Category Archives: Photography

Photoshop CS5 and CAF

Uncle Joe would be proud.

I have been ticking along for many years with Photoshop CS2 and been quite happy with it for my modest needs. I’m no Photoshop expert, goodness knows, my primary use being for round tripping images from Lightroom to fix leaning verticals, where PS does a better job (Edit->Transform->Distort) than the rudimentary controls in Lightroom 3. A related, occasional use is to remove overhead cables and the like using the clone tool where, once again, the LR tool does not cut it.

A while back I tried CS4, a loaner from a friend, and noticed a couple of things. First, it’s an Intel app in the Mac version, meaning it runs far faster than the older PPC CS2, which has to run through the Rosetta emulator. One simple example is that even on my fast HackPro desktop, CS2 takes 20+ seconds to load whereas CS4 takes 3, using an SSD drive. Everything else is faster too.

Now that speed increase alone is not enough to make me shell out for CS5, the current version but, as luck would have it, I was riding the Caltrain from the South Bay to San Francisco the other day, merrily reading my iPad, when the chap next to me started up a conversation. Turns out he’s an engineer at Adobe which makes its home on Townsend Street, a few hundred yards form the SF Caltrain terminus, our destination. When I told him I was still on CS2 he gently reprimanded me after picking his jaw up off the floor. Consider me reprimanded! “Dude”, quoth he, “You just have to try CS5. Content Aware Fill will blow your mind. And you gotta try the new outlining tool”.

This was both flattering (being a ‘Dude’ just shy of 60 years of age feels pretty good) and intriguing, based on his explanation of Content Aware Fill, which can do a smart job of replacing pixels in an image based on the surrounding details. And the enhanced outliner would be nice for those times I want to use Auto Blur when the ‘everything sharp at all times’ curse of the small sensor on the Panny G1 dictates manual blurring of a distracting background.

A little bit of digging made things more intriguing. CS5 is the first version of Photoshop which runs in 64-bit mode on the Mac. Further, Adobe offers a $199 (at Amazon) upgrade which will work all the way back to CS2! (Trying to upgrade from within CS5 is a waste of time, returning page errors. Adobe- wake up!) No way I was going to pay the $700 asked for CS5, especially as I own CS2, long registered at Adobe, which started life as CS1 on my G5 iMac a few centuries ago. Finally, as the next version of the Mac OS, Lion, will no longer support Rosetta/PPC apps, I have to do something as I’m not about to get left behind by sticking with Snow Leopard when that cat’s time has passed, and while I do not love PS, I do need it now and then. The icing on the cake is that Adobe offers a 30 day free trial of CS5, so before you could say ‘dial-up’ I had the software downloaded and installed. Well, you actually need broadband because downloading this 700mB whopper would take longer than life is worth with dial-up. It would be cheaper to buy the disc! And I’m not talking CS5 Extended – just the basic CS5-only version.

Let me pause and jump to some recent history before writing further of Content Aware Fill. When the British and Americans gave away Eastern Europe at Yalta in early-1945 to a grasping Stalin, the Cold War commenced. For reasons never quite clear to me, FDR and Churchill, the donors of countries they did not own, referred to Stalin as Uncle Joe; it’s tough to ascribe avuncular qualities to the greatest psychotic mass killer in history, but FDR was gaga by then and WSC was down to his uppers (and about to lose a General Election to an ungrateful nation), having just barely saved Englishmen from having to learn German. So I suppose while Eastern Europeans would disagree, those two Western leaders might be excused for their poor judgment. Heck, I still named our son Winston. Great men have great faults.

The point of this historical flashback is that Uncle Joe would have loved (I almost wrote ‘killed for’) Content Aware Fill (CAF). You see, in those days before Photoshop, when he would whack the occasional cabinet member just to keep the other boys on the Politburo in line, photo retouchers would have to set to and start editing out the whackee from all know official pictures. Then, after hundreds of hours of careful retouching to eliminate all trace of Comrade Whackee, the history books would be republished – pity the poor proof reader who missed a name – and schoolchildren indoctrinated afresh in whoever the new leaders were. People would literally be ‘disappeared’ from photographs, which took a good deal longer than two shots in the back of the head. Suffice it to say that Content Aware Fill is so good that Uncle J would have been at the front of the line at Adobe on Townsend Street, San Francisco, credit card in hand, long before the ink was dry on the first glowing reviews a year ago. Mercifully, UJ has long been six feet under, thus saving the lives of many soon-to-be-whacked photo retouchers, as their work could now be done in minutes instead of months.

The best way to illustrate CAF is with a ‘before and after’.

After and Before applying CAF

The overhead wires, a bugaboo of architectural and city photographers everywhere, took all of a minute to replace. I simply dragged the Healing Brush tool along them, regardless of background, hit Enter and after a few seconds of the spinning gear wheel here is what I got. It’s not perfect once enlarged, but a little local fixing wth the regular Clone tool and it’s done. Doing something like this in areas with complex detail would have taken ages using the Stamp and Clone tool.

