All posts by Thomas Pindelski

Panasonic 45-200 mm lens for the G1 – Part II

A sweetheart in use.

I looked at the design of this lens in Part I. Nothing could more clearly illustrate the difference in size between a full frame 400mm and Panasonic’s 45-200mm:

The Panny is at 200 (=400mm on full frame), the Canon has no choice in the matter!
The hood on the Canon is not extended for fair comparison. Weight differences are just as impressive.

Update February 2011: The above picture which, let’s face it, is fairly ridiculous, coupled with a failing back and increasing tendonitis which makes it hard for me to lift weights, saw me sell the superb Canon 400mm f/5.6L lens to a happy, younger user.

I took the Panny out for its first street trip today and found that it is a real sweetheart to use. Forget the dumb lens hood which makers it look gargantuan; without it no one would begin to think that so long a focal length is in use and while, I suppose, it’s great for clandestine stuff, that’s not my thing, so I just played about enjoying some architectural details in the old town of Burlingame, CA.

I used Lightroom 2.6 for processing with sharpness settings on import of 100/1.1/64 and ISO set at 320. I find that speed to be the sweetspot – grain is not objectionable in large prints and you have enough sensitivity that short shutter speeds are the norm. I mostly used full aperture as I have had such success with it on the 14-45mm kit lens.

A guilty confession. I popped the kit lens in my jacket pocket even though I resolved not to use it. So enamored am I of its quality and compactness that I thought I might need a quick fix, so better safe than sorry. In the event I managed to keep it off the G1 but dropping it in a jacket pocket took me way back to when I last did that with a lens – that would have been with Leica’s ne plus ultra 35mm Asph Summicron-M with its 90mm Asph brother mounted on the Leica M2. Nice glass, but hopelessly outmoded today with auto-nothing and if their optical quality is marginally better, Lightroom can fix that and the Panny lenses are one tenth of the cost. I’m tempted to say “throw away cheap” and while that sounds arrogant, that will likely be their fate when something better comes along in a few quarters.

For the pictures which follow, the focal length is stated at actual on the G1; double the number for the 35mm full frame equivalent.

While web reproductions cannot do the originals justice, the fringe here is to-die-for sharp:

At 128mm, f/6.3, 1/3200, ISO 320

No, not a test chart. Just some nice brickwork. At 61mm, f/4.1, 1/4000, ISO 320

No lack of detail in the textured stucco here. At 45mm, f/4, 1/4000, ISO 320

Nothing wrong with the detail in this lovely relief.
I especially like the eccentric alignment of the letters. At 124mm, f/5, 1/2000, ISO 320

At huge enlargement ratios the micro detail is lower than with the Canon, but the Panny is the one you take with you.
At 45mm, f/7.1, 1/500, ISO 320

At the local brew pub. At 91mm, f/10, 1/5th, ISO 320

I meant to set the lens to full aperture but somehow messed up and was awfully lucky to get away with this at 1/5th second exposure at a 35mm-equivalent of 182mm. Sometimes you get lucky. This pretty girl is the hostess at the local Steelhead Brewing Company restaurant which makes a nice selection of very decent beers right on the premises. They even serve them at something approximating the right temperature, meaning not ice cold. The staff seems to mostly consist of aspiring actors and actresses, judging by their looks. I was enjoying a Red Zeppelin at the time – who could turn down that name?

As is my usual approach, I used aperture priority and auto-everything (except ISO) for all of the above. It’s so nice not to have to worry about the technical mumbo jumbo and just take snaps. More of these at Snap! over the next few days.

On one or two very high contrast color transitions I noticed a touch of blue fringing, but nothing major. The software correction of aberrations is pretty thorough in Lightroom.

If you like baggy jackets with big pockets but lack big pockets for the exotic glass, this sweetheart of a lens is just what the doctor ordered. I’m keeping mine. Is the Canon better? Absolutely. But it can’t be very good when it’s at home, which is the likely result when you can choose between it and the Panny zoom.

Often photographers will find they are using zooms at maximum extension. No problem here – if you need a 400mm equivalent, the only thing currently available in micro-four-thirds size is this lens and you have a bunch of other useful focal lengths thrown into the bargain, at no additional cost.

When the next generation of sensors and EVFs comes along in a year or two I suspect we will all be wondering how we managed with those gargantuan clods of old. The only challenge will be for professionals, who will have a job convincing clients to take their G2 with its miniscule 20-200 f/2 lens seriously ….

