Category Archives: Nikon bodies

About Nikon DSLRs

Nikkor-Q 135mm f/3.5

Neither here nor there.

Blue, blue, blue. The mottling is from a mesh screen on the window, not in the lens.

Before the DSLR revolution the standard ‘3 lens’ outfit for the 35mm SLR snapper was comprised of 35, 50 and 135mm lenses. Today, with super range zoom lenses that is all yesterday’s news. In between, that outfit got shorter and wider, many opting for 28 or even 24mm at the wide end, 35mm as the ‘standard’ lens with 85-105mm at the long end. It’s not that there was anything inherently wrong with the 135mm focal length, it’s just that it was too long for portraits and too short to be really, well, long. But before they fell out of favor, Pentax, Minolta, Canon and Nikon made a boat load of 135s.

If serial numbers are any guide, Nikon alone made over 300,000 of the early 135mm f/3.5 design, their ‘budget’ model, comprised of but four lenses in three groups and made during the period June 1959 through March 1977. The first ones coincided with the release of the single greatest 35mm SLR in the history of the design, the Nikon F. And, indeed, my 1971 version not only remains budget priced – $65 near mint – but also comes with that exceptional build quality common to all Nikkors of the era, regardless of price. The same quality found in that Nikon F of yore.

A few minutes with a screwdriver and a flat file saw me confer the appropriate Ai relief on the rear of the aperture ring, which comes off easily once the five bayonet flange retaining screws are removed. Those less confident in their mechanical skills should send the lens to John White along with the modest fee asked. You really will hate getting this wrong. Another few minutes and overnight to let the epoxy cure saw a CPU installed.

Note the wild blue color of the single anti-reflection coating on the front element, something common to lenses of the period. No matter the color, it works well, though the lens benefits from a lens hood when used into the sun. Modern optics with multi-coating are more flare resistant. Then again, they don’t come along at $65, either ….

Preliminary snaps indicate a near total absence of vignetting or distortion at any aperture, with outstanding resolution fully open, peaking at f/8. But then that is to be expected from a beautifully simple Zeiss/Leitz optical design which goes back to the 1930s.The laws of physics do their thing at apertures smaller than f/11, where diffraction messes with light rays, but the optic is superb and highly recommended. The rendering of the out of focus bits is especially noteworthy, smooth and gentle. Balance on the Nikon D700 is well nigh perfect – a solid body and a no less compromised lens.

Lens correction profile::

Though in this case it’s pretty much overkill, the lens is that good, you can download the lens correction profile here. Maximum definition is reached at f/4.5 and maintained down to f/16. Distortion is negligible.

Some snaps from this lovely lens are coming soon. Look here.

A couple from the 35mm Nikkor

Great street snapper.

First snaps through the 40 year old 35mm Nikkor, profiled yesterday.

Yesterday and tomorrow. D700, 35mm. Click the picture for the location.

Oyster vendor. Same gear.

Cheese shop. Same gear, at full aperture.

Flower. Same gear.

Looks like a keeper. The lens has a CPU installed, which took a few minutes, and I used my custom lens correction profile on import to Lightroom 4. The CPU allows the correct profile to be automatically selected and applied in LR or PS.

Nikkor-O 35mm f/2 lens

A superb 35mm optic for pennies.

35mm Nikkor-O f/2, with period hood. The CPU is visible on the rear baffle.

The manual focus 35mm f/2 Nikkor-O, from the ‘all metal’ era whose construction quality has never been surpassed, shows moderate vignetting at f/2 and f/2.8 with a small amount of barrel distortion at all apertures. Full resolution is reached at f/4. Contrast is very high. The 8 elements in 6 groups design appears to have remained unchanged in the pre-Ai, Ai and Ai-S versions, spanning December 1965 through August 1981, and testifying to the excellence of the design. Later models, named ‘O.C’, were multicoated; mine is single coated. This lens is fully the equal of any Leitz or Leica 35mm Summicron on a Leica M, regarded by many as the standard at this focal length. Having owned and used 8 element and 6 element spherical Summicrons and the Aspherical model, I can testify to this.

Mine is 1971 vintage and there is one huge difference compared to the Leica optic. The latter will run you $3,200 new and not much less used. My Nikkor was $175 with hood for a near mint version. Another $25 was spent on an Ai conversion and the CPU ran $30 more. The CPU is easily installed with epoxy, directly on the rear baffle. More on CPU installation here. I see very minor diffraction loss at f/16, and slight red fringing at all apertures (you really have to pixel peep to divine that) easily corrected in LR4 by checking the ‘Remove Chromatic Aberration’ box, which I have done in creating my import setup. This means the lens is perfectly useable – and will render huge prints – at any aperture.

I have made a tailored lens profile to correct the minor aberrations in this lens and you can download it here. It works with PS or LR.

Pictures will follow when I have had a chance to wring the lens out. Look here.

Nikkor-N.C 24mm lens

A fine street snapper.

The 24mm Nikkor was the first Nikkor lens with floating elements. Disparate glasses – there are nine elements – move in a non-linear manner as the lens is focused, enhancing aberration correction. I have added a CPU to mine and the related ACR lens correction profile which is automatically recognized in LR and PS with any lens equipped with a CPU can be downloaded here. The profile is also manually selectable for non-CPU lenses.

Contrast is very high at all apertures, with central definition identical to my 16-35mm f/4 AF-S optic, but the old lens is simply in a different class when it comes to quality of manufacture. Edge definition in the modern optic is better through f/5.6 with the old 24mm N.C catching up at f/8.

