it to be used as a cellular modem, AT&T has yet to enable that feature owing to the parlous state of their network. Even when they do, you can bet the monthly charges will be egregious.

It’s a meaningful step forward in delivering news in a clear format which allows the reader to adjust type size with a click. Great for those of us with less than 20/20 vision and a step in the right direction to saving a great paper, even if it often forgets there is meant to be a Chinese wall between editorial content and news reporting. Let’s hope the picture integration moves apace; right now you get a scrollable list under ‘News in Pictures’ which is just about useless.

If they get that right, and given the frequent writing about photography, I’ll be sticking with my monthly subscription.

And let’s hope someone at Wordpress comes up with a template that emulates Adobe Air/Times Reader for us bloggers.

June 30, 2009

Ernst Haas

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 11:23 am

A master of color

This picture by Ernst Haas (1921-1986) is the earliest ‘art’ photograph in color which I recall, having probably seen it in my early teens.

Talk of starting at the top!

While abstraction pervades his work, Haas never abstracts just for the sake of doing so; rather, the context is always clear, the vision insightful and the feel warm and sympathetic.

Check out more of his work in the book Ernst Haas – Color Photography – hard to get, expensive and worth it.

Edwin Smith

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 11:16 am

As good as they get

Edwin Smith (1912-71) was a photographer of the British heritage. That sounds pretty dry, but once you have seen the work of this architect-painter-photographer, you realize that he really is as good as they get.

His wonderful vision, perfect technique and aesthetic sensibilities are perfectly displayed in this book, published by Merrell and the Royal Institute of British Architects, with monochrome reproductions of the very highest quality.

If high aesthetic sense is your thing, executed at an incomparable level of excellence, this book is for you.

June 28, 2009

Awnings

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 11:05 am

Downtown

Another early Sunday morning snap from downtown San Mateo, CA.

The multiple plates you see are through rods, bolted at either opposing wall. This is what passes as “earthquake proofing” here. No kidding.

June 24, 2009

Spanish revival

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 12:19 pm

A fine example

Built in 1925 in the Spanish Revival style, the US Post Office in San Mateo, California is on the register of historic places. Thank goodness. This should prevent some latter day vulgarian pulling it down and replacing it with a glass and steel box.


5D, 24-105mm at 70mm,1/4000, f/6.7 ISO 250

Snapped in early morning light.

June 23, 2009

Another Haeber special

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:41 am

Superb and original work.

I make no secret of the fact that I dislike authority in nearly all its guises, for so much of it is mindless. So when it says “Don’t Walk on the Grass” I generally make a point of doing just that.

Jonathan Haeber is a kindred spirit, but one much more daring. I last referred to his work when he showed pictures of the awful Jackling Mansion – Steve Jobs’s property in Woodside, CA, which he is having such difficulty tearing down owing to misplaced envirolooney thinking, and possibly by local councillors looking for a kickback. C’mon, let’s get real here.

This time, with his pictures clandestinely snapped from within the abandoned PacBell building in San Francisco, Haeber has outdone himself. With friends he gained access to the innards of this neo-Gothic masterpiece through a manhole cover in the dead of night, and the results speak for themselves.

Click the picture for more:


The PacBell building at night

Our world needs more Haebers to restore the ‘can do’ American spirit and to deny creeping authoritarianism. Well done, sir.

June 22, 2009

Walking corpse

Filed under: Business — Thomas Pindelski @ 6:19 am

The GM of the photography world

As the New York Post, excuse me, the WSJ, reports:

All you need to know about this miserably run corpse is in the chart below:

And all you need to know about the greatest film in the history of film photography is here.

June 21, 2009

Early Sunday

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 10:15 am

The best day for Hopper

In addition to avoiding the clutter of urban life, the early Sunday street snapper sees what Hopper would be painting today.


Downtown San Mateo, CA. 5D, 24-105mm at 24mm, ImageAlign Pro, 1/2000, f/6.7, ISO250

Snapped this morning. A round trip to PS2 and ImageAlign Pro corrects for the slight tilt in the verticals resulting from the wide angle lens setting.