Woof! At 200mm. f/11, 1/250, ISO 320

Zishaan Hayath

Great minds think alike!

Since I first came across it in my earlier photoblogging days years ago, I have been following Zishaan Hayath’s photography at his blog Point and Shoot with great interest. I recommend you hop over there and take a look at his work, frequently distinguished by fine use of bold color with a strong focus on street photography.

The other day Zishaan dropped me an email pointing out the remarkable similarities between one of his pictures and one of mine, and here they are, compared with his permission.

Zishaan’s version – 5th Avenue, NYC 2007

My version – off Market Street, San Francisco, 2009

Remarkable, huh? Who knows, maybe some deep memory of his picture implanted itself in my brain – I have no recall of seeing it before – and triggered my right index finger at the magic moment?

Thanks, Zishaan.

Panasonic 45-200 mm lens for the G1 – Part I

A little bit of magic.

Santa came through again this year, this time in the guise of a Panasonic 45-200mm zoom for my G1. I had noodled on the idea of getting the 20mm f/1.7 but that lens’s lack of OIS meant that its f/1.7 was no faster than the f/3.5 of the 14-45mm kit zoom from a steadiness perspective. Further the saving in bulk was not that great – the camera is not pocketable with either. So while f/1.7 is appealing from the perspective of limited depth of field, the overlap with the range of the kit lens left me uninterested.

The miniscule 45-200mm mounted on a G1

When I was buying the G1 I wrote of the myriad adapters available for the body, but I have since realized that these offer far less than you might think. Unless you have some special bit of legacy glass that you absolutely must use, adapted lenses fail on many fronts. You have no aperture or focus automation, manual focus with the enlarged EVF image needs buttons to be pressed, taking away the G1’s immediacy of reponse, you lose OIS and you have no possibility of taking advantage of the wonderful distortion and color correction afforded by Lightroom when processing your RAW originals. Which is another way of saying that I sold all my costly Leica M rangefinder optics ages ago and I’m simply not going to go back in time. The operating speed of the G1 is a factor of major importance to the way I work and that would be lost with these kludgy adapters which are doubtless just fine for static work. Not my thing.

So what are the first reactions? Really much the same as with the G1 itself.

  • The lens is incredibly small and light when you realize it’s equivalent to a 90-400mm on a full frame body
  • OIS is built in
  • The zoom ring is smoother than on the kit lens but tightens up a bit at 160-200mm – no effect on use
  • Mine has those three magic words on the barrel – ‘Made in Japan’. Sorry Beijing!
  • The lens hood is huge – I didn’t even unpack it. No use to me.
  • The balance on the body is perfect
  • Focus is fast but not Canon 5D fast
  • Manual focusing brings up the magnified EVF image and is very accurate – surely this is the most perfect manual focusing system yet?
  • Minimum focus at 200mm is a mere 3.3 feet – like a 50mm lens on full frame at 5 inches!
  • The barrel extends maybe 3″ at 200mm and has very little side-to-side play.
  • Apertures are reasonable – f/4 at the short end falling to f/5.6 fully extended and perfectly usable at maximum aperture.

While there are several digital point-and-shoot cameras available with fixed ‘mega zoom’ lenses, I suspect this is the smallest and lightest interchangeable DSLR lens which reaches out to 400mm (35mm equivalent). Panny’s own FZ35 spans no less than 27-486mm with apertures of f/2.8-4.4. Canon has the SX20 (28-560mm, f/2.8-5.7). Nikon the Coolpix P90 (26-624mm, f/2.8-5.0). All breathtaking stats. And while these may be compromised with lousy EVFs and very small and relatively noisy sensors, it’s very much where design is going. Before long we will likely have APS-C sensor fixed zoom DSLRs with comparable zoom ranges and low bulk.

This Panny zoom weighs in at just 13 ounces making it, from my perspective, the first lens with 400mm capability that you take with you without another thought.

