Category Archives: Photography

Death knell tolls

For the full frame DSLR.

One of the thrilling aspects of the just announced Olympus E-M5 Mark II MFT SLR (see previous column) is the HR mode which blends 8 images into one 40mp file, delivering the resolution of a Nikon D800/810 in a pint-sized MFT body. Olympus has downplayed the significance of this technology, and there are some practical limitations. It takes one second for this magic to happen so moving subjects will mostly not work.

But Oly is clearly not resting on its laurels and seems determined to extract a quart from its pint pot. Click the image of General Manager Setsuya Kataoka below to read about the thrilling coming enhancements in a fine DP Review interview:

Click the image.

Simply stated, Oly proposes to make this a much speedier process, delivering the blended composite in 1/125 second. The miniscule sensor movements involved are truly an engineering masterpiece.

Given that the E-M5/II sample blended images linked in the previous column are better than those from the Nikon D810 (same resolution, no moiré effects), this seems to announce the death knell of the DSLR flapping mirror behemoth and its ridiculously large and heavy optics. The warbler is about to boot the cuckoo from his nest.

Another no less exciting possibility is that of a minimalist variant without all those wretched buttons and dials.

I am on the waiting list for the E-M5/II. So what if it’s rapidly obsoleted? Oly deserves my dollars for its development effort. The genius of Maitani, the designer of the OM1, lives on at Olympus. Not since Oskar Barnack and Walter Mandler at Ernst Leitz have we seen anything like this.

Olympus E-M5 II

Thinking outside the box.

Olympus may have committed one of the larger accounting frauds in recent years, to the tune of over-reporting income by $1.5 billion, but mercifully no such stupidity pollutes their camera design team which has generally been original and stellar in execution for decades. The Pen F brought a high quality half-frame (72 snaps on a roll of 35mm film) body with interchangeable lenses to the film world and the OM1 and successors saw Oly’s jeweled execution conferred on one of the most lovely film SLRs ever made. When they persuaded famous British bird photographer Eric Hosking to dump his heavy Zeiss Contarex gear in favor of their light and capable system, sales took off. No wonder that they have modeled the OM-D MFT DSLR range on the OM1.

When MFT digital came along both Oly and Panasonic were there from inception, rolling out a succeedingly better body seemingly annually. I went with the Panny G1 which was a groundbreaker, sold well before Oly came to market with its first MFT DSLR body. When I recently moved from a G3 to a pair of GX7s the main appeal of Panny over Oly was the availability of the silent electronic shutter in the GX7, a body which finally added IBIS, another first in the Panny line and something Oly had incorporated all along. Now I could get vibe free images at slow shutter speeds using the 17mm and 45mm Oly fixed focal length prime lenses which are excellent quality, fast, faster focusing than anything Panny sells and very compact indeed. The 17mm resides on one GX7, the 45mm on the other, and they are never removed. I also much prefer the unobtrusive ‘Leica M look’ of the GX7 over the OM-D with its intrusive and purposeless hump.

But let’s give credit where it’s due, for Oly has just announced it’s latest MFT DSLR body and it again reminds us that the mental sloths at Canon and Nikon need a good going over with with a cattle prod to wake up, smell the market and come out with FF mirrorless DSLRs in lieu of their antiquated, senseless bouncing mirror/glass prism, noisy monstrosities. Their continued complacency will see someone do this for them (Sony does not count – no credibility, like buying a Hyundai and pretending it’s German), with Fuji rumored to be working on one right now. Before they know it, Canon and Nikon will be yesterday’s news. Kodak anyone?

Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, and the sensor shifting HD technology in Oly’s new body is a variation of that used by Hasselblad in its $50k HD50 body which takes multiple images, stitching them together in post, each image seeing the sensor displaced a tad so that the overlaps fix what ails digital sensors – moiré, color issues, grain. Oly does this in the E-M5 II by combining 8 images which can be processed using an included plug-in in Photoshop. True the technology – whether Hasselblad’s or Olympus’s – can only be used with stationary subjects, but check out this fine analysis by Imaging Resource, clicking through to their test chart images, and I think you will be challenged to distinguish the OM-D’s images from those taken using a 36mp Nikon D810. One easy way to spot the Oly images is by the complete absence of moiré effects in the material swatches even though the Oly sensor, like that in the D810, lacks an anti-aliasing filter. Extraordinary. Don’t waste time looking at the Sony images – the model/mount/lens range will be replaced three or more times by Christmas.

The other appealing thing is that finally an OM-D body includes a silent electronic shutter, something I use exclusively on my GX7s where it really is silent and results in far less mechanical wear than is the case with the mechanical one. (If you want a loud and slow focusing 35mm FFE lens, by all means try the execrable 20mm Panny offering – by the time it focuses your subject has crossed the nearest state boundary). The only sound you can hear when the shutter is released is that of the lens focus motor and the motors in the Oly primes I favor will be audible to you only. And by all accounts the multi-axis IBIS in the OM-D bodies is quite a bit better than that in the GX7 (not that I’m complaining) which otherwise resorts to in-lens vibration reduction, meaning Panasonic lenses only. Until the GX7 came along, the Panny user could only get vibration reduction with Panny lenses.

I don’t need the HD function of the new OM-D or any of the dozens of movie modes, but many landscape and architecture snappers will jump at the HD opportunity. Having schlepped their gear miles into the wilderness for yet another mind-numbingly inane image of Half Dome, these erstwhile mavens of the landscape world will welcome the new found lack of bulk and weight as they try yet again to imitate the famously mediocre Saint Ansel when they are not getting off arguing over hardware at LuLa. For snappers needing FF DSLR image quality from an MFT kit, the new OM-D is just the ticket.