June 17, 2009

The Seeberger brothers

Filed under: Book reviews — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:51 am

A fascinating chronicle

When it comes to fashion – the great years of fashion through 1960, that is – the interested student can indulge in one stop shopping with no fear of missing anything of importance. And that one stop is Paris. Throughout the first sixty years of the twentieth century the domination of this creative center of the world was all you needed to know about, a natural magnet for the best and the most innovative in the world of women’s clothing and accessories. Poiret, Vionnet, Chanel, Gres, Balenciaga, Dior – the list is a Who’s Who of the nucleus of clothing design.

Naturally, the greatest photographers of the age gravitated to this force of nature, and it certainly didn’t hurt that their city of choice was the most beautiful the western world had to offer. It remains so to this day. While the British were busy trying to hold on to a fading empire and the Germans were busy killing everyone, the French devoted their efforts to what the French do best. Great clothes, great design …. and great food! A casual visitor to the City of Light need only glance at the delicious filigree cast iron entrance to any Metro station and he will know that there’s something special in the air.

So the best photographers either ended up in Paris or were to be found photographing Parisian fashion for Vogue and Harper’s. If you liked high-end kitsch Baron de Meyer and Beaton were your first port of call. High style romantics gravitated to Hoyningen-Heune. Ascetics to Penn. And the cubist set settled on Horst P. Horst. That was the top end. But Vogue needed to fill its burgeoning page count with more than any one of these exemplars of taste and quality could produce so they went to the journeymen of the fashion photography world, the Seeberger brothers. Unlike the Penns et al of the photo world the Seebergers never made it into society or the salons. They were tradesmen photographers and traded quantity, in the guise of snaps of the latest fashions, for quality. And the magazines bought their work throughout the period.

This book is a fascinating look not only at the fashions of the era but also at the gargantuan output of the three brothers – you cannot distinguish the work of one from that of the others. It’s production line quality. Invariably taken at the racecourses of Paris, where the smart set liked to show off its finery, the pictures show both the rich and the ‘plants’ (models masquerading as society to better show off Chanel’s latest) in a functional way. The emphasis is totally on the clothes, gowns often photographed from behind to show off the details. If there’s a sea change in photographic style here, it occurs in 1935 when the brothers migrated from 5″ x 7″ glass plate ‘portable cameras’ (the book’s words, not mine – tripods were forbidden at racecourses, so these monsters had to be hand held!) to the Rolleiflex. Depth of field suddenly changes from isolated to contextual, and for the better. You can make out the setting without being distracted by it, whereas in the earlier plate camera pictures, backgrounds are completely blurred, often to distraction. Witness the pre-Rollei cover picture, above.

This is a lovely book, with a compelling, well informed narrative. In 1970 the Seebergers’ collection passed to the Bibliothèque Nationale de France where, mercifully, it safely remains to this day.

June 16, 2009

Getting closer

Filed under: Cameras — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:56 am

Small, yes, but is it fast?

The Olympus Digital Pen is an exciting prospect for those of us interested in an affordable alternative to the ridiculously priced digital Leica M8, whose cost of entry with a lens is well north of $7,000.


The Olympus Digital Pen wit the 17mm (=34mm) non-zoom lens

At $900 for the body with the 34mm wide angle and optical viewfinder it is affordable as a street snapper but as yet there’s no indication what the shutter lag is like; auto focus with a lens this short is not important as pretty much everything will be sharp all the time, but what the world really needs is a pocketable high quality camera with a decent sized sensor without the interminable shutter lag which makes just about very point-and-shoot out here useless for street photography.

Thank goodness Olympus has had the good taste to release the body in chrome. The more amateur it looks the less visible the photographer becomes.

One other thought – the Pen is smaller than the M8 in every dimension without a lens, and much smaller with the 17mm fitted compared to, say, a 28mm lens.

Check the Comment for some preliminary feedback on shutter and focus lag.

June 12, 2009

Trying the new MacBook Pro

Filed under: Computer hardware — Thomas Pindelski @ 11:29 am

OK, but not a buy

I stepped by the local Apple Store yesterday to play with the 13.3″ $1200 new aluminum MacBook Pro.

