Monthly Archives: February 2012

Donald Jean

Photographer of Venice.

The work of Venetian photographer Donald G. Jean is very special.

I have recently been writing about my preparation for the arrival of a Nikon D700, mostly dry technical content, but in the process of researching the hardware I stopped by the estimable Fred Miranda Nikon discussion forum, one of whose longest threads concerns the use of legacy Nikon optics. In that 500+ page thread I chanced on the work of Donald Jean and was enchanted by this photographer’s vision, replete with a mastery of color and light and shade such as one very rarely encounters.

There are allusions here to Saul Leiter and the great Visconti’s Death in Venice, a movie in which you luxuriate and revel, for the photography there is also to die for. But Jean’s work is in no way imitative. It has its own pulse and vision.

The thread running through many of Don’s photographs is the solitary figure, portrayed as often as not at night and invariably in Venice. And while the sheer selection of optics used is breathtaking, at no time is there any intimation that this is the work of any less than a photographer who has long ago put technical considerations behind him, all the focus being on light, shade and composition.

The results are magic.

Here are some words from Donald about his work together with some choice images. You can see more of his work on his flickr pages.

* * * * *

I’ve been taking photos for more than 35 years, but I only became “serious” about photography about 5 years ago. It started in 2007 right after I opened a flickr account. Before that my photography was limited mostly to family snapshots but once I started posting on flickr–and receiving almost instantaneous feedback–I got hooked.

From the beginning I was attracted to solitary figures, silhouettes, shadows and select focus and that’s mostly what I still do — usually at night. I also like to shoot in the rain and against the sun. I’m attracted to classic and imposing architecture too. Fortunately I live in Italy so there’s no shortage of wonderful scenes and backdrops for this kind of photography.

I’ve been living in Italy on and off since 1973 (and permanently since I retired from the US Army 16 years ago). However, contrary to what many of my flickr viewers believe, I don’t live in Venice. I live outside of Vicenza, which is about 30 miles (50 km) away.

Generally speaking, my usual “technique” is to find a scene or situation I like and stand there until an “interesting” person walks into or out of the scene. Often times I end up waiting for a long time. Rarely do I pose or stage a scene and most of my best shots usually come when I’m least prepared and have to react quickly.

I’ve always used Nikon cameras and Nikkor lenses.

Some of my favorite photographers are Brassai, Saul Leiter, Alfred Eisenstaedt, and Rui Palha. I also like many of the works of the early Pictorialist photographers as well as the paintings of Whistler, Hopper and Sargent.

* * * * *

Thank you, Donald, for sharing your very special work with my readers. You can see where Don lives below:

D700 – in the studio

Winston at ten!

The D700 and 85mm lens arrived just in time for our son’s tenth birthday and the obligatory annual studio portrait, so it was out with the Novatron gear. I decided to shoot tethered to the MacBook Air, connecting the D700’s mini-USB socket with a USB cable. This gives large screen previews of exposure etc. Lightroom 3 makes this easy, yet my first attempt returned an error message saying “No camera detected”. I rummaged in the garage cardboard box where the mess of cables makes its home, and found several with the requisite connectors. The second one worked fine and continued to do so when extended with a further cable. No need for ‘factory authorized’ this or ‘premium priced Nikon’ that.

First I snapped a couple of test shots to see what the D700’s sensor, with its modest pixel count, can deliver. On paper, it should yield prints three times the size of those I get from the 16mp MFT sensor in the Panny G3, which allows for grain-free prints sized 24″ x 16″. That sensor is one quarter the area of the D700’s, so ‘stretch’ those pixels over 4 times the area and you get 4mp effective density. The D700 is some 12mp, or three times the enlargement for the same pixel density, meaning 72″ x 48″.

I tested that on my Dell 2209WA displays and, indeed, the definition held up fine even at 90″ x 60″ effective size. large enough for me, making me wonder who on earth needs the 36mp of the just announced D800? Not to mention a monster file size which takes three times as long to download. Whatever.

