Category Archives: Computing

The back-end to making pictures

Big small storage

2.5″ spinning hard drives.


Dual 2.5″ drive enclosure compared to 4 bay 3.5″ behemoths. As the yellow label discloses, this Mac Pro runs a speedy 3.33GHz CPU.

As my movie collection grows, not helped by the 25GB size of ripped BluRay discs (compared with but 4GB for regular DVDs), so does the need for storage space.

Heretofore I have used Mediasonic 4-bay 3.5″ drive enclosures at $100 for the 4-bay version, and they have performed flawlessly for over 5 years now, loaded with Western Digital Red 4TB hard drives. The drives now retail for $135, which is a lot more than I paid years ago. The blue tape on these which you can just make out in the picture is to blank off the obnoxiously bright flashing LEDs on the fascia.

With traditional spinning disk technology refusing to die, and SSD prices still far too high for bulk storage, the much more compact 2.5″ hard drives have made huge leaps. 4TB capacities are now readily available in the smaller drive size. Seagate makes 4TB 15mm thick drives for $130 and two of these fit an inexpensive $40 enclosure. There are many versions available; just make sure the one you order will accommodate 15mm drives, which are a good deal thicker than the typical notebook drive. So the cost per 4TB of 2.5″ storage figures to $150, compared with $160 for the older tech 3.5″ drives, with great savings in space and, as importantly, far lower power draw. The enclosure of choice used here supports USB3 (though USB2 is perfectly adequate for movies) and comes with both USB2 and USB3 cables, as well as a power supply. I have added USB3 – having run out of USB2 sockets – using an Inateck USB3 PCIe card; the Mac Pro comes with USB2 native ports only and I happened to have a spare card lying around. USB3 is not a requirement here. The price of this card appears to have more than doubled since I bought mine.

A 4TB drive (the second drive is a back-up clone) will store some 160 BluRay disks, so this big little addition should see me happy for another year or two. The cost of storage per movie, along with the backup clone, figures at just $1.88.

How to blow $7bn in 3 months

Monkey Boy rules!
All of the CEOs of Microsoft.

Microsoft closed its acquisition of a near-dead Nokia for $7bn in April, 2014.

Yesterday it announced 18,000 layoffs, mostly from the 25,000 Nokia workforce, cementing Ballmer’s achievement of perhaps the greatest waste of money in corporate history. And you thought the US military was a spendthrift?

New CEO Satya Nadella has a dream job. After all, how could anyone be worse than Ballmer?

Wall Street loved the move, naturally:

No need to get excited about anything MSFT makes. Yet. Excel is fine. Otherwise, fughedaboutit.

As for Ballmer, with a net worth of $18bn, he’s living proof of the dictum that has it “It’s who you know, not what you know”. Or should that be “Screw up and go up”?

Enough with the Cloud, already

The insidious creep of property theft.

The premise which has it that computing’s Cloud exists for users’ convenience is fundamentally flawed. The goal of the Cloud is to wrest control of the user’s data from his local disk storage to the vendor’s storage on his disks. That data can then be examined and parsed without the owner’s knowledge, hacked and resold for profit. The user’s convenience has nothing to do with it. Google Reader is a perfect example of this realization dawning on one of America’s biggest businesses.

If you believe that, then you are naïve. Google is discontinuing its RSS aggregator to force users to migrate to Google+, where Google can collect and resell your web behavior to all at sundry, and tough if you don’t know about it. It’s their competitor for the no less disingenuous Facebook. And while these vendors are selling everything about you, you pay for the privilege with inflated phone bills so that they can distribute your data free of charge, while proclaiming such utter nonsense as ‘net neutrality’ and ‘information wants to be free’. That they continue to do so, successfully at that, says more about consumers than I want to contemplate.

Like most Google ‘free’ products, Reader had one of the poorest user interfaces it’s possible to imagine. That fired entrepreneurial spirits and great front ends to Reader’s database like NetNewsWire and Reeder came along and provided an exceptional user experience. Because much of an RSS feed was downloaded by these products, the experience without fast wi-fi was excellent for subsequent reading. You may not have been able to get at the full story fast, but you got the crux of it and you got that immediately.

But with Reader being discontinued on June 30, you must migrate to a new product unless you prefer to have your identity appropriated and resold by Google.

Thus I have tried a couple of alternatives. Feedly seemed promising but on some of my machines it refuses to import my (many) Google Reader feeds. That makes it essentially useless – as useless as trying to get Apple’s iCloud to synch Bookmarks in Safari across many devices. I wrote enthusiastically about Feedly a while back but I was wrong owing to this debilitating error. For the life of me, I cannot find a fix in their help pages.

More recently I have tried the ridiculously named Inoreader. It imported my Google Reader feeds fine but access is slow and the product is useless without wi-fi. The interface does not compare with NetNewsWire or Reeder, but those two services are seemingly silent on what they will do after June 30, 2013 passes, and Google Reader disappears.

