Category Archives: Photography

The Fuji X100 – time to wait

Fuji

Not ready for prime time.

I have been reading David Pogue, the New York Times’s technology columnist, for ages. What he lacks in sheer technical knowhow he more than makes up for in his ability to get to the point of the real world user. Sort of like Consumer Reports. Neither may know exactly how fuel injection works, say, but both will tell you straight whether the car can be guaranteed to start when the ignition key is turned. That’s what users need.

So while his review of the Fuji X100 is replete with a howler or two which will make ‘experts’ cringe (he describes it as a great portrait camera, despite the short lens, etc.) he does hit the nail on the head in disclosing what is now a worryingly frequent complaint on chat boards from those lucky enough to have got an example of this rare beast. And as I am more likely to believe Pogue than I am the average chat board aficionado, here it is, plain and simple:

“You should also know that the camera doesn’t focus quickly, especially in low light.
It does have an autofocus assist lamp that comes on in dim rooms,
briefly providing enough illumination for it to focus,
but time is going by meanwhile.”

First, forget using an autofocus lamp. This camera is meant to be stealthy, not a walking advertisement. Next, with my jarring experience with the 20mm Panasonic for the G1, which I returned almost as soon as I bought it, I am super sensitive about fast autofocus. The Panny was simply unable to focus fast enough for street snapping, delivering a 30% focus failure rate in the almost 500 exposures I made with it, and I don’t propose to relive the experience with the X100. I suppose you could use the camera for landscapes or whatever, but fail to see what it adds compared to the regular DSLR in that regard. The fact that the X100 is small, has a real optical finder and is quiet and unobtrusive, is what turns my crank, and street snaps are what I mostly do.

Yes, there are several other quirks in the design which can be cured by Fuji tweaking the software (button assignments, menu layout and the like), but speeding up the focus operation is not, I would guess, one of them. Your focus motor is either fast or not. In this case, it increasingly seems not.

This is not the low risk prospect that buying the iPad on Day One of availability was. Apple had several years of touchscreen development under its belt with the iPhone so screwing up the iPad was not a big risk. By contrast, what we have in the Fuji is a camera with a massively complex EVF/OVF eye level finder from a low volume manufacturer not known for making like products. That’s high risk in my book. The X100 Mark II will likely get it right, and I’m also hoping that the likes of Panasonic come out with something as good or better by then, at a saner price.

So, for now, I will either cancel my X100 order or flip the camera on eBay if it still commands today’s 50-100% black market premium at my date of purchase. Free money is never a bad thing. The latter option will, at least, allow me to try it for myself.

Another fine Photoshop CS5 book

Software, Technique

Evening again.

I made mention of Martin Evening’s fine photography and technical writing when I looked at his Lightroom 3 book a while back. Having just upgraded from Photoshop CS2 to CS5, I favorably commented on Richard Harrington’s book recently. It excels for its author’s clear language and an abundance of videos, even if the definition in those is sorely lacking.

Given my previous experience with Martin Evening’s work I went ahead and splashed out on his CS5 book. By contrast to Harrington’s it’s more print than video; the quality of the videos is simply outstanding and I only wish there were more. His video on masking and replacing the background in a subject is so well done that I tried it with a couple of my own snaps and the instructions worked perfectly first time. The chapters are color tabbed so that you can jump to what you want with ease, and taking this large work in bite sized chunks is, I find, the way to learn. It took a couple of decades to get PS to where it is to day, so no one is going to learn it overnight.

Click the picture to go to Amazon.

I find I tend to watch the Harrington book videos on my TV whereas I tend to sit at the HackPro and work my way through the Evening examples. Like Harrington’s, the book comes with a DVD replete with pictures and videos.

Recommended. And I have to go back on what I wrote about the LR3 book; it’s far easier to use a paper copy than an iPad version. It’s just easier to look things up in a book.

Small sensor noise

Technique

Working with the G1.