A little more tweaking to establish the optimum settings for import sharpening with the 85mm f/1.8D Nikkor yielded the following, required to counter the Anti-Aliasing filter in front of the sensor, there to prevent ‘jaggies’. Using RAW, with 1:1 previews in Lightroom 3, I settled on the following:

D700 LR3 file import sharpening settings.

That’s a bit more aggressive than the Canon 5D needed and may, of course, vary between lenses, but it’s just right, and at the cusp of where sharpening artifacts just start to appear. This is not prescriptive – each to his own. Color rendition seems neutral with default body settings, so no changes there. These were determined using LR3 using the 2010 Process. LR4 introduces yet another Process (will Adobe ever stop this nonsense?) and the Beta version is buggy. As a fellow photographer (and many on the web) report, try converting 2010 process files to 2012 and LR4 crashes, in both Windows and OS X. So I’m sticking with LR3 for now, especially as the changes in LR4 are aimed more at Adobe’s P&L than photographers’ needs.

One unexpected benefit of tethered capture is that the subject can see the results withing a couple of seconds on the laptop’s display. 10 year old boys aren’t exactly renowned for having great attention spans when their pictures are being taken, but this mechanism both kept Winston interested and helped him with posing. Neat.

We took about four dozen snaps and maybe six or so were ‘keepers’. This one stood out.

Winston Howard Hofler, aged ten.
D700, 85mm f/1.8 at f/5.6, ISO100.

The highlights in the hair are from a boom mounted top light, in the style of the great Hollywood photographer of the stars, George Hurrell. In addition to the boom, two other strobe heads, in umbrellas, were used. A related benefit of strobes is that you don’t get the huge retinas that strong incandescent lights cause.

D700 – first impressions

Finally here.

Taking no more than 20 minutes to walk that man about town, Bertram the Border Terrier, it figured that UPS called as the pup was out raising the leg, and the depressing little note stuck to the door said they would try delivering the D700 next Monday, signature required. The same for a delayed gift for our boy’s birthday. A call to UPS established that a visit to their warehouse between 9:00 and 9:15pm in South SF would get the packages in my hot little hands and though I turned up a few minutes early, I was quite unprepared for what followed.

First, the UPS facility is simply enormous, rows of warehouses full of trucks and boxes. Second, there was a long line of idling cars on a rainy night, all apparently waiting for the gate to open for late night pick-ups. Straight out of film noir. I got in pretty much at the back of the line and, boy, what is wrong with people? Here I am on Cloud Nine, delighted to be getting our boy’s gift and my toy, and I’m at the back of a line of the most miserable cross section of humanity on earth. I try to make conversation but it’s useless. Except for me no one wants to be here. Well, at least the charming ladies at the counter are pleasant and I leave assuring them that America is indeed a great nation.

UPS line at 9:15pm, South SF.

I get home, tuck the boy in bed, place the pup on the bed, and pop the box. Seconds later I have the 85mm f/1.8D on the body, one of the two batteries has a solid charge and I’m in there changing the defaults and Copyright data. The first impression is one of solidity, it’s not light, the fit in the hand is good, the rear LCD bright and the finder a pleasure to use. The 0.72x magnification (same as on a Leica M2) is just right. The previous owner has left the shutter on high speed sequential and I startle myself when first releasing the shutter with the machine gun result. My misionary work with the manual the last two days pays off and it’s not too hard to figure most things out. Best of all, the two batteries provided both show ‘new’ status, attesting to the light use the body enjoyed with it’s first owner. And yes, it’s a USA import, as the box testifies.

I contemplate installing the Upstrap but it’s late, the strap will fit a dozen ways with only one of those right, so I call it a day. This Nikon D700 computer can wait another day.

More anon.

Modeling fee? Outrageous.

D700 options

How best to set these?

Reading of the wretched Nikon D700 manual surfaced some interesting questions. I read it using Good Reader on the iPad where I keep all my camera manuals. It’s a simple matter to annotate pages for subsequent follow up.

I short listed a few issues which I shared with a friend who is a D700 expert, as follows (parentheses refer to page numbers in the English manual):

In camera © Copyright information (page 343):

You can add this in the camera so it’s recorded with every picture. Those using Lightroom can also add it on import, but this seems a more robust approach as there is nothing to forget. Use the wrong import setting in LR and the information will missing if not recorded in the camera.

