All posts by Thomas Pindelski

Francis Bacon

A dark modernist.

No painters used photography more than Degas, David Hockney and Francis Bacon (1909-1992). For the last, it was the source of much of his output of dark, brooding, tortured canvases, familiar to all. I doubt that his personality was captured better than by the expressionist photographer Bill Brandt in this powerful portrait:

Bacon’s foundation has just released a free e-book on the painter, his studio and his use of photography, well explained in the first of the two included videos. You can read more about it here, whence you can download it to your iPad at no cost. The book is an example of where art publishing is headed and is beautifully done.

A snap over lunch

A picture of a fine man with his first born.

A happy, modern Pietà.

Date: May 11, 2012
Place: Rosamunde on Mission Street
Modus operandi: Looking forward to a cool beer
Weather: Parisian morning sun
Time: 12:39:44
Gear: Nikon D700, 50mm f/1.4 MF Nikkor-S
GPS: Click the image.
Medium: Digital
Me: A lovely man with a divine baby
My age: 60

I was traipsing around San Francisco’s Mission District, enjoying the locals and the murals, when hunger did its thing and directed me to the Rosamunde Sausage Grill on Mission at 24th for a pint and a sausage. After trying mightily to engage the very attractive barmaid in idle banter, and failing miserably, I opted instead for the Ninkasi ‘Spring Reign’ blonde ale, and got to chatting with a fellow diner in the welcoming beer cellar setting. The sausage of choice was a fiery Andouille, with the beer serving as fire extinguisher.

Bruce had a very small baby strapped to his chest and was a delightful companion. Handsome, open, with a straight gaze, a ready laugh and a natural curiosity, we got to chatting. He related that he was selling his restaurant down the road to concentrate fully on bringing up the baby. Spotting the Nikon dangling in that insouciant way from my shoulder, a style that only I can pull off, one thing led to another and he agreed to let me snap a picture of the two of them.

I took a small handful of snaps, composed very tightly, at close to full aperture. I lucked out in keeping both Bruce’s eyes (stolen, clearly, from Cary Grant) and the baby’s head and eyelashes sharp. Natural light from the adjacent window provides gentle modeling.

Bruce with his son, Oliver. D700, 50mm f/1.4 Nikkor-S at f/2. Click the picture.

For those readers who might understandably have questioned my sanity in fine tuning the focus indicator for this lens, the proof of the pudding is above. The eyes and child’s lashes are critically sharp, whereas the father’s chin is already blurred.

A friend with better eyes than mine, not to mention a knowledge of Hindu, relates that the father’s T Shirt is emblazoned with the word ‘Om‘. How apt.

The related large print is in the mail to Bruce as you read this.

Here’s the ‘contact strip’ from Lightroom:

Nikkor N.C. 28mm f/2 lens

A fine wide angle optic.

The aperture claw has been removed here, as it serves no purpose on modern digital bodies.

The 28mm f/2 Nikkor had a very long life, starting in 1970 and finally yielding to the Ai-S version, likely of similar nine elements in seven groups construction, in 1981. The Ai-S version continued through 2005, finally replaced by the AF D, which was recomputed.

Mine is the N.C. version, meaning multicoated, from 1974 and is in absolutely mint condition, claimed to have had but one prior owner, and ran me $252. It is a pre-Ai lens so I removed the rear flange – five Philips rather than slotted screws – pulled off the aperture ring and conferred the appropriate Ai relief on the rear of the aperture ring using a small flat file. Those less courageous can send any pre-Ai lens to John White who can convert it for use on the D700 and like bodies for a modest sum.

The floating element design first used in the 24mm f/2.8 is used in this optic, helping with corrections at closer distances.

In practice the lens’s definition falls in the extreme corners on full frame cameras through f/4 by when they almost match the very sharp center. By f/5.6 full sharpness is secured across the frame, with f/2 being perfectly useable for large prints and sharp as a tack in the center of the image, well toward the corners. Contrast is very high at all apertures (mine is the multicoated version, which probably helps) and I see no diffraction even stopped down to f/22 (but I do see all the crud on my sensor at that aperture!). Minor vignetting gradually disappears by f/5.6.

Quality of construction and the sheer tactile pleasure in use have to be experienced to be believed. Superb in every way. I have the HN-2 hood on mine though that’s actually intended for the 28/3.5. The HN-1 is the correct model, but the HN-2 works fine, with no vignetting fully open.

I installed a CPU in mine – a simple glue-on operation.

Lens correction profile:

Owing to the gradual drop in vignetting from f/2 through f/4, I have made the lens correction profile at four apertures – f/2, f/2.8, f/4 and f/5.6. You can download it here.

Some snaps from this optic appear here.

A few from the 50mm f/1.4 Nikkor

A bargain classic lens.

The Nikkor-S 50mm, f/1.4 lens I own dates from 1968 and needs no excuses. After adding a CPU and adjusting the LED focus confirmation light for critical focus accuracy at closer distances wide open, the results are a wonderful thing to behold. Contrast is high, definition outstanding and the chunky lens balances well on the large D700 body. I use a period Nikon HS-9 hood on mine which helps out with the lens’s modest single anti-reflection coating. But, really, no excuses need be made.

Electrifying, like the lens. At f/1.4. D700.

Whale time. Same gear.