More fool me for having used Google Reader in the first place, disregarding my own instincts about this business.

I suppose complaining about the Cloud is rather like Canute trying to reverse the waves, but I’m sure he was pretty miffed when the royal toes got soaked, and I am no less upset.

Every place I now go on the internet comes with loud demands that I join Facebook, or Google+ or any one of many other ‘social’ sites. I do not want to be ‘social’. I prefer to choose my own friends, not have them chosen for me. When I tried Twitter a while back my feed was inundated with messages from strangers of no interest to me. I quickly closed the account, though it was not easy to do. I constantly get messages from Linkedin users who want to share their profile with me. Why would I care about a stranger’s job aspirations? As for Facebook, well, I haven’t the faintest interest in exchanging images of my latest tattoo or dog with all and sundry and I certainly do not wish to hang out with a bunch of 10 year olds using US public school grammar. I want solid, hard information reliably delivered, information whose sources I choose. I want it fast and I do not want my profile being resold by my friendly Cloud provider.

And I also want to own my software (and forget those probably illegal agreements – with software, possession is ownership in my book, and I do not need your permission to use something I have paid for), not becoming a slave of the likes of Adobe who now insist I pay rent to access the latest versions of Photoshop in …. yes, you guessed it, the Cloud. Once I cease paying rent I may still have access to my locally stored images, but if they are in the wrong file format, I may no longer be able to process them. Why would anyone agree to that or be forced to adopt workarounds by storing in DNG or TIFF?

And if you believe one word of what a Facebook or a Google says about your security well, frankly you deserve one another. Here’s a search of the NYT on two comically contradictory words:

Facebook security

My advice to you? Close your Facebook account and cease being a marketable product. And view everything Google does with the most intense suspicion. You are a product to be sold. You are not the customer. Their advertiser is. And fight the Cloud with all your might to keep your data in your home, not on remote servers. Finally, for heaven’s sake, do not cave and sign up for Photoshop in the cloud. You do not need the latest purported features and your money is better spent on a standalone product whose entrepreneurial creator can use the capital and will allow you to retain future processing access to your pictures.

The future of NetNewsWire and Reeder:

Neither of these messages make me optimistic:

The best computer ever

Flashback to 1981.


The Osborne 1.

That’s a big claim, so let me step back a moment. The first personal computer which was actually usable by regular people was the Apple II, introduced in 1977. It cost some $2,500 plus lots more for a disk drive and software, appealed to a small cadre of visionaries – rich visionaries – and was out of my price range. When the Osborne I came along, it was some 100% cheaper than a loaded Mac and was quite perfectly ugly by comparison. Ostensibly portable, it would take a Schwarzenegger to justify that claim, for the Ozzy weighed in at 25lbs. Worse, it came with an awful 52 column by 25 row grey-on-black CRT display, quite unreadable to all but F15 pilots with 20-20 vision. So another $100 procured a 12″ green CRT display which was actually usable. The two disk drives were inept beyond belief, two single-sided 5 1/4″ floppy drives, each floppy storing but 360k of data. A few months later a 300 baud modem was made which slotted neatly into the fascia and provided dial-up access to …. well, not very much. I used The Source, a dial-up bulletin board which was great for exchanging use tips. The case, in cream plastic, was poorly made, the seams awful, and closing the box up was not a pretty matter. There was no battery – how much did you want to carry? – and the keyboard/cover was connected to the body with a broad and fragile ribbon cable.

Yet it was fabulous.

You what?

Simply stated, it came with the greatest package of software on earth. And that software was to be inextricably linked with my Unfair Advantage. Where others blew their coin on wine, women and song, I blew mine on what Steve Jobs famously called ‘A Bicycle for the Mind’. Man is a tool using beast, the feature which distinguishes him from other primates (OK, otters are pretty cool), and the Ozzy’s software cornucopia provided more leverage for the mind than Archimedes ever dreamt about.

The Ozzy sported a grand 16k of memory, a good chunk of which was taken up by the CP/M operating system, which had to be loaded from a floppy every time the machine was fired up. Hence the two floppy drives – one for the OS, the other for data. You would fire up the OS, then insert one of the software floppies to invoke the application of your choice. The bicycling mind still thought this was a great return on time invested.

And here’s the magic sauce. The software the Osborne came with still constitutes the bulk of my computer knowledge. It was outstanding in every regard.

The CP/M OS was superb – small, lean, fast, easy to learn as long as you were prepared to type commands on the one line command-line interface, confronted with a small flashing cursor which left everything to the imagination. When Microsoft’s DOS was introduced later, with the IBM PC, it was very much like using CP/M. I do not recall a lockup with either.

Once the OS was up and running, a minute or two of grinding from the left-hand floppy, you pulled the disc and installed one of Basic, Supercalc, Wordstar or dBaseII. What a thrill!