Here’s another far more extreme example, which took 15 minutes to do:

CAF at the max. Streetcar lines be gone!

Where fine detail is involved I have found that using the Healing Brush to confer CAF is more effective than the alternative method. That method has you using the lasso tool to select a large area to be replaced, then clicking Shift-F5->Content Aware. The latter method takes a larger, cruder surrounding data sample in doing its thing, and tends to be best on a subject against a uniform background.

A handy related use of CAF is when you use the Edit->Transform->Distort tool in PS to correct leaning verticals. If the nature of your stretching of the original image leaves white areas within the picture, you can use CAF to fill those in.

CAF is not perfect. It likes a fair amount of surrounding area to sample and if that area includes other image elements, it will unnecessarily place them in the fill, but after a bit of use you get the hang of it and learn how much has to be sampled around the object to be replaced. It’s pretty remarkable technology and Uncle Joe would be proud as must be his many latter day descendants across the world. Judging by the fact that even the HackPro spins its gear wheel when doing CAF you really need a powerful CPU and GPU in your Mac unless you place little value on your time. There is some very complex processing going on here.

I fancy Adobe and Amazon will be finding themselves $199 better off when my 30-day Photoshop CS5 trial is up. Meanwhile, my hat is off to Adobe for a superb idea, well executed. Version two will likely be able to remove whole armies without a shot fired.

Here’s how UJ did it – before/after whacking Comrade Yezhov:

Now you see him, now you don’t.

You can read about Uncle Joe and Comrade Yezhov here.

As for the enhanced outlining tool mentioned by my new found friend from Adobe on the train, more of that later.

Mac OS X is Ten years old

The OS that made me switch.

Say what you may about Mac hardware (I’m in the ‘overpriced, poorly heat managed, form-over-function-even-if-gorgeous-to-contemplate’ camp) the compelling reason for switching to the Mac today is the same as it was ten years ago when OS X was launched, replacing OS 9. I had long thought about switching from Windows by that time, but was aware that OS 9 was every bit as buggy and unstable as Windows ’98, so when OS 10.0 (Cheetah) came out, I decided to wait a while for the bugs to be worked out. But early trials set the heart racing – clean, quick, logical, uncluttered and with readable fonts.

So when OS 10.3 ‘Panther’ arrived and with it the first LCD iMac came out, so did my credit card and the new iMac was soon at work. (I skipped OS 10.1 ‘Puma’ and 10.2 ‘Jaguar’, as the original iMac hardware with its luridly colored translucent shell was ghastly to look at and had very modest specifications for the price). The excellent Epson 1270 ink printer plugged in and ‘just worked’, all sorts of other peripherals did likewise, and as a photographer I have never looked back. The first task was to start scanning all my negatives and slides using a Nikon Coolscan 2000 scanner. After connectivity agonies with Windows it was an unforgettable experience to plug the Coolscan in and find it was ready to go. Thereafter I simply had high quality scans made of all my negatives when they were processed and dumped them on the iMac’s hard drive.

My first Mac – $2,632.79!

At today’s prices, using the US CPI, that comes to $3,149.39, almost twice the cost of my quad core, three screen, SSD equipped Hackintosh! But it was worth every penny and more.

I bought the iMac for the OS, not the OS for the iMac though, strangely, that G4 iMac ‘screen on a stick’ continues to be the only one that has not failed and works to this day. It’s called proper heat management.

There’s an argument to be made that OS X saved Apple from oblivion and for the whole fascinating story of its development, chronicled by estimable British journalist Leander Kahney at Cult of Mac, click the picture below. Leica used to design a camera like this – prototype after prototype – until it worked right.

Click for the story.

The latest changes to OS X are at the margin and mostly icing on the cake, as the primary effort must go where the money is, meaning iOS. But while desktops and laptops are in inexorable decline, I expect that future versions of OS X will build on the iOS experience and only make things better. And as my quick check of the latest version of Snow Leopard the other day confirms, Apple is not letting code bloat slow things down. Indeed, Snow Leopard appears to be the fastest version of OS X yet.

Here’s to the next ten years. Well done Mr. Jobs and the whole team at Apple.

HP DesignJet monochrome printing

Using the right profile.

I’m really not a black and white guy, having last seriously used the medium in 1979. Still, now and then I make a monochrome print from a color original, using the ‘B & W’ option in Lightroom’s Develop module. This is well engineered as you can still vary the mix of the original colors using the sliders for each, and can easily alternate between color and monochrome renditions to gauge the effect.

The dye ink HP DesignJet printers are renowned for the outstanding depth of their black inks with no bronzing on HP Premium Plus Satin Photo paper. Read on to get the best black and white rendition possible, short of paying up for custom profiles.

Using the stock Premium Plus Photo Satin color profile a monochrome print from my DesignJet 90 is too cold. I mostly prefer a slightly warm rendition, so I set about finding dedicated monochrome profiles for this fine paper.