Here are my reactions:

Positives:

  • Rolls Royce look and feel
  • Super sharp, bright screen – excellent for photo processing
  • Easily user upgradeable for more RAM and bigger HDD without voiding the warranty
  • Price – great value at $1200
  • Excellent Nvidia 9400 graphics card
  • Backlit keyboard
  • Fast CPU

Negatives:

  • Glossy screen with no matte option
  • Black keys – not my thing
  • I suspect the aluminum case will dent whereas a plastic case will bend and spring back
  • Store employees were unclear whether it will drive the 30″ Cinema Display (the 15″ and 17″ models will but they have an enhanced 9400/9600 card – I checked the system profile on all three models). Subsequent checking on the Apple site confirms that the 13.3″ model will drive the 30″ Cinema Display (though there may be issues with other makers’ dual DVI monitors) at full 2520 x 1600 definition
  • Still too heavy – my netbook (no DVD drive) is 2 lbs lighter at 4.8lbs, but you have to hack it to run OS X

I will wait for the ($700?) Tablet which should be out by 2010, presumably with a touchscreen like the iPhone but with a much faster CPU than used in that device. However, if your current Mac is dying or you have finally decided that your time is worth more than the time sink that is Windows, this would be a great starter machine with the ability to drive very large displays.

June 9, 2009

Stub toe. Restart.

Filed under: Computer hardware — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:49 pm

Credit where it’s due

Mine was but one of a loud chorus of voices raised in protest when Apple decided to drop Firewire connectivity from its latest aluminum-bodies MacBooks. You could get Firewire 400 on the white plastic model or Firewire 800 on the costly MacBook Pro line, but buyers of the new MacBook with the aluminum body were out of luck. There are no adapters to convert USB to FW and so buyers were faced with the choice of dumping all their Firewire drives and peripherals or paying up for the Pro model.

Well, yesterday Apple ate crow and fixed all of that. The new MacBook aluminum models now sport the ‘Pro’ moniker and add FW800 – easily converted to FW400 with an inexpensive adapter.

Nice to see that a mega corporation is not tone deaf.


The new MacBook Pro with FW800

And at $1200 the machine is almost affordable. And did I mention that Apple has finally learned from cheap netbook makers and added an SD card slot for photographers? Plus this model now sports the backlit keyboard for use in low ambient light environments and the hard drive and RAM are easily replaced by the user without voiding the warranty on the guts of the machine. Now all they need do is drop the largely unused DVD burner and shave another 2 lbs. off the weight and …. Hey, presto! a $700 Mac netbook. And given that the resale value of Macs is far higher than that of any Windows junk, I would be first in line to buy one.

June 8, 2009

The Race Track improved

Filed under: Panoramas/QTVR, Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:35 pm

Dykinga was good. Edwards is better

There’s a magical place in Death Valley, Arizona and it’s called the Race Track.

Jack Dykinga illustrated it in his magnificent book which I reviewed a couple of years ago. Simply stated, stones of substantial mass move, magically, yet no one has ever seen this occur. I choose not to dwell on the reasons. Some things are simply magic. The Race Track is one of those.

Why not leave it there?

Well, because a fine photographer whose work I have been privileged to mention here on occasion, has done it better.

Rod Edwards, a UK professional, is that photographer and he has taken Dykinga’s work to a higher level in his rendition of that phenomenal place in Death Valley.

I have been unsuccessful in monetizing my QTVRs, much as I have tried. I would take my iBook around various wineries in central California and show them to proprietors, only to be met with blank stares. Indeed, when I had my one man show I considered including a couple of big screen TVs to better show them off, sound effects and all, but gave up on the idea based on those self same stares.

However, to Edwards’s credit, he has persevered and has been justly rewarded with a commission from Britain’s National Trust – an institution which you can best learn about from the wonderful writings of James Lees-Milne, a magnificent conservator and writer about the early years of the NT. Simply stated, the National Trust is charged with the preservation of the UK’s architectural and cultural heritage – a rare good use of taxpayer monies.

No need to dwell further on the subject – just click on the picture below.


Rod Edwards’s Race Track

June 5, 2009

Elitism

Filed under: Cameras — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:59 am

Guilty as charged!

