Monthly Archives: February 2020

Back to the future

Minolta pointed the way.

Given that they have yet to have an idea not stolen from someone else – meanly mostly from Apple – I spend little time in reading about anything from Samsung.

But their most recent theft is surprising only for how long it took them to think of it, for their latest ‘high-end’ phone (there’s an oxymoron for you) steals from a 2002 inspired design by Minolta in its 2mp Dimage digital point and shoot.



The elegant Minolta Dimage of 2002.

This elegant design had one truly original feature, in addition to its neat packaging in that small square case. It used a periscope optical zoom, vertically oriented inside the case, with light rays deflected through the associated right angle with a mirrored prism. This allowed the incorporation of an otherwise lengthy optical path within the tight confines of the body, a small 3.3″ x 2.8″ x 0.8″. For comparison, my iPhone 11 Pro in its case measures 5.5″ x 3″ x 0.5″.

This cutaway view shows how it worked:



Illustration of the ‘folded’ optical path.

We can expect to see this sort of thing in a future iPhone as modern technology has made things even smaller 18 years after Minolta’s inspired design. Optical zooms beat digital zooms as there’s no pixel degredation as magnifications increase.

Now if there’s a criticism to be leveled at the iPhone 11 Pro – in addition to its poor ergonomics – it’s that there’s no lens at the long end. Sure, there’s a 10x digital zoom, but you can do that just as easily in Lightroom, with all the attendant issues. So you are stuck with ultrawide, very wide and normal, call it 12mm, 24mm and 50mm FFE, all superb but none of them long.

So if Apple can add one of those ‘periscope’ optical zooms and make the 50mm a 50-200mm optic, well, that’s going to be all she wrote for the few remaining sales of silly-priced and even sillier-sized DSLRs.

Fuji X100V

Ummm ….

Technologies reach their peak just before they die.

Recent examples include the LP, cassette tapes, the CD, the DVD and so on.

Here’s the latest:



Let’s take a quick look at the feature set, or rather at the lack thereof:

  • No IBIS
  • No GPS
  • No HDR
  • No Night Mode
  • Only one lens
  • Cannot store an image depth map
  • Has zero access security
  • Cannot make phone calls
  • Cannot surf the web
  • Cannot give you directions
  • Cannot pay for your groceries
  • Cannot buy your airline tickets
  • You cannot read a book on it
  • Cannot play your videos
  • Cannot play your music
  • Cannot fit in your pocket
  • Cannot run 2 days on one charge
  • Cannot call for pizza delivery
  • Does not come in green
  • $1400

Yep, a real value, that one.

The old Mac Pro is plenty fast

Perfect for Lightroom.

For an index of all my Mac Pro articles, click here.

If still image processing is your thing and you do not need fast 4K, 8K or 100K movie capability, the old Mac Pro is perfectly adequate.

Click the video to learn more:


Hover the mouse over the video and click the rectangle at bottom right for a full screen view.

A nice 2010 dual CPU Mac Pro can be had for under $500, the faster CPUs to replace the pokey stock ones ran me $170 for two X5690 (at 3.46gHz, the fastest which will work in this chassis), the memory another $115 (you can use cheap server memory in a Mac Pro chassis) and I would recommend an RX580 GPU as it will work with Catalina (my GTX980 stops at High Sierra). Reckon on $180 for the GPU. So for under $1000 you have an industrial grade machine, as fast as anything out there, and infinitely repairable. The only modern connectivity you cannot install is Thunderbolt, so if that is important to you, this is not the right hardware solution.

For the techies out there, here’s the Geekbench data for CPU and memory performance:



Geekbench data for the computer used in the above video.
I am running High Sierra.

I am using a BENQ PD3200Q display which I recommend based on its price:performance.