Category Archives: Photography

The new Mac Pro – 2013 – Part XX

A poor value.

For an index of all my Mac Pro articles, click here.


The new Mac Pro.

Apple announced some of the pricing for the new Mac Pro (“nMP”) yesterday and it’s hard to see much of interest for still photographers whose application use is centered on Photoshop and Lightroom, for the high price asked.

The base spec 4-core 3.7gHz machine comes with 12gB of memory and two AMD FirePro D300 GPUs for $3,000. The 6-core comes with 16gB of RAM and one 6-core 3.5gHz CPU with two FireCore D500 GPUs for $4,000. Each comes with one 256gB SSD. You will need to add external drive enclosures to those as there are no internal slots for drives, meaning USB3 (cheap) or Thunderbolt (still very expensive).

Given the CPU-intensive nature of PS and LR, the provision of two excellent GPUs in the nMP is largely wasted.

Compared with the 2.66gHz 4-core current MacPro (“MP”) the nMP 4-core will be 39% faster and the 6 core will be 97% faster on CPU tasks. However, you can buy a mint 2009 MP 4-core ($700) and upgrade it to a 6-core 3.33gHz i7-980 ($275 net of old CPU resale) with USB3 ($50) and a 256gB SATA III SSD ($175) on an Apricot PCIe card ($50) and with a GTX660 GPU ($150 net) for $1,400. I set forth the details of the upgrades here. The CPU speed of this upgraded MP machine will be 35% greater than the 4-core nMP and 10% less than the 6-core nMP and you will have a lot of money left in your pocket. And that’s before adding external disk storage for the nMP.

That makes the nMP a very poor value for still photographers. Movie makers should be able to take advantage of the new, dual GPUs when used with the latest version of Final Cut Pro X, but those GPUs are of little use to still snappers.

The 2009 4-core will only fall in value, owing to age and because more will become available as nMP early adopters sell their old machines. Thus the next few quarters will represent an excellent opportunity for 4-core MP buyers who, as a side benefit, will be spared all the usual teething troubles of a new, untested design, and will not need to buy external enclosures and costly Thunderbolt cables if that option is elected.

Update January, 2014:

Performance data are now coming out for the New Mac Pro and, frankly, they are very disappointing for the money asked. The $3,000 4-core base machine records a 64-bit Geekbench score of just 14,200. Compare that to the stock 2009 old Mac Pros:

  • 4-core – 9,100 (Used mint cost $750)
  • 4-core with Core i7/980 upgraded CPU – 15,000 ($1050) – faster than the nMP at one third the cost
  • 8-core – 12,000 ($1100)
  • 12-core with W5660 upgraded CPU – 25,000 ($1400)

Nor is video performance much to get excited about. With the single exception of Final Cut ProX, version 10.1 (not 10.0) no apps currently out there appear to use all the cores of the high-core count nMP fully, and with the better specified nMPs running $4,000 (6-core), $5,500 (8-core) and an eye-popping $7,000 (12-core) that’s simply money poorly spent until applications start using the new technology fully. Don’t hold your breath for Adobe to get with the action any time soon when it comes to PS and LR.

Finally, I am sick and tired of the puerlie images comparing the sizes of the small nMP with the older MP’s case. That’s comparing apples and oranges. If the old MP is a truck, then the new MP is a passenger car needing a bolt-on trailer. The old MP has storage for up to 10*** (or more) drives inside (with PCIe cards and optical drive installations in addition to the stock slots) whereas the nMP accommodates but the one PCIe SSD. By the time you have the nMP in a like configuration, you will have boxes and cable clutter all over your work space. And there are still no proper thermal stress tests of the nMP running under full load, an area where the old MP is a known and robust performer.

In conclusion, a stock or modestly upgraded 2009 old MP remains a superb bargain which yields little in performance to the new machine. A state-of-the-art nVidia GTX680 GPU ‘Made for Mac’ card can be installed in a couple of minutes in the old Mac Pro for some $500, providing video performance comparable to the nMP, so the buyer of the upgraded 8-core/W5590 old Mac Pro is looking at a bill of $2,000 with the fast CPUs and the better GPU. No contest.