I am an unashamed elitist, a status too often mistaken for snobbery. The two are unrelated. To misquote Wilde, the snob knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. The elitist, by contrast, focuses solely on value. Scratch an elitist and you will find an engineer.

I was stuck by this realization when thinking of the choices I have made in machines over the years. Before we get to cameras, let’s look at some other daily possessions and the brands involved.

In the kitchen you simply cannot beat GE appliances. Not some fancy marque name, just your basic GE (and still made by GE as their disaster passing for a CEO failed to sell the home appliance division). Bog reliable, no instruction book needed and parts easily available when they do eventually break. But let’s face it, they rarely do. The GE fridge is the very touchstone of reliability.

With the mundane behind us, let’s focus on the essential. Motorcycles. For as long as I can remember I have ridden BMW motorcycles. Air cooled twins, water cooled flat threes and fours, oil cooled twins, faired, naked (the bike, not me), carburetted, injected, with or without sidecar, fast, slow, I loved them all, but only my first – a 1975 R90/6 air cooled boxer – remains, and is much loved. It had style where the others had function. Riding that old BMW reminds me that it’s the journey, not the destination, which matters.

In watches, I would love to tell you that I have always worn a Patek, but that would require that I had done a far better job of choosing my parents. Let’s face it, Polish refugees who had the poor sense to choose England over America as the land of the future – we are talking 1947 here – for their kids aren’t going to be troubling the Nobel Committee any time soon. Econ. 101 was plainly not on my parents’ curriculum. Add a curious predisposition for keeping their wealth in a Polish bank despite six – 1933-1939 – years’ warning that maybe moving the lot to Switzerland might make sense, their belief in the League of Nations and in the power and goodness of America saw them lose the lot to the invading hordes. So, to cut a long story short, I can claim to have worn nothing but a Patek since 1996. For nigh on twenty years, every time I was about to get one, the price had risen that bit faster than my disposable income. Well, it inspired me to try harder, I suppose.

I was a long time woodworker. Relaxing like nothing else, very challenging (metalwork is child’s play by comparison) and a perennial source of dissatisfaction. You can always do better. And I say ‘was’ because the onset of tendonitis – meaning my wrists hurt like hell when stressed – dictated disposal of my tools and conversion of the woodshop to a home theater. But I did keep one or two for the odd occasion and they all say Makita or Panasonic on the body. The Japanese make lovely, well adjusted and light tools which take an incredible beating and remain in perfect order. By contrast American tools – they used to be made here – try to impress with weight and the heck with the fit and finish. De Walt and Porter Cable have a lot to answer for when you look at just how shoddily the average American home is put together. As for the cheap and cheerful Chinese imports, whether from Taiwan or PRC, well you get a kit which has to be repaired and tuned before it works. Not a great use of valuable time.

Though I’m lousy at it, I do enjoy cooking and the pots and pans have always said All Clad. You can bury me with those. Good weapons too, in the event of a burglary. The chef’s knife is a Sabattier because if you want to cut well, use what the world’s most food obsessed nation swears by. Leave the guns to the Germans.

And speaking of Germans, when it comes to cars, few would disagree that the best cars made from 1975 through 1990 came from Stuttgart. Mercedes had the market cornered in execution, quality, longevity, resale value and safety, and Americans – me included – were happy to pay a premium for the three pointed star. Sure, the budding Andrettis swore by Porsche, the gold chain set by BMWs and techies by Audis, but Mercedes was the car for the rest of us. Masocists, by the way, opted for Jaguars. Then, two momentous events changed everything in 1990. The accountants took over Mercedes Benz and dictated that cars need only last two years. Greedy, over-leveraged Americans no longer bought cars, they leased them for two years then traded in for the latest variant. So, as leases were only 2 years long, no one cared if the knobs, dials and button failed on Day 731. It was someone else’s problem. The other event, which the dumb Germans made light of, was Toyota’s entry with a new luxury brand aimed directly at Mercedes. The Lexus LS400 introduce in 1990 cost 25% less than the top of the line Mercedes and outperformed it in every regard. My last Mercedes was the 560SEL, maybe their most glorious sedan creation and my first Lexus which I drive to this day is a 2000 LS400. MPG? How about 14 vs. 27 on the freeway. Horsepower? 238/290. Comfort? Identical. Noise? Lots/none. Repairs: Constant/none. So Lexus was this elitist’s choice.