Swing set

Cayucos beach.

Taken over a decade ago, I was reminded again how much Adobe has improved the processing controls in Lightroom in versions 4 and 5, especially the Highlights and Shadows sliders, when reprocessing this old image for printing.

Absent the occasional need for, say, the Healing Brush for removal of overhead cables or for selective outlining with the Magic Lasso to confer background blur, both Photoshop tasks, Lightroom really has 95% of what any practical photographer needs, allied with an excellent database cataloging system with easy metadata filtration and sorting.

Crown Graphic 4×5, 150mm Xenar, Kodak Verichrome sheet film, hand held.

The Panasonic LX100 – a closer look

An outstanding lens.

My first experience with the LX100 is here.

Since then I have looked through the menu options more carefully and found some very handy things, and one disappointment.

The handy things include one setting to turn off all sounds – the focus beep and the shutter ‘clack’ – switching to the silent electronic shutter, the street snapper’s favorite. Another is the ability to set the lens so that it extends to a favorite focal length when the camera is turned on. The default is 24mm; I have it set to 35mm where it takes maybe an additional 0.5 second to extend compared with the 1.0 second for the default. No big deal.

One feature which really got me excited is the ability to change the function of the focus collar on the lens. There are several options but the most useful is to make it into a zoom ring, rather than using the small control concentric with the shutter release. Nice idea, Panny, but horribly implemented. You really want the focal length range (24-75mm) to be spanned in at most a quarter turn of the ring, maybe one eighth, but in practice it’s very low geared needing over 360 degrees to go through the range. Useless. Still, the shutter button control is fine and in practice it jumps between the most common settings – 24, 28, 35, 50, 70 and 75mm – and does so quickly. (Non-stepped focal length selection is also an option). Maybe Panny can fix the collar ‘gearing’ in a firmware upgrade?

The other finding, if hardly a disappointment, is that for critical focus the default multi-area focusing is also useless. But I have found this to be the case on every camera I have used with this dumb feature. It bears repeating the question. How can the camera know what the critical point of focus is?

Let me illustrate. Here’s my son at lunch the other day.


LX100, 35mm, 1/80, f/2.4 ISO1250.

Lovely lighting and note how the fast lens throws the background out of focus. This was taken using the multi-area focusing. Now zoom in and you get:


Unsharp Winston.

The point of critical focus selected by the multi-area technology, and it is very sharp indeed, is three inches behind my son’s eyes. So the first thing to do is to turn off this solution looking for a problem and set the body for single area central focus, using ‘focus and recompose’ with a first pressure on the shutter release to lock in correct focus, where it works as perfectly as on every previous Panny MFT body I have used.

Now here’s the real shocker. Long time readers know I favor a GX7 with the 17mm f/1.8 Olympus MFT Zuiko most of the time, with a second GX7 body with the 45mm f/1.8 Zuiko MFT in a shoulder bag for the occasional close-up. Given that I favor the (17)/35mm lens, it made sense to do a comparison under controlled conditions to confirm what I suspected. And that is that the Leica optic on the LX100 yields nothing to the outstanding Olympus 17mm lens. Using a bookshelf at home here are the comparisons. The GX7 is at the left in all these examples and no processing or sharpening of any kind was applied in these RAW images, shown in LR5.

Center at f/2, f/2.8 and f/4:

Corner at f/2, f/2.8 and f/4:

The 35mm setting on the LX100 comes with a maximum aperture of f/2.3 against the Zuiko’s f/1.8, an immaterial 0.5 stop difference.

Overall the Leica zoom on the LX100 is marginally better at all stops in the center, the Oly Zuiko marginally better in the corner, but as you can see from the above sections of what would be 30″ x 20″ prints, the differences are vanishingly small. I used 1600ISO for the LX100 snaps (by mistake) and the absence of grain and noise is remarkable. The cameras were on a very sturdy tripod, the vibrationless electronic shutter was used, and the shutter was released with the self timer to make sure all was still. Central area, single point AF was used for all images.

The different baseplate design of the LX100 means that you will be unable to open the battery/SDHC card door with even the smallest of Arca tripod plates fitted. It has to be removed if either is to be swapped. The GX7 has an angled door which clears the plate.

So if the 24-75mm zoom range solves for you, there is little justification in buying a body with interchangeable lenses with all the futzing around and dirt issues that entails. The LX100 has all you need with a lens that matches the best fixed focus optics available for the MFT format, is a very wide 24mm at its widest setting and the whole package can just be squeezed into a generously sized pocket with the lens collapsed.


Though smaller than the GX7, the LX100 (lower) has superior ergonomics owing
to the plethora of manual controls and the extended thumb grip on the rear.
The serrated dial at lower right is also a rotary control.

The modern Leica is here, and it’s made by Panasonic.


Indeed. This is true.

Modern trends

Smaller is better.

The trend to ever smaller cameras and cellphones continues, and I’m by no means immune to it.

Here are data for my 2014 ‘keepers’:


2014 data from LR.

Now compare with a year ago:


2013.

The bottom line is that the immense weight and bulk of the FF DSLR no longer solves, a result compounded by age (mine!) and the excellent sensors to be found in Panny’s GX7 MFT bodies and in the iPhone 6. I expect the huge Nikon D3X will move along to a new home in 2015 given my principle of only keeping what I use.


Three and three. iPhone 6 snap.