Old MP buyers will only be winners over the next few quarters as early upgraders flood the used market with the older machines, making for abundant supply and falling prices.

*** Old MP drive capacity:

  • Four 2.5″/3.5″ in the backplane slots/trays. Up to 16TB total.
  • Two 2.5″/3.5″ in the optical drive area. Up to 8TB total.
  • Four 2.5″ in two dual Apricorn PCIe cards (cards are <$100 each). Up to 4TB total.
  • One or two more in the PCIe area attached to the sockets on the PCIe cards. Up to 8TB total.
  • Total? Up to 12 drives. Up to 36TB total.

Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 Micro lens

A high definition macro lens.

Choices:

After the 50mm f/2 Nikkor, this is quite possibly one of the commonest Nikon lenses ever made. The 55mm f/3.5 Micro Nikkor is abundantly available in many variants:

  • Metal focus barrel, compensating aperture, pre-Ai
  • Metal focus barrel, non-compensating aperture, pre-Ai
  • Rubber focus barrel, pre-Ai
  • Rubber focus barrel, Ai
  • Rubber focus barrel, Ai, multi-coated

The later 55mm f/2.8 Ai-S MF optic is not recommended, owing to widespread reports of oil migrating from the focus mechanism to the aperture blades. Overhauling the lens to replace lubricants makes no economic sense owing to the high cost of labor. The even later 60mm f/2.8 versions, all AF, have the benefit of extending the focus range to life-size without the need to use an extension tube. But the construction quality of the 55mm f/3.5 was never equalled.

Ai conversion:

Spare no thought of destroying ‘collectible value’ by doing the Ai conversion. First, collectors are scum who serve only to drive up used gear costs. People who put gear in storage – be it camera or Ferrari – are beyond contempt in my book. Second, Nikon made hundreds of thousands of these lenses and you can always find any version in any condition on the used market, at very short notice. There is no such thing as a ‘collectible’ 55mm Micro Nikkor.


The rear of the lens is exceptionally well baffled.

This means that the usual work will have to be done to file away an arc of alloy to permit clearance of and proper engagement with the aperture follower on the Nikon’s body. Not doing this will damage your camera. This work has yet to be done in the above illustration.

The snag is that the aperture collar where the filing has to be done cannot be removed by simply removing the bayonet flange – the five slotted screws shown. No, removing the small radial aperture ring indexing screw does not help. Don’t bother trying. So to work around this, after removing the bayonet flange, I placed some heavy-duty tape over the rear of the lens and scribed around carefully with a sharp knife to produce a thoroughly sealed interior which resisted any ingress of metal filings.


With the bayonet flange removed, 3M clear Scotch tape is placed in position, ready for filing.

Be sure to keep the lens focused at its closest distance – the protruding rear element will otherwise contact the adhesive tape, a move not calculated to enhance definition. Filing can now proceed in the usual way, using my guide here. All filings are blasted away with compressed air after which the Scotch tape can be discarded and the bayonet flange replaced.

CPU installation is as easy as it gets. No changes are needed, the CPU simply being glued in place in the usual way as I indicate here.

In use:


Deeply recessed front element.

The front element of the Micro Nikkor is deeply recessed within the barrel, so it’s unlikely that adding a lens hood will make any difference to results. Some reports indicate that the Micro Nikkor has poor performance at infinity, only really coming into its own at 1:10 and greater reproduction ratios. I have no idea where these urban myths were perpetrated – perhaps the results of a bad sample or two? – but mine is tack sharp at all apertures and subject distances, with optimum resolution being at f/5.6 through f/11 in the center and f/8 through f/11 in the extreme corners. Minor diffraction resolution losses become apparent at f/16 and f/22, and by f/32 these are noticeable, so I would avoid using the smallest aperture.