Pretzels, Churros, Corn Dogs …. and sugared water. A highly disciplined display. Same gear.

Pier 39. Same gear.

At the mechanical toy museum. At f/1.4. Same gear.

Marie. Same gear.

Four. In the style of Keld Helmer-Petersen.

Chef and Waiter, at Scoma’s Seafood Restaurant. Same gear.

All snapped a couple of days ago around Fishermen’s Wharf, San Francisco. If you go to the north end where the fishing boats are moored you will find the authentic Fishermen’s Wharf rather than the awful tourist trap down the road at the end of the Embarcadero. There are a couple of really good seafood restaurants among the boats and Scoma’s (last snap above) is one.

Adjusting the CPU focus point in MF Nikkor lenses

The final touch.

In earlier pieces dealing with the installation of a CPU in old Manual Focus Nikkors, I have explained most of the benefits of CPU use. Further, by making tailored lens profiles, I have made it possible to get the best possible results as regards freedom from vignetting, distortion and chromatic aberration.

The last frontier is optimal focus.

When using MF lenses on the D700, which is blessed with a large, bright finder and an LED confirmation dot, with arrows showing which way to turn the lens when it’s not in focus, things are pretty easy. The LED is fairly accurate and the addition of a magnifying eyepiece further simplifies regular old screen focus, if the dot is not to your liking.

However, get in really close at f/1.4 with something like the Nikkor-S 50mm, f/1.4 and any errors start to show themselves.

To check things out, I placed the camera on a tripod with a QR head (to permit accurate replacement) at a roughly 45 degree angle to a bookcase and four feet distant. Not surprisingly, the contents are solely photography books! One snap was made with the single center focus rectangle placed on the ‘O’ in ‘HORST’.

I then loaded the image in LR4 and looked at the enlarged version to see what was what.

Well, the LED dot was wrong. I have marked the focus point and the point of sharpest focus on the image below.

Red line is where the LED dot focus was made. Green dotted line shows where the image is sharpest.

The sharpest focus is closer to the camera than the point at which focus was aimed.

The CPU installed in the lens permits adjustment of the point at which the LED illuminates. You can move that point back or forward in 8 discrete steps in either direction, making a total of 17 settings including the default. The provided instructions use English poorly and it’s hard to divine which way to go.

Here’s the rule. After doing the 1-6-1 second programming setup:

  • If you hit the shutter release when the top LED panel indicates F10, the LED will illuminate at a shorter focus point distance from the camera as indicated on the lens, meaning further from infinity.
  • If you hit the shutter release when the LED panel indicates F20, the LED will illuminate at a longer focus distance from the camera as indicated on the lens, meaning closer to infinity.
  • Each subsequent shutter release at F10 or F20 will move the LED illumination point further in the respective direction.

Now the LED is not that sensitive. In practice there’s a small range (“more or less right”) where it stays illuminated and I simply oscillate the lens’s focus collar either side until I am centered on the focus range for the LED illumination point.

In the above example the LED was illuminating on a point too far from the camera as optimal focus was closer than the point at which the LED was aimed. Thus I needed to move the LED illumination point away from the camera, meaning that I operated the F20 switch in the programming instructions once.

I then refocused the lens on the ‘O’ in ‘HORST’ and took a second picture. Here is the result:

Red line is where the LED dot focus was made. Green dotted line shows where the image is sharpest.

Bingo! Bang on. The LED illumination and best focus point are identical.

Just to confirm, I then cycled the F20 one more time, moving the LED illumination point yet further away from the camera, with the focus collar set closer too infinity to illuminate the LED at the same point in the identically framed image.

Red line is where the LED dot focus was made. Green dotted line shows where the image is sharpest.

In the above example the LED was illuminating on a point too close to the camera as optimal focus was closer than the point at which the LED was aimed.

So I went through one F10 cycle to revert the optimal LED illumination point, as in the second picture above.

In practice, it’s really only necessary to do this with wide aperture lenses used at close distances, or extremely long focus lenses which have very shallow depth of field, like the 500mm Reflex Nikkor. In these circumstances, you must remember to do your critical focusing using the LED light not the focusing screen if you have found it necessary to move the LED illumination point using CPU programming.

But this absolutely puts the icing on the cake for fast and/or long MF Nikkors. For AF Nikkors (AF D or AF-S) a like functionality exists in the body of the camera in the rear LCD menus. With AF Nikkors the camera ‘remembers’ the setting for each lens; with MF + CPU lenses, each lens stores its own setting in the glued-on CPU. This does not address the case where the photographer wants to use the same MF + CPU lens on different Nikon (or Fuji) bodies. In that case, if the bodies differ significantly, it’s best to have the factory fix the body rather than trying to fix the lens.

I have only found it necessary to move the focus point on three lenses – the 50/1.4, the 85/1.8 and the 105/4 Micro – of the dozen I own. All the others are spot on including the 500mm f/8 Reflex! Why these two lenses should differ, I do not know, but differ they do, as multiple tests have consistently confirmed. Indeed, I only really started to see what the 105/4 Micro-Nikkor could do after this focus fine tuning process. It is ‘scary sharp’!

Is this all worth the effort? If you use the lens at f/1.4 or f/2, just check this out.

By the way, to learn more about Horst, one of the greatest fashion photographers of the twentieth century, click here.