The lens vignettes noticeably (but see the note at the end of this piece), and there is very slight barrel distortion, with the sweet spot at f/8, but that does not stop me from publishing a few snaps from its first outing in San Francisco yesterday. The extreme corners are degraded through f/5.6 but that’s only noticeable if your subject is right at the edge of the frame. Small, exquisitely made like all early all metal Nikkors, my model is the later multi-coated version denoted by the ‘C’ in the description. Mine is Ai factory converted, allowing use on the D700 or other Nikon bodies with the aperture follower on the lens escutcheon without modification.

24mm Nikkor-N.C.

Here are a few snaps. all but the last from the vicinity of the magnificent Oakland Bay Bridge in San Francisco. Constructed at the height of the Great Depression by Real Men, it took a scant 39 months to build, opening in November 1936. Today it would take a decade.

The power and majesty of riveted steel.

It’s almost impossible to convey the power of the construction.

With bird. Flare is commendably low, using the HN-1 lens hood.

Steve Jobs is alive!

Lunch by the Oakland Bay Bridge. Click the picture to see the map location.

Gold Street, Jackson Square.

A note on filter use:

I rather suspected the corner vignetting at f/8 as being a mechanical not an optical problem, for example in the third picture above, and so it proved. I was using an inexpensive aftermarket filter which protrudes 0.21″ from the front of the lens. The stock Nikon HN-1 screw-in lens hood then mounts on the filter. Replacing the filter with a slimmer Nikon branded one, which protrudes only 0.15″, took away almost all of the vignetting compared to the un-filtered lens though, surprisingly, the merest trace of corner shading remains, which my lens correction profile will remove. So use a slimline filter not a stock one with this lens. A filter is recommended owing to the rather exposed nature of the front glass.

Lens correction profile:

Click here for the lens correction profile. This file includes two profiles, at f/2.8 and at f/5.6. LR and PS will use the closest match. The 24mm f/2.8 shows moderate vignetting at f/2.8 with minimal distortion at all apertures. By f/5.6 vignetting is negligible. An extraordinary piece of optical design.

Nikon Magnifying Eyepiece

I can see!

The Nikon Magnifying Eyepiece, DK-17M, is one of those “Why didn’t I think of this before?” accessories for the D700 and similar bodies.

DK-17M top, and stock eyepiece, bottom.

The stock viewfinder magnification of the D700 is 0.72x, identical to the fabulous range/viewfinder in the Leica M2 which I used for many years. That’s OK, and a whole lot better than the ‘tunnel vision’ you tend to get with APS-C mirror reflex DSLRs (MFT EVFs are far superior in this regard) but it could be better. With lenses up to 90mm and f/2 or smaller the Leica is far easier to focus manually than the D700, thanks to the finest rangefinder focusing device conceived by man.

The DK-17M is a 1.2x magnifier, so the 0.72x stock magnification rises to 0.86x with this eyepiece fitted, which is close to the 0.91x Leica users enjoy with the Leica M3 body, one I used for over three decades. And that one, predating the M2 by some 5 years (1954), was even better than the one in the M2 (1959). It seems the intervening half century has seen little improvement in manual focusing aids.

Some user comments at B&H and Amazon state that the corners of the finder view are vignetted and that the data display at the base is obscured when the DK-17M is installed. I wear vision glasses (I have astigmatism and modest near sightedness) yet suffer neither problem. While not cheap at $38, there’s no way I’m removing this from my D700. It’s well made, uses glass not plastic, and the only thing you have to remember is that the eyepiece shutter must be closed for removal/installation. As you can see the DK-17M protrudes a little further from the body than the stock eyepiece, but that has no negative effect in practice. I have no need for a rubber eyecup as those interfere with viewfinding for spectacle wearers in my experience.

Like magnifiers exists for APS-C bodies, though I believe the model number is different. The DK-17M fits the D1, D2, D3 and D700 DSLRs and the F3HP, F4, F5 and F6 film bodies according to B&H. I am not sure but would be prepared to bet it fits the D4, D800 and D800E also.

To put the difference in perspective, the hardest to focus MF lens I own is the 500/8N Ai-S Nikkor Reflex. With the DK-17M fitted I can nail focus 7 times out of ten when focusing by eye then looking to the focus confirmation LED as a cross check. Without the DK-17M my success rate is at best 3 out of 10 with final focus dependent on the LED.

One alternative is to have an aftermarket focusing screen fitted but that does not pass the smell test for me. First, why would Nikon fit anything substandard to their best bodies, with years of experience in optical design? Second, many of the aftermarket screens use a split image center focusing device. The effective base length (a measure of sensitivity) of these, compared to the finders in rangefinder Leicas, is pathetic and falls as the aperture falls. Further, the split image prisms (or microprisms in variants) tend to black out at smaller apertures and will not work with a 500mm Reflex lens with its modest f/8 fixed aperture. Finally, aftermarket screens cost over $100, typically, for an uncertain outcome, plus cost of installation. DIY is for the brave only.

The DK-17M works, being in equal parts a focus and compositional aid. Even with AF lenses where no focus assistance is required, the enhanced view is a revelation. This accessory is highly recommended as long as you have no finder vignetting issues. The view through the eyepiece reminds me of nothing so much as my Leicaflex SL, which also happened to have the best microprism ever devised. But that’s another story.

T. Brannan Street, SF yesterday. D700, 50mm f/2 Nikkor-H, DK-17 eyepiece. Click the picture.

The beautiful color rendering of this 40+ year old MF Nikon optic has to be seen to be believed. And you would have to try really hard to spend more than $50 on one, plus $30 for a CPU.

And, yes, look hard and that’s my ghostly reflection in the door ….

Me and T.