Computers? Apple. If you have to ask, you just don’t get it.

Home electronics? It really doesn’t matter. Nearly everything made is dead reliable and dirt cheap – premium prices generally add never-used features. So brand no longer matters. No one buys a Sony because it’s a Sony any more, as Sony is finally learning. This is the Era of Price.

Furniture? Unless you are into antiques, see ‘Home electronics’ above. I despair at how good cheap imported furniture is (as do the last two remaining US manufacturers in North Carolina) and how much better than even my best woodworking efforts.

Long time readers will experience no surprises when it (finally!) comes to photography.

Cameras :

Ultra small: Then nothing, now Panasonic LX1
Small: Then – Leica M, now Canon 5D
Medium: Then Rollei, now Canon 5D
Large: Then Crown Graphic 4×5, now fughedaboutit

Printers:

Then Epson, now HP – because it does big prints using dyes, which I love and they don’t fade like the old Epson’s dyes.

Tripods:

Then Gandolfi, now Linhof

Lenses:

Then Leica and Zeiss, now Canon (how I wish Leica would fully automate their wides in a Canon DSLR mount!)

Studio light: Then Novatron, now Novatron (proudly and very well made in Dallas, Texas – at least mine was)

So, there you have one elitist’s choices. Notice how the photographic ones need no explaining, telling their own story. It’s when you get to kitchen tools that you are forced to expound at length, it seems.

May 31, 2009

Contacts

Filed under: Photographers — Thomas Pindelski @ 8:18 am

A forgotten technique

One of the more fun aspects of the drudge that used to be darkroom work was making a contact sheet of your 35mm film roll. Arraying 36 snaps on one sheet of 8″ x 10″ paper made for easy selection of the winners.

It’s a forgotten technique as now we bang away, a million snaps a minute, and then examine everything on a computer screen. Every bit as valid but far less contemplative. And easier to miss a good one amongst all the noise.

Here’s a contact sheet from the great humorist with a Leica, Elliott Erwitt:

And here’s the one he chose:

You can enjoy more of this sort of great learning experience by subscribing to the Patek Philippe magazine.

May 28, 2009

America’s (other) disease

Filed under: Photographs — Thomas Pindelski @ 7:31 am

Notable for its absence

For my many years as a California resident I have voted against every single proposition – these appear about twice annually on the ballot – which asked whether the government should borrow more. These propositions address a gamut of pork barrel issues from school funding (why would you waste money on the worst schools in the nation run by a corrupt cadre?) to – I kid you not – storm drain bonds in areas where rainfall is a few inches a year.

My reasoning is simple. Starve the beast of government and you return money to the people.

Until last week, nearly every such proposition was carried by a two thirds majority yet, ask any voter where he thought the money would come from and your reply would be a blank stare. Something finally happened to shake voters into the real world last week when four tax propositions were defeated but I had long ago concluded that America’s greatest disease was financial illiteracy. Why else would you get workers borrowing egregious sums with no prospect of timely debt service in some pie in the sky belief that their real estate would inflate in value indefinitely? This financial illiteracy, exploited by unscrupulous lenders, has brought America to its knees, a status it’s unlikely to emerge from for at least a decade. If it emerges at all, that is.

So blind ignorance, brought on by an educational system that favors populism and sales over hard work and numerate skill, is America’s Number One disease.

Number Two?

It’s easily seen by its absence in this great 1942 picture by reportage snapper Wegee (Arthur Fellig):


Coney Island, 1942

America’s Number Two disease, which is crippling the finances of the responsible and padding the pockets of the unscrupulous is, of course, obesity. Simply stated, if you are fat, I am subsidizing your medical costs. My responsible behavior and healthy eating habits are penalized by your gluttony. Go to any public place in America and you will see that fully two thirds of the people around you are not just overweight. They are grossly over weight. Obese. And it’s a disease which modern prosperity, pushed by those same sales skills taught in schools, coupled with a constant need for one more fast meal because we are too busy to cook healthy food, has created.

