iPad – first reactions

Blah.

I put my predictions on the line yesterday and blew it in two major respects – the price (I reckoned on $1,000) and the lack of Blutetooth (iPad has it).

Having watched today’s presentation and read the tech specs of Apple’s new touch screen tablet computer, here are my first reactions:

    The Good:

  • Great entry price at $499+tax
  • 802.11n high speed wifi
  • I make the full diagonal to be 12.13″ so the 9.7″ claimed for the display area is likely true – that’s a good size
  • IPS screen technology will be great for accurate color photograph display if it can be profiled properly
  • 1.5lb light weight – but no mention of how much the charger weighs – I assume it takes forever to charge through a low current USB cable connection
  • Claimed 10 hour battery life – though I have difficulty believing that
  • Integrated with iTunes store for books, magazines, movies, music
  • If you have an iPhone/Touch you already know how to use it
  • Lots of apps already available though most will have to be rewritten to take advantage of the full definition
  • Bluetooth – let’s hope it works with existing wireless keyboards
  • No need to pay twice for tunes and apps if I read that right – the iPhone version can also be loaded on the iPad at no extra cost
  • Nice looking iBook application
  • iWork and iLife upgraded for touchscreen use
  • Components of iWork may be separately purchased
  • iPhone OS – lean, mean and hopefully fast
  • Claimed ‘instant on’
  • Monthly 3G telco plan available – no long term contract

    The Bad:

  • Glossy screen
  • No iChat camera
  • Poor storage capacity (16gB in base model – that’s only 1,600 RAW files – not much for an extended trip) but maybe the USB port is not crippled and will allow use of external HDDs
  • Uses AT&T not Verizon in the 3G (add $130) versions
  • No indication whether you can upload Lightroom or similar apps and whether the custom CPU can handle it
  • If it doesn’t run Excel and Word say goodbye to any corporate sales. Like it or not, these are the standard
  • No touch screen feedback when keys are activated
  • No indication whether the telco chip will support Verizon technology
  • No SDHC/SDXC card slot – bad oversight – more things to forget for your next trip
  • 4:3 screen not 16:9 – who makes movies on 4:3 any more?

    The Ugly:

  • Dumb as a brick name – “Honey, where’s the iPod?” said with an American accent reminds me of this
  • Ugly broad black bezel
  • Lower margin in an attempt to grab netbook market share – bad for the stock?
  • Probably fragile – a big expanse of bendable glass and lots of fingerprints to contend with on that glossy screen, not to mention your own reflection when in use
  • No support for Adobe Flash – whether you like it or not, that’s the default application for much video on the web

I would like to have seen more emphasis in today’s weak, self congratulatory presentation on other uses, like universal remote functionality, ability to host a business projection, photography, etc.

However, at that price, if the virtual keyboard works reasonably well and if the dockable external keyboard is well priced, this will be a significant challenger to low margin netbooks made by the competition unless the system is so locked that you cannot use applications of choice. Who in their right mind, for example, prefers iWork Numbers to Microsoft Excel for serious number crunching or Pages to Word for heavy duty word processing? My sense is that the old “never buy v1.0 of anything” rule applies strongly here and that my $400 netbook with its 500gB HDD, 802.11n and an SDHC reader, not to mention a real keyboard, just got a new lease on life. Even if it weighs one pound more – worth it for the matte screen alone.

Disclosure: No AAPL positions.

One thought on “iPad – first reactions

  1. I still think that if Lightroom and Excel are your top concerns, you are not getting the value proposition for this device at all. It is not meant as a computer replacement, it is meant as something to bridge the gap between your phone and your computer. Something to surf the web on the couch, watch a movie on the airplane, and keep up with email on the go. I agree, a camera would be nice for video conferencing; I disagree on flash—if we are lucky this will be the nail in the coffin for garbage flash websites/ads and something more open will take over as the video standard for the web. Finally, I do strongly prefer Pages to the Mac version of Word, and use it all the time. That said, I don’t expect to be writing essays or business documents much on my iPad…

Comments are closed.