HP still offers free downloads of icc paper profiles from its website for black and white printing and warn that these should not be used for color prints as the results may be unpredictable.

Click below to download these:

Click to download HP monochrome profiles.

There are many to choose from. Basically you experiment until you find the profile that suits your tastes. The download includes instructions for Photoshop but you can readily adapt these to Lightroom.

After downloading, I installed the HP neutral profiles by dragging and dropping the downloaded folder to Username->Library->Colorsync->Profiles. I printed the test print (named Neutral_Profiles,jpg and to be found in the ‘Index_profiles’ folder in the download) using Snow Leopard and Lightroom, and telling LR to use the Neutral 0 profile.

As luck would have it that one gave me the result I wanted, viewed by daylight, warmer than the stock color profile and just right for my taste, so I renamed the Localized Description String as explained here in the ‘Neutral 0’ profile to HP 90 Neutral 0, and checked it off, along with the regular color profile in the Print module of LR (you can also see the other B & W profiles which I did not rename in this screenshot):

Now when I go to the profile selector in LR I see:

It takes less time to do than to explain and is a worthwhile step for best black and white print quality. You can use any one of the many profiles to suit your preference. I like life simple, so I only use the two profiles above with HP Premium Satin photo paper.

Snow Leopard 10.6.7

The latest release.

Snow Leopard 10.6.7 came out yesterday, with bug fixes and security enhancements, and before you could say ‘Hackintosh’ I had it installed on the HackPro.

It’s worth the upgrade. Running in 64-bit mode here is the Geekbench (OS performance as reflected in CPU and RAM throughput – no disk factors, so the SSD I have recently installed is irrelevant to comparisons) report:

Snow Leopard 10.6.7

Here is 10.6.6 with the same configuration:

Snow Leopard 10.6.6

That’s 2.4% faster. Not enough to notice, but nice to know that the newer version is not the victim of performance drag from code bloat. The biggest component of the overall change is in the memory performance result which is 8.0% faster. Nice code optimization, Apple!

On the 2010 MacBook Air (mine is the 11″ with the base spec and minimum RAM) the change in speed is +5%. Once again, not noticeable but nice to know.

Goodbye, Canon and Thank You.

The end of a beautiful friendship.

My Canon 5D and its collection of Canon lenses are for sale.

5D and friends.

You can see all the journal pieces I wrote on this transformational camera by clicking here.

The decision to sell was not an easy one, but I am a user, not a gear collector. In my book, it’s a crime to have equipment of this quality sitting around unused. Simply stated, when the 5D, with its full frame sensor, came out it instantly obsoleted all the 35mm and medium format film gear I owned. A short time thereafter my Leica M bodies, used by me for 35 years, my Mamiya 6, Rollei 3.5F and Rollei 6003 Pro were all gone, along with their lenses. Such was the quantum leap in image quality and versatility offered by this magnificent camera. My Canon 5D journey commenced over five years ago and as my first serious digital camera I thank Canon for its 5D, which revitalized my interest in taking pictures, while simultaneously obsoleting the sheer drudgery of film processing. I have always preferred pressing the button to time in a darkened room with smelly chemicals.

But a couple of significant changes have occurred in my life since the 5D was purchased. First, we sold our vineyard in the country and moved back to the San Francisco Bay Area. It was a fun experiment, my zinfandel grapes won a lot of prizes but the whole farming thing started to get old. Plus, we wanted our son to grow up with all the diversity and distractions offered by one of the world’s great cities. And, from a snapper’s perspective, being close to the City by the Bay meant a return to my first love, street snaps. So while landscape work was fun and my one man show of landscape snaps was a success, my heart remains on the streets, a genetic code inculcated during a youth in London. And a street snapper the 5D is not. It’s not that it’s a big camera, it’s that it’s simply not the best instrument for my way of working on the street. I tend to get really, really close to my human subjects and the 5D just is not right in that context. Yet whether it’s outdoors for infinite vistas, QTVRs with a fisheye, bugs and birds, or in the studio, I have yet to use a finer instrument.

Other things changed in my life. Testifying to the abuse of my hands over many years of tinkering with cars and engines and woodworking, I started to develop tendonitis in my wrists. Make me lift a heavy weight and it’s not a lot of fun. Further, with age, my back has started to give out and carrying heavy gear compounds my problems. Canon 5D gear is built like a tank; it is not featherweight.

I still believe that in a world where very few prints are made, there’s simply nothing like a large print to do justice to a great photograph. For those, the 5D is unbeatable. Photo exhibitions still favor mounted, framed prints, not LCD screens. The 5D is crazy sharp and grain free, at any rational enlargement size. Want prints over 36″ on the short side? The 5D Mark II is for you.

Update 4/23/2011: All my 5D gear has been sold. I hope the new owners will enjoy this superb equipment as much as I did.

Thank you, Canon, and Goodbye.