In addition to avoiding the Nazi guards trying to enforce a truly moronic ‘No Photography’ rule at the de Young Balenciaga show, I had to contend with camera shake and noise from the Panasonic G1’s small sensor which, even cranked up to ISO 1600, was resulting in long shutter speeds. While the OIS in the kit lens helps greatly, adding two full stop’s worth on the shutter speed front, it’s still all I could do to get a half decent image in the low lighting used at the show. The 1/10th shutter speed in the images below figures to probably an effective 1/40th as regards camera shake with the benefit of the magic that is OIS anti-shake technology. The 28mm (FFE) focal length used also helps, adding a further stop compared to a 50mm standard lens, so that 1/10th makes me look a lot better than I really am, figuring to an equivalent 1/80th or so with a 50mm lens and no OIS.

You can see the original snap which I am talking about here.

In the following images I show enlarged screen shots from Lightroom 3 which are equivalent to a 30″ x 45″ print, meaning huge.

Here’s the first snap with only standard sharpening applied on import of the file to Lightroom, meaning 100/1.1/64 which I find optimal in counteracting the anti-aliasing filter in the G1. Noise reduction in LR3 was set at 0:

Luminance noise is clearly visible though I also have a 13″ x 19″ print in front of me, made on the HP DesignJet90 printer on HP Premium Plus Satin paper (the textured surface tends to mitigate noise to some extent compared with glossy paper) which is perfectly fine unless you stick your nose in it.

In the next picture I applied the following settings in the Detail panel of the Develop module in LR3:

Anything much over 50 on the Noise Reduction – Luminance slider results in artifacts, and falling definition, so it’s a juggling act between noise reduction and sharpness.

The bottom line is that, even at ISO 1600, the small MFT sensor in the Panny can more than cope with noise at any reasonable reproduction ratio for your images. And, as I wrote here, anyone knocking the Panasonic kit zoom as a piece of plastic junk is simply clueless and would likely be better employed telling innocent patrons not to take photographs at costume exhibitions.

To get an idea of the relative size of the Micro Four Thirds sensor (same as Four Thirds – circled) the following image from Wikipedia tells all – it’s approximately one quarter of the area of a full frame sensor as found in the costliest DSLRs:

Incidentally, with the near-grainless sensors in full frame 35mm DSLRs it’s very hard to make a case for the extremely costly medium format DSLRs from the likes of Hasselblad (made by Fuji), Leica with their S2 and others. The gear is far heavier, the lenses bulky and the cost exorbitant, not to mention having to cope with huge file sizes which will need superior computer gear to process efficiently.

No looking back

Photographs, Photography

An interesting exchange with a reader.

A friend of the blog left an interesting Comment/question the other day which I was pleased to debate. Absent a digital point-and-shoot, Michel is still largely a film user of all formats from 35mm to 4″ x 5″, with Leica M6 and R hardware as well as a Hasselblad 501. He’s thinking about a G series Panny for the same reason I took the leap – small, decent sensor, good lenses. Our exchange is repeated below, with Michel’s permission.

The M6 – an exemplar of the last generation of film cameras.

Michel – interesting question.

Full frame cameras:

First I cannot go back to a heavy full frame camera owing to wrist and back pain. Second, I cannot adopt an M9 owing to absence of autofocus and silly pricing. Lenses have a decent life expectancy, sensors do not, so $7k for an already obsolete sensor fails my basic test of economics and useful life. Case in point, I took a beating on the sale of the 5D whereas all my Canon lenses sold at 80-90% of my cost of 5 years ago.

Until/if FF cameras get much lighter, I have no interest in one. Equally, had you told me five years ago that I would be selling the 5D for an MFT sensor (which did not exist at the time) I would have laughed. So ‘never-say-never’. The design genius residing in Japan is quite capable of crafting a Full Frame body which takes a series of compact, high spec lenses and has a superb EVF which is, even in the G1, superior to anything on any Leica RF in poor light. However, if the Japanese continue to perceive there is too small a market for those, we will never see one. Great design and consumer demand/profits are not the same thing.

