Monthly Archives: July 2005

More large format adventures

I finally got the first 4”x5” negatives back from the processor and began making some 13” x 19” prints. Amazingly, I had managed to load the film in the right way around and all the exposures, using my highly refined Modified Zone System (see June 25, 2005, below), were spot on. It probably did no harm to use negative film with its enhanced latitude for error even if the orange masked-negatives are harder to evaluate than transparencies.

My first reactions on getting the 13 negatives back was shock – those are really large pieces of film – and satisfaction when I saw just the very high level of definition they possessed. The mask in my flat bed film holder is actually 3.7” x 4.7”, so a 13” x 19” print works out to an enlargement ratio of only 4x so it’s hardly a surprise to see that sharpness and detail are the order of the day.

On my first outing I had taken just four pictures, constrained by the fact that the Crown Graphic camera came with just two film holders. One of those four was double exposed. Don’t ask. What with all the rushing water and beauty of nature going on, I couldn’t hear the shutter trip so tripped it….again. Now if I had been using a Holga or similar toy camera the result would have immediately qualified as Art, but I instead consigned it to the round file.

On my second outing I had taken 12 more pictures, using the six additional film holders I had since acquired. Well, that turned out to be 11 pictures as I had inserted one of the film sheets incorrectly and had to pull the holder out of the camera without its dark slide, the latter proving impossible to replace. There I am, standing in the middle of the street, struggling with a sheet of film, more than a tad over-exposed, hoping no one was witnessing this debacle. Indeed, I found out that I have to do a good deal more practicing with film loading as a couple of my other shots were less than centered on the sheet. However, the film is so much thicker than 120 roll film that handling it is a joy and no cotton gloves are needed as it does not buckle when held by the edges.

Scanning on my flatbed was very simple, if slow, at 2400 dpi – I reckon that will give me the requisite 300 dpi at an 8x enlargement ratio, which is a print sized no less than 32” x 40”. Now that is really large! I found there is no need for a glass film holder, once more thanks to the high rigidity and flatness of the negative. The scans in PSD or TIFF format come in at 280 megabytes, give or take, and that takes a while to load on the computer.

Over the past week I had finally bitten the bullet and decided to upgrade my outstanding Apple iMac G4 (the one that had locked up once in thirty months on, you guessed it, a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet) to an iMac G5. A colleague had reported how his dad was loading large files in no time, so it wasn’t just the mildly enhanced CPU speed at work – Apple must have done something to upgrade image processing. By way of comparison, as 250 megabyte medium format scan which would take 90 seconds to load now loads in 10 (yes, 10!) and all related actions – like rotation, levels, sharpening, etc in Photoshop are similarly faster. The time savings really add up, for 90 seconds is too short to leave the computer to do something else and too long to be fun.

Once I took a hard look at the scans I could see that the four element Schneider Xenar lens – probably single coated given it’s 40+ years in age – is a tad prone to flare into the light, so I will have to watch that, but covers with high resolution to the edges of the frame, although I should add that I have not used any swings or tilts to really test edge definition.

Anywhere, here is a much reduced version of my first every 4” x 5” photograph in one of the magnificent redwood forests off Highway 1 in California – 4 seconds at f/32 if you must know:

On my second outing I had decided to use the Crown as a hand held rangefinder camera and while this occasioned more than one questioning look from passers by (they did at least give me generous space on account of my presumed lunacy), it turned out to be wonderfully engineered for just this purpose, even if film changing is a bit of a challenge if you only have two hands. The New York street photographer of the 1940s, Weegee, knew what he was on to.

Here’s the first hand held shot in one of those many broken down old towns in central California:

So, all in all, this Crown Graphic experiment has all the makings of a beautiful friendship, once I learn to load those film holders correctly.

Is it enough if you just enjoy it?

It was the height of the tech boom. 1999. A close friend of mine, maybe the person I care more for than anyone I know, had hit it big. He’s a modest man, not given to self-aggrandisement. But he had had a tough childhood, he had married the woman of his dreams relatively late in life and he had had made a son of whom he was justly proud, even though the making had come rather late.

So for the first time, he had said ‘What the heck!. I’m going to get a beautiful place, the better to see the wife and child grow’. And because the wife, at her not-so-tender age had expressed an interest in the piano, something very close to my friend’s heart, why, he went out and got her the very best he could afford, to be installed in the place of honor in his splendid, new estate in America’s most hallowed zip code. Not only was this piano imported directly from Germany but it came replete with the maker’s signature, no less.

I will never forget the look of sheer delight on his face the day it arrived. ‘Thomas’ he called excitedly, ‘You have got to see this thing’. Now while my friend was endowed with something akin to perfect pitch, he couldn’t play a note if you paid him. But he knew the instrument of his choice was capable of great things. Indeed, the sound was beyond compare. My friend had invited a classical pianist to put the instrument through its paces and some four of Chopin’s Nocturnes later you new that heaven was close indeed.

