Monthly Archives: October 2011

Diner

Photographs

A shaft of sunlight.

At Third and Brannan Streets, San Francisco. G3, 1/400, f/4.9, ISO 1600.

In a large print the G3’s sensor confirms that it’s as good at ISO 1600 as the G1’s is at ISO 400, when it comes to a lack of noise.

Odysseys and Photographs

Book reviews

Book review.

Click for the Amazon listing.

This book profiles four famous National Geographic photographers spanning the transition from large format glass plates to 35mm Leica Kodachromes. The sense of arduous discovery, the difficulty and danger of the expeditions these men undertook and the unstinting commitment of the National Geographic Society to exposing its readership to the unknown is hard to convey.

The men profiled – Maynard Owen Williams, Luis Marden, Volkmar Wentzel and Thomas Abercrombie – are all exceptional. Whether polyglots, great writers (true photjournalists), technologists (Marden was an expert pilot and scuba diver) or humanitarians (Abercrombie became a Muslim, so committed was he to the Arabic way of life from his travels), all were superb photographers.

There are many fascinating tidbits here, such as NG’s reluctance to take Marden’s Leica negatives seriously. Then Kodachrome came along and all that changed.

But the prevailing memory from reading this beautifully printed book is of the photographs, never less than special, often breathtaking.

You can pay up at Amazon for this $40 tome or get one from Edward R Hamilton, as I did, for all of $3.95. I order books there by the dozen and whether you buy one or a hundred, shipping is $3.95. That’s quite a bargain had you tried to lift the last delivery into your home as I did. I’m going to need the money saved on shipping to pay the chiropractor.

The economics of art books continue to leave me befuddled. Why would anyone want to lose so much money? Thank goodness they do, though, as it makes for an inexpensive library.

EyeOne and OS X Lion – updated

Hardware

Finally software is available.

Xrite just released a Beta update of their EyeOne Display profiling software which works with OS X Lion; until now you had to use Snow Leopard or earlier to get the software to work – a royal pain if you had upgraded to Lion, necessitating keeping a bootable copy of the older OS available. No more. You can download it here.

You can read more about the excellent EyeOne Display2 colorimeter for profiling displays here.

The new software is free regardless of when you bought your EyeOne – a wise choice contrary to Xrite’s earlier threats to charge older users. There are some bugs which they honestly disclose – I got stuck at the red screen but waited it out – 3 minutes – and the app commenced working. I was also unable to get ambient light measurement to yield a proper profile, though it was an overcast day when I ran the profiles for my three Dell 2209WA displays, so I’ll report back when profiling in more normal lighting. In the meanwhile I used the D65 lighting profile – meaning 6500K daylight temperature. This presumes that your prints will be viewed in like lighting; I prefer to profile to ambient light because that’s what they will be most often viewed in.

The process takes 8 minutes per display once you get the hang of it and, unlike its predecessor, the app no longer asks you to adjust display colors, doing it through software. All you have to do is match the display’s brightness to your preferred setting. I use 120 Cd/m. The klieglicht ultrabright settings with which modern displays ship are of no use to photographers desiring color matched prints.

The colorimeter measures 132 color patches in all and the profile, once generated, is saved at the click of a mouse. One new feature is that all three displays in my Hackintosh setup are displayed and clicking on any one switches the app to the display selected. Nice.

Matching between displays is as close as ever, meaning it’s excellent. The EyeOne Display2 remains a quality choice for the advanced amateur and professional requiring a well profiled display, and having castigated Xrite for dragging its feet on releasing the Lion version it’s only fair to compliment them on the new app and on their coming to their senses on pricing.

All three displays are selectable. As a display is selected, the app switches to it.

The brightness adjustment screen.

The profile reminder screen – choices remain at 1, 2 or 4 weeks.

A new and very useful feature is Trending – the app saves a graphical trend of profiles so you can judge drift over time.

Trending.

Here’s the location of the three profiles on my system.
If you cannot find the Username->Library directory, hold down the option key while clicking Finder->Go.

Kodak RIP

Photography

Finished.

Kodak will file for bankruptcy protection soon, the only way in which it can sell its last remaining asset, the patent portfolio, without attracting fraudulent conveyance suits from creditors.

When they ran this moronic and arrogant full page ad in the WSJ in June, 2009, it was already all over:

The risible statement that their business is about humanity tells you all you need to know.

And while journalists are proclaiming the cause of Kodak’s death as a failure to see digital coming, nothing could be further from the truth.

The digital sensor may have been invented by Bell Labs in the 1960s but it took Kodak to place it in a working camera in 1975. By 1991 that camera was a commercial product, with a slightly smaller than MFT sensor lodged inside a Nikon SLR (and later Canon SLR) and selling for over $25,000. Yes, Nikon and Canon were using Kodak’s sensors twenty years ago! Kodak got the manufacturing process fixed and prices down, while quality went up over the next decade, and today you will still find Kodak sensors inside many costly cameras – from medium format professional DSLRs to collectible jewelry like the Leica M9. So it’s not like Kodak was anything but a leader here. Where they lost the plot was in not going mainstream and doing a lousy job of protecting their many patents, the same patents which are all that is left of value in Rochester. Only a naïve inventor thinks that he need not sue to protect his intellectual property. You think Apple is bringing daily patent suits against the those ‘designers’ who are legally challenged at Samsung, HTC and Google for fun?

So critics of Hewlett Packard can take solace in the knowledge that while HP’s management has been stuck on dumb for a decade now (and will likely have to break up the company and sell off the pieces soon), Kodak beat them to the punch years earlier. Kodak’s demise is not the result of their missing technological change. It’s the result of a failure of execution, meaning lousy management, blind to the marketplace and hampered by a great legacy. The boards of both companies have been committing grand larceny every pay day for years and the shareholders have no one to blame but themselves.