I do not recommend using a protective UV filter. It will serve only to attract light reflections, especially as it will be situated a considerable distance from the front element.

The lens is very light and the focusing helicoid exceptionally well designed, so that there is no play in the barrel even with the lens fully extended at its closest focus distance.

f/3.5 is not especially fast so how is focusing? I use the focus confirmation display in the D3x and hitting the illuminated central LED is very sensitive, meaning focus is very accurate. The infinity setting is exceptional, as the combination of 55mm Micro Nikkor and D3x body can easily distinguish between 250 feet and infinity. For reference, the same focus module is used in the D700, D3 and D3s bodies. So even at close focus distances, getting critical focus is trivial, though a tripod is strongly recommended in the close-up range where even minor movement of the camera can significantly upset focus.

Lens correction profile:

The lens is pretty close to perfect as is. There is very minor vignetting at f/3.5, and very low barrel distortion at all apertures. Chromatic aberration is almost non-existent. Nonetheless, I have made a lens correction profile which you can download here. This corrects these very minor aberrations, and if you add a CPU then you can have this profile automatically invoked and applied in Lightroom or Photoshop when downloading images from your camera’s storage card.


A CPU allows the correct profile to be automatically
loaded in Lightroom and Photoshop.

Comparison with the 50mm f/1.4 Nikkor:

The 50mm f/1.4 Nikkor of the same era is a firm favorite of mine and both optics are absolute classics from the period when Nikon’s mechanical and optical designs peaked. It’s hard to put in words the tactile pleasure of using these lenses. How do they compare? At f/3.5, f/5.6 and f/8 the Micro Nikkor has the edge in errr…. edge performance, but you would need to make a 40″ print to prove it. The 50mm of course opens up to F/1.4 and the Micro Nikkor goes down to 50% life-size, so it’s horses for courses. Neither will let you down.

The following images are of a 27x enlargement of the top right corner of the frame:

At 1:2 closest focus distance:

This image of a wristwatch was exposed at f/3.5, full aperture, at the closest focus distance:


Helicon Focus focus stacking of 14 images.


The 14 differentially focused images and the Helicon composite.

This gives you a sense of the maximum image size at the 1:2 closest focus distance. The image was created using Helicon Focus focus stacking software, and is a composite of no fewer than 14 differentially focused images, all taken at f/3.5. Because it takes a few seconds to take all the constituent images, refocusing a bit between each, I have removed the blur of the seconds hand using Photoshop.

The 55mm Micro Nikkor is recommended without reservation and at current market prices it’s almost offensively inexpensive.

Quadcopter imagery

Stunning technology.

Quadcopter technology is becoming both reliable and inexpensive.

Checkout this stunning video of the Niagara Falls:


Click the image for the video.

Be sure to watch it in HD. It’s breathtaking.

The artist used a Phantom Quadcopter (Amazon has it for $479) and a Black Magic Hero3 camera.

The Phantom uses GPS positioning technology and has a maximum yaw velocity of 200 degrees a second, meaning it can spin a full circle in under two seconds. Maximum flight speed is 33 feet/second, meaning 30 mph, and it comes with a microphone.


Click the image for the DJI Phantom site.

The Hero3 camera shoots – wait for it – 4K video, and comes with wifi technology. It can record 12mp still images at 30 frames per second. Check out some of the incredible videos on their home page. Whether mounted on helmets, surfboards, birds or lions (!) the effect is overwhelming. Image stabilized, wifi, 4K definition and $400 at Amazon.


Click the image for the GoPro site.

So $879 gets you technology that cost Stanley Kubrick thousands times that when he made the first Steadicam movie, The Shining. That was in 1980.

Nikkor 20mm f/3.5 UD lens

Finally! Wide angle bliss.

I have been using the 20mm f/3.5 Ai-S Nikkor for a while now and it is both compact and optically excellent. But my first choice in a classic MF 20mm Nikkor was always the earlier UD of 1967. The snag is, it’s not easy to find a mint specimen.