For a while there after that magical evening I lost track of him and his wife, the pianist in the making. He survived the fallout in the markets in 2000, moved on to better things and took the wife with him. Then we happened to bump into one another again and wiled away a pleasant evening over a couple of bottles of Napa’s finest with the food prepared just so.

“She cannot play to save her life”, he said, once well into his cups. “Come now”, I responded, “let’s not be so cruel. After all, you cannot fault the effort she puts into the thing”. For try she did. Twice weekly lessons, endless practice, scores by the….well…score. If effort correlated with results, the woman would have surpassed Horowitz. Sadly, she was proof of just one more example that you cannot put in what God leaves out, and that fateful evening, my friend had realized the truth of the matter, cruel as it may be. His piano was nothing more than a piece of beautiful furniture. It was a Leica in a glass case. There to be admired, but if the aesthetic senses of the world were to be saved, never to be used.

So is it enough if you just enjoy it? Does it matter that you have spent the earth and accomplished nothing except, maybe, a blip on the manufacturer’s bottom line. Do you grin and bear it and say, well, I tried?

The economic reality, of course, is that without consumers like my friend there would be no economy. Ferrari owners who cannot drive. Steinway owners who cannot play. And Leica owners who cannot take a photograph. But it is not fair to denigrate these folks. They are, after all, a source of cheap supply of the world’s finest equipment to those of us who dare not, or cannot, buy it new.

An exchange of shared values

The UPS driver was getting used to the routine.

Every Friday there was a delivery to the estate from B&H in New York. Place your order for film or paper or printing inks on a Sunday and the following Friday, as sure as the Government wants your money every April 15th, UPS arrives at your door with the supplies.

A First Class Business selling First Class Products delivered by a First Class Business.

Now this little haven in the undiscovered central coast of California, has much to recommend it. Beautiful landscape, vineyards as far as the eye can see (not least the few acres of Zinfandel we pride ourselves on, affording isolation from all and sundry, and looking gorgeous in the process) and fine, honest Americans.

So we got to chatting, every Friday, our UPS man and I. There’s something about UPS that encourages that sort of relationship. FedEx doesn’t have it. Too harried, no time for civilized discourse. The grandly named United States Post Office obviously does not. Are you going to trust someone who takes your tax dollars? But no one refers to the UPS man. It’s always our UPS man.

So after a few months of this routine, and after copious quantities of Portra, Gold and Epson paper and inks had been delivered, it was natural to graduate to first name terms. I’m Marty. Hi, I’m Thomas.

And thus it went for a few more months. Ice is hard to break and these UPS chaps have it in their veins in abundance. As is well known, every one wants a UPS man of their own.

Then, the other day, Marty opens up with “I’m giving a concert at Castoro this Sunday at 3 p.m.”

Let me start by saying that Castoro makes the second best zinfandel on the Central Coast. Needless to add, Chateau Winston, named after my son, a.k.a. the family abode, is superior. Both reside in that small area of paradise known as the Templeton Gap, west of Highway 101 and south of Highway 46. The world’s best Zinfandel grapes make their home there.

Before I could ask ‘What do you play’ Martin Paris proferred a CD with a picture of him on the cover, acoustic guitar and all. Without thinking, after profuse thanks, I offered that I was a photographer and could I please inscribe a copy of my book for you? The thought of commerce did not remotely enter my head. After all, it hardly needs saying that playing classical instruments or taking art photographs are two of the least commercial enterprises on this God’s earth. So we made an exchange. Marty’s Spanish guitar playing, all of his own compositions, is simply wonderful. His generosity of spirit and basic sense of American decency unsurpassed. My book of picture is….well, you be the judge.

So we exchanged good wishes. Marty signed his CD “Thomas – All My Best” and I reciprocated with “For Martin – with thanks for the beauty you have brought us”.

This little episode, seemingly insignificant in the grand panoply of life, brings us back to the central beliefs of these essays. Show your work and you will be rewarded. The rewards may be psychic rather than financial, but they are deep and lasting.

Publish a book. Now. Have something to exchange.

The vines doing their thing on the estate, framed by a cottonwood.

Anonymous writes

Now and then Anonymous soils these pages with his Comments. Or detritus, more accurately.

He is always Anonymous.

After all, would you want anyone to know that your grammar is that of the mean streets, and your mental capacity somewhere around Second Grade?

No problem. Clean up of Anonymous’s leavings takes as long as is required to hit the ‘Delete Comment’ button and life goes on unsullied by life’s losers.

However, now and then, old Anonymous writes something so completely inane, that his nonsense rises out of the field of tragedy and migrates to the truly hilarious. Here, for your amusement, are some of Anonymous’s best:

On my piece about Cartier-Bresson: “All his pictures were posed anyway”.

On Film is Dead (Anonymous had lots of foul mouthed company on this one – the truth hurts): “All digital photographs look alike, anyway, which is why I use film”. “Just because you have gone all digital, don’t expect real photographers to”.

On Make Mine Monochorome: “Yes, color is hard, which is why I use black and white”.