Putting matters in perspective, the G1/45-200mm combination is no substitute for a Canon 5D equipped with Canon’s non-IS 400mm f/5.6, which I wrote about here or similar ‘pro’ equivalents from Nikon, Pentax, Sony and others. While the non-IS Canon lens is the bottom of their 400mm line, which sports no fewer than four models, the other three are all faster with IS; even so, the Canon f/5.6 I own is simply in a different league optically and mechanically from any 400mm lens I have owned. Even after a couple of years’ use it still takes my breath away with its autofocus speed and accuracy and its ability to capture micro-contrast and detail at full aperture. You can see some results here. This speed and quality come at a price, of course, meaning enormous bulk and weight. You do not just casually drop the Canon in your bag when making off to take pictures. It’s a considered decision because you are not going to be switching merrily from ultra-wides to 400mm unless you want to carry a lot of gear. Further, chances are you will be taking a monopod or tripod when using it.

A significant point is that the Canon will run you over $1,200 whereas the Panny comes in at just $300. Maybe not a fair comparison as the Canon covers a full 24 x 36mm frame and is in a different class build-wise, but money is money and few need the big print capability of the superior Canon optic.

The working style with the Panny optic could hardly differ more. First the lens has no tripod bush, so you tend to think about hand holding it. Second, IS adds two to three shutter speeds making handholding even more tempting. And third, it’s so light and small that …. heck, you end up hand holding it! A nice added feature is that the filter size, at 52mm, is identical to that of the 14-45mm kit lens – nice for me as I forgot to order a UV filter when I bought the lens!

The first thing I did on receiving the lens was to go to Panasonic’s site and download upgrades for the lens’s firmware. Yes, modern lenses are packed with code and Panny’s 14-45mm and 45-200mm lenses are now on version 1.2. Both mine were on 1.0, so I updated each – the downloaded installable files differ between the two. I neither much know or care what these downloads change but I prefer to be current. The G1 itself is now on body firmware version 1.4.

The next step was to bang away and try a few snaps at 1/125th or so at full extension. The claimed 3 shutter speed benefit of OIS seems largely realized as I was finding that two out of every three snaps were shake free and good enough for 13″ x 19″ prints. Further, these were taken at full aperture, which is f/4 at 45mm, dropping to f/5.6 at 200mm. I simply set the lens to f/4 at the wide end and that leaves it at maximum aperture throughout the zoom range. Having got into the habit of using the 14-45mm at full aperture and finding the results to be excellent, I went the same way with the 45-200mm and was not disappointed.

I processed the RAW images in Lightroom 2, because that’s what I ordinarily use and because Adobe has built in distortion and chromatic aberration specific to these lenses which is applied automatically. As a result, the pictures appear distortion free and I cannot see any significant color fringing anywhere in the zoom range. Quite why Adobe is not broadcasting this wonderful bit of application programming from the rooftops beats me, as independent reviews confirm that the native output of the lens exhibits significant distortion and chromatic aberration problems, whereas the Lightroom user sees none of these.

In Part II I will look more at practical use and results but can already say that this is an exciting addition to a very small camera outfit which, with two light and compact zooms, offers excellent image quality all the way from 28mm to 400mm (35mm full frame equivalents) in a camera which uses a reasonably sized, low noise sensor. Now if only Panny could be convinced to make a 10mm pancake, equivalent to an ultra-wide 20mm on full frame, this user would have everything needed in a superbly compact outfit with very light weight.

Snap!

My new photoblog.

I miss photoblogging.

I don’t miss the pressure of ‘one snap a day’, but I do miss the opportunity of presenting my work in a clean, uncluttered format. Just the pictures, without too much in the way of explanation. If a picture is worth so many words, it shouldn’t need many to explain it.

So a month ago I decided the time had come to cease publishing my own pictures here and, instead, decided to post them in a dedicated photoblog, designed to show photographs.

With much help from friends who pored interminably over draft designs and pretended to be interested, I got something which seems half decent. Thank you Gregg, Ed, Leigh, Rio and Roy for your constructive criticism, technical assistance, patience and corrections of my worst boo-boos.

So, without further ado, go to my new photoblog by simply clicking the picture below.

I have included a few dozen recent snaps to get things rolling, mostly ‘never published before’, as the saying has it. There’s an RSS feed if you want to use your feed reader to be automatically alerted of new posts.

My years in retail – 1963-1974

A Christmas Carol.

These pieces generally run annually in time for Hanukkah and Christmas.

As a kid growing up in London all I remember is that I wanted to do but one thing. Take pictures. OK, that and the awful climate.

In 1965, aged 13, London. The camera is my Olympus Pen F.