The UD was a very special lens for its time. Until its creation, Nikon F owners made use of the mirror lock-up and separate optical finder needed to accommodate the 21mm design from Nikon’s rangefinder line. Hardly consonant with the SLR concept. Leica (with the 21mm Super Angulon for the original Leicaflex) and Zeiss (with the 21mm Biogon for the fabulous Contarex) adopted like strategies, mirror lock-up and all. All three came with the most awful, distorting viewfinders imaginable.

But the UD applied Nikon’s retrofocus research and resulted in a super-wide lens which needed no mirror lock-up or external finder. You saw through the pentaprism finder what the film would record. And it was massive, compared to their later 20mm designs – the 20mm f/4, f/3.5 and f/2.8, all MF and all excellent. Nikon lists the f/2.8 to this day.

So why bother spending all this time tracking down a pristine UD when all its successors are wonderful? Well, it’s that old fixation of mine. Metal. I believe lenses should be metal, not rubber or plastic mounted. I believe their ergonomics should fit the camera. And the D3x and D2x on which I use my lenses are very large bodies indeed. The 20mm Ai-S on the D3x is, frankly, rather dwarfed by the bulk of the body.

I searched some 18 months for a perfect UD specimen, being outbid several times on eBay as the UD seems to be attracting that vermin of the photography world, the gear collector. My sample, indistinguishable from new in every way, cost me $327 delivered, some $75 more than when I first started searching. By contrast, the Ai-S f/3.5 version can be had for maybe $250, or so. The CPU adds $30 and the Ai conversion requires a Dremel tool with a cut-off wheel, a small file and sweat equity.

Here’s the real thing:


D3x, 20mm f/3.5 UD Nikkor. Mine was made in September, 1973.
Production ceased in April, 1974.

Nikon pulled no punches here. This lens is simply outstanding optically and mechanically. Almost 50 years after it was designed it remains a bedrock of solidity and pure old-fashioned mechanical engineering. Handling, feel, balance on the big body – there’s no comparison with its smaller and lighter successors. No play, no wobble, just high integrity build and finish. A man’s lens. For sheer beauty of execution only the pre-Ai 200mm f/4 Nikkor-Q compares.

My example was pre-Ai, as were all 20mm UD Nikkors, so it necessitated Ai conversion. Forget about trying to find genuine Nikon factory conversion kits – they are rarer than hen’s teeth.


A factory modified UD Nikkor – note the protruding
ridge which abuts the aperture follower on the lens. Good
luck finding the modified aperture ring on the used market.

And conversion of this lens is tricky. Instead of just relieving the aperture ring to clear and activate the aperture follower on modern digital bodies, the lens has to have a protruding part attached to contact the follower, unlike other pre-Ai lenses. The easiest way to do this is to reverse the stock Nikon aperture claw, and cut off part of it until the dimensions are right. Nikon unwittingly provided just what’s needed for digital conversion, and the aperture claw I used has no purpose on modern Nikon DSLRs so its reuse has no negative effects. The modified, cut down claw will correctly contact the aperture follower as illustrated below.


The aperture follower. Very robust despite appearances,
the final thing is painted black to match the lens.


The aperture follower in use on the Nikon DSLR body.
Note the vacant claw retaining threaded hole to the right.

A note on ‘de-clawing’ the lens: Ordinarily, once I have converted an MF Nikkor to work on the modern Nikon DSLR, I remove the aperture claw on top of the aperture ring and store it. Because the two retaining screws are small and easily lost, I replace them in the vacant holes in the aperture ring, using a magentized screwdriver (any other way invites insanity). Do not replace the second claw retaining screw in the 20mm UD Nikkor (the other screw is used to retain the reversed claw). Doing so you will find that the screw countersinks too deeply into the innards of the lens and will prevent movement of the aperture ring.

The contrast in size with the later 20mm f/3.5 is striking:


The 1967 design pre-Ai UD and the 1977 design Ai-S.
No rubber or plastic on the UD.

The handling of the big UD on the large D3x and D2x bodies is ergonomic perfection.

