Costly excess

Canon introduces the 50mm f/1.2 L.

A while back Canon used to sell a 50mm f/1.0 L lens for its DSLRs, quietly discontinuing it rather than face the barrage of derision it generated. Seems that the bottom of an old Coke bottle had superior resolving power and you could buy half of Atlanta’s annual production for less.

Now, just in time for Photokina, Canon announces the slightly slower 50mm f/1.2 L variant.

I confess that it has always left me wondering why anyone makes an f/1.2 standard lens. The quality has historically been poorer than the f/1.4 across the board, the weight and bulk double and the cost far greater. All of this for half a stop in speed?

Step back a moment and think about this. In its DSLR range Canon has the best sensors on the market. Sony may be catching up (they make the sensors for the Nikon DSLRs) but try your full frame Canon DSLR at 1600 ISO and you will know what I am talking about. Now given that you can make more than acceptable originals for 10x enlargements at 1600 ISO, how on earth can half a stop be justified? Shoot in RAW and you can pick up another stop or two at the processing stage with very little quality loss.

So unless you really need to have bragging rights, keep your money and buy a couple of f/1.4 variants. The f/1.2 will retail at $1,600 (!), whereas the f/1.4, a lens with a great reputation, sells for $315. You can drop one of the f/1.4s on the concrete sidewalk and still walk away unhurt…. Now I know that $1,600 is chump change by Leica’s standards whose superb 50mm f/1.0 Noctilux sells for no less than $3,900, but then only collectors and tort lawyers (prrobably the same thing) buy those anyway.

I would far prefer to see Canon adding internal IS to their top of the line bodies (like Sony/Minolta) or at least incorporate IS in the 400mm f/5.6 L lens, which sorely needs it.