There were two obstacles to this noble desire of course and both involved money. Or, in my case, a distinct lack of it. One was the cost of hardware. Cameras and lenses. The other was the cost of software. Film, paper and chemicals.

You see, I had done a miserable job of choosing my parents. My father had decided to die when I was fourteen, though it made little difference to our economics. He was a dreamer who had not one iota of business sense, even though he had single handedly almost conquered the invading German hordes back in September, 1939. ‘Almost’ seemed to be the story of his life. Indeed, had you made the opposite of his choices, you would likely be very affluent indeed by now. Still, I’m glad he chose my mother.

My mother, who never ceased to tell me of her noble ancestry in far away Poland, never mentioned the fact that nobility doesn’t exactly set you up for a lifetime of steady income, especially when an invading enemy has made off with your lands and coin. Her nobility got her a job as a doctor’s secretary where, for some nineteen years, she managed to make ends meet, thereafter delegating the responsibility to me. Anyway, you can address me as Count Pindelski henceforth.

Thus I found myself oldveau pauvre where what I really needed was a spot of nouveau riche.

So I had to find some way of feeding my habit of photography and retail sales were about the only thing available in a nation of shopkeepers.

In its earliest gestation that role was at Harrods, the posh Knightsbridge department store, then still renowned as part of the House of Fraser years before one Mohamed al Fayed bought it. This is the same fellow who cannot seem to get English citizenship no matter his billions, and whose son famously went for a fatal car drive with the queen of the gossip columns. Middle Eastern trash meets White trash. His father proved that poor judgment ran in the family, convincing himself – but no one else – that Prince Philip had fixed the brakes on the car …. and he wonders he can’t get a British passport.

My first job at Harrods was in the Tube Room (Rube Room), an instrument of modern torture comparable only to the worst the Spanish Inquisition had to offer. In the cavernous underground city that is Harrods’ storage and supply repository, complete with streets and electric cars that purr away quietly under the main thoroughfare of Knightsbridge, the Tube Room was where a small fortune in copper tubing terminated. Each tube originated at a sales location in the giant store so when you entered the room it was like entering some Victorian hell, which of course it was, out of sight of the wealthy who under no circumstances should see change being made. Their cash proffered to the sales clerk, it would be stuffed in a small, tubular container with a sales receipt, and sped on its way by compressed air to Yours Truly in the Tube Room, where it would pop out with a gigantic whoosh of pressurized air, deafening all within a hundred yard radius. I had to make change, bank the cash and return the tube to the system so that the customer could walk away happy. And God help you if you confused the Food Hall tube with Ladies’ Furs. Servants shopped in the former, their mistresses in the latter.

Harrods

After a faultless week, for which I thank an educational system which used to teach arithmetic, I applied for a mercy transfer, having already set a new duration record for any Tube Room operator. The loony bins of England are full of chaps who served in the Tube Room. Once my hearing and nerves recovered, my battlefield promotion and shell shock saw me transferred to the Chief Cashier’s office, headed by one Mr. Shinn, a character straight out of Dickens. History fails to disclose whether there was an under Chief Cashier and given that Mr. Shinn was a raving pansy, I hate to think what the job involved. Mercifully, unlike the monks at my school, he did not like little boys.

My rôle in the Chief Cashier’s Office of this august institution, Hatmakers to HM Queen Elizabeth II (she bought her undies at Marks & Sparks), was to accompany a doddering eighty year old ‘security guard’ with a briefcase chained to his wrist. Twice daily we would empty all the cash registers in the store, the envelopes overflowing with HM’s likeness, signed and sealed at each location and stuffed through the slot in grandpa’s bag who, every now and then, would take a swig from his hip flask. I don’t think water was involved. Now counting other people’s money is hardly my idea of fun but I did get to hang out in the ladies’ Personal Accoutrements section a lot and established a fine friendship with the lovely young women serving the nobs (nobesses?) with the latest in personal garments. That was always my favorite stop where I loved to linger(ie).