Skeptical?

Can you see a fat person in Wegee’s picture?

The picture was taken 67 years ago. The crowd is from the lowest social demographic and, hence, the least likely to eat healthy foods. Yet there’s not an obese person in sight.

May 22, 2009

Helvetica

Filed under: The digital revolution — Thomas Pindelski @ 2:16 pm

A design masterpiece

Reed College in Oregon has two distinctions. On the one hand it is almost certainly the worst school in the United States. Its reputation has been so poor for so long that, when I was hiring, any resumé mentioning Reed went in the recycling faster than you could say ‘loser’. Sure, you might get someone good, but time is money and my chances of getting a winner were many times better when the paperwork said Princeton or Harvard or …. you get the idea. Reed, in other words, was where you went if no one else would have you.

Reed’s other distinction, of course, for a school so priding itself on liberal arts programs and a seeming total lack of academic discipline (hey! studying is meant to be hard – if anyone could do it, why bother?) – is a dubious claim to fame. Their most famous ex-student never graduated, being none other than Steve Jobs. No, you don’t hear him boasting about his alma mater. You wouldn’t, either. Mercifully, he had the wisdom not to complete one of their worthless degrees but preferred to swan about in a haze and would drop in on classes that intrigued him. As he has explained it, the faculty thought nothing of letting former students – or seemingly anyone for that matter – drop in on their classes. If it’s free, it’s rarely worth having, last I checked. Mercifully, one of the classes he did chance upon was in calligraphy and many attribute the extraordinary definition and graphics power of today’s Apple computers to this early interest of Jobs’s.

Typefaces are simply vital for photographers. Any time you present your work with words you are faced with the decision of which typeface to use. And the right choice can go an awfully long way to improving the presentation of your work. I have long been interested in typography and spent some happy hours attending lectures at UCLA in Westwood, Los Angeles, given by one of the great typeface designers, Hermann Zapf.

If you are interested in the subject rent a copy of Helvetica, which addresses the eponymous typeface which is all around us. It may not be the prettiest (I admit to being a Garamond fan, for its elegance – if you read the link it seems one Mr. Jobs shares that affectation) but it does the job in what I call high traffic situations, as it is easily read at a glance. What? Watch a movie about a typeface? Why not? Unlike those addled Reed graduates, you might actually learn something.

May 20, 2009

Good thinking from Pentax

Filed under: Cameras — Thomas Pindelski @ 12:37 pm

A sense of innovation returns.

Ask me who was the most innovative camera maker of the last thirty or so years of film and I would unhesitatingly answer ‘Pentax’.

From the effective mass implementation of the instant return mirror (the East Germans got there first but, naturally, screwed it up), to the exquisite Spotmatic, an ergonomic masterpiece, through the ME Super, a camera which took ‘compact’ very seriously and offered full automation with manual override, Pentax has had some wonderfully innovative camera designs over the years. I used an ME Super for years and loved it. At the other extreme there was the 6×7 medium format monster SLR which, if your hearing survived the slap of the mirror, offered image quality as good as it gets.


Pentax K-7

So it was heart warming to read of the new Pentax DSLR, the K-7, at the DP Review site. The camera looks much smaller than either its predecessor or anything from the competition, offers a choice of better quality fixed focus lenses and now many of the lenses made for the body are being issued in weather sealed designs. If you use the vacuum pump which doubles as a lens on a 5D – the 24-105mm L zoom – you will know why this matters. Too bad Pentax does not have the wherewithal to develop a full frame body.

Two of the neatest features offered are two unique exposure modes. In one you set the ISO and the camera does the rest. Nice, but hardly revolutionary.

In the other you tell the camera your choice of shutter speed and aperture (say, 1/1000 at f/2) and the camera adjusts the ISO to maintain these settings. Now that’s smart.

If you are in the market for a decent DSLR which is small and has the benefit of Samsung’s capital to back it, consider this one. And check out the Pentax prime lenses while you are at it.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress