Category Archives: Photography

Intuit’s sloth

Just say ‘No’ to TurboTax.

For an index of all my Mac Pro articles, click here.

Like many readers of this journal I have been using TurboTax for Mac for aeons to prepare my taxes. The system works well in as much as anything can work well with the mess that is the Internal Revenue Code of the United States.

Now it so happens that I am happily running OS X High Sierra (10.13) on my 2010 Mac Pro, and Intuit, the maker of TurboTax has been making noises for a couple of years that I will soon have to upgrade to OS X Mojave (10.14) for their software to work. Intuit would have you believe that this is a change dictated by Apple and that no backward compatibility for TurboTax 2020 exists.


What Intuit demands for TT 2020..

But the snag is that I cannot run Mojave without tossing out my excellent Nvidia GTX980 graphics card, replacing it with an ATI Radeon offering, as Mojave will not run on Nvidia GPUs. And I do not wish to make that change as the GTX980 remains as capable today as it was 5 years ago when installed.

So I shopped around and determined that it’s Intuit’s sloth, not Apple’s requirements, which is the cause of TT 2020 not running on my High Sierra/GTX980 setup. HR Block is the other leading vendor of US tax preparation software and here are their system requirements:


HR Block’s 2020 tax prep software requirements.

So I spent $37.79 which got me the application, by download from Amazon, and this includes one State tax application. Intuit is asking much the same for their basic software version. Well, that and a new $250 GPU.

And guess what? I asked the HRB app to find my 2019 TT return and it was imported in seconds, and all numbers match. So now I’m ready to prepare my 2020 taxes using HRB’s software and the costly GTX980 can remain in place.

Sure, you say. You could always use Intuit’s online tax prep software which is machine independent. And you expect me to trust these people with my data? Uh huh.

Up periscope!

The future approaches.

This year or next will probably see the addition of an optical zoom lens to high end iPhones. I wrote “high end” as the change in Apple’s marketing strategy with the iPhone 12Pro and Pro Max is clear. They are distinguished from lower models by adding a longish lens (65mm on the Max) and, in the case of the Max, bigger sensors. And bigger margins, of course.

Rotating turret lenses in cine cameras have been around for decades:


The Bolex H16, originating in 1927, was last made in 2016 by the Swiss Paillard company.

Compared with zooms the lenses were lighter and faster. And mostly sharper, to boot.

Never one to resist an opportunity to make yet another gadget, Leica went all out with a turret attachment for its 35mm film cameras, coming up with this monstrosity



The Leica turret attachment from the 1940s..

While you might argue that simply changing lenses would be easier, Leitz persisted with this nuttiness into the Leica M era which saw the old, slow screw mount give way to a fast bayonet variant, yet the turret remained available, now with bayonet mounts. The pocketable aspect of the small and elegant Leica body was rather lost in the process.

But zooms were the way of the future and while they came with limitations, they were a lot more appealing to the average consumer. 2002 saw the introduction of Minolta’s Dimage film camera with a periscope zoom, and it was a knockout.



The elegant Minolta Dimage of 2002.

The periscope optical zoom, vertically oriented inside the case, saw light rays deflected through the associated right angle using a mirrored prism. This allowed the incorporation of an otherwise lengthy optical path within the tight confines of the body, a small 3.3″ x 2.8″ x 0.8″. For comparison, my iPhone 12Pro Max in its ‘bumper‘ measures 6.5″ x 3.1″ x 0.3″. You can read DPR’s 2002 review of this 2 megapixel digital masterpiece here.

This cutaway view shows how it worked:



Illustration of the ‘folded’ optical path.

While the Dimage sported a 37-111mm (3:1) zoom with modest aperture of f/2.8-3.6, I think we can expect a lot more from the iPhone 13 or 14. For this user a 28-200 (7:1) f/2 optic would be perfect, and leave the UWA lens as a separate choice. That makes the optical designer’s job easier and, let’s face it, you really do not need a zoom starting at 12mm given the relatively infrequent use of something so wide. Nor do you need a turret.

Once that iPhone Zoom hits the market the sole remaining users of traditional DSLRs or their mirrorless brothers will be press photographers and the fashion set, because both would be laughed off the set were they to be seen using an iPhone. And, of course, the few remaining nuts taking nature photographs because, you know, of the trillions of images already out there, all available for pennies from stock vendors, there must be something yet undiscovered. As for the camera divisions of Canon, Nikon, Sony et al, say goodbye.