On Losing my (large format) Virginity, where I refer to my Harris Tweed cap and Tartan tripod bag, both purchased when I was one of Her Majesty’s loyal subjects some 30 years ago: “Harris Tweed cap and Scottish tartan tripod bag. You Americans make me laugh”.

On Throw away your lens cap and case: “Unlike you, I keep a lens cap on my pristine Leica at all times to avoid having the sun burn a hole in the shutter”. Guess how many great photographs this one takes.

On Rot which debunks all the silliness about Art poseurs using plastic cameras: “If you weren’t such a bigot you would get a Lomo, a fine (sic) made Russian camera and take some really good pictures”.

On Leicas – this one is a real Dusie: “Would it be to (sic – notice the grade school grammar) bold to speculate that you have never owned a Leica yourself. (sic) If you had you would understand the quality of the camera. There is no mistaking a picture taken with a Leica lens vs. any other brand.” And more from this child: “As to your point about AUTO FOCUS??? (sic) Why would anyone ever, want to use auto focus for any type of professional photograph. (sic). Since you used a car analogy once before perhaps the one I use will sink in. Compare a manual car to a stick shift (huge difference there!). They both will run, however, the stick shift will always go faster when the driver knows how to operate it.” What a pleasure it was to hit the ‘Add to Spam list’ button on that one. Phew!

All happily deleted, their authors added to the permanent spam list. This list not only forever bans these folks from posting here it also bans them from soiling other lists using like spam software as the database of spammers is shared. Neat, huh?

So, Mr. (and Ms.) Anonymous, keep ’em coming and we will be pleased to add you to our list, allowing all and sundry to join us in a good laugh. But think twice first as you may just be excluded from many other blogs. On second thoughts, just hit the ‘send’ button and do us all a favor.

Stop wasting Time – Part I

You need some woodworking done in your home. Two laborers show up bidding to do the work. One brings with him only hand tools. Not a motor or power source in sight, save his well developed biceps. The other comes with an assistant and every power tool known to man. Both come recommended, so you know the quality of the work is not an issue.

Which do you choose? The romantic aspects of the craftsman with the brawny arms notwithstanding, you obviously choose the man with the power tools and the assistant. He will be faster, his work more dimensionally accurate and less of your precious time will be taken up with the sawing and hammering that ensues. Plus it will cost you less.

In that example the value of your time is irrelevant as you are not doing the work in either scenario.

Now translate the problem to one of making photographic prints. You pride yourself on traditional darkroom techniques, you set up your darkroom, prepare the quickly aging chemicals and potter about in the dark, shading here and burning there, never quite sure how it will turn out, the while praying that little Johnny will not come into your miserable, smelly work area and destroy yet another box of printing paper.. You are automatically constrained to monochrome, of course, because it is beyond any rational person’s effort to home process color prints using traditional chemical means. So right there you have excluded 99% of your audience. When all is done and the print fixed, you pray it will look something like what you want when the light is switched on (you did put the unexposed paper away first, didn’t you?) and luckily, even if it does, your are still faced with the task of washing the prints in an attempt to render them permanent, drying, glazing, and on and on. You have retained the artisan with the hand tools.

You and the artisan have failed to notice one key thing about life. Technology has moved on. Both of you have unconsciously placed a very low value on your time.

The power tool photographic worker, meanwhile, having established a well rehearsed routine, has used Photoshop or whatever his application of choice is, done what dodging and burning is needed, removed dust spots (he only needs to do this once, ever, while the artisan must do it on every print) and spooled out twenty print jobs to his computer and left it to print while getting on with other more important things. Like taking more photographs.

The power tool worker’s level of retouching and corrections is infinitely superior and his prints are all identical. Exactly, you say, see, they are all identical. No two of my prints are ever alike. Obviously not. Your are technically incapable of making identical prints as your technology is inept. Making prints that look different is nothing more or less than a statement of your incompetence and refusal to recognize that times have changed. And they have changed for the better.

You tell yourself that none of that makes any sense, of course, as your traditional darkroom print is so much better. Of course, it is impossible for you to make that statement, as you have never mastered the modern technology of the computer print, but it makes you feel self satisfied and happy. Your time, in other words, is worth very little.

The reality is that not only is your print not better than the ink jet worker’s, you produce one for every twenty or thirty his modern machinery outputs. His artistic output is thus many times yours, his chances of acceptance and success commensurately greater. Worst of all for you, the artisan, is that the consumer cares not how the print was made. He just cares about the result. Unless you are showing your work to those sad souls who collect equipment and cannot take a picture to save their lives (why would you waste your time doing that?), believe me, no one will ever ask you what camera you used or – I mean how comical – inquire whether this is a chemical or ink jet print!

You already have a computer or you would not be reading this. Supremely competent ink jet printers are available for under $100. Photoshop Elements retails for a similar amount unless it happens to come free with your printer.

Then, when you become supremely successful, the resulting tripling of your time for photography certainly enhancing your prospects greatly, you can delegate all printing to some poor toad who does this for a living and get rid of the printing drudgery for once and all.