How about resolution? At normal enlargement ratios neither lens will let you down in big prints. But the optical design philosophies could scarcely be more different. The UD is computed for maximum resolution at the center and hang the edges. Indeed, central resolution remains largely unchanged, and outstanding, at all apertures, being pretty much perfect by f/4.5. By contrast the Ai-S optic compromises central resolution, trading it for more even across-the-frame performance. The Ai-S never quite matches the UD in the center and the UD never quite matches the Ai-S in the corners. For reference, I have a 48″ x 36″ print made from a 20mm Ai-S image and it’s perfect at normal viewing distances, so it’s not as if any excuses need be made for the compact Ai-S variant of this lens.

Here are center comparisons at f/3.5 and f/8, UD on the left. I’m using my usual utility pole in the backyard, that exemplar of America’s infrastructure. The equivalent print sizes would be 40″ x 27″, something very few users will ever make, so if you think the UD’s edges are poor and the Ai-S’s center is so-so, bear in mind what you are looking at:


Centers at f/3.5.


Centers at f/8.

And here are the extreme corners:


Corners at f/3.5.


Corners at f/8.

I’ll trade central resolution for corner sharpness any day.

I used the same lens correction profile for the UD as for the Ai-S, after adding a CPU in the usual way. Comparison with the Ai-S showed almost exactly the same level of vignetting and optical errors, meaning wave/mustache distortion of straight lines at the edge. Both lenses cease vignetting by f/5.6.


UD at f/3.5 – no profile. Note wave form distortion
of top of fence and vignetting.


UD at f/3.5 with profile.

You can find the lens correction profile here and use of this profile corrects vignetting and renders straight lines straight, not wavy. Flare into the sun is almost identical, the Ai-S reproducing sharper magenta spots where the UD delivers one considerably smaller one, this despite the huge front element in the UD. In both cases flare spots are far less pronounced through f/5.6, becoming pretty objectionable by f/22 with the Ai-S, though easily corrected in post-processing. Contrast of the two lenses appears identical at all apertures.


The profile in use – Lightroom 5.


UD flare at f/22.


Ai-S flare at f/22.

The sun was just out of the frame in both images and no lens hoods were used. Both lenses have UV protective filters, which probably does not help matters. The UD is single coated, the Ai-S multicoated. The UD only shows a minor loss in definition from diffraction at f/22 – remarkable. To put this further in perspective, the UD is 1-2 stops sharper across the frame then the current 16-35mm AFS G zoom, which costs $1,300. So much for optical progress ….

If you have a big body Nikon and yearn for the days of mechanical engineering which Nikon has never surpassed, the 1967-74 UD Nikkor is for you.


The finished job. The red dot on the CPU serves as an alignment aid when mounting the lens.


Correct EXIF data in LR5, read from the CPU.


Winston hammers away at his latest Lego kit. D3x, 20mm UD Nikkor at f/4.

A few early snaps appear here.

The USPS is back

A new business opportunity.

Among the many much maligned arms of the US government, the Unites States Postal Service comes in for more than its share of abuse. Of course, many of these wounds are self-inflicted, like backing druggie bike racers with taxpayer money or raising the public’s ire with endless streams of junk mail deliveries. Yet, on reflection, I challenge anyone to begin to match the efficiency and low cost of the USPS, delivering millions of pieces of mail daily be it to Wall Street or Po Dunk, Iowa. And that with a success rate that you can only dream about. The complexity and scope of the post office’s undertaking are breathtaking. When did you last have a piece of mail lost? Yet we read daily that the USPS is on its last legs, destroyed in mail by email and in package delivery by the likes of Federal Express and UPS, both far costlier and not that much better. Remember that last smashed parcel accorded the tender care of the brown truck driver?

But I see a new business opportunity for the USPS and it’s courtesy of the very same US government.