The technology is out there. A 2019 Huawei cell phone uses it and you get free Chinese spying software as part of the deal. Wait for the real thing.

iPhone 12Pro Max bumper

Protecting the lens assembly.



Click the image to go to Amazon.

It’s not that easy to find a pure bumper for the iPhone 12Pro Max. Most cases come with a variety of front and rear covers, neither wanted by this user as I use a belt holster.

I did not want to get a case for the iPhone 12, to keep bulk down and to retain the better grip afforded by the square sides. However I did find the sides rather slippery but, more importantly, noticed that the protruding lens assembly meant that the iPhone would not rest flat on a desk or table, but would rest that corner on the lenses themselves. Not good.

So I caved and got one of the above. It’s slightly less slippery than the native edge, the square profile of the sides is retained, the touch of the buttons remains good (though the mute switch is a bit tough to access) and it has corner protrusions which protect the lenses when the iPhone is placed lens-down on a flat surface. While the package included a screen protector I consider that a waste of time as I have never known an iPhone screen to scratch unless something truly thoughtless is done to it, like putting it in a pocket with unprotected keys. As for covering the lovely Pacific Blue back, why on earth would you want to do that?

iPhone 12 Pro Max – some observations

The world’s best cellphone gets better.

I opted for the Max large version of the iPhone 12 Pro for two reasons. I really want to obsolete my 7″ Kindle Fire for reading (it’s a nice small size and weight which can be held in one hand when lying on the sofa) as fewer gadgets are always a good thing. And because the iPhone 12 Pro Max has some nice enhancements over the iPhone 12 Pro and 11 Pro when it comes to the cameras. Night Mode is now available on both 12 Pro models for the UWA lens (not available in the iPhone 11 Pro) and internal processing sees to it that the objectionable UWA ‘mustache’ distortion is no longer present.



Uncorrected UWA images – iPhone 11 Pro vs. iPhone 12 Pro Max.

You can read about the high distortion levels in the UWA lens in the iPhone 11 Pro here and follow the link to my LR/PS distortion correction profile from that piece. Suffice it to say, as the above images disclose, there is no need for a distortion correction profile with the UWA lens in the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Masochists can go to Settings->Camera->Lens Correction to turn off in camera distortion correction for both the UWA and standard lenses.

Another reason to upgrade to the iPhone 12 is the shape of the case. The iPhone 12 has reverted to the slab sided design seen in the iPhone 4 and boy, is it wonderful to hold after the slippery eel that is the iPhone 11. So much so, that while I am sticking with a (larger) belt holster for the iPhone 12 Pro Max, I no longer use a protective cover or case as it’s so much nicer to hold naked in the hand. The worst aspect of the iPhone as a full time camera has always been its awful ergonomics, and this is a significant step in the right direction.

There’s another ergonomic upgrade courtesy of software changes. Go to Settings->Accessibility->Touch->Back Tap and set it as follows:



Back Tap.

You can now simply double tap the rear of the iPhone to release the shutter; sadly no single tap option is available. But either way, this is a strong argument to avoid the use of any sort of protective cover, or to cut a hole in the back if you do use one to permit the use of Back Tap. I have found that the UWA is so wide that getting your fingers out of the way is a challenge using Back Tap with that lens, but it’s easy with the other two.

Speaking of lenses, the ‘long’ lens, still at 50mm in the iPhone 12 and 12 Pro, is now 65mm in the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Until a periscope zoom comes along in later iPhones, this is a step in the right direction.

Finally, the new LIDAR detector permits accurate determination of focus even in darkness. This image of my son watching TV on the patio was taken in almost total darkness, the iPhone advising me to keep still during the three second hand held exposure. This is magic. Why would anyone revert to the dated, incompetent offerings from Sony, Nikon, Canon et al?



LIDAR assisted Night Mode in near total darkness. 65mm lens.

As for obsoleting that Kindle Fire as a book reader, here are the key statistics:

Kindle Fire – screen diagonal 6.8″, weight 10oz, battery life 7 hrs.
iPhone 12 Pro Max – screen diagonal 6.4″, 8.6 oz, battery life 20 hrs.

Hast la vista Kindle.

More when Apple Pro RAW becomes available in the iPhone 12 with an upcoming iOS release.

The iPhone 12 Pro is the best camera in the world for 99% of users.

You think the iPhone 12 Pro Max is expensive? Run the numbers. Read this. It costs $300 a year.