The obviousness of Supercalc, the second spreadsheet app after Apple’s Visicalc, was true magic once you got it. Learn how to input numbers and letters (‘strings’ in the Osborne’s arcane manual), input your first 2+2 calculation then change one of the cells to 3 and …. magic! 5 appeared on the screen. And while the spreadsheet has created more wealth destruction through its undisciplined interface, lacking all control and intellectual rigor, it was a ‘light bulb’ moment. Since then the spreadsheet has been the cause of insane, the tool for massive fraud by investment bankers back-solving for the desired input and continental depression, yet that ‘magic 5’ remains a moment I will never forget.

Continental depression? Why, yes. Just last week it was disclosed that two ‘esteemed’ economists – a contradiction in terms if there ever was one – funded by knuckle-dragging conservatives, had made fundamental formula errors in solving for their desired result. The conclusion from their spreadsheet? That Debt:GDP ratios exceeding 90% meant the end of the world. These ‘distinguished’ economists – two frauds named Reinhart and Rogoff – convinced western Europe that austerity was the only way out of the global recession. The only snag is, had they got their formulas right, they would have come up with a different answer and austerity would never have raised its ugly head, instead of ruining the economies of Great Britain, France, Portugal, Spain, Greece, Italy and so on. So yes, while the magic of the spreadsheet was immediately obvious, it was every bit as obvious that you could work that magic to get to any answer you wanted (investment bankers) or screw up royally and procure additional funding from your masters at the right-wing think tank (R & R).

The Basic app was outstanding. After mugging up on the language it was a simple matter to write your own routines to perform recurring calculations. Sort of a one cell spreadsheet. When the IBM PC came along a couple of years later the only software it shipped with was DOS and ROM Basic, the latter written by none other than Bill Gates himself, and it was what I used to codify bond math to a point where all the user had to do was input a variable and have the result appear instantly. A one cell spreadsheet calculator, if you like. The error, if any, was made at the coding stage, not at the calculation step.

Wordstar was a blast. For the first time I could write – and write copiously – and print the result to a 9 x 9 pin Okidata dot matrix printer. Trust me, that was a whole lot better than my handwriting. The wonderful Toshiba 24-pin variant came along two years later and suddenly dot matrix approximated the one-use carbon ribbon in the IBM ‘golf ball’ Selectric typewriter. Best of all, you could hack the source code with ease, though I still recall one evening when I was adding my own tailored commands to the menu only to come across the programmer’s invocation “You should not be looking here!” buried in the source code. Computing on the frontier was an absolute blast back then. And because you only had some 6k of memory left after the OS and Wordstar were loaded, Wordstar would permit near-infinite length documents by simply paging through them by swapping the contents of memory to that other floppy. Brilliant. Photoshop uses that technique to this day. And you could spread your magnum opus over as many floppy disks as your wallet could afford. Tolstoy would have loved Wordstar.

But all of those pale when it comes to applied rigor and discipline, and the name of this unforgiving teacher was dBaseII. dBase was originally written by Ashton Tate for the CP/M OS and it taught programming discipline like nothing else. Sure, you could carve out ‘if-this-then-that’ rules for special cases, but large populations of data hew to the rules of large numbers, with 80/20 rule sets very much at their core. You did not have to carve out too many exceptions when sorting through large data sets. I taught myself database programming using a book which profiled Fred’s Fish Shop, taking you thorough sales, inventory, receivables, payables and so on, all absorbed on daily commutes on the M104 bus in Mahattan on the way to work. Sure, the bus took longer to get to Wall Street than the RR subway from my Westside place, but it was air conditioned and the extra time was welcomed, dictating only that the alarm clock be set some 30 minutes earlier. When philosophical reflection on the plight of man was called for, all it took was a glance out of the window as the bus labored down Broadway, the passengers alternating between white, brown, yellow and black, then white again. The availability of a superbly powerful database management system for the price of the Ozzy was so overwhelming an economic proposition that I went out and bought Ashton Tate stock without a second thought. The return on that investment yielded my next computer, the first IBM PC.

The rest is history but the Ozzy can fairly be said to have been my greatest teacher ever.

Graphics User Interfaces? That was all much later. 1984 to be exact when the Macintosh arrived. And photo processing on a computer was a dream which did not see reality until 1990 with the introduction of Photoshop, only on the Mac! The first Nikon (not so) affordable scanners came along a few years later and suddenly all your images could be made digital and easily manipulated, be it Mac or PC. But that Ozzy, or more correctly, its software bundle, paved the way for this computer ingénu and all that followed.


The view east toward the MONY building, winter 1981,
as I learned dBase II on the Ozzy from my apartment
at 310 W 56th Street, New York City.
Leica M3, 50mm Summicron, Kodachrome 64.

The Ozzy passed to my niece at Champaign-Urbana, University of Illinois, upon which she wrote her dissertation which got her a first in brain studies. Or something. Way over my, err… head.