After a couple of school holidays counting all that money – this was before credit cards ruled – I got tired of the commute to Knightsbridge and found another retail job at Kensington Cameras on Earl’s Court Road, right around the corner from our miserable fourth floor walk up flat (˜our” being mum and me). There you would find me selling film and taking D&P orders from the locals, most of whom seemed to be itinerant Aussies complete with the obligatory backpacks covered with patches from various hell holes they had visited on their travels. “D&P” was not some perverse practice, standing rather for ˜Develop and Print”, which got your roll back to you in strips with 36 black and white prints generally ill exposed and blurred to boot. The scratches on the film were no extra charge. Aussies couldn’t afford color and they certainly couldn’t take pictures, probably because they were mostly drunk. The only thing I recall of this miserable position is that we always had to check the job returned from the lab to make sure everything was suitably awful before handing it back to the customer. Whenever something saucy crossed the tape you could bet that one of the two proprietors – Bruce Waterman and David Geller – would make off to the back room to double check that all was well with the printing.

Earl’s Court Road

Actually, that’s not quite fair. The funniest thing that happened at Kensington Cameras was when a distraught customer came in complaining his camera was jammed. “No problem”, quoth I, “I’ll just get the changing bag out and fix it”, the ‘changing bag’ being a black cotton bag with two light proof sleeves which allowed you to manipulate things in broad daylight. “No, no” the customer protested. “I’ll do it”, whereupon he proceeded to open the camera in bright light on KC’s counter, his eyes resolutely closed as tight as can be ….

On to the big time. This is about 1966. I applied for a job at Dixons at 159-161 Kensington High Street (amazingly still there today – right next to the wonderfully named Adam and Eve Mews, beloved of straying husbands and their dolly birds) and because the manager was a Canadian who liked the English, was given the position and a nice raise. They only found out I was a dumb Polack later, when I completed the application form. Dixons was then a small chain of retail stores which consciously focused down market and pushed D&P and movie cameras, which is where the money was. They had a line of the most awful movie cameras, made of pure pot metal which gave plastic a bad name, sold under the name Prinz. Now and then a contest would be held for the best catchy one liner, the one I recall with fondness being ‘Zoom Day my Prinz will come’. The lady writing that one declined to disclose any other thoughts on manhood but was rewarded, nevertheless, with a roll of Kodak’s finest 8mm cine film, running time four minutes. I don’t think Dixons ever quite got the double entendre.

Dixon’s location in Kensington, London, W8.

Sadly, the charming Canadian who had hired me was promoted to Dixons Central soon after I started, to be replaced by a genuine boor named Des O’Connell. Des didn’t so much have a chip on his shoulder as a sequoia, and no matter how often I told him that I was born in Dublin of escaped Polish refugees, Des never got over the fact that I spoke the Queen’s English whereas he had majored in Bog Irish. Worst of all, he had skipped history lessons and insisted on wearing a Hitler-style mustache which was, on reflection, just what the doctor ordered. What I thought of as ingratiating myself with the boss, a shared land of birth and all, seemed only to increase his hatred for me. Ireland, which ranks first amongst England’s failed attempts at foreign rule, seems to engender especially strong feelings from its denizens toward its former oppressors. Mercifully, Des hated just about everyone so I didn’t feel especially singled out. Truth be told, it would have been pretty worrying had he liked me.

I have but two memories of Des. His awful mangling of the mother tongue and his blast furnace breath, a delightful mixture of cheese and (Irish) beer, which seemed to radiate in all directions in a five foot radius about his person. This, of course, ensured everyone kept their distance, which he put down to English standoffishness. However he did teach me a valuable lesson. I have been vigorously denying that Dublin was my birthplace ever since.

I did however make some great friend at Dixons, where I worked every Saturday and during my school holidays. Stores were still closed on Sundays in honor of some ridiculous Puritan concept of not dirtying your hands with commerce on the Sabbath – this from a secular nation – unless that commerce involved handing over loot at the local palace of perversion, also known as the church. Empire building had been strictly a Monday through Friday affair in England for a few centuries and old habits die hard.

Gary Smith was the Assistant Manager for whom Des kept an especially malicious place in his heart. Des, having risen well above his level of competence, rewarded with suspicion and dread any who threatened his exalted position. A gentle giant of a man, Gary one day came into the store limping badly and somewhat the worse for wear, nursing a bruised set of knuckles. It transpired that a car had knocked him down at a local pedestrian crossing and Gary, full of the sense of fair play his ancestors had displayed on numerous battlefields for a millennium or so, had remonstrated with the driver only to be met with a hail of abuse. So he did the only rational thing a big bear with no enemies would do and smashed the driver’s side window. With his fist.