Daily we learn of more snooping, more abuse of our constitutional rights, more clandestine dirt. With USG’s traditional sound judgment the snoops are now being found to have spied on Facebook messages, those messages between a collective with an average IQ in the low double figures. Well, gag me with a spoon. Now we can be comfortable that Latisha’s Facebook posting to Jamal debating the quality of the local Big Mac will be rapidly disclosed as a coded plot to blow up something or other. This makes it so much easier getting to sleep at night, knowing that we are all safe from burger bombers and that a mainstay of American commerce and global dietary disaster can remain in business.

And this is where the USPS and snail mail come into their own. I was reading a noir suspense novel the other day, set in the 1950s, and every time the French resident key character and anti-hero wanted to preserve secrecy in communications with his crooked London buddies he would …. write them a letter! Even then the telcos appear to have kept logs of calls, but stick it in the mail and there is no trace. And the global mails did one heck of a job exporting America’s intellectual property to the east, be it nukes to Moscow or electronics to Japan.

One of the key tools the spies of the time used to effect their snail mail treason was the Minox camera.


Note the minimum focus distance.

Easily hidden in the palm of a hand, vest pocket or lady’s garter belt (!) the Minox first came to life, appropriately enough, in subsequently Communist-controlled Latvia, in 1936. The bad guys took to it like Russians to vodka, and before you knew it no self respecting spy was without one. Minox made a whole range of accessories to support the minuscule images rendered by the camera – there was even a darkroom enlarger – with the negative being but 8 x 11mm, meaning a 4″ x 6″ print required an enlargement of almost 13 times to see the light of day. Not exactly your modern full frame DSLR definition, but it worked at a pinch for images of nuclear fission devices and the new fangled transistors coming out of Bell Labs.

I sold many of these during my student years in retail, but to put that in context the retail store was in a ritzy part of London and the Minox was invariably bought by rich guys with two seaters and three girlfriends. No one, you understand, ever ended up using the Minox, except for 007 and his buddies. Very few cassettes ever came back for processing and our film sales were almost non-existent, but the camera itself sold well. It was beautifully made, a real jewel, with many later model variations. Each came with a metal lanyard which doubled as a measuring device for the very close focusing lens – just the thing when you were busy at the Department of Defense making snaps for the Commies or Mr. Morita by the light of a 60 watt bulb.

The early Minox A had no coupled meter, but you can get a good sense of the accessory range in this 1955 advertisement. My snooper’s favorite is the binocular attachment:


The Minox A in 1955 – the spy’s favorite at the height of the Cold War.

Note the 50 picture capacity – and in cassette-loaded film at that. Very impressive. No true snoop used the tripod stand – a dead giveaway. He used the lanyard to determine image distance and focus.

Here’s another scan of the 1967 Wallace Heaton ‘Blue Book’ – the catalog put out by this long defunct upmarket UK photographic equipment vendor – multiply the price by three to get US $:



‘Your sort of man’ – contemporary advertisement.

As you can see, the Minox of the time was remarkable full featured. For comparison, the Nikon F with 50mm f/1.4 lens sold for twice as much at the time.

True blue spies would go the extra step of having the Minox’s already diminutive negative further reduced to microdot size, say 1-2mm across, a technology much beloved of spy thriller movies of the time. Goodness knows how they handled the drop in definition which ensued. Maybe they had to write a lot of letters to contain these miniature negatives? And the medium of choice for transmission of these state secrets was none other than the mail, the USPS doing its patriotic bit before ceding control to the foreign carrier, be it the Bundespost or Pochta Rossii.

Anyway, as the USPS has not been well served by its marketing arm in the past few decades, I’ll kick things off with a dynamite slogan which will see traditional full rate business boom overnight:

“USPS. For when you are tired of the only part of your government that listens – the NSA.”

They could offer a free starter cassette of Minox film to all takers.

And there will always be clients for the USPS’s low tech solution:


Jamal – tomorrow’s radical USPS customer in training.

Best of all, when the USG closes down, like today, the USPS remains open. ‘Essential service’, don’t you know.

Nikon D3x, 35-70 AFD Nikkor.