Small sensors:

I expect small sensor cameras to only improve over the next few years. Case in point, tests (not mine, as I have yet to try it) suggest that the second ever sensor made for MFT cameras (all Panasonic and Olympus models have used the same sensor until now), the one found in the costly Panasonic GH2, is noticeably better than the original model in the G1, EP-1, etc. I wrote off the MFT format when it was introduced and I was dead wrong. (Well, I did call the iPad right, buying two on the first day!)

The most used camera:

I just read today in MacWorld that the most used camera on Flickr is about to be …. the iPhone4. So I am not alone in wanting small, light and take-it-with-you-without-excuses gear. Interestingly the big body DSLRs seem to be peaking, looking at the chart below.

Cameras and trucks and prints:

A while back Steve Jobs said that the desktop PC (and, by inference, the traditional laptop) will become the ‘truck’ of the computing world. It will be a limited use, special tool for the few power users who need it. I believe the full frame and medium format digital cameras of today are already heading in the same direction. Those who need big enlargements will continue to justify putting up with the bulk, weight, noise and cost of the gear. But given that even the cheapest point-and-shoot more than adequately fills a 50″ LCD screen at home and with a little care will yield 13″ x 19″ enlargement (the maximum the ‘prosumer’ printer can do) and that paying just a little more gets you an excellent APS-C Nikon/Canon or MFT Panny/Oly which can scale to 18″ x 24″ paper prints without too much difficulty, who needs more? How many prints larger than that does the average consumer have at home on the wall? I would bet none. There’s is a growing case to be made for the argument that the traditional photo print is, in fact, dead.

One size fits all:

You make the valid point that Ansel Adams might not be the right candidate for a small sensor digital. Agreed. His descendants will happily continue using trucks. And you don’t need me to tell you that ‘One size fits all’ seldom works. Choose the right tool. However, given my avocation for street snaps and the occasional studio portrait, rather than the other way around, MFT works fine for me and I’m sure if I did the research there are some APS-C bodies every bit as capable. Pentax is a master at miniaturization and has produced some nice small APS-C bodies and lenses. Let’s hope that overpriced baubles like the Fuji X100 (yes, I am on the waiting list!) will spur the big boys into competitive action.

Weddings by Buissink

Photographers, Photography

A true master of the genre.

While I have never wanted to make so much as one penny from taking pictures, I greatly respect those who do.

It’s a very tough way of making a living, made tougher in the digital age of “anyone can take a picture”, whereas in reality the percentage of camera owners who can do so has never been lower. Aunt Nellie with her POS point-and-shoot will make sure that the bride’s dress is eyeball searing white, not an iota of detail left in the trashed highlights and the groom’s tails will be every bit as lacking when it comes to detail in that expanse of black. Of course, there’s a good chance that everyone’s eyes will be closed and there will be a tree growing out of the bride’s head. There’s a reason Nellie’s pix are free and an equally good one why a real pro charges a great deal for his services.

Other than fashion photography where only a handful make a real living, surely one of the toughest fields has to be wedding photography. Except perhaps in Hollywood, there’s no repeat business for the most part. The stress is enormous. The photographer has to be a master orchestrator of diverse personalities on what is, for at least two of the participants, one of the most stressful days of their lives. The one trying to look her best and weak from all the fasting and exercise, the other trying to disregard the hangover. And the pictures must come out. Failure of equipment or technique is simply not an excuse. Further, everyone now expects to see the proofs at the reception after the wedding, so the photographer is running on fumes for the best part of a day. And did I mention the videos? Not my idea of fun, so when I see work of this nature done at an exceptional standard, my respect for the photographer is immense.

While it’s not a genre I’m especially into – it’s not like you search out wedding snaps to enjoy good photography – I know great work when I see it and none is better than that of Joe Buissink, a high-end wedding photographer in southern California. His work transcends the mere record which is most wedding photography and becomes art. The pictures are great despite the subject.

Here’s an example of the man’s art, taken from his web site. Cartier-Bresson would be proud of this one:

Click the picture for Joe Buissink’s superb web site.

No, you will not find ugly or fat (or ugly fat) people on his site, and for that we should all be truly grateful. His women are gorgeous, the way they should be on this most special of days in their life. His men are handsome. And the children properly dressed and simply divine.