Irfan Haq became a close friend. A diminutive Pakistani with a wonderful wit, he was not only an ace salesman but a warm, friendly human being. Now you need to understand that the Pakistani and Indian populations in England were, at the time, a growing cause of concern amongst rabble rousing politicians. Having been roundly thrashed by a little guy in a loincloth and spinning wheel, the English were naturally not a bit miffed at the prospect of being overrun by the hordes from their former colonies and many hewed to the neo-Fascist rhetoric of one Enoch Powell, a barking-mad politician who pronounced that the free immigration of all these unwashed masses would result in a “River of Blood” in the streets of London. Not much changes – they are called ‘conservatives’ in today’s America.

A little guy in a loincloth.

The United Kingdom, in its infinite wisdom, had made the boo-boo of granting citizenship to all in its colonies so, when the colonies refused to be colonial, those leaving them did so with English passports in hand. And their first port of call was, of course, England. Powell (another twit with a Hitler mustache – what is it with these guys?) could not have been more wrong, for all these poor immigrants wanted was a job and hot running water. They make the trains run to this day and do the jobs their former oppressors refuse. The colonists have been colonized.

Enoch Powell. A brilliant scholar and
genuine English loony.

Powell’s grandfather had been a coal miner, suggesting an unprecedented degree of social mobility by his descendants in a nation which frowns on the concept. From black lung to black heart in two generations.

But Irfan sloughed off all of this hatred and reveled in being British. Plus, like me, he loved that most cerebral of games, cricket. (To this day the single worst thing I can say about America, my adopted country, is that it doesn’t ‘get’ cricket.) India and Pakistan have returned the favor of colonialism by roundly thrashing England at their own noble game ever since. Never mess with a man’s googly.

One of the perks of working at Dixons was that we could borrow any piece of equipment of our choice over a weekend, so Irfan and I would generally get the best they had – meaning a Nikon or Pentax (we weren’t allowed to touch the Leicas!) – and would go off photographing London with free gear over our shoulders on Sundays, our day off.

My favorite Sunday ‘loaner’ from Dixons – the superb Nikon F

The friendship which was the most fun was with Anthony Harvey. Like me Tony was a victim of the best English schooling had to offer (unlike mine his parents had to pay whereas I got the guilt scholarship they awarded to those of ‘foreign extraction’ as it was charmingly put), which meant that our English diction was calculated to drive Des crazy, something we enjoyed doing at every possible occasion. Like Irfan, Tony was an ace salesman and, being somewhat older than I, was always assigned the gentry business. He was, after all, not only white but genuinely British and an old Harrovian to boot. As often as not a customer would announce that they were Lady this or Sir that, which played right into Tony’s sales talk, not least because he sounded like one of them and they felt that they were speaking to one of their own. Which they were, Tony being a drop out from a well-to-do aristocratic family. Never mind the fact that their checks, generally from the private bank of Coutts & Co., invariably bounced once or twice before clearing. An English gentleman had every right to bounce a check when, that is, he wasn’t bouncing his mistress.

When Tony learned that I was going on to study mechanical engineering at University College, London he decided we should try some of the principles of destructive testing on what Dixons claimed was the world’s best tripod, a German Linhof. This thing was massive – more steel than in a Krupp weapon of war. We never sold a single one though I have always suspected it was Lord Lucan’s weapon of choice when bludgeoning the household help. I explained to Tony that nothing was indestructible and that machines were routinely tested to failure to see what they could handle. Well, the wager was made, Tony on the side of the the master race, I on the British side, the one of imminent failure. We made a fine test rig. It was off to the stock room under the store where he grabbed two of the tripod’s legs and I the third, pulling in the opposite direction. The crack of brittle metal failure had the rest of the sales staff running down to the stock room to see who had been shot, only to find Tony and I lying on the ground hopelessly convulsed with laughter holding what was now a two piece tripod. “No problem”, quoth Tony cooly, “I’ll just return it and say it arrived broken” which he did and we never heard any more about the matter. Mercifully Des, he of the flamethrower halitosis, was out that day.

Tony later got the wrong girl pregnant (“She is so below me” he would lament, forgetting how much he had enjoyed her being below him a few months earlier, though it needs to be added that the girl was, indeed, a genuine scrubber) and moved to Oxford where he administered matters for the Oxford Farmers’ Union. Neither of us had any idea what this institution actually did, but he got free board and lodging in exchange for menial duties which gave him lots of time to pursue his new vocation of oil painting. I would take the train from London during my university days to spend time with him at weekends and have my picture painted. I recall his style was a sort of mixture of Soutine and Modigliani, but have sadly lost track of both the painter and of the painting which was actually half good.