Non-CPU lenses (210):

Most older Nikon lenses (pre G and D series) have no CPU yet will fit the D700, some with reduced functionality. If you are prepared to cope with the rigors of manual focusing there is a cornucopia of ridiculously cheap Nikkors out there which will work, and which can be programed into the D700 to present correct EXIF data. Doing so also enables automatic power zoom with select Nikon Speedlight flashguns. A quick check discloses that some of the all time classic Nikkors of the film era, like the 20mm f/3.5, 24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 55mm f/1.2, 85mm f/1.8, 105mm f/2.5, 180mm f/2.8, 200mm f/4, 300 f/4.5 and 500mm Mirror, are not only abundantly available lightly used, but prices are generally below $400, sometimes below $100! For the rarely used optic for a special occasion snap there’s much to like here. Indeed, I have a hankering for the 500mm Mirror optic. The D700’s viewfinder has a focus confirmation light to tell the user when the lens is in focus. It’s not AF but it beats nothing.

The 300mm f/4.5 Nikkor from the KEH catalog – $89!

Custom Menus (364):

You can create your own custom menu for frequently accessed options on the rear LCD screen.

Sensor cleaning (393):

You can have this automated at On, Off, On and Off or manual! My colleague uses manual, used as needed. This approach saves wear and tear and speeds start-up time.

Active D-lighting (179):

An enhanced dynamic range setting which my friend believes is largely obsoleted by the enhanced controls in Lightroom 3. I’ll have to experiment with this one. Anything which reduces post processing time is a good thing in my book.

Color Space (181):

You can set sRGB or Adobe RGB. I use the latter for the broadest color gamut.

12-bit or 14-bit RAW files (68):

The 14-bit setting is reputed to store more shadow detail, at the penalty of file size.

Bob Johnson has an interesting article, referred to me by my colleague, on the merits of 14-bit, and suggests that one good use for the Custom menu is to include a 12/14 bit toggle. Presumably the 14-bit setting would be reserved for very high dynamic range subjects where exposure is for the highlights, with consequent underexposure of the shadows, the latter being recovered in post processing.

Be sure to check Arun Gupta’s Comment below on why 14-bit and Adobe RGB go together.

GPS geotagging (213):

The D700 accepts Nikon’s shoe-mounted GPS unit ($190) with a wire and plug for the socket on the front, and stores geotagging information with the picture file. Aftermarket units sell for $67 and the trick.com site has an article explaining why you should save $123. I’m no geotagging maven but it can be fun and a small unit at low cost is tempting.

So there’s lots of value added from reading the poor manual, and the D700’s design is clearly one aimed at conferring a high level of flexibility in use.

Manual change

An opportunity.

The digital camera is the most complex consumer device made. Not complex as in lots of parts from disparate manufacturers, like a car, but complex in the sense that the combination of buttons, menus and control dials results in millions of potential combinations.

I am a huge believer in learning all the functions of my cameras, as this enhances my ability to choose which to set-and-forget and which I need in daily use. If you don’t know what’s available you cannot make this decision correctly. A good user manual is key to this learning process.

There are but two models for gadget manuals out there. I call the first the Arrogant Model, typified by the near complete absence of instructions shipped with any Apple gadget. The arrogance stems from the belief that “our gear is so simple to use that no instructions are needed”. This results in a user who is so clueless about leveraging his investment that his smart phone become as dumb as its owner. Apple does a superb manual for the iPhone, for example, but good luck trying to find it. And speaking of dumb, the other manual model is indeed the Dumb Model, used by everyone else. (OK, there’s also the Bauhaus Model where you retain some unemployed graphics art student to illustrate everything with line drawings which are unintelligible in any language. You save the translation fees and insult your buyer in the process. No repeat sales for you).

The D700. A study in complexity. British Bulldog sadly not included.
I always get a kick when I see that ridiculous question mark at left.

I am stuck with the Dumb Model. With a view to getting a jump on things, while my Nikon D700 is subjected to the tender mercies of UPS, I downloaded the User Manual from Nikon or, more correctly, the three manuals they offer, two being addenda. What prompted this action was that in many of the secondhand sale listings snaps I perused before plonking down my cash, there was the ominous presence of not one but two thick paperbacks. This suggested there’s a lot going on here and the main download confirmed my fears, coming in at no less than 444 pages. As I recall the pocket booklet for the Canon 5D was all of 50 pages or so. Yes, it was poor, but 50 pages of bilge pump imitation beats 444.

First there’s the obligatory dozen pages from scummy lawyers telling you not to feed the baby discharged batteries. When will companies learn that this nonsense never keeps them out of court? Cynically labelled ‘For Your Safety’ (meaning ‘Screw you if we screw up’) these come in handy in the event of a toilet paper shortage. And the rest is predictably awful, a dry recitation of each control, sorted by button or menu choice.

The D700 manual. How not to write a user guide.

There is no thought of activity- or goal-based learning here. Button A does this, dial B that, and so on. And it’s not like I’m singling out Nikon. The manuals for the Panny G1 and G3 are comically inept, in addition to being authored in Chinglish. Between 200 and 300 pages long, I have yet to figure out why the AE lock button assignment in my G3 refuses to ‘stick’ between uses, no thanks to the manual. Coincidentally, our TV is a Panasonic (dollar loyalty, not brand loyalty) and the manual is no less than 60 pages, clearly from the same Shakespearean. And this for a product with a 42″ screen and speakers, crying out for an interactive on-screen narrated guide. (The manuals for the old film Leica M cameras were great but, then again, it doesn’t take Einstein to explain a shutter dial, a focus and aperture ring and wind and film rewind levers. And the Germans have been practicing their English for most of the past century, so it was pretty good).

Maybe the lack of good camera manuals is the result of everyone’s being so awful that there’s no need to compete and run up costs, yet I cannot but think that there is a great profit opportunity here for the smart manufacturer. The dictates are simple:

  • Hire someone whose native language is English (immigrants are a good bet as they generally have better grammar)
  • Make sure he is a great photographer (so that rules out all the fanboy sites)
  • The author has to be a skilled technical writer (which rules out 99+% of English speakers)
  • All marketing people excluded
  • Absolutely no lawyers allowed
  • All legal disclaimers printed on a roll of toilet paper, shipped separately to the buyer
  • Pay the author $100,000 for 3 months’ work
  • Make all design engineers available to the writer at his beck and call
  • Add professional videos and ship these on a free flash card with every camera
  • Add interactive help files to the LCD screens found in every digital camera
  • Fly out the usual whores reviewers from NYT, WSJ, Time, etc. first class to the factory – just like Apple does
  • Waste no time marketing to the fanboy sites. They are sold already.
  • Be sure the members of the Fourth estate are given two of everything free – one for the journalist, the other to sell tax free
  • Call the gifts ‘Long term loans’ to avoid any ethical issues***
  • Provide them with whatever extra curricular activities they desire – look, these are gear reviewers who cannot get a date
  • Bask in the glory of your paid copy. “Canikolypuji revolutionizes user friendly camera design”
  • Clean up at the cash register

*** Tricky one that. When companies like Olympus can engage in a decade long fraud that makes the boys at Enron look like pikers, ethics may well be a tough concept to grasp.

As author, a writer/photographer of the caliber of a Martin Evening is what is called for here. If you cannot take pictures you have no business writing camera manuals. And if you can write well there’s no reason to think you can take pictures. The writer must be adept at both.

OK, so what with the author’s fee, the dancing girls, five star accommodation and related production costs, you are out $500k for a series of guides for your 5 camera DSLR range, say. Your gross margin is 30% so you have to sell another $1.5mm in hardware just to break even. At an ASP of $750 you have to pick up 2,000 conquest sales from the competition. Doesn’t seem so hard now, does it? And each additional sale thereafter falls straight to the bottom line.

Meanwhile, I’m back to jumping around the 444 page wonder from Nikon in the hope I might actually figure out how to use this complex computer that just happens to make photographs, before it darkens the front porch.