As the kid on the block I was rarely allowed to deal with big sales, having yet to learn the meaning of the word ‘commission’, but did luck out once. Appropriately it was an American customer who saw me hit the sales leader board. Within seconds of coming in I was ˜Tom”, a familiarity I managed to survive while selling him a Nikkormat FTn with 24, 50 and 135mm Nikkor lenses. That was a nice camera with a somewhat fragile shutter speed-setting ring concentric with the lens mount. The Nikkors, still set in the scalloped metal mounts of old, were as good as they got and a lot better than this customer would ever be a photographer. He would come in from time to time, ask for ˜Tom” and buy more gear which had absolutely no impact on the quality of his work. It remained awful.

Des, however, he of the gas mask breath, was eventually to get his revenge. One day in 1970 a nice looking, well spoken chap came in asking to look at a Pentax Spotmatic. This was the camera you bought if you were serious but couldn’t quite afford the Nikon F. Sensing a big sale I gladly acceded to his request to try it out on the street and, next thing I knew, Des and I were chasing him down Kensington High Street. I should have known better than to trust a chap in red trousers. I let Des take a strong lead, which was not easy given that I had been a competent runner at school and Des’s girth exceeded his height, but why tempt providence, I thought. The only thing I remember were my grandfather’s words ‘When in doubt, run away, so that you can come back to run away another day’ coursing through my head. Given that Grandfather was a successful economist and banker I paid heed, and loped merrily along watching the Spotmatic recede even faster than Des, who was, I confess, giving spirited chase to one who was clearly an Olympic athlete. Des managed the first 100 yards in something approaching four times world record pace though even a casual observer would have to admit that his speed dropped off sharply thereafter. Well, this was the excuse he needed and I was summarily fired a week later when he had regained his bad breath and the cops had concluded that I was not in on the scam. All I recall during the firing are the crumbs of cheese on Des’s Hitler mustache and wondering how long it took him to trim the wretched thing every morning.

This was another important lesson in life. Quit before you are fired. I did a lot of quitting thereafter before I started working for a real ass years ago. At least he can’t fire me as I have been self-employed all those years.

During all these years in retail I had been squirreling away the pittance I was paid until, in 1971 I finally had enough to buy my dream camera – the one Dixons never let me borrow for the weekend.

The sales receipt for my Leica M3, bought used.

Every spare moment, typically after a day’s work at Dixons, was spent in the local Kensington Public Library poring over the works of the great photographers of the world. Now I could be one of them! And, in truth, it was like a duck taking to water for after being published (and paid!) many times in the photo press, three years later Photography Magazine named me its Photographer of the Year and gave me a bunch of gear to commemorate the occasion. This, of course, I immediately sold to fund film, paper and chemical needs.

Photographer of the Year, 1974. Sculpture by Reg Butler.

My life in retail had, however, come to an end and just three years later I was clutching a one way ticket to America, wearing the same C&A suit from my retail years and headed for a new life. My accent went with me and I was now genuinely English, having had to emigrate to acquire that status. My fondest memory on leaving is of my boss, a fellow named W. G. Carter, whose parting words were “But Thomas, why would you want to go there? It’s full of Americans”. Three years later he was posted to Manchester which was full of the former colonials his ancestors had so abused.

Postscript: Having exploited my Englishness for many years after immigrating to the States in 1977, I was, inevitably, sent on business to London some ten years later. (“Gee, Tom, you can speak those guys’ language” was the analytical thinking). American corporations have always confused motion with action and without their obsessive belief in the value of movement for its own sake both Boeing and Airbus doubtless would not exist. Anyway, after the obligatory pressing of the flesh with my English mates in the office, I decided to put on my best tweed cap and jacket and furled my umbrella just so before visiting the local pub. An English gentleman’s umbrella, you should understand, is for ever to be furled in a land where it rains at least daily. Bellying up to the bar, I ordered a pint of Courage Director’s from the publican. As he handed the brew over he casually glanced at me, asking “Oh! yeah, mate, ‘ow long you over ‘ere for then?”. My accent had migrated west with Horace Greeley and I had been well and truly exposed.

* * * * *

Click here for